Evaluating motivation of construction workers: a comparison of fuzzy rule-based model with the traditional expectancy theory

    Muluken Yeheyis Info
    Bahareh Reza Info
    Kasun Hewage Info
    Janaka Y. Ruwanpura Info
    Rehan Sadiq Info

Abstract

Measuring workers’ performance and the level of motivation is of paramount importance as the productivity of workers at a workplace primarily depends upon their level of motivation. However, measuring the level of workers’ motivation at workplace is not always straightforward because the workers’ motivation is a function of various personal and external factors. This paper proposes a fuzzy rule-based model for evaluating the motivation level of construction workers using their working patterns. The motivation level evaluated using the fuzzy rule-based model was compared with motivational levels determined by the traditional Vroom’s expectancy theory or Expectancy-Instrumentality-Va­lence (EIV) method. EIV method used questionnaire surveys and interviews to determine workers’ motivation. The results of fuzzy rule-based models aligned closely with the EIV model, especially for the middle range of motivation levels. Compared to traditional EIV model, the fuzzy rule-based system is simple to implement and found to be very pragmatic in construction field settings.

Keywords:

worker motivationworker motivation, construction productivity, expectancy theory, fuzzy set theory, fuzzy rule-based model

How to Cite

Evaluating motivation of construction workers: a comparison of fuzzy rule-based model with the traditional expectancy theory. (2016). Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(7), 862-873. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.914103

Share

Published in Issue
July 12, 2016
Abstract Views
1801

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2016-07-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Evaluating motivation of construction workers: a comparison of fuzzy rule-based model with the traditional expectancy theory. (2016). Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(7), 862-873. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.914103

Share