Methodology for planning bicycle path connections through urban recreational areas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2026.27116

Abstract

Urbanization and the increasing use of private cars lead to higher levels of environmental pollution, traffic congestion, and a negative impact on quality of life. Cycling is considered one of the most important measures for promoting sustainable mobility; however, cycling infrastructure in cities is often planned by separating recreational routes from everyday transport corridors. Recreational areas – such as parks, waterfronts, and green spaces – have significant potential to function as cycling connections that ensure safe, comfortable, and attractive daily mobility. Based on scientific literature, the main factors influencing cyclists’ route choice and planning principles were identified and transformed into an evaluation criteria system. The relative importance of the criteria was determined using expert judgement and the Kendall coefficient of concordance. The results of the expert evaluation revealed that path connectivity (weight 0.134) and route quality (weight 0.125) are the most significant criteria for functional cycling connections, whereas environmental aesthetics and route curvature are perceived as less important in the context of everyday commuting. The proposed methodology enables a systematic assessment of cycling connections within recreational areas and can be applied in sustainable urban mobility planning to encourage the use of bicycles for everyday trips.

Article in Lithuanian.

Dviračių takų jungčių rekreacinėse miestų teritorijose planavimo metodikos rodiklių vertinimas

Santrauka

Miestų urbanizacija ir augantis automobilių naudojimas didina aplinkos taršą, eismo spūstis ir neigiamai veikia gyvenimo kokybę. Dviračių transportas laikomas viena svarbiausių darnaus judumo priemonių, tačiau dviračių eismo infrastruktūra miestuose dažnai planuojama atskiriant rekreacines trasas nuo kasdienio susisiekimo maršrutų. Rekreacinės teritorijos – parkai, pakrantės ir žaliosios erdvės – turi didelį potencialą tapti funkcinėmis dviračių jungtimis, užtikrinančiomis saugų, patogų ir patrauklų kasdienį judumą. Remiantis moksliniais šaltiniais išskirti pagrindiniai dviračių maršrutų pasirinkimą lemiantys veiksniai ir planavimo principai, kurie transformuoti į vertinimo kriterijų sistemą. Kriterijų reikšmingumui nustatyti taikytas ekspertinis vertinimas ir Kendall konkordancijos metodas. Nustatyta, kad planuojant funkcines jungtis per rekreacines teritorijas, svarbiausi kriterijai yra takų junglumas (svoris 0,134) ir trasų kokybė (svoris 0,125), o aplinkos estetiniai veiksniai bei maršruto kreivalinijiškumas turi mažesnę įtaką kasdienio susisiekimo kontekste. Parengta metodika leidžia sistemiškai vertinti dviračių takų jungtis rekreacinėse teritorijose ir gali būti taikoma miestų darnaus judumo planavimo srityje, siekiant skatinti dviračių naudojimą kasdienėms kelionėms.

Reikšminiai žodžiai: dviračių trasų planavimas, metodikos vertinimo kriterijai, dviračių eismo infrastruktūra, rekreacinės teritorijos, darnus judumas, ekspertinis vertinimas, daugiakriteris vertinimas, miestų planavimas.

Keywords:

bicycle path planning, evaluation criteria, cycling infrastructure, recreational areas, sustainable mobility, expert judgment, multicriteria evaluation, urban planning

How to Cite

Kasparavičienė, J., & Ušpalytė-Vitkūnienė, R. (2026). Methodology for planning bicycle path connections through urban recreational areas. Mokslas – Lietuvos ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 18. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2026.27116

Share

Published in Issue
September 10, 2026
Abstract Views
11

References

Ahmed, T., Pirdavani, A., Wets, G., & Janssens, D. (2024). Bicycle infrastructure design principles in urban bikeability indices: A systematic review. Sustainability, 16(6), Article 2545. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062545

Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A. M., González, V. I., & Henao, C. A. (2020). Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.010

Bai, Y., Bai, Y., Wang, R., Yang, T., Song, X., & Bai, B. (2023). Exploring associations between the built environment and cycling behaviour around urban greenways from a human-scale perspective. Land, 12(3), Article 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030619

Böcker, L., Dijst, M., & Faber, J. (2016). Weather, transport mode choices and emotional travel experiences. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.021

Buehler, R., & Dill, J. (2016). Bikeway networks: A review of effects on cycling. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908

Cervero, R., Denman, S., & Jin, Y. (2019). Network design, built and natural environments, and bicycle commuting: Evidence from British cities and towns. Transport Policy, 74, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.007

European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:640:FIN

Handy, S. (2018). Enough with the “D’s” already – Let’s Get Back to “A”. https://transfersmagazine.org/magazine-article/issue-1/enough-with-the-ds-already-lets-get-back-to-a/

Heinen, E., & Götschi, T. (2022). Chapter one – Cycling: Past, current and future. Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2022.04.001

Hong, J., McArthur, D. Ph., & Stewart, J. L. (2020). Can providing safe cycling infrastructure encourage people to cycle more when it rains? The use of crowdsourced cycling data (Strava). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 133, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.008

Jakimavičius, M., Burinskienė, M., Gusarovienė, M., & Podviezko, A. (2016). Assessing multiple criteria for rapid bus routes in the public transport system in Vilnius. Public Transport, 8, 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0146-7

Karolemeas, C., Vassi, A., Tsigdinos, S., & Bakogiannis, D. E. (2022). Measure the ability of cities to be biked via weighted parameters, using GIS tools. The case study of Zografou in Greece. Transportation Research Procedia, 62, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.008

Kendall, M. G. (1975). Rank correlation methods (4th ed.). Charles Griffin.

Lietuvos Respublikos aplinkos ministerija. (2015). Urbanizuotų teritorijų susisiekimo sistemų planavimo normos. https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/de/legalAct/832fadf074ed11e6b969d7ae07280e89

Lietuvos Respublikos susisiekimo ministerija. (2024). Dviračių ir pėsčiųjų eismo infrastruktūros planavimo ir projektavimo taisyklės. https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/4b1abe31ac3611efaae6a4c601761171?jfwid=n3y3fwa09

Lu, Y., Yang, Y., Sun, G., & Gou, Z. (2019). Associations between overhead-view and eye-level urban greenness and cycling behaviors. Cities, 88, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.003

Martin, A., Morciano, M., & Suhrcke, M. (2021). Determinants of bicycle commuting and the effect of bicycle infrastructure investment in London: Evidence from UK census microdata. Economics & Human Biology, 41, Article 100945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100945

McCreery-Phillips, S., & Heydari, S. (2023). Neighbourhood characteristics and bicycle commuting in the Greater London area. Transport Policy, 142, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.08.007

Miller, E. J. (2018). Accessibility: Measurement and application in transportation planning. Transport Reviews, 38(5), 551–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1492778

Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2007). Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation, 35, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9137-5

Stinson, M. A., & Bhat, C. R. (2005). A comparison of the route preferences of experienced and inexperienced bicycle commuters. In TRB 84th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers (No. 05-1434). ResearchGate.

Wahlgren, L., & Schantz, P. (2014). Exploring bikeability in a suburban metropolitan area using the active commuting route environment scale (ACRES). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(8), 8276–8300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110808276

Weikl, S., & Mayer, P. (2023). Data-driven quality assessment of cycling networks. Frontiers in Future Transportation, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffutr.2023.1127742

Zabielaitė-Skirmantė, M. ir Burinskienė, M. (2024, birželio 14 d.). Veiksnių, lemiančių pasirinkimą atlikti keliones dviračiais, ir eismo įvykių, susijusių su kelionėmis dviračiais, analizė. Iš 27-osios Jaunųjų mokslininkų konferencijos „Mokslas – Lietuvos ateitis“ teminės konferencijos Darni Aplinka straipsnių rinkinio (p. 1–9). Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas. https://doi.org/10.3846/da.2024.016

Zavadskas, E. K., & Vilutienė, T. (2006). A multiple criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block’s maintenance contractors: I–Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria. Building and Environment, 41(5), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.02.019

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2026-09-10

Issue

Section

Environmental Engineering / Aplinkos inžinerija

How to Cite

Kasparavičienė, J., & Ušpalytė-Vitkūnienė, R. (2026). Methodology for planning bicycle path connections through urban recreational areas. Mokslas – Lietuvos ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 18. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2026.27116

Share