Navigating the green gap: the role of identity alignment motivation in shaping sustainable consumption behavior
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2026.24649Abstract
This study examines how environmental awareness, social norms, and identity alignment motivation influence sustainable consumption behavior among Generation Z students in Central Java. It explores the “green gap” between intention and actual behavior, focusing on identity alignment motivation as a mediator. Despite heightened environmental awareness, a significant gap exists between Gen Z’s intention to consume sustainably and their actual behavior due to conflicting personal and social identities. The novelty of this study lies in introducing identity alignment motivation as a mediating factor, which has not been fully explored in prior research. Data from 238 students across several Central Java universities were collected using purposive sampling and analyzed with SmartPLS. The results show that both environmental awareness and social norms significantly influence sustainable consumption behavior, with identity alignment motivation playing a strong mediating role. The study underscores the importance of identity alignment in bridging the gap between awareness and sustainable behavior.
Keywords:
environmental social norms, environmental awareness, identity alignment motivation, sustainable consumption behaviorHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aguirre Sánchez, L., Roa-Díaz, Z. M., Gamba, M., Grisotto, G., Moreno Londoño, A. M., Mantilla-Uribe, B. P., Rincón Méndez, A. Y., Ballesteros, M., Kopp-Heim, D., & Minder, B. (2021). What influences the sustainable food consumption behaviours of university students? A systematic review. International Journal of Public Health, 66, Article 1604149. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2021.1604149
Ajibade, I., & Boateng, G. O. (2021). Predicting why people engage in pro-sustainable behaviors in Portland Oregon: The role of environmental self-identity, personal norm, and socio-demographics. Journal of Environmental Management, 289, Article 112538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112538
Akhir, Md. N., Lun, A. W., Yeang, C. M., Rahman, N. A., & Halim, L. (2022). Establishing the value-psychological-educational dimensions for “learning to action” model for pro-environmental behaviour. Cogent Education, 9(1), Article 2156748. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2156748
Alfrey, K.-L., Waters, K. M., Condie, M., & Rebar, A. L. (2023). The role of identity in human behavior research: A systematic scoping review. Identity, 23(3), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2023.2209586
Ali, Q., Parveen, S., Yaacob, H., Zaini, Z., & Sarbini, N. A. (2021). COVID-19 and dynamics of environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility in Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(40), 56199–56218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14612-z
AlSuwaidi, M., Eid, R., & Agag, G. (2021). Understanding the link between CSR and employee green behaviour. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.11.008
Altassan, A. (2023). Sustainable integration of solar energy, behavior change, and recycling practices in educational institutions: A holistic framework for environmental conservation and quality education. Sustainability, 15(20), Article 15157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015157
Aqmala, D., Panjaitan, R., Ardyan, E., & Putra, F. I. F. S. (2025). The role of green blue ocean strategy in enhancing frugal innovation through IoT and AI: A resource-based view perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 21(2), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.7341/20252124
Barbu, A., Catană, Ș.-A., Deselnicu, D. C., Cioca, L.-I., & Ioanid, A. (2022). Factors influencing consumer behavior toward green products: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), Article 16568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416568
Barth, M., Masson, T., Fritsche, I., Fielding, K., & Smith, J. R. (2021). Collective responses to global challenges: The social psychology of pro-environmental action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74(1), Article 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101562
Berger, J. (2021). Social tipping interventions can promote the diffusion or decay of sustainable consumption norms in the field. Evidence from a quasi-experimental intervention study. Sustainability, 13(6), Article 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063529
Bouzari, M., Safavi, H. P., & Foroutan, T. (2022). Outcomes of environmental awareness. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(10), 3655–3676. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2021-1412
Boyer, S., Jiang, Z., & Lyu, J. (2024). Sustainable style without stigma: Can norms and social reassurance influence secondhand fashion recommendation behavior among Gen Z? Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 15(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2024.2317796
Cesinger, B., Vallaster, C., & Müller, J. M. (2022). The ebb and flow of identity: How sustainable entrepreneurs deal with their hybridity. European Management Journal, 40(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.04.003
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Čapienė, A., Rūtelionė, A., & Krukowski, K. (2022). Engaging in sustainable consumption: Exploring the influence of environmental attitudes, values, personal norms, and perceived responsibility. Sustainability, 14(16), Article 10290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610290
Do, V. T. H., & Do, L. T. (2024). The effectiveness of social norms in promoting green consumption. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(3), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2022-0466
Duong, C. D. (2024). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2022-0487
Elgammal, I., Ghanem, M., & Al-Modaf, O. (2024). Sustainable purchasing behaviors in Generation Z: The role of social identity and behavioral intentions in the Saudi context. Sustainability, 16(11), Article 4478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114478
Garnelo-Gomez, I., Money, K., & Littlewood, D. (2022). From holistically to accidentally sustainable: A study of motivations and identity expression in sustainable living. European Journal of Marketing, 56(12), 3272–3312. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2020-0226
Ghaffar, A., & Islam, T. (2024). Factors leading to sustainable consumption behavior: An empirical investigation among millennial consumers. Kybernetes, 53(8), 2574–2592. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1675
Gibson, K. E., Sanders, C. E., Byrd, A. R., Lamm, K. W., & Lamm, A. J. (2023). The influence of sustainability on identities and seafood consumption: Implications for food systems education for Generation Z. Foods, 12(10), Article 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12101933
Gil-Giménez, D., Rolo-González, G., Suárez, E., & Muinos, G. (2021). The influence of environmental self-identity on the relationship between consumer identities and frugal behavior. Sustainability, 13(17), Article 9664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179664
Hadad, E., Grzymala, Z., Wójcik-Czerniawska, A., & Szewczyk, P. (2023). Enhancing waste resource efficiency: Circular economy for sustainability and energy conversion. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, Article 1303792. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1303792
Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
Han, R., & Cheng, Y. (2020). The influence of norm perception on pro-environmental behavior: A comparison between the moderating roles of traditional media and social media. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), Article 7164. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197164
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hossain, I., Fekete-Farkas, M., & Nekmahmud, M. (2022). Purchase behavior of energy-efficient appliances contribute to sustainable energy consumption in developing country: Moral norms extension of the theory of planned behavior. Energies, 15(13), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134600
Itani, O. S., & Chaker, N. N. (2022). Harnessing the power within: The consequences of salesperson moral identity and the moderating role of internal competitive climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(4), 847–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04794-4
Jang, Y.-J., & Kim, E. (2023). Social and personal norms in shaping customers’ environmentally sustainable behavior in restaurants’ social media communities. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086410
Jiang, S., Jotikasthira, N., & Pu, R. (2022). Toward sustainable consumption behavior in online education industry: The role of consumer value and social identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 865149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865149
Jilani, G., Yang, G., & Siddique, I. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behavior of the individuals from the perspective of protection motivation theory. Sustainability, 13(23), Article 13406. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313406
Jung, J., & Cho, S. Y. (2023). How do individualism and collectivism influence pro-environmental purchasing behavior based on environmental self-identity? Sustainability, 15(22), Article 16075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216075
Kara, A., & Min, M. K. (2024). Gen Z consumers’ sustainable consumption behaviors: Influencers and moderators. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2022-0263
Khare, A., & Pandey, S. (2017). Role of green self-identity and peer influence in fostering trust towards organic food retailers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(9), 969–990. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-07-2016-0109
Kowalska, A., Ratajczyk, M., Manning, L., Bieniek, M., & Mącik, R. (2021). “Young and Green” a study of consumers’ perceptions and reported purchasing behaviour towards organic food in Poland and the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 13(23), Article 13022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313022
Lavuri, R., Akram, U., & Akram, Z. (2023). Retracted: Exploring the sustainable consumption behavior in emerging countries: The role of pro‐environmental self‐identity, attitude, and environmental protection emotion. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5174–5186. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3411
Li, L. M. W., Liu, M., & Ito, K. (2021). The relationship between the need to belong and nature relatedness: The moderating role of independent self-construal. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 638320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.638320
Lin, C. A., Wang, X., & Yang, Y. (2023). Sustainable apparel consumption: Personal norms, CSR expectations, and hedonic vs. utilitarian shopping value. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 9116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119116
Ling, P.-S., Chin, C.-H., Yi, J., & Wong, W. P. M. (2024). Green consumption behaviour among generation Z college students in China: The moderating role of government support. Young Consumers, 25(4), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-01-2022-1443
Mahasuweerachai, P., & Suttikun, C. (2022). The effect of green self-identity on perceived image, warm glow and willingness to purchase: A new generation’s perspective towards eco-friendly restaurants. Sustainability, 14(17), Article 10539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710539
Majid, S., Zhang, X., Khaskheli, M. B., Hong, F., King, P. J. H., & Shamsi, I. H. (2023). Eco-efficiency, environmental and sustainable innovation in recycling energy and their effect on business performance: Evidence from European SMEs. Sustainability, 15(12), Article 9465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129465
Niu, N., Fan, W., Ren, M., Li, M., & Zhong, Y. (2023). The role of social norms and personal costs on pro-environmental behavior: the mediating role of personal norms. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 2059–2069. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S411640
Norouzi, M., Chàfer, M., Cabeza, L. F., Jiménez, L., & Boer, D. (2021). Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, Article 102704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704
O’Reilly, C., Maher, P. J., Smith, E. M., MacCarron, P., & Quayle, M. (2024). Social identity emergence in attitude interactions and the identity strengthening effects of cumulative attitude agreement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3000
Palomo-Domínguez, I., Elías-Zambrano, R., & Álvarez-Rodríguez, V. (2023). Gen Z’s motivations towards sustainable fashion and eco-friendly brand attributes: The case of Vinted. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 8753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118753
Perry, G. L., Richardson, S. J., Harré, N., Hodges, D., Lyver, P. O. B., Maseyk, F. J., Taylor, R., Todd, J. H., Tylianakis, J. M., & Yletyinen, J. (2021). Evaluating the role of social norms in fostering pro-environmental behaviors. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, Article 620125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.620125
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Rahmani, L., Haasova, S., Czellar, S., Clergue, V., & Martin, C. (2022). How often do you think about your relationship with nature? The measurement of environmental identity salience and its relationship with proenvironmental behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 877978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877978
Saracevic, S., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2021). The impact of social norms on pro-environmental behavior: A systematic literature review of the role of culture and self-construal. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095156
Sharma, K., Aswal, C., & Paul, J. (2023). Factors affecting green purchase behavior: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2078–2092. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3237
Sierra-Barón, W., Olivos-Jara, P., Gómez-Acosta, A., & Navarro, O. (2023). Environmental identity, connectedness with nature, and well-being as predictors of pro-environmental behavior, and their comparison between inhabitants of rural and urban areas. Sustainability, 15(5), Article 4525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054525
Simons, J. D. (2021). From identity to enaction: Identity behavior theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 679490. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679490
Steiglechner, P., Smaldino, P. E., Moser, D., & Merico, A. (2023). Social identity bias and communication network clustering interact to shape patterns of opinion dynamics. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 20(209), Article 20230372. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2023.0372
Tang, H., Ma, Y., & Ren, J. (2022). Influencing factors and mechanism of tourists’ pro-environmental behavior – empirical analysis of the CAC-MOA integration model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1060404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1060404
Wan, Q., & Du, W. (2022). Social capital, environmental knowledge, and pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), Article 1443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031443
Wang, B., & Udall, A. M. (2023). Sustainable consumer behaviors: The effects of identity, environment value and marketing promotion. Sustainability, 15(2), Article 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021129
Williams, A., & Hodges, N. (2022). Adolescent generation Z and sustainable and responsible fashion consumption: Exploring the value-action gap. Young Consumers, 23(4), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-11-2021-1419
Zeng, Z., Zhong, W., & Naz, S. (2023). Can environmental knowledge and risk perception make a difference? The role of environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior in fostering sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 4791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064791
Zhao, A. L., Dermody, J., Koenig‐Lewis, N., & Hanmer‐Lloyd, S. (2024). Cultivating sustainable consumption: The role of harmonious cultural values and pro‐environmental self‐identity. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 1014–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2261
Zhao, X., & An, H. (2023). Research on the mechanism of heterogeneous corporate environmental responsibility in Z-Generation consumers’ sustainable purchase intention. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310318
Zhu, X., Chiong, R., Liu, K., & Ren, M. (2021). Dilemma of introducing a green product: Impacts of cost learning and environmental regulation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 92, 829–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.11.026
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.