Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for assessing multinational enterprises’ outbound investment destinations on the basis of tax factors

    Chun-Chieh Chu Info
    Ping-Yu Hsu Info
    Shih-Tong Lu Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.22834

Abstract

Taxes are a crucial consideration in a multinational enterprise’s (MNE)’s choice of overseas market to invest in. Taxes are affected by a variety of factors, and these factors are prioritized vis-à-vis each other in such investment decision-making. The present study thus developed a framework for evaluating the relative importance of tax factors affecting the outbound investment decisions of MNEs, using insights from the literature and expert interviews to establish evaluation criteria. To address the complexities of multicriteria decision-making, this study employed fuzzy linguistic preference relations. The study subsequently applied the fuzzy Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) approach to rank the alternatives proposed by the expert decision-making group. Finally, this study applied this methodology to a case study of candidate overseas markets (Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia) for Taiwanese firms to invest in, providing a practical demonstration of the model. In conclusion, the present study’s comparative analysis of the application of fuzzy VIKOR to foreign direct investment by Taiwanese MNEs offers a systematic approach for both academic and industry practitioners involved in strategic host country selection for multinational investments.

First published online 14 July 2025

Keywords:

tax factors, multinational enterprise, outbound investment, multicriteria decision-making, fuzzy VIKOR, fuzzy linguistic preference

How to Cite

Chu, C.-C., Hsu, P.-Y., & Lu, S.-T. (2025). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for assessing multinational enterprises’ outbound investment destinations on the basis of tax factors. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.22834

Share

Published in Issue
July 14, 2025
Abstract Views
30

References

References

Akcigit, U., Hanley D., & Stantcheva, S. (2022). Optimal taxation and R&D policies. Econometrica, 90(2), 645–684. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA15445

Azémar, C., & Delios, A. (2008). Tax competition and FDI: The special case of developing countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2007.02.001

Azémar, C., & Dharmapala, D. (2019). Tax sparing agreements, territorial tax reforms, and foreign direct investment. Journal of Public Economics, 169, 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.10.013

Bacchetta, P., & Wincoop, E. V. (2006). Can information heterogeneity explain the exchange rate determination puzzle? American Economic Review, 96(3), 552–576. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.552

Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141

Beer, S., de Mooij, R., & Liu, L. (2020). International corporate tax avoidance: A review of the channels, magnitudes, and blind spots. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3), 660–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12305

Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., Brooks, R., & Do, H. X. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels. Economic Modelling, 121, Article 106203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106203

Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9

Buettner, T., Overesch, M., & Wamser, G. (2018). Anti profit-shifting rules and foreign direct investment. International Tax and Public Finance, 25, 553–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9457-0

Chatterjee, P. & Charkraborty, S. (2016). A comparative analysis of VIKOR method and its variants. Decision Science Letters, 5, 469–486. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.5.004

Chen, S.-J., & Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4

Chen, F., Zhou, X.-c., & Cao, Y.-y. (2023). Unintended consequences: How anti-avoidance policy lead to corporate tax avoidance. SSRN.

Christians, A. (2017). Take MAP with a grain of salt: Sifto and the legal nature of competent authority agreements. Tax Notes International, 86, 81–83.

Chyz, J. A., Gal-Or, R., Naiker, V. & Sharma, D. S. (2021). The association between auditor provided tax planning and tax compliance services and tax avoidance and tax risk. The Journal of American Taxation Association, 43(2), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.2308/JATA-19-041

Damak-Ayadi, S., Sassi, N., & Bahri, M. (2020). Cross-country determinants of IFRS for SMEs adoption. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2018-0118

Devereux, M. P., & Griffith, R. (1998). Taxes and the location of production: Evidence from a panel of US multinationals. Journal of Public Economics, 68(3), 335–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00014-0

Dharmapala, D., & Hines, J. (2009). Which countries become tax havens. Journal of Public Economics, 93(9–10), 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.07.005

de Mooij, R. A., & Ederveen, S. (2003). Taxation and foreign direct investment: A synthesis of empirical research. International Tax and Public Finance, 10, 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026329920854

Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002

Drucker, J. (2010). Google 2.4% rate shows how $60 billion lost to tax loopholes. Bloomberg.

Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, E., Chiclana, F., & Luque, M. (2004). Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7

Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. L., & Saavedra, D. (2017). The taxman cometh: Does tax uncertainty affect corporate cash holdings? Review of Accounting Studies, 22, 1198–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9398-y

Hsu, M., Lee, J., Leon-Gonzalez, R. & Zhao, Y. (2018). Tax incentives and foreign direct investment in China. Applied Economics Letters, 26(9), 777–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1495817

Kuzniacki, B. (2018). The limitation on benefits (LOB) provision in BEPS action 6/MLI: Ineffective overreaction of mind-numbing complexity – Part 1. Intertax, 46(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2018007

Lu, S.-T., Hsieh, T.-Y., Lee, J.-S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2001, December 19–21). A decision support system for planning and design tender selection in public buildings. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Electronic Business (pp. 215–217). Hong Kong, China.

Mahmoudi, A., Sadi-Nezhada, S., & Makui, A. (2016). An extended fuzzy VIKOR for group decision-making based on fuzzy distance to supplier selection. Scientia Iranica, 23(4), 1879–1892. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2016.3934

Moser, T. (2017). The Provisions of the EU anti-tax avoidance directive regarding controlled foreign company rules: A critical review based on the experience with the German CFC legislation. Intertax, 45(10), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2017052

Merlo, V., Riedel, N. & Wamser, G. (2019). The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the location of multinational firms’ foreign affiliates. Review of International Economics, 28(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12440

Mintz, J. M., & Weichenrieder, A. J. (2010). Holding companies and ownership chains. In Indirect side of direct investment: Multinational company and finance and taxation (pp. 77–120). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014496.001.0001

Mosquera Valderrama, I. J. & Burgers, I. J. J. (2019). Review of anti-avoidance measures of a general nature and scope – General anti-avoidance rules. Bulletin for International Taxation, 73(10). https://doi.org/10.59403/2ch63ny

National Development Council of Taiwan. (2021). Approved FDI projects accumulated since 1952. https://investtaiwan.nat.gov.tw

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2002). Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8667.00269

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020

Picciotto, S. (2018). Problems of transfer pricing and possibilities for simplification (ICTD Working Paper No. 86). Institute of Development Studies. https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/problems-of-transfer-pricing-and-possibilities-for-simplification/

Prebble, J. & Hikaka, G. (2010). Autopoiesis and general anti-avoidance rules. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(7), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2009.07.001

Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.

Sarfo, N. A. (2022). Microsoft engaged in tax avoidance, report says. Tax Notes Today International.

Schanz, D., Dinkel, A., & Keller, S. (2017). Tax attractiveness and the location of German-controlled subsidiaries. Review of Managerial Science, 11, 251–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0190-3

Shieh, W.-S., Ou, J.-N. & Wang, J.-C. (2014). The impact of anti-thin capitalization rules on capital structure in Taiwan. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(11), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n11p142

Suh, Y., Park, Y., & Kang, D. (2019). Evaluating mobile services using integrated weighting approach and fuzzy VIKOR. PLoS ONE, 14(9), Article e0222312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217786

Tzeng, G.-H., Lin, C.-W., & Opricovic, S. (2005). Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1373–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014

Wang, T.-C., & Chen, Y.-H. (2008). Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP. Information Sciences, 178(19), 3755–3765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.028

Wang, T. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2010). Incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations under uncertain environment. Information Fusion, 11(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2009.05.004

World Bank Group. (2019). Regulatory governance for development and growth: Malaysia’s experience with good regulatory practices. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/993771569259958518/pdf/Regulatory-Governance-for-Development-and-Growth-Malaysias-Experience-with-Good-Regulatory-Practices.pdf

Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2025-07-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chu, C.-C., Hsu, P.-Y., & Lu, S.-T. (2025). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for assessing multinational enterprises’ outbound investment destinations on the basis of tax factors. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.22834

Share