Research on multiple improvement paths of innovation performance in regional innovation ecosystem based on fuzzy qualitative comparative analysis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2026.25190Abstract
Prioritizing the development of regional innovation ecosystems (RIE) is essential for advancing China’s innovation-driven strategy. This study investigates how combinations of innovation elements, namely resources, services, achievements, and environment, affect regional innovation performance. Drawing on both innovation value-chain and ecosystem perspectives, we analyze the data from 31 Chinese provinces using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Our findings identify five distinct configurations that lead to high innovation performance and three that result in low or medium performance. High performance configurations include: resource achievement dual drive, outcome driven, and resource driven. Low performance configurations include talent shortage type, service deficiency type, and resource service dual weakness type. These results illustrate the principle of equifinality, indicating that different regions can achieve similar innovation outcomes through different pathways, and they underscore both the substitutability of certain elements and the synergy among them. Theoretically, the study advances configurational approaches in innovation research by integrating ecological and value-chain perspectives. Practically, it provides differentiated policy insights, suggesting that regions should tailor their innovation strategies to leverage specific strengths and thereby foster high-performance outcomes.
First published online 4 March 2026
Keywords:
regional innovation ecosystem, innovation value chain, innovation performance, fsQCA, value co-creationHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
Chen, Y., Huang, S., & Wang, S. (2022). The operational efficiency of China’s regional innovation ecosystem: Based on the perspective of the innovation value chain. Science Research Management, 43(7), 11–19.
Dai, S. (2025). Understanding automation’s impact on ecological footprint: Theory and empirical evidence from Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics, 88, 503–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00938-y
Du, Y., & Jia, L. (2017). Configuration perspective and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): A new path in management research. Management World, 23(6), 155–167.
Fan, F., Dai, S., Zhang, K., & Ke, H. (2021). Innovation agglomeration and urban hierarchy: Evidence from Chinese cities. Applied Economics, 53(54), 6300–6318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1937507
Fernandes, C., Farinha, L., Ferreira, J. J., Asheim, B., & Rutten, R., (2020). Regional innovation systems: What can we learn from 25 years of scientific achievements?. Regional Studies, 55(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1782878
Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. The Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
Gao, S., & Tan, J. (2021). The continuous evolution mechanism of innovation ecosystem: Based on the perspective of government and enterprises. Studies in Science of Science, 39(5), 900–908. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2021.05.009.
Hansen, M. T., & Birkinshaw, J. (2007). The innovation value chain. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 121–130.
Jagódka, M., & Snarska, M. (2023). Regional disparities as a result of differences in human capital and innovativeness on the example of Poland. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(2), 696–716. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.18536
Kulkov, I., Ivanova-Gongne, M., Bertello, A., Makkonen, H., Kulkova, J., Rohrbeck, R., & Ferraris, A. (2023). Technology entrepreneurship in healthcare: Challenges and opportunities for value creation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), Article 100365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100365
Li, B., Xu, Z., Wu, H., Hong, N., & Skare, M. (2023). Open innovation: A research framework and case study of Huawei. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(1), 278–306. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.17843
Li, F., Aw, E. C.-X., Tan, G. W.-H., Cham, T.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2022). The Eureka moment in understanding luxury brand purchases! A non-linear fsQCA-ANN approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, Article 103039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103039
Li, S., & Zhu, S. (2021). Has technology evaluation effectively promoted regional technological innovation – from a policy driven perspective. Science Research Management, 42(7), 11–21.
Li, X., & Zhang, X. (2019). Research on the impact of regional innovation ecosystem symbiosis on regional science and technology innovation. Studies in Science of Science, 37(5), 909–918. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2019.05.017.
Li, Y.-R. (2021). The technological roadmap of Cisco’s business ecosystem. Technovation, 29(5), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.007
Liu, Y., & Wang, Q. (2021). New paradigm of innovation management research: Innovation ecosystem management. Science of Science and Manage of S.&.T., 42(10), 20–33.
Liu, P., Zhu, B., Yang, M., & De Baets, B. (2024). High-quality marine economic development in China from the perspective of green total factor productivity growth: Dynamic changes and improvement strategies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(6), 1572–1597. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.22018
Long, Y. Gu, X. & Liao, Y. (2018). Research on master-slave coordination of industrial technology innovation based on knowledge ecological transformation. Science and Technology Management, 39(2), 104–115.
Long, Y., & Liu, P. (2021). Study on coordination of industrial technology ambidextrous innovation in knowledge ecology spiral. Kybernetes, 50(12), 3246–3268. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2020-0479
Long, Y. Zeng, Q., & Chen, Q. (2023). An innovation subsidy of industrial generic technology based knowledge niche debugging. Engineering Letters, 31(3), 47–59.
Nylund, P. A., Brem, A., Chaudhary, P., & D’alberti, F. (2024). The impact of crisis on interecosystemic innovation: Dynamics of enel’s hydrogen ecosystem. International Journal of Innovation Management, 28(1–2), Article 2450006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919624500063
Oh, D.-S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Ragin, C. (2010). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
Ritala, P., Agouridas, V., Assimakopoulos, D., & Gies, O. (2013). Value creation and capture mechanisms in innovation ecosystems: A comparative case study. International Journal of Technology Management, 63(3/4), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2013.056900.
Ruan, R., & Chen, W. (2024). Research on the impact of geographic distance on corporate technology for social good: From the perspective of institutional environment and regional innovation capability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 457, Article 142391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142391
Shah, A. k., Yu, J., Sukamani, D., & Kusi, M. (2022). Influence of agile leadership on project success; a moderated mediation study on construction firms in Nepal. Engineering Letters, 30(2), 463–476.
Shang, M., Jia, C., Zhong, L., & Cao, J. (2024). What determines the performance of digital transformation in manufacturing enterprises? A study on the linkage effects based on fs/QCA method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450, Article 141856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141856
Tang, K., Ouyang, J., Zhen, J., & Ren, H. (2021). How does the regional innovation ecosystem drive innovation performance – Qualitative comparative analysis of Fuzzy set based on 31 provinces and cities. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T., 42(7), 53–72.
Tura, N., Kutvonen, A., & Ritala, P. (2017). Platform design framework: Conceptualisation and application. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(8), 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1390220.
Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace perform model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495–2503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
Wu, L.-C. (2023). Formulated optimal solution for EOQ Model with Fuzzy Demand. International Journal of Computer Science, 50(3), 890–898.
Xie, X., & Liu, X. (2021). Evaluation and prediction of ecological niche suitability of regional innovation ecosystem: An empirical study based on data from 30 provinces and cities in China from 2009 to 2018. Studies in Science of Science, 39(9), 1706–1719.
Yang, G., Bai, X., & Yang, S. (2023a). Analysis strategy configurations in risk taking using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(3), 981–1004. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.18779
Yang, Y., Chen, W., & Gu, R. (2023b). How does digital infrastructure affect industrial eco-efficiency? Considering the threshold effect of regional collaborative innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 427, Article 139248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139248
Yuko, O., & Junichi, L. (2018). An empirical analysis of the dependence structure of international equity and bond markets using regime-switching Copula Model. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 48(2), 191–205.
Zhang, M., Li, B., & Yin, S. (2020). Configurational paths to regional innovation performance: The interplay of innovation elements based on a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 32(12), 1422–1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1773423
Zhang, S., & Wang, Q. (2021). Exploratory research on the regional innovation development path of the same way but different road – configuration analysis based on the theoretical framework of innovation system symbiosis. Studies in Science of Science, 39(2), 233–243.
Zhang, Y., Song, W., Wu, X., Zhang, W., & Zhang, J. (2021). The multiple concurrent causal relationships and multiple paths of technological innovation driving industrial upgrading. Science Research Management, 42(12), 19–28.
Zhang, Z., Wang, L., & Song, Y. (2022). How does the business environment ecology drive urban innovation performance – Qualitative comparative analysis of Fuzzy set based on innovative cities. R & D Management, 34(3), 24–40.
Zhao, F., Hu, S., Liu, Q., Chen, Y., & Hu, W. (2021). Factor identification, configuration configuration and breakthrough path of high incubation performance of science and technology Business incubator: Multi factor configuration analysis based on fsQCA. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 38, 8–17.
Zhu, G., Sai, F., & Qin, Z. (2021). Identification of key influencing factors and development paths of innovation level in China’s provinces: A qualitative comparative analysis based on Fuzzy set. Science of Science and Manage of S.&.T., 42(9), 52–70.
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.