Dynamic capabilities facilitate the use of technology to promote organizational ambidexterity
Abstract
The organizational ambidexterity of commercial banks has been the subject of recent research. As a novelty, research has yet to be conducted on the banking sector in a dynamic environment. This study’s goal is to identify the variables that affect ambidextrous banking. The research methodology uses quantitative techniques with six constructs: organizational ambidexterity (OA), dynamic capability (D-CA), organizational culture (O-CU), human capital (H-CA), and technological capacity (T-CA) with moderator environmental dynamism (E-DY). The research questionnaire was measured using seven Likert scales, and the data was processed using structural equation modeling and Smart PLS software. The results of all hypothesis tests are as follows: First, technological capacity, organization culture, and dynamic capability have a positive effect on organizational ambidexterity. Second, technological capacity, human capital, and organizational culture have positive results for a positive effect on dynamic capability. Third, the moderating effect of E-DY on the relationship between T-CA and OA has a negative and significant impact. Fourth, the moderating effect of E-DY on the relationship between O-CU and OA is insignificant. Fifth, the moderating influence of E-DY on the link between dynamic capability and organizational ambidexterity has a positive and significant impact. This study will contribute to the theoretical aspect by enriching the theory that human resource management, technological capacity, organizational culture, and dynamic capabilities are essential in organizational ambidexterity.
Keyword : dynamic capability, organizational culture, human capital, technological capacity, environmental dynamism, organizational ambidexterity
How to Cite
Yunita, T., Sasmoko, S., Bandur, A., & Alamsjah, F. (2024). Dynamic capabilities facilitate the use of technology to promote organizational ambidexterity. Business: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 468–487. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2024.18998
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6
Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
Alavi, S. B., & Gill, C. (2017). Leading change authentically: How authentic leaders influence follower responses to complex change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816664681
Albright, K. S. (2004). Environmental scanning: Radar for success. The Information Management Journal, (May/June).
Ali, M. A., Hussin, N., Haddad, H., Alkhodary, D., & Marei, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and their impact on intellectual capital and innovation performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(18), Article 10028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810028
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00610.x
Andrade, J., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2020). Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: The moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 2111–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00416-x
Anzenbacher, A., & Wagner, M. (2020). The role of exploration and exploitation for innovation success: Effects of business models on organizational ambidexterity in the semiconductor industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(2), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00604-6
Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic supply chain capabilities: How market sensing, supply chain agility and adaptability affect supply chain ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(12), 2266–2285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2017-0555
Ballestar, M. T., García-Lazaro, A., Sainz, J., & Sanz, I. (2022). Why is your company not robotic? The technology and human capital needed by firms to become robotic. Journal of Business Research, 142, 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.061
Baškarada, S., Watson, J., & Cromarty, J. (2017). Balancing transactional and transformational leadership. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(3), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2016-0978
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
Bierly, P. E., & Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(4), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.x
Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101578
Brock, J. K. U., & von Wangenheim, F. (2019). Demystifying AI: What digital transformation leaders can teach you about realistic artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219865226
Bruni, D. S., & Verona, G. (2009). Dynamic marketing capabilities in science-based firms: An exploratory investigation of the pharmaceutical industry. British Journal of Management, 20(s1), S101–S117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00615.x
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cabrita, M. R., & Bontis, N. (2008). Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1–3), 212–237. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.019416
Camisón, C., & Puig-Denia, A. (2016). Are quality management practices enough to improve process innovation? International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 2875–2894. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1113326
Campanella, F., Del Giudice, M., Thrassou, A., & Vrontis, D. (2016). Ambidextrous organizations in the banking sector: An empirical verification of banks’ performance and conceptual development. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(2), 272–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1239122
Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & García-Pérez, A. (2021). An integrative view of knowledge processes and a learning culture for ambidexterity: Toward improved organizational performance in the banking sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2917430
Cepeda-Carrión, I., Leal-Millán, A. G., Ortega-Gutierrez, J., & Leal-Rodriguez, A. L. (2015). Linking unlearning with service quality through learning processes in the Spanish banking industry. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1450–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.032
Chiang, C. Y., Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, C., & Suresh, N. (2012). An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm’s supply chain agility. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211195736
Chin, W. W. (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
Chirkov, V. I., Lynch, M., & Niwa, S. (2005). Application of the scenario questionnaire of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism to the assessment of cultural distance and cultural fit. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.05.014
Choi, S., Cho, I., Han, S. H., Kwak, Y. H., & Chih, Y.-Y. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of project-based organization in global operations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(5), Article 04018027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000621
Chow, I. H. S. (2012). The roles of implementation and organizational culture in the HR-performance link. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3114–3132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.639553
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(July), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. In Research methods in education (8h ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Crick, R. D., Haigney, D., Huang, S., Coburn, T., & Goldspink, C. (2013). Learning power in the workplace: The effective lifelong learning inventory and its reliability and validity and implications for learning and development. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(11), 2255–2272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.725075
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.275
Dasgupta, M. (2019). Business model innovation: Responding to volatile business environment in the Indian banking industry. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 20(4), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2019.1684168
De La Latra, S., Garcia-Carbonell, N., Martin-Alcazar, F., & Sanchez-Gardey, G. (2016). Intellectual capital role in ambidexterity emergence: A proposal of a multilevel model and research agenda Introduction. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 63(5), 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709342931
Dombrowski, C., Kim, J. Y., Desouza, K. C., Braganza, A., Papagari, S., Baloh, P., & Jha, S. (2007). Elements of innovative cultures. Knowledge and Process Management, 14(3), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.279
Effendi, N., Setiawan, M., & Indiastuti, R. (2018). Technical efficiencies of Indonesian regional and non-regional banks pre- and post-financial crisis. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 16(3), Article 355. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2018.094389
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. 3.0.CO;2-E> https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148(April 2021), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030
Felipe, C. M., Roldan, J. L., & Leal-Rodriguez, A. L. (2017). Impact of organizational culture values on organizational agility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122354
Feng, B., Sun, K., Chen, M., & Gao, T. (2020). The impact of core technological capabilities of high-tech industry on sustainable competitive advantage. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072980
Ferraris, A., Erhardt, N., & Bresciani, S. (2019). Ambidextrous work in smart city project alliances: Unpacking the role of human resource management systems. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1291530
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Frank, H., Güttel, W., & Kessler, A. (2017). Environmental dynamism, hostility, and dynamic capabilities in medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750317723219
Frels, R. K., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2013). Administering quantitative instruments with qualitative interviews: A mixed research approach. Journal of Counseling and Development, 91(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00085.x
Gallego-Gomez, C., & De-Pablos-Heredero, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence as an enabling tool for the development of dynamic capabilities in the banking industry. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 16(3), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2020070102
Ganderson, J. (2020). To change banks or bankers? Systemic political (in)action and post-crisis banking reform in the UK and the Netherlands. Business and Politics, 22(1), 196–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2019.34
Ganotakis, P., D’Angelo, A., & Konara, P. (2021). From latent to emergent entrepreneurship: The role of human capital in entrepreneurial founding teams and the effect of external knowledge spillovers for technology adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170(June), Article 120912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120912
García-Morales, V. J., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Llorens-Montes, F. J. (2007). Effects of technology absorptive capacity and technology proactivity on organizational learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19(4), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403540
Ghozali, I., & Fuad. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Dengan Program Lisrel 9.10. In Badan Penerbit (4th ed.). Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
González-Benito, Ó., González-Benito, J., & Muñoz-Gallego, P. A. (2014). On the consequences of market orientation across varied environmental dynamism and competitive intensity levels. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12028
González-Moreno, Á., Triguero, Á., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2019). Many or trusted partners for eco-innovation? The influence of breadth and depth of firms’ knowledge network in the food sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147(June), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.011
Gordon, G. G. (1991). Industry determinants of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278959
Goyal, J., Singh, M., Singh, R., & Aggarwal, A. (2018). Efficiency and technology gaps in Indian banking sector: Application of meta-frontier directional distance function DEA approach. Journal of Finance and Data Science, 5(3), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2018.08.002
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. E. N. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L., & Antony, J. (2020). Continuous improvement initiatives for dynamic capabilities development: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(1), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2018-0071
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019a). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409137.ch4
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019b). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: An illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019c). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017a). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017b). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hensellek, S. (2020). Digital leadership: A framework for successful leadership in the digital age. Journal of Media Management and Entrepreneurship (JMME), 2(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/JMME.2020010104
Holmqvist, M. (2003). A dynamic model of intra- and interorganizational learning. Organization Studies, 24(1), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001684
Hsu, L. C., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: The mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00718.x
Hung, R. Y. Y., Yang, B., Lien, B. Y. H., McLean, G. N., & Kuo, Y. M. (2010). Dynamic capability: Impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.003
Hwang, B. N., Lai, Y. P., & Wang, C. (2023). Open innovation and organizational ambidexterity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 862–884. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2021-0303
Ikhsan, K., Almahendra, R., & Budiarto, T. (2017). Contextual ambidexterity in SMEs in Indonesia: A study on how it mediates organizational culture and firm performance and how market dynamism influences its role on firm. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(S2), 369–390.
Imran, M., Ismail, F., Arshad, I., Zeb, F., & Zahid, H. (2021). The mediating role of innovation in the relationship between organizational culture and organizational performance in Pakistan’s banking sector. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(s1), Article e2717. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2717
Jakšič, M., & Marinč, M. (2019). Relationship banking and information technology: The role of artificial intelligence and FinTech. Risk Management, 21, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-018-0039-y
Jansen, J. J. P., Simsek, Z., & Cao, Q. (2012). Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross-level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1286–1303. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1977
Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.67734
Jantunen, A., Tarkiainen, A., Chari, S., & Oghazi, P. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry. Journal of Business Research, 89, 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.037
Kafetzopoulos, P., Psomas, E., & Katou, A. A. (2023). Promoting strategic flexibility and business performance through organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712997
Kelemen, M., & Papasolomou, I. (2007). Internal marketing: A qualitative study of culture change in the UK banking sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(7–8), 746–768. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725707X230027
Khan, S. J., & Mir, A. A. (2019). Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations: The role of organizational slack and environmental factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2287
Khue Ngo, N. D., Le, T. Q., Tansuchat, R., Nguyen-Mau, T., & Huynh, V. N. (2022). Evaluating innovation capability in banking under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3135556
Kim, T., & Rhee, M. (2009). Exploration and exploitation: Internal variety and environmental dynamism. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 11–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100125
Konlechner, S., Müller, B., & Güttel, W. H. (2018). A dynamic capabilities perspective on managing technological change: A review, framework and research agenda. International Journal of Technology Management, 76(3–4), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091285
Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Tõnurist, P. (2018). Technological capacity in the public sector: The case of Estonia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317735164
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2s), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535
Li, C. R. (2016). The role of top-team diversity and perspective taking in mastering organizational ambidexterity. Management and Organization Review, 12(4), 769–794. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2015.54
Lin, H. E., & McDonough, E. F. (2011). Investigating the role of leadership and organizational culture in fostering innovation ambidexterity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(3), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2092781
Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., Gu, J., & Chen, H. (2010). The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.010
López-Zapata, E., & Ramírez-Gómez, A. D. J. (2023). Intellectual capital, organizational culture and ambidexterity in Colombian firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(2), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2020-0286
Mahmood, T., & Mubarik, M. S. (2020). Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160(August), Article 120248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120248
Marabelli, M., Frigerio, C., & Rajola, F. (2012). Ambidexterity in service organizations: Reference models from the banking industry. Industry and Innovation, 19(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.650881
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Martínez-Falcó, J., Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Sáez, P., & Sánchez-García, E. (2023). The effect of organizational ambidexterity on sustainable performance: A structural equation analysis applied to the Spanish wine industry. Agribusiness, December 2022, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21846
Matsuo, M., & Nakahara, J. (2013). The effects of the PDCA cycle and OJT on workplace learning. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(1), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.674961
McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069340
Mention, A. L., & Bontis, N. (2013). Intellectual capital and performance within the banking sector of Luxembourg and Belgium. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 286–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931311323896
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12343
Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information and Management, 57(2), Article 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004
Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004
Miller, D., & Dröge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392963
Mitropoulos, P., & Mitropoulos, I. (2020). Performance evaluation of retail banking services: Is there a trade-off between production and quality? Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(7), 1237–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3169
Mohammad, H. I. (2019). Mediating effect of organizational learning and moderating role of environmental dynamism on the relationship between strategic change and firm performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2018-0064
Moon, T. (2010). Organizational cultural intelligence: Dynamic capability perspective. Group and Organization Management, 35(4), 456–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378295
Mubarik, M. S., Naghavi, N., & Mahmood, R. T. (2019). Intellectual capital, competitive advantage and the ambidexterity liaison. Human Systems Management, 38(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-180409
Muhammad, F., Ikram, A., Jafri, S. K., & Naveed, K. (2021). Product innovations through ambidextrous organizational culture with mediating effect of contextual ambidexterity: An empirical study of IT and telecom firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010009
Nieves, J., & Haller, S. (2014). Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 40, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.010
Niramarn Ngammoh Atthaphon Mumi, S. P., & Issarapaibool, A. (2023). Enabling social media as a strategic capability for SMEs through organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 35(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2021.1980682
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Ojha, D., Acharya, C., & Cooper, D. (2018). Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.001
Ousama, A. A., Hammami, H., & Abdulkarim, M. (2020). The association between intellectual capital and financial performance in the Islamic banking industry: An analysis of the GCC banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2016-0073
Papachroni, A., Heracleous, L., & Paroutis, S. (2016). In pursuit of ambidexterity: Managerial reactions to innovation–efficiency tensions. Human Relations, 69(9), 1791–1822. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715625343
Parameshwar, H. S., Sruthie, A., Cisse, M., Ajay Kumar, M., & Misra, S. (2019). Fintech and disruptions: An impact assessment. Journal of Critical Reviews, 6(6), 89–97.
Patrício, V., Lopes da Costa, R., Pereira, L., & António, N. (2021). Project management in the development of dynamic capabilities for an open innovation era. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030164
Peng, M. Y. P., & Lin, K. H. (2019). Impact of ambidexterity and environmental dynamism on dynamic capability development trade-offs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082334
Revilla, E., Prieto, I. M., & Prado, B. R. (2010). Knowledge strategy: Its relationship to environmental dynamism and complexity in product development. Knowledge and Process Management, 17(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.339
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2007). Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm congruity principle. British Journal of Management, 18(s1), S17–S27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00523.x
Sánchez-Cañizares, S. M., Ayuso Muñoz, M. Á., & López-Guzmán, T. (2007). Organizational culture and intellectual capital: A new model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710774849
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
Saunder, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2099
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). Multiple indicator-multiple indicator cause, mixture, and multilevel models. In A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge.
Simerly, R. L., & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31–49. 3.0.CO;2-T> https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<31::AID-SMJ76>3.0.CO;2-T
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
Slagmulder, R., & Devoldere, B. (2018). Transforming under deep uncertainty: A strategic perspective on risk management. Business Horizons, 61(5), 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.05.001
Soto-Acosta, P. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemic: Shifting digital transformation to a high-speed gear. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461
Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: A study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0448
Sullivan, J. J., & Nonaka, I. (1986). The application of organizational learning theory to Japanese and American management. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490805
Sutopo, W., Astuti, R. W., & Suryandari, R. T. (2019). Accelerating a technology commercialization; with a discussion on the relation between technology transfer efficiency and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040095
Standard Chartered. (2020). Supporting our clients, colleagues and communities. Here for good. https://www.responsibilityreports.co.uk/HostedData/ResponsibilityReportArchive/s/LSE_STAN_2020.pdf
Swain, S. D., Weathers, D., & Niedrich, R. W. (2008). Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed likert items. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.1.116
Swart, J., Turner, N., van Rossenberg, Y., & Kinnie, N. (2019). Who does what in enabling ambidexterity? Individual actions and HRM practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 508–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1254106
Tajeddini, K., & Mueller, S. (2018). Moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between a firm’s entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 9(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2018-0283
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfondations of(sustainabble) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, 18(4 March 1997), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_689-1
Tran, N. P., & Vo, D. H. (2020). Human capital efficiency and firm performance across sectors in an emerging market. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1738832
Trieu, H. D. X., Nguyen, P. Van, Nguyen, T. T. M., Vu, H. T. M., & Tran, K. T. (2023). Information technology capabilities and organizational ambidexterity facilitating organizational resilience and firm performance of SMEs. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(4), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.03.004
Tsai, K. H., & Hsieh, M. H. (2009). How different types of partners influence innovative product sales: Does technological capacity matter? Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.003
Tseng, J. F., Wang, H. K., & Yen, Y. F. (2014). Organisational innovability: Exploring the impact of human and social capital in the banking industry. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 25(9), 1088–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.781294
Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., García-Lillo, F., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. C. (2018). Continuous innovation in the hotel industry: The development of organizational ambidexterity through human capital and organizational culture in Spanish hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(12), 3609–3631. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2017-0326
Valdez-Juárez, L. E., & Castillo-Vergara, M. (2021). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco-innovation: Dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010008
Vidotto, J. D. F., Ferenhof, H. A., Selig, P. M., & Bastos, R. C. (2017). A human capital measurement scale. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2016-0085
Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
Wamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2020). The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, Article 107498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.019
Wang, H., & Li, J. (2008). Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Management, 34(5), 925–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321547
Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x
Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004
Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). IT infrastructure for strategic agility. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.317307
Wewege, L., Lee, J., & Thomsett, M. C. (2020). Disruptions and digital banking trends. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 10(6), 1792–6599.
Wright, P. M., Coff, R., & Moliterno, T. P. (2014). Strategic human capital: Crossing the great divide. Journal of Management, 40(2), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313518437
Yang, Z., Gan, C., & Li, Z. (2019). Role of bank regulation on bank performance: Evidence from Asia-Pacific commercial banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3), Article 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030131
Yi-Ying, C., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, 49(10), 1658–1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183816
Zhai, Y. M., Sun, W. Q., Tsai, S. B., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., & Chen, Q. (2018). An empirical study on entrepreneurial orientation, absorptive capacity, and SMEs’ innovation performance: A sustainable perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020314
Zheng, J., Liu, H., & Zhou, J. (2020). High-performance work systems and open innovation: moderating role of IT capability. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 120(8), 1441–1457. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2019-0475
Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3549-8
Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
Alavi, S. B., & Gill, C. (2017). Leading change authentically: How authentic leaders influence follower responses to complex change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816664681
Albright, K. S. (2004). Environmental scanning: Radar for success. The Information Management Journal, (May/June).
Ali, M. A., Hussin, N., Haddad, H., Alkhodary, D., & Marei, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and their impact on intellectual capital and innovation performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(18), Article 10028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810028
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00610.x
Andrade, J., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2020). Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: The moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 2111–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00416-x
Anzenbacher, A., & Wagner, M. (2020). The role of exploration and exploitation for innovation success: Effects of business models on organizational ambidexterity in the semiconductor industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(2), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00604-6
Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic supply chain capabilities: How market sensing, supply chain agility and adaptability affect supply chain ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(12), 2266–2285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2017-0555
Ballestar, M. T., García-Lazaro, A., Sainz, J., & Sanz, I. (2022). Why is your company not robotic? The technology and human capital needed by firms to become robotic. Journal of Business Research, 142, 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.061
Baškarada, S., Watson, J., & Cromarty, J. (2017). Balancing transactional and transformational leadership. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(3), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2016-0978
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
Bierly, P. E., & Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(4), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.x
Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101578
Brock, J. K. U., & von Wangenheim, F. (2019). Demystifying AI: What digital transformation leaders can teach you about realistic artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219865226
Bruni, D. S., & Verona, G. (2009). Dynamic marketing capabilities in science-based firms: An exploratory investigation of the pharmaceutical industry. British Journal of Management, 20(s1), S101–S117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00615.x
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cabrita, M. R., & Bontis, N. (2008). Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1–3), 212–237. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.019416
Camisón, C., & Puig-Denia, A. (2016). Are quality management practices enough to improve process innovation? International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 2875–2894. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1113326
Campanella, F., Del Giudice, M., Thrassou, A., & Vrontis, D. (2016). Ambidextrous organizations in the banking sector: An empirical verification of banks’ performance and conceptual development. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(2), 272–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1239122
Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & García-Pérez, A. (2021). An integrative view of knowledge processes and a learning culture for ambidexterity: Toward improved organizational performance in the banking sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2917430
Cepeda-Carrión, I., Leal-Millán, A. G., Ortega-Gutierrez, J., & Leal-Rodriguez, A. L. (2015). Linking unlearning with service quality through learning processes in the Spanish banking industry. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1450–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.032
Chiang, C. Y., Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, C., & Suresh, N. (2012). An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm’s supply chain agility. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211195736
Chin, W. W. (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
Chirkov, V. I., Lynch, M., & Niwa, S. (2005). Application of the scenario questionnaire of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism to the assessment of cultural distance and cultural fit. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.05.014
Choi, S., Cho, I., Han, S. H., Kwak, Y. H., & Chih, Y.-Y. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of project-based organization in global operations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(5), Article 04018027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000621
Chow, I. H. S. (2012). The roles of implementation and organizational culture in the HR-performance link. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3114–3132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.639553
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(July), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. In Research methods in education (8h ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Crick, R. D., Haigney, D., Huang, S., Coburn, T., & Goldspink, C. (2013). Learning power in the workplace: The effective lifelong learning inventory and its reliability and validity and implications for learning and development. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(11), 2255–2272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.725075
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.275
Dasgupta, M. (2019). Business model innovation: Responding to volatile business environment in the Indian banking industry. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 20(4), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2019.1684168
De La Latra, S., Garcia-Carbonell, N., Martin-Alcazar, F., & Sanchez-Gardey, G. (2016). Intellectual capital role in ambidexterity emergence: A proposal of a multilevel model and research agenda Introduction. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 63(5), 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709342931
Dombrowski, C., Kim, J. Y., Desouza, K. C., Braganza, A., Papagari, S., Baloh, P., & Jha, S. (2007). Elements of innovative cultures. Knowledge and Process Management, 14(3), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.279
Effendi, N., Setiawan, M., & Indiastuti, R. (2018). Technical efficiencies of Indonesian regional and non-regional banks pre- and post-financial crisis. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 16(3), Article 355. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2018.094389
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. 3.0.CO;2-E> https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148(April 2021), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030
Felipe, C. M., Roldan, J. L., & Leal-Rodriguez, A. L. (2017). Impact of organizational culture values on organizational agility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122354
Feng, B., Sun, K., Chen, M., & Gao, T. (2020). The impact of core technological capabilities of high-tech industry on sustainable competitive advantage. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072980
Ferraris, A., Erhardt, N., & Bresciani, S. (2019). Ambidextrous work in smart city project alliances: Unpacking the role of human resource management systems. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1291530
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Frank, H., Güttel, W., & Kessler, A. (2017). Environmental dynamism, hostility, and dynamic capabilities in medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750317723219
Frels, R. K., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2013). Administering quantitative instruments with qualitative interviews: A mixed research approach. Journal of Counseling and Development, 91(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00085.x
Gallego-Gomez, C., & De-Pablos-Heredero, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence as an enabling tool for the development of dynamic capabilities in the banking industry. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 16(3), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2020070102
Ganderson, J. (2020). To change banks or bankers? Systemic political (in)action and post-crisis banking reform in the UK and the Netherlands. Business and Politics, 22(1), 196–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2019.34
Ganotakis, P., D’Angelo, A., & Konara, P. (2021). From latent to emergent entrepreneurship: The role of human capital in entrepreneurial founding teams and the effect of external knowledge spillovers for technology adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170(June), Article 120912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120912
García-Morales, V. J., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Llorens-Montes, F. J. (2007). Effects of technology absorptive capacity and technology proactivity on organizational learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19(4), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403540
Ghozali, I., & Fuad. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Dengan Program Lisrel 9.10. In Badan Penerbit (4th ed.). Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
González-Benito, Ó., González-Benito, J., & Muñoz-Gallego, P. A. (2014). On the consequences of market orientation across varied environmental dynamism and competitive intensity levels. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12028
González-Moreno, Á., Triguero, Á., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2019). Many or trusted partners for eco-innovation? The influence of breadth and depth of firms’ knowledge network in the food sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147(June), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.011
Gordon, G. G. (1991). Industry determinants of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278959
Goyal, J., Singh, M., Singh, R., & Aggarwal, A. (2018). Efficiency and technology gaps in Indian banking sector: Application of meta-frontier directional distance function DEA approach. Journal of Finance and Data Science, 5(3), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2018.08.002
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. E. N. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L., & Antony, J. (2020). Continuous improvement initiatives for dynamic capabilities development: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(1), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2018-0071
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019a). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409137.ch4
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019b). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: An illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019c). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017a). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017b). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Hensellek, S. (2020). Digital leadership: A framework for successful leadership in the digital age. Journal of Media Management and Entrepreneurship (JMME), 2(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/JMME.2020010104
Holmqvist, M. (2003). A dynamic model of intra- and interorganizational learning. Organization Studies, 24(1), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001684
Hsu, L. C., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: The mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00718.x
Hung, R. Y. Y., Yang, B., Lien, B. Y. H., McLean, G. N., & Kuo, Y. M. (2010). Dynamic capability: Impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.003
Hwang, B. N., Lai, Y. P., & Wang, C. (2023). Open innovation and organizational ambidexterity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 862–884. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2021-0303
Ikhsan, K., Almahendra, R., & Budiarto, T. (2017). Contextual ambidexterity in SMEs in Indonesia: A study on how it mediates organizational culture and firm performance and how market dynamism influences its role on firm. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(S2), 369–390.
Imran, M., Ismail, F., Arshad, I., Zeb, F., & Zahid, H. (2021). The mediating role of innovation in the relationship between organizational culture and organizational performance in Pakistan’s banking sector. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(s1), Article e2717. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2717
Jakšič, M., & Marinč, M. (2019). Relationship banking and information technology: The role of artificial intelligence and FinTech. Risk Management, 21, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-018-0039-y
Jansen, J. J. P., Simsek, Z., & Cao, Q. (2012). Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross-level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1286–1303. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1977
Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.67734
Jantunen, A., Tarkiainen, A., Chari, S., & Oghazi, P. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry. Journal of Business Research, 89, 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.037
Kafetzopoulos, P., Psomas, E., & Katou, A. A. (2023). Promoting strategic flexibility and business performance through organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712997
Kelemen, M., & Papasolomou, I. (2007). Internal marketing: A qualitative study of culture change in the UK banking sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(7–8), 746–768. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725707X230027
Khan, S. J., & Mir, A. A. (2019). Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations: The role of organizational slack and environmental factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2287
Khue Ngo, N. D., Le, T. Q., Tansuchat, R., Nguyen-Mau, T., & Huynh, V. N. (2022). Evaluating innovation capability in banking under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3135556
Kim, T., & Rhee, M. (2009). Exploration and exploitation: Internal variety and environmental dynamism. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 11–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100125
Konlechner, S., Müller, B., & Güttel, W. H. (2018). A dynamic capabilities perspective on managing technological change: A review, framework and research agenda. International Journal of Technology Management, 76(3–4), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091285
Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Tõnurist, P. (2018). Technological capacity in the public sector: The case of Estonia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317735164
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2s), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535
Li, C. R. (2016). The role of top-team diversity and perspective taking in mastering organizational ambidexterity. Management and Organization Review, 12(4), 769–794. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2015.54
Lin, H. E., & McDonough, E. F. (2011). Investigating the role of leadership and organizational culture in fostering innovation ambidexterity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(3), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2092781
Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., Gu, J., & Chen, H. (2010). The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.010
López-Zapata, E., & Ramírez-Gómez, A. D. J. (2023). Intellectual capital, organizational culture and ambidexterity in Colombian firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(2), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2020-0286
Mahmood, T., & Mubarik, M. S. (2020). Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160(August), Article 120248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120248
Marabelli, M., Frigerio, C., & Rajola, F. (2012). Ambidexterity in service organizations: Reference models from the banking industry. Industry and Innovation, 19(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.650881
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Martínez-Falcó, J., Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Sáez, P., & Sánchez-García, E. (2023). The effect of organizational ambidexterity on sustainable performance: A structural equation analysis applied to the Spanish wine industry. Agribusiness, December 2022, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21846
Matsuo, M., & Nakahara, J. (2013). The effects of the PDCA cycle and OJT on workplace learning. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(1), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.674961
McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069340
Mention, A. L., & Bontis, N. (2013). Intellectual capital and performance within the banking sector of Luxembourg and Belgium. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 286–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931311323896
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12343
Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information and Management, 57(2), Article 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004
Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004
Miller, D., & Dröge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392963
Mitropoulos, P., & Mitropoulos, I. (2020). Performance evaluation of retail banking services: Is there a trade-off between production and quality? Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(7), 1237–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3169
Mohammad, H. I. (2019). Mediating effect of organizational learning and moderating role of environmental dynamism on the relationship between strategic change and firm performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2018-0064
Moon, T. (2010). Organizational cultural intelligence: Dynamic capability perspective. Group and Organization Management, 35(4), 456–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378295
Mubarik, M. S., Naghavi, N., & Mahmood, R. T. (2019). Intellectual capital, competitive advantage and the ambidexterity liaison. Human Systems Management, 38(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-180409
Muhammad, F., Ikram, A., Jafri, S. K., & Naveed, K. (2021). Product innovations through ambidextrous organizational culture with mediating effect of contextual ambidexterity: An empirical study of IT and telecom firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010009
Nieves, J., & Haller, S. (2014). Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 40, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.010
Niramarn Ngammoh Atthaphon Mumi, S. P., & Issarapaibool, A. (2023). Enabling social media as a strategic capability for SMEs through organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 35(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2021.1980682
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Ojha, D., Acharya, C., & Cooper, D. (2018). Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.001
Ousama, A. A., Hammami, H., & Abdulkarim, M. (2020). The association between intellectual capital and financial performance in the Islamic banking industry: An analysis of the GCC banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2016-0073
Papachroni, A., Heracleous, L., & Paroutis, S. (2016). In pursuit of ambidexterity: Managerial reactions to innovation–efficiency tensions. Human Relations, 69(9), 1791–1822. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715625343
Parameshwar, H. S., Sruthie, A., Cisse, M., Ajay Kumar, M., & Misra, S. (2019). Fintech and disruptions: An impact assessment. Journal of Critical Reviews, 6(6), 89–97.
Patrício, V., Lopes da Costa, R., Pereira, L., & António, N. (2021). Project management in the development of dynamic capabilities for an open innovation era. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030164
Peng, M. Y. P., & Lin, K. H. (2019). Impact of ambidexterity and environmental dynamism on dynamic capability development trade-offs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082334
Revilla, E., Prieto, I. M., & Prado, B. R. (2010). Knowledge strategy: Its relationship to environmental dynamism and complexity in product development. Knowledge and Process Management, 17(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.339
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2007). Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm congruity principle. British Journal of Management, 18(s1), S17–S27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00523.x
Sánchez-Cañizares, S. M., Ayuso Muñoz, M. Á., & López-Guzmán, T. (2007). Organizational culture and intellectual capital: A new model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710774849
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
Saunder, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2099
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). Multiple indicator-multiple indicator cause, mixture, and multilevel models. In A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge.
Simerly, R. L., & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31–49. 3.0.CO;2-T> https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<31::AID-SMJ76>3.0.CO;2-T
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
Slagmulder, R., & Devoldere, B. (2018). Transforming under deep uncertainty: A strategic perspective on risk management. Business Horizons, 61(5), 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.05.001
Soto-Acosta, P. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemic: Shifting digital transformation to a high-speed gear. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461
Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: A study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0448
Sullivan, J. J., & Nonaka, I. (1986). The application of organizational learning theory to Japanese and American management. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490805
Sutopo, W., Astuti, R. W., & Suryandari, R. T. (2019). Accelerating a technology commercialization; with a discussion on the relation between technology transfer efficiency and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040095
Standard Chartered. (2020). Supporting our clients, colleagues and communities. Here for good. https://www.responsibilityreports.co.uk/HostedData/ResponsibilityReportArchive/s/LSE_STAN_2020.pdf
Swain, S. D., Weathers, D., & Niedrich, R. W. (2008). Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed likert items. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.1.116
Swart, J., Turner, N., van Rossenberg, Y., & Kinnie, N. (2019). Who does what in enabling ambidexterity? Individual actions and HRM practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 508–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1254106
Tajeddini, K., & Mueller, S. (2018). Moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between a firm’s entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 9(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2018-0283
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfondations of(sustainabble) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, 18(4 March 1997), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_689-1
Tran, N. P., & Vo, D. H. (2020). Human capital efficiency and firm performance across sectors in an emerging market. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1738832
Trieu, H. D. X., Nguyen, P. Van, Nguyen, T. T. M., Vu, H. T. M., & Tran, K. T. (2023). Information technology capabilities and organizational ambidexterity facilitating organizational resilience and firm performance of SMEs. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(4), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.03.004
Tsai, K. H., & Hsieh, M. H. (2009). How different types of partners influence innovative product sales: Does technological capacity matter? Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.003
Tseng, J. F., Wang, H. K., & Yen, Y. F. (2014). Organisational innovability: Exploring the impact of human and social capital in the banking industry. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 25(9), 1088–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.781294
Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., García-Lillo, F., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. C. (2018). Continuous innovation in the hotel industry: The development of organizational ambidexterity through human capital and organizational culture in Spanish hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(12), 3609–3631. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2017-0326
Valdez-Juárez, L. E., & Castillo-Vergara, M. (2021). Technological capabilities, open innovation, and eco-innovation: Dynamic capabilities to increase corporate performance of SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010008
Vidotto, J. D. F., Ferenhof, H. A., Selig, P. M., & Bastos, R. C. (2017). A human capital measurement scale. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2016-0085
Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
Wamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2020). The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, Article 107498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.019
Wang, H., & Li, J. (2008). Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Management, 34(5), 925–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321547
Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x
Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004
Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). IT infrastructure for strategic agility. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.317307
Wewege, L., Lee, J., & Thomsett, M. C. (2020). Disruptions and digital banking trends. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 10(6), 1792–6599.
Wright, P. M., Coff, R., & Moliterno, T. P. (2014). Strategic human capital: Crossing the great divide. Journal of Management, 40(2), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313518437
Yang, Z., Gan, C., & Li, Z. (2019). Role of bank regulation on bank performance: Evidence from Asia-Pacific commercial banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3), Article 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030131
Yi-Ying, C., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, 49(10), 1658–1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183816
Zhai, Y. M., Sun, W. Q., Tsai, S. B., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., & Chen, Q. (2018). An empirical study on entrepreneurial orientation, absorptive capacity, and SMEs’ innovation performance: A sustainable perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020314
Zheng, J., Liu, H., & Zhou, J. (2020). High-performance work systems and open innovation: moderating role of IT capability. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 120(8), 1441–1457. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2019-0475
Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3549-8