University students’ perspectives on creativity in learning in the 21st century
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2025.18515Abstract
The importance of students’ creativity in tertiary institutions lies in the need to prepare young people for the 21st century. On the other hand, higher education is generally unfamiliar with creativity environments, so it will hinder their learning creativity outcomes and experiences, which will impact their creativity cognition and knowledge. The research goals are to calculate the percentages of university students’ perspectives on the importance of their learning creativity outcomes and experiences and to test the influence of each variable. All respondents are 586, with an age range of 19–24 years. The author created learning creativity instruments. The results showed that there are twelve outcomes and eleven experiences of learning creativity that are important to university students. Less than 50% of university students get learning creativity experiences on campus four or more times a week and/or for more than three hours a day. There is a positive and significant influence between the importance of learning creativity outcomes and experiences as well as the frequency and duration of those experiences. For achieving twelve learning creativity outcomes, tertiary institutions must ensure the implementation of experiences learning creativity experiences, as well as the adequacy of the frequency and duration of those experiences.
Keywords:
21st century, creativity in learning, experiences, outcomes, perspectives, university studentsHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.6
Bezerra Figueiredo Lima, V., & Soriano de Alencar, E. M. L. (2014). Criatividade em programas de pós-graduação em Educação: práticas pedagógicas e fatores inibidores [Creativity in post-graduation programs in education: Pedagogical practices and inhibiting factors]. Psico-USF: Bragança Paulista, 19(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712014000100007
Bialik, M., Bogan, M., Fadel, Ch., & Horvathova, M. (2015). Character education for the 21st Century: What should students learn? Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x
Burkšaitienė, N. (2018). How can university learning environment contribute to students’ creativity? Lithuanian students’ perspective. Creativity Studies, 11(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.271
Cachia, R., & Ferrari, A. (2010). JRC scientific and technical reports. Creativity in schools: A survey of teachers in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
Cassia Nakano, de T., & Wechsler, S. M. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21st Century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300002
Cropley, A. (2020). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 315–322). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23524-4
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2011). Measuring creativity for innovation management. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 6(3), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000300002
Daly, Sh. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., Oprea, S. L., Huang-Saad, A., & Seifert, C. M. (2016). College students’ views of creative process instruction across disciplines. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.07.002
Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st Century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004
Febrianti, M. I., & Hasan, M. (2020). Contribution of learning style, learning creativity and exploratory interest to students’ simulation and digital communication learning outcomes during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education Technology, 4(4), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i4.29701
Feist, G. J. (2004). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.016
Fitriani, F. (2018). The correlation between students’ creativity and English learning achievement [Bachelor’s Thesis, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia]. https://digilibadmin.unismuh.ac.id/upload/669-Full_Text.pdf
Florida, R. (2006). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. Liberal Education, 92(3), 22–29.
Forster, J. (2014–2015). The significance of creativity in our lives. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 2(2)–3(1), 53–68.
Fritzsche, D. J. (1977). On the relationships of learning style, perceived learning, and performance in an experiential learning environment. Computer Simulation and Learning Theory, 3, 455–462.
GALLUP. (2019). Creativity in learning. https://www.gallup.com/education/267449/creativity-learning-transformative-technology-gallup-report-2019.aspx
Glăveanu, V.-P. (2011). How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers. Theory and Psychology, 21(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310372152
Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). Educating which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.006
Gonçalves, C, & Lima Rua, O. (2021). Learning creativity and student’s performance: An empirical study from Portugal. E-Revista de Estudos Interculturais, 9(3). https://parc.ipp.pt/index.php/e-rei/article/view/4231/2038
Gong, Zh., Soomro, S. A., Nanjappan, V., & Georgiev, G. V. (2021). Creativity methods adoption in higher education: Perspectives of educators and students. Blucher Proceedings, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.5151/ead2021-113
Gormley, K. (2020). Neoliberalism and the discursive construction of “Creativity”. Critical Studies in Education, 61(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1459762
Hee Kim, K., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and behavior problems among underachieving elementary and high school students. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.481518
Ho, W.-Ch. (2020). Students’ perceptions of creativity education: A perspective from Hong Kong, China. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 6(6), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.6.20003-6
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471722146
Kaplan, D. E. (2019). Creativity in education: Teaching for creativity development. Psychology, 10, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.102012
Kettler, T., Lamb, K. N., & Mullet, D. R. (2021). Developing creativity in the classroom: Learning and innovation for the 21st-Century schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003234104
Likert, R. (1932). Archives of psychology. A technique for the measurement of attitudes (Vol. 140). R. S. Woodworth (Series Ed.). https://legacy.voteview.com/pdf/Likert_1932.pdf
Mangion, M., & Riebel, J. A. (2023). Young creators: Perceptions of creativity by primary school students in Malta. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030053
Martinez, E., G., & Tuesca, R. (2019). Learning styles and gross anatomy assessment outcomes at a Colombian School of Medicine. Educación Médica, 20(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.12.012
Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (2014). Creativity in 21st-Century education. Prospects, 44, 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9322-1
Nur Setyaningsih, E., Sunarno, W., & Ariyanto, J. (2022). Hubungan kreativitas dengan hasil belajar siswa pada materi getaran gelombang dan bunyi [The relationship between creativity and student learning outcomes in the material on wave vibrations and sound]. Paedagogia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 25(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v25i1.43535
Oakley, B. (2014). A mind for numbers: How to excel at math and science (even if you flunked algebra). Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers and Education, 54(1), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Capstone Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780857086549
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Runco, M. A., & Pagnani, A. R. (2011). Psychological research on creativity. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), Routledge international handbooks. The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 63–71). Routledge.
Saleh, S. E. (2019). Critical thinking as a 21st Century skill: Conceptions, implementation and challenges in the EFL classroom. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1). https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejfl/article/view/2209/4846
Schachtel, E. G. (2001). Metamorphosis: On the conflict of human development and the psychology of creativity. Routledge.
Schreuder, E. J. A., & Mioch, T. (2011, 10–11 February). The effect of time pressure and task completion on the occurrence of cognitive lockup. In E. Carrea, A. Greco, & C. Penco (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings: Proceedings of HCP 2011 – Fourth Workshop on Human Centered Processes (pp. 63–74), Genoa, Italy. University of Utrecht.
Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2010). Educational creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 250–264). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.016
Soriano de Alencar, E. M. L., Souza Fleith, de D., & Pereira, N. (2017). Creativity in higher education: Challenges and facilitating factors. Trends in Psychology, 25(2), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2017.2-09
Sudjana, N. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar [Assessment of the results of the teaching and learning process]. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Winardi, J. (2005). Entrepreneur dan entrepreneurship [Entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship]. Kencana.
Yunus, M. (2015). Challenges and alternative of creativity development in higher education. Journal of Humanity, 3(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.14724/jh.v3i2.40
Yurdugül, H., & Menzi Çetin, N. (2015). Investigation of the relationship between learning process and learning outcomes in e-learning environments. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 58, 57–74. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.59.4
Yusuf, K., & Jazilah, N. (2020). Exploring creativity in English writing by using Instagram: University students perceptions. Pedagogy Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2069
Zampetakis, L. A., Bouranta, N., & Moustakis, V. S. (2010). On the relationship between individual creativity and time management. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.12.001
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.