ESG and green transition of enterprises: a perspective from emission reduction and development
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2026.25616Abstract
Using data from 2009 to 2020 of A-share listed firms in China, this study investigates how ESG (Environmental, social, and governance) impacts corporate green transition (GT) from two perspectives: carbon emission intensity and total factor productivity. Results show that ESG significantly enhances corporate GT. Channel analysis shows that ESG improves the financing environment, optimizes environmental governance strategies, and improves the information environment, thereby promoting corporate GT. After the implementation of the new Environmental Protection Law (EPL) and the Environmental Protection Tax Law (EPTL), the GT with ESG advantages is significantly enhanced compared to those without ESG advantages. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the positive effects of ESG are more pronounced in firms with low availability of green credit and high levels of greenwashing. In addition, social responsibility of ESG has the greatest effect in enhancing GT, and ESG uncertainty can weaken the promotion effect of ESG on GT. The industry spillover effect test found that ESG has an industry emission reduction governance effect, and there is a peer effect of mutual influence on carbon emissions decisions among enterprises. Overall, our results reveal that ESG can promote GT to achieve sustainable development.
First published online 26 March 2026
Keywords:
ESG, green transition, emission reduction, development, spillover effects, peer effectsHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aksoy, L., Buoye, A. J., Fors, M., Keiningham, T. L., & Rosengren, S. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) metrics do not serve services customers: A missing link between sustainability metrics and customer perceptions of social innovation. Journal of Service Management, 33(4–5), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-11-2021-0428
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112, Article 106186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186
Atkins, J., Doni, F., Gasperini, A., Artuso, S., La Torre, I., & Sorrentino, L. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of sustainability measurement: Which ESG metrics will survive COVID-19? Journal of Business Ethics, 185, 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05183-1
Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
Baldi, F., & Pandimiglio, A. (2022). The role of ESG scoring and greenwashing risk in explaining the yields of green bonds: A conceptual framework and an econometric analysis. Global Finance Journal, 52, Article 100711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100711
Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, Article 125791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791
Breuer, W., Müller, T., Rosenbach, D., & Salzmann, A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and cost of equity: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Banking & Finance, 96, 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.07.018
Chen, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, F. (2021). Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, Article 120744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120744
Chen, D., Hu, H., & Chang, C.-P. (2023a). Green finance, environment regulation, and industrial green transformation for corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2166–2181. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2476
Chen, M., Yang, D., Zhang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023b). How does ESG disclosure improve stock liquidity for enterprises – empirical evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98, Article 106926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106926
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
Deschenes, O., Greenstone, M., & Shapiro, J. S. (2017). Defensive investments and the demand for air quality: Evidence from the NOx budget program. American Economic Review, 107(10), 2958–2989. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131002
Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225–3268. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv044
Du, K., Cheng, Y., & Yao, X. (2021). Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities. Energy Economics, 98, Article 105247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013
Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50–60.
Fan, M., Li, M., Liu, J., & Shao, S. (2022). Is high natural resource dependence doomed to low carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from 283 cities in China. Energy Economics, 115, Article 106328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106328
Flammer, C. (2015). Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1469–1485. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2307
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Gilje, E. P., & Taillard, J. P. (2016). Do private firms invest differently than public firms? Taking cues from the natural gas industry. The Journal of Finance, 71(4), 1733–1778. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12417
Gormley, T. A., & Matsa, D. A. (2014). Common errors: How to (and not to) control for unobserved heterogeneity. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(2), 617–661. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht047
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2004.tb00338.x
Hall, B. H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.35
He, X., Jing, Q., & Chen, H. (2023). The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, Article 118578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118578
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
Hottenrott, H., & Peters, B. (2012). Innovative capability and financing constraints for innovation: More money, more innovation?. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1126–1142. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00227
Lee, C. C., Wang, F., & Chang, Y. F. (2023). Towards net-zero emissions: Can green bond policy promote green innovation and green space? Energy Economics, 121, Article 106675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106675
Lee, M. T., & Raschke, R. L. (2023). Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations? Journal of Business Research, 155, Article 113393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113393
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246
Li, D., & Lv, H. (2021). Investment in environmental innovation with environmental regulation and consumers’ environmental awareness: A dynamic analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1366–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.012
Li, H.-L., Zhu, X.-H., Chen, J.-Y., & Jiang, F.-T. (2019). Environmental regulations, environmental governance efficiency and the green transformation of China’s iron and steel enterprises. Ecological Economics, 165, Article 106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106397
Li, J., Lian, G., & Xu, A. (2023). How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? Mechanism discussion and performance study. Journal of Business Research, 158, Article 113648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113648
Lin, H., Chen, L., Yuan, M., Yu, M., Mao, Y., & Tao, F. (2021a). The eco-friendly side of narcissism: The case of green marketing. Sustainable Development, 29(6), 1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2206
Lin, Y., Fu, X., & Fu, X. (2021b). Varieties in state capitalism and corporate innovation: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, Article 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101919
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
Lu, Y., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). Can the green finance policy force the green transformation of high-polluting enterprises? A quasi-natural experiment based on “Green Credit Guidelines”. Energy Economics, 114, Article 106265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106265
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/259398
Murè, P., Spallone, M., Mango, F., Marzioni, S., & Bittucci, L. (2021). ESG and reputation: The case of sanctioned Italian banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2047
Olley, S., & Pakes, A. (1992). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry (Working Paper No. 3977). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3977
Oyewo, B. (2023). Corporate governance and carbon emissions performance: International evidence on curvilinear relationships. Journal of Environmental Management, 334, Article 117474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117474
Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021). Sustainable investing in equilibrium. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011
Pizzetti, M., Gatti, L., & Seele, P. (2021). Firms talk, suppliers walk: Analyzing the locus of greenwashing in the blame game and introducing ‘vicarious greenwashing’. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04406-2
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., & Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2134
Reber, B., Gold, A., & Gold, S. (2022). ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in initial public offerings. Journal of Business Ethics, 179, 867–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04847-8
Roy, P. K. (2023). Enriching the green economy through sustainable investments: An ESG-based credit rating model for green financing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 420, Article 138315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138315
Saygili, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.001
Szabo, S., & Webster, J. (2021). Perceived greenwashing: The effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04461-0
Taj, S. A. (2016). Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory. European Management Journal, 34(4), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.001
Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers’ environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, Article 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906
Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2011). The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: The case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(9), 2136–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.039
Wang, J., Ma, M., Dong, T., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Do ESG ratings promote corporate green innovation? A quasi-natural experiment based on SynTao Green Finance’s ESG ratings. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, Article 102623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102623
Wang, Q., Li, S., Li, R., & Jiang, F. (2022). Underestimated impact of the COVID-19 on carbon emission reduction in developing countries – a novel assessment based on scenario analysis. Environmental Research, 204, Article 111990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111990
Wang, Z., Huang, W., & Chen, Z. (2019). The peak of CO2 emissions in China: A new approach using survival models. Energy Economics, 81, 1099–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.027
Weber, T. A., & Neuhoff, K. (2010). Carbon markets and technological innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.04.004
Wu, B., Gu, Q., Liu, Z., & Liu, J. (2023). Clustered institutional investors, shared ESG preferences and low-carbon innovation in family firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, Article 122676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122676
Yang, X., Jiang, P., & Pan, Y. (2020). Does China’s carbon emission trading policy have an employment double dividend and a Porter effect? Energy Policy, 142, Article 111492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111492
Yu, E. P. Y., Luu, V. B., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, Article 101192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192
Yu, J., Shi, X., Guo, D., & Yang, L. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and firm carbon emissions: Evidence using a China provincial EPU index. Energy Economics, 94, Article 105071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105071
Yu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2021). Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Economics, 96, Article 105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105125
Zeng, M., Zheng, L., Huang, Z., Cheng, X., & Zeng, H. (2023). Does vertical supervision promote regional green transformation? Evidence from Central Environmental Protection Inspection. Journal of Environmental Management, 326, Article 116681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116681
Zhao, J., Jiang, Q., Dong, X., & Dong, K. (2020). Would environmental regulation improve the greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas use? A Chinese case study. Energy Economics, 87, Article 104712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104712
Zheng, M., Feng, G.-F., Jiang, R.-A., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Does environmental, social, and governance performance move together with corporate green innovation in China? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1670–1679. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3211
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.