Polycentric creative communication:  the dispositive

Algis Mickūnas

doi:10.3846/cs.2018.6594

Polycentric creative communication: the dispositive

Algis Mickūnas Info

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.6594

Abstract

The essay explicates the polycentric awareness as a ground of communication with anyone, anytime, to the extent that all communication is a sense making process about something. This makes accessible “Others” from other times, present in texts which open communication through linguistic and cultural media. We read Plato and argue with him about justice, or debate the issue of beginning of the universe with astronomers. These two levels, polycentric and dialogical, is supplemented by a concrete analyses of body as an active and interactive dimension with many contemporary technical media, from film, television, Internet, and smart phones.

Article in English.

Policentrinė kūrybinė komunikacija: dispozityvumas

Santrauka

Straipsnyje gvildenamas policentrinis potyris kaip komunikacijos pagrindas su bet kuo, bet kada ir tuo lygmeniu, kuriuo bet kokia komunikacija suprantama kaip prasmė, kurianti kokį nors procesą. Dėl to tampa pasiekiami „Kiti“ iš kitų laikų, aprašomų tekstuose, atveriančiuose komunikaciją per lingvistines ir kultūrines medijas. Skaitome Platono tekstus ir ginčijamės su juo teisingumo klausimu arba diskutuojame apie visatos pradžią su astronomais. Šie du lygmenys – policentrinis ir dialoginis – papildomi konkrečiais tyrinėjimais, skirtais kūnui kaip aktyviai ir interaktyviai dimensijai, susietai su daugybe šiuolaikinių techninių medijų – pradedant filmais, televizija, internetu ir baigiant išmaniaisiais telefonais.

Reikšminiai žodžiai: komunikacija, medijos, kūniškumas, interaktyvumas, Kiti.

Keywords:

communication, media, bodyness, interactivity, Others

How to Cite

Mickūnas, A. (2018). Polycentric creative communication: the dispositive. Creativity Studies, 11(2), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.6594

Download Citation

Share

Published in Issue

December 6, 2018

Abstract Views

1095

PDF Downloads

833

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Althusser, L. (2005). For Marx. London: Verso.

Aristotle. (2008). Physics. Series: Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext[e].

Descartes, R. (1985). The philosophical writings of Descartes. Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dostoevsky, F. (2002). The brothers Karamazov. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Habermas, J. (1968). Erkenntniss und Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Incorporated.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Series: Theory and History of Literature. Vol. 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Mann, Th. (1995). The magic mountain. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2014). Phenomenology of perception. London and New York: Routledge.

Newton, I. (2010). The Principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy. New York: Snowball Publishing.

Nietzsche, F. (1974). The gay science with a prelude in rhymes and an appendix of songs. New York: Vintage Books.

Planck, M. (1969). Treatise on thermodynamics. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Plato. (2010). Dialogues of Plato. Series: Simon & Schuster Enriched Classic. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Sophocles. (2008). Electra. Series: Cambridge Translations from Greek Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

The Bhagavad Gita. (2007). Series: A Classic of Indian Spirituality. Tomales, CA: Nilgiri Press.

Tolstoy, L. (1994). Anna Karenina. New York: Random House, Inc.

Polycentric creative communication: the dispositive

Abstract

Keywords:

How to Cite

Share

License

References

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

Published

Issue

Section

Copyright

License

How to Cite

Share