Methodology for planning bicycle path connections through urban recreational areas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2026.27116Abstract
Urbanization and the increasing use of private cars lead to higher levels of environmental pollution, traffic congestion, and a negative impact on quality of life. Cycling is considered one of the most important measures for promoting sustainable mobility; however, cycling infrastructure in cities is often planned by separating recreational routes from everyday transport corridors. Recreational areas – such as parks, waterfronts, and green spaces – have significant potential to function as cycling connections that ensure safe, comfortable, and attractive daily mobility. Based on scientific literature, the main factors influencing cyclists’ route choice and planning principles were identified and transformed into an evaluation criteria system. The relative importance of the criteria was determined using expert judgement and the Kendall coefficient of concordance. The results of the expert evaluation revealed that path connectivity (weight 0.134) and route quality (weight 0.125) are the most significant criteria for functional cycling connections, whereas environmental aesthetics and route curvature are perceived as less important in the context of everyday commuting. The proposed methodology enables a systematic assessment of cycling connections within recreational areas and can be applied in sustainable urban mobility planning to encourage the use of bicycles for everyday trips.
Article in Lithuanian.
Dviračių takų jungčių rekreacinėse miestų teritorijose planavimo metodikos rodiklių vertinimas
Santrauka
Miestų urbanizacija ir augantis automobilių naudojimas didina aplinkos taršą, eismo spūstis ir neigiamai veikia gyvenimo kokybę. Dviračių transportas laikomas viena svarbiausių darnaus judumo priemonių, tačiau dviračių eismo infrastruktūra miestuose dažnai planuojama atskiriant rekreacines trasas nuo kasdienio susisiekimo maršrutų. Rekreacinės teritorijos – parkai, pakrantės ir žaliosios erdvės – turi didelį potencialą tapti funkcinėmis dviračių jungtimis, užtikrinančiomis saugų, patogų ir patrauklų kasdienį judumą. Remiantis moksliniais šaltiniais išskirti pagrindiniai dviračių maršrutų pasirinkimą lemiantys veiksniai ir planavimo principai, kurie transformuoti į vertinimo kriterijų sistemą. Kriterijų reikšmingumui nustatyti taikytas ekspertinis vertinimas ir Kendall konkordancijos metodas. Nustatyta, kad planuojant funkcines jungtis per rekreacines teritorijas, svarbiausi kriterijai yra takų junglumas (svoris 0,134) ir trasų kokybė (svoris 0,125), o aplinkos estetiniai veiksniai bei maršruto kreivalinijiškumas turi mažesnę įtaką kasdienio susisiekimo kontekste. Parengta metodika leidžia sistemiškai vertinti dviračių takų jungtis rekreacinėse teritorijose ir gali būti taikoma miestų darnaus judumo planavimo srityje, siekiant skatinti dviračių naudojimą kasdienėms kelionėms.
Reikšminiai žodžiai: dviračių trasų planavimas, metodikos vertinimo kriterijai, dviračių eismo infrastruktūra, rekreacinės teritorijos, darnus judumas, ekspertinis vertinimas, daugiakriteris vertinimas, miestų planavimas.
Keywords:
bicycle path planning, evaluation criteria, cycling infrastructure, recreational areas, sustainable mobility, expert judgment, multicriteria evaluation, urban planningHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmed, T., Pirdavani, A., Wets, G., & Janssens, D. (2024). Bicycle infrastructure design principles in urban bikeability indices: A systematic review. Sustainability, 16(6), Article 2545. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062545
Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A. M., González, V. I., & Henao, C. A. (2020). Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.010
Bai, Y., Bai, Y., Wang, R., Yang, T., Song, X., & Bai, B. (2023). Exploring associations between the built environment and cycling behaviour around urban greenways from a human-scale perspective. Land, 12(3), Article 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030619
Böcker, L., Dijst, M., & Faber, J. (2016). Weather, transport mode choices and emotional travel experiences. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.021
Buehler, R., & Dill, J. (2016). Bikeway networks: A review of effects on cycling. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908
Cervero, R., Denman, S., & Jin, Y. (2019). Network design, built and natural environments, and bicycle commuting: Evidence from British cities and towns. Transport Policy, 74, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.007
European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:640:FIN
Handy, S. (2018). Enough with the “D’s” already – Let’s Get Back to “A”. https://transfersmagazine.org/magazine-article/issue-1/enough-with-the-ds-already-lets-get-back-to-a/
Heinen, E., & Götschi, T. (2022). Chapter one – Cycling: Past, current and future. Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2022.04.001
Hong, J., McArthur, D. Ph., & Stewart, J. L. (2020). Can providing safe cycling infrastructure encourage people to cycle more when it rains? The use of crowdsourced cycling data (Strava). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 133, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.008
Jakimavičius, M., Burinskienė, M., Gusarovienė, M., & Podviezko, A. (2016). Assessing multiple criteria for rapid bus routes in the public transport system in Vilnius. Public Transport, 8, 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0146-7
Karolemeas, C., Vassi, A., Tsigdinos, S., & Bakogiannis, D. E. (2022). Measure the ability of cities to be biked via weighted parameters, using GIS tools. The case study of Zografou in Greece. Transportation Research Procedia, 62, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.008
Kendall, M. G. (1975). Rank correlation methods (4th ed.). Charles Griffin.
Lietuvos Respublikos aplinkos ministerija. (2015). Urbanizuotų teritorijų susisiekimo sistemų planavimo normos. https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/de/legalAct/832fadf074ed11e6b969d7ae07280e89
Lietuvos Respublikos susisiekimo ministerija. (2024). Dviračių ir pėsčiųjų eismo infrastruktūros planavimo ir projektavimo taisyklės. https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/4b1abe31ac3611efaae6a4c601761171?jfwid=n3y3fwa09
Lu, Y., Yang, Y., Sun, G., & Gou, Z. (2019). Associations between overhead-view and eye-level urban greenness and cycling behaviors. Cities, 88, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.003
Martin, A., Morciano, M., & Suhrcke, M. (2021). Determinants of bicycle commuting and the effect of bicycle infrastructure investment in London: Evidence from UK census microdata. Economics & Human Biology, 41, Article 100945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100945
McCreery-Phillips, S., & Heydari, S. (2023). Neighbourhood characteristics and bicycle commuting in the Greater London area. Transport Policy, 142, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.08.007
Miller, E. J. (2018). Accessibility: Measurement and application in transportation planning. Transport Reviews, 38(5), 551–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1492778
Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2007). Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation, 35, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9137-5
Stinson, M. A., & Bhat, C. R. (2005). A comparison of the route preferences of experienced and inexperienced bicycle commuters. In TRB 84th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers (No. 05-1434). ResearchGate.
Wahlgren, L., & Schantz, P. (2014). Exploring bikeability in a suburban metropolitan area using the active commuting route environment scale (ACRES). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(8), 8276–8300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110808276
Weikl, S., & Mayer, P. (2023). Data-driven quality assessment of cycling networks. Frontiers in Future Transportation, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffutr.2023.1127742
Zabielaitė-Skirmantė, M. ir Burinskienė, M. (2024, birželio 14 d.). Veiksnių, lemiančių pasirinkimą atlikti keliones dviračiais, ir eismo įvykių, susijusių su kelionėmis dviračiais, analizė. Iš 27-osios Jaunųjų mokslininkų konferencijos „Mokslas – Lietuvos ateitis“ teminės konferencijos Darni Aplinka straipsnių rinkinio (p. 1–9). Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas. https://doi.org/10.3846/da.2024.016
Zavadskas, E. K., & Vilutienė, T. (2006). A multiple criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block’s maintenance contractors: I–Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria. Building and Environment, 41(5), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.02.019
View article in other formats
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.