Share:


Architectural and urban transformations of large housing estate related to functional diversification: case of Kelenföld in Budapest

    Hlib Antypenko Affiliation
    ; Melinda Benkő   Affiliation

Abstract

Large housing estates (LHEs) is a global product of modern planning and architecture based on the concept of the functional city. However, during the last decades, these inherited mass housing neighborhoods have been gradually transformed in their social and physical context. Much of this change is due to functional diversification of LHEs following rising consummation demands. The objective of the research is to create a general simple typology discovering this phenomenon and providing a method to make case study analysis and comparative studies. How to classify functional diversification and morphological transformations in LHEs in general? What are the functional and morphological values that were preserved from modern development period and what are the new characteristics of contemporary transformations? What are the special characteristics of the functional diversification in a post-socialist city? Kelenföld case study from Budapest is introduced to test the typology by using local documents and fieldwork methods in architecture: mapping, morphological analysis, and photo making. Kelenföld is one of the best located and the first LHE in Budapest realized with large panel technology in the 60’s, being today intensively developed and favored by its users.

Keyword : Budapest, functional city, functional diversification, large housing estate, typology of transformation, urban renewal

How to Cite
Antypenko, H., & Benkő, M. (2022). Architectural and urban transformations of large housing estate related to functional diversification: case of Kelenföld in Budapest. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 46(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2022.17462
Published in Issue
Dec 14, 2022
Abstract Views
80
PDF Downloads
96
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Balla, R. (2021). Modern large housing estates in Budapest built after 1954 [Az 1954 után épült modern nagy lakótelepek Budapesten] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. BME, Budapest, Hungary.

Balla, R., Benkő, M., & Durosaiye, I. O. (2017). Mass housing estate location in relation to its livability: Budapest case study. Cities, Communities and Homes: Is the Urban Future Livable?, 192–203.

Benkő, M. (2015). Budapest’s large prefab housing estates: Urban values of yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Hungarian Studies, 29(1–2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1556/044.2015.29.1-2.2

Berman, M. (1982). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. Penguin. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgmvx

Dekker, K., Hall, S., van Kempen, R., & Tosics, I. (2005). Restructuring large housing estates in Europe. University of Bristol.

Engel, B. (2019). Mass housing in a socialist city: Heritage, values, and perspectives. Dom.

Fortepan. (2022). Images of Kelenföld. https://fortepan.hu/hu/photos/?q=kelenf%C3%B6ld

Glendining, M. (2021). Mass housing: Modern architecture and state power – A global history. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474229302

Gold, J. R. (1998). Creating the charter of Athens: CIAM and the functional city, 1933-43. Town Planning Review, 69(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.69.3.2357285302gl032l

Harbusch, G., Maurer, B., Pérez, M., Somer, K., & Weiss, D. (2014). Atlas of the functional city CIAM 4 and comparative urban analysis. Thoth.

Hirt, S. (2012). Mixed use by default: How the Europeans (don’t) zone. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412212451029

Jovanovic, M., & Ratkaj, I. (2014). Functional metamorphosis of New Belgrade. The Planning Review, 50(4), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2014.1007653

Karro, V. (1975). Novye industrialnye goroda: Opyt proektirovanija. Leningrad.

Kartashova, K., & Zhavoronkova, I. (1971). Stupenchataia sistema obsluzhivaniia naseleniia novykh zhylykh raionov. Tsentr Nauchno Tekhnicheskoi Informatsii po Grazhdanskomu Stroitel’stvu i Arkhitekture, Moscow.

Kovacs, Z., Egedy, T., & Szabó, T. (2018). Persistence or change: Divergent trajectories of large housing estates in Budapest, Hungary. In D. Hess, T. Tammaru, & M. van Ham (Eds.), Housing estates in Europe (pp. 91–214). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_9

Kropf, K. (2014). Ambiguity in the definition of built form. Urban Morphology, 18(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i1.3995

Losonczy, A., Balla, R., Antypenko, H., & Benkő, M. (2020). Re-shaping Budapest: Large housing estates and their (un)planned centers. Architektúra & Urbanizmus, 54(1–2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.31577/archandurb.2020.54.1-2.4

Metspalu, P., & Hess, D. B. (2018). Revisiting the role of architects in planning large-scale housing in the USSR: The birth of socialist residential districts in Tallinn, Estonia, 1957–1979. Planning Perspectives Journal, 33(3), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2017.1348974

Murie, A., van Kempen, R., & Knorr-Siedow, T. (2003). Large housing estates in Europe, general developments and theoretical background (RESTATE Report). Utrecht University.

Musterd, S., & van Kempen, R. (2005). Large-scale housing estates in European cities: Opinions of residents on recent developments (RESTATE Report). Utrecht University.

Neducin, D., Škoric, M., & Krkljes, M. (2019). Post-socialist development and rehabilitation of large housing estates in Central and Eastern Europe: A review. Tehnički vjesnik, 26(6), 1853–1860. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20181015174733

Othernity. (2021). Hungarian Pavilion – 17th International Architecture Exhibition La Biennale di Venezia. http://othernity.eu/

Pesti, M. (2019, October 21). Az antialvóváros kísérlete – A Kelenföldi városközpont. Lechner Tudásközpot. https://lechnerkozpont.hu/cikk/az-antialvovaros-kiserlete-a-kelenfoldi-varoskozpont

Power, A. (1997). Estates on the edge: The social consequences of mass housing in Northern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.

Struyk, R. (1996). Housing privatization in the former Soviet Bloc to 1995. Cities after Socialism, 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712733.ch6

Szabó, B., & Burneika, D. (2020). The impact of social structure and physical characteristics on housing estate renovation in postsocialist cities: Cases of Vilnius and Budapest. Geographia Polonica, 93(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0171

Treija, S., Bratuškins, U., & Bondars, E. (2013). Green open space in large scale housing estates: a place for challenge. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 36(4), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2012.753981

Yanitsky, O. (2009). Urbanization in the USSR: Theory, tendencies and policy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 10(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1986.tb00015.x