Unlocking the inverted-U: exploring the threshold impact of population  aging on income inequality dynamics

    Muhammad Raees Shaik Saffarudin Info
    Chee Hong Law Info
    Koi Nyen Wong Info
    Soo Khoon Goh Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.23762

Abstract

As population aging unfolds at an unprecedented scale worldwide, its impact on income inequality continues to be contentious, with no clear consensus in the literature. Rather than viewing the aging-inequality linkage as solely positive or negative, this paper introduces a modified life cycle with precautionary behavior, indicating that inequality may initially worsen with aging before stabilizing at later stages. The Dynamic Panel Threshold Kink (DPTK) regression method is used to identify the threshold point of aging intensity at which the inequality begins to moderate following a period of intensification. The findings reveal a threshold aging intensity of 1.4%, which supports an inverted-U characterization of the aging-inequality nexus. The results suggest that liberalizing trade and improving government redistribution can assist countries experiencing a rise in inequality. At the same time, the prevalence of precautionary effects due to population aging may offer a natural defense against the detrimental effects of inequality over time.

First published online 05 June 2025

Keywords:

income inequality, population aging, panel data, kink threshold regression

How to Cite

Shaik Saffarudin, M. R., Law, C. H., Wong, K. N., & Goh, S. K. (2025). Unlocking the inverted-U: exploring the threshold impact of population  aging on income inequality dynamics. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.23762

Share

Published in Issue
June 5, 2025
Abstract Views
89

References

Alimi, O. B., Maré, D. C., & Poot, J. (2017). More pensioners, less income inequality? The impact of changing age composition on inequality in big cities and elsewhere (IZA Discussion Paper No.10690). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2956785

Anderson, E., Jalles D’Orey, M. A., Duvendack, M., & Esposito, L. (2017). Does government spending affect income inequality? A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 961–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12173

Andriopoulou, E., Karakitsios, A., & Tsakloglou, P. (2017). Inequality and poverty in Greece: Changes in times of crisis (IZA Discussion Paper No. 11006). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3041802

Antonelli, C., & Gehringer, A. (2017). Technological change, rent and income inequalities: A Schumpeterian approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.023

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D

Aydin, C., & Esen, Ö. (2018). Reducing CO2 emissions in the EU member states: Do environmental taxes work? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(13), 2396–2420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1395731

Barreti, G. F., Crossley, T. F., & Worswick, C. (2000). Demographic trends and consumption inequality in Australia between 1975 and 1993. Review of Income and Wealth, 46(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2000.tb00410.x

Bhattacharyya, A. K. (1975). Income inequality and fertility: A comparative view. Population Studies, 29(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1975.10410181

Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Fink, G. (2010). Implications of population ageing for economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(4), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grq038

Boar, C. (2020). Dynastic precautionary savings (NBER Working Paper No. 26635). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26635

Cameron, L. A. (2000). Poverty and inequality in Java: Examining the impact of the changing age, educational and industrial structure. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00079-1

Chen, X., Huang, B., & Li, S. (2017). Population aging and inequality: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China (ADBI Working Paper No. 794). Asian Development Bank Institute.

Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6

Chong, T. T. L., & Ka, Y. T. (2019). Forecasting income inequality with demographic projections (MPRA Paper No. 99160). University Library of Munich, Germany.

Crowe, C. (2004). Inflation, inequality and social conflict (CEP Discussion Paper No. 657). Centre for Economic Performance.

Danziger, S., van der Gaag, J., Smolensky, E., & Taussig, M. K. (1982). The life-cycle hypothesis and the consumption behavior of the elderly. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5(2), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1982.11489357

Dolls, M., Doorley, K., Paulus, A., Schneider, H., & Sommer, E. (2019). Demographic change and the European income distribution. Journal of Economic Inequality, 17, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-019-09411-z

Dong, Z., Tang, C., & Wei, X. (2018). Does population aging intensify income inequality? Evidence from China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 23(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2017.1354270

Elinder, M., Erixson, O., & Waldenström, D. (2018). Inheritance and wealth inequality: Evidence from population registers. Journal of Public Economics, 165, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.06.012

Ferjani, S., Saafi, S., & Nouira, R. (2023). Will substantial revaluation of Chinese currency be helpful in attenuating the United States’ trade deficit with China? New evidence from the dynamic threshold kink model. The International Trade Journal, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2023.2236220

Goh, S. K., McNown, R., & Wong, K. N. (2020). Macroeconomic implications of population aging: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Asian Economics, 68, Article 101198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101198

Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1

Haq, M., Badshah, I., & Ahmad, I. (2016). Does globalisation shape income inequality? Empirical evidence from selected developing countries. Pakistan Development Review, 251–270.

Hong, B. E., & Kim, H. Y. (2012). Trends of income inequality among the elderly in Korea. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 6(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-1411.2011.00062.x

Hwang, S., Choe, C., & Choi, K. (2021). Population ageing and income inequality. Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 20, Article 100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2021.100345

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

Jain-Chandra, S., Kinda, T., Kochhar, K., Piao, S., & Schauer, J. (2016). Sharing the growth dividend: Analysis of inequality in Asia (IMF Working Paper No. 16/48).

Jäntti, M. (1997). Inequality in five countries in the 1980s: The role of demographic shifts, markets and government policies. Economica, 64(255), 415–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.00088

Jenkins, S. P. (1995). Accounting for inequality trends: Decomposition analyses for the UK, 1971–86. Economica, 62(245), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2554775

Kang, S. J., & Rudolf, R. (2016). Rising or falling inequality in Korea? Population aging and generational trends. Singapore Economic Review, 61(5), Article 1550089. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590815500897

Khera, P., & Gao, Y. (2024). Sustainable path to inclusive growth in Japan: How to tackle income inequality? (IMF Selected Issue Paper No. SIP/2024/026). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400282232.018

Kremer, S., Bick, A., & Nautz, D. (2013). Inflation and growth: New evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis. Empirical Economics, 44, 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0553-9

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

Lam, D., & Levison, D. (1992). Age, experience, and schooling: Decomposing earnings inequality in the United States and Brazil. Sociological Inquiry, 62(2), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1992.tb00195.x

Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2014). Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption. Science, 346(6206), 229–233.

Lee, S.-H., Mason, A., & Park, D. (2011). Why does population aging matter so much for Asia? Population aging, economic growth, and economic security in Asia (ADB Economics Working Paper No. 284). Asian Development Bank. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1960877

Lu, X., & White, H. (2014). Robustness checks and robustness tests in applied economics. Journal of Econometrics, 178(1), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.016

Luo, Z., Wan, G., Wang, C., & Zhang, X. (2018). Aging and inequality: The link and transmission mechanisms. Review of Development Economics, 22(3), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12394

Maddah, M., Nejad, A. H. G., & Sargolzaei, M. (2022). Natural resources, political competition, and economic growth: An empirical evidence from dynamic panel threshold kink analysis in Iranian provinces. Resources Policy, 78, Article 102928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102928

Nord, S. (1980). An empirical analysis of income inequality and city size. Southern Economic Journal, 46(3), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.2307/1057154

Ohtake, F., & Saito, M. (1998). Population aging and consumption inequality in Japan. Review of Income and Wealth Series, 44(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1998.tb00287.x

Okunade, S. O. (2022). Institutional threshold in the nexus between financial openness and TFP in Africa: A dynamic panel analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 5(1), Article 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100245

Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (CEsifo Working Paper No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504

Saffarudin, M. R. S., Goh, S. K., Wong, K. N., & Law, C. H. (2024). The impact of social globalization on domestic savings: A long-run macroeconomic analysis of advanced ageing economies in the Asia-Pacific Region. Applied Economics, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2379510

Scott, A. J. (2021). The longevity society. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2(12), e820–e827. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00247-6

Seo, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2016). Dynamic panels with threshold effect AND endogeneity. Journal of Econometrics, 195(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.005

Seo, M. H., Kim, S., & Kim, Y. J. (2019). Estimation of dynamic panel threshold model using Stata. Stata Journal, 19(3), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X19874243

Shaik, M. R., Goh S. K., Wong, K. N., & Law, C. H. (2023). Does population aging coexist with income inequality in the long run? Evidence from selected Asia-Pacific countries. Economic Systems, 48, Article 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101149

Shen, C., & Zhao, X. (2023). How does income inequality affects economic growth at different income levels? Economic Research – Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 36(1), 864–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2080742

Solt, F. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795

Steiner, F. (2001). Regulation, industry structure and performance in the electricity supply industry (OECD Economic Department Working Paper No. 238). http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.223648

Tsionas, M. (2019). Panel data econometrics. Academic Press.

United Nations. (n.d.). Regional groups of member States. https://www.un.org/dgacm/en/content/regional-groups

University of Texas at Austin. (2015). Estimated Household Income Inequality (EHII) [Data set]. http://www.utip.lbj.utexas.edu/data/UtipUnidoEhiiV2017_v.1.xlsx

Westerheide, P. (2005). Auswirkungen von Erbschaften und Schenkungen auf die Vermögensbildung privater Personen und Haushalte [The importance of intergenerational transfers for private wealth accumulation: An empirical analysis of German survey data]. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 225(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2005-0407

World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators [Data set]. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

World Inequality Database. (n.d.). https://wid.world/data/

Yu, S., Liu, J., Hu, X., & Tian, P. (2022). Does development of renewable energy reduce energy intensity? Evidence from 82 countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, Article 121254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121254

Zhang, Y., Parker, D., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2005). Competition, regulation and privatization of electricity generation in developing countries: Does the sequencing of the reforms matter? Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 54(2–3), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2004.12.009

Zhang, H., Ke, L., & Ding, D. (2021). The effect of Chinese population aging on income inequality: Based on a micro-macro multiregional dynamic CGE modelling analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(5), 1399–1419. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1623781

Zhong, H. (2011). The impact of population aging on income inequality in developing countries: Evidence from Rural China. China Economic Review, 22(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.09.003

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2025-06-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shaik Saffarudin, M. R., Law, C. H., Wong, K. N., & Goh, S. K. (2025). Unlocking the inverted-U: exploring the threshold impact of population  aging on income inequality dynamics. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.23762

Share