Creative technological, educational, effective, and secure smartness of higher education institutions: the pilot study of the perspective of Estonian students

    Kate-Riin Kont Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.24226

Abstract

Since such a topic has not been investigated in Estonia before, the author decided to conduct a pilot study in preparation for the main study. The overall goal of the current pilot study is to gain first understanding of students’ perspectives on both technological and educational technological applications in the context of a smart campus, as well as the privacy aspects of different solutions. The survey took place from 01.02.2024 to 10.06.2024. The link to the questionnaire was distributed through the student councils and communication offices of Estonian public universities and universities of applied sciences. A total of 286 students from all over Estonia answered the questionnaire.

Keywords:

smart campus, smart technology, sustainability, effectiveness, security, privacy
Published in Issue
September 21, 2026
Abstract Views
26

How to Cite

Kont, K.-R. (2026). Creative technological, educational, effective, and secure smartness of higher education institutions: the pilot study of the perspective of Estonian students. Creativity Studies, 19(2), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.24226

Share

References

Ben-Naim, D. (2017). What makes a smart course ‘smart’? https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-01-13-what-makes-a-smart-course-smart

Chen, Y., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Gao, L. (2011). The design and implementation of intelligent campus security tracking system based on RFID and ZigBee. In The 2011 Second International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering (pp. 1749–1752), Hohhot. https://doi.org/10.1109/MACE.2011.5987296

Chen, Y., Zhang, R., Shang, X., & Zhang, S. (2013). An intelligent campus space model based on the service encapsulation. In Z. Zhang, Zhang, R., & Zhang, J. (ed.), Liss 2012 (ed. 127, pp. 919–923). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32054-5_128

Coccoli, M., Guercio, A., Maresca, P., & Stanganelli, L. (2014). Smarter universities: A vision for the fast changing digital era. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 25(6), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.09.007

Coccoli, M., Maresca, P., Stanganelli, L., & Guercio, A. (2015). An experience of collaboration using a PaaS for the smarter university model. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 31, 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.10.014

Conti, F., Pullini, A., & Benini, L. (2014). Brain-inspired classroom occupancy monitoring on a low-power mobile platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 610–615). Columbus, OH, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2014.95

De Angelis, E., Ciribini, A. L. C., Tagliabue, L. C., & Paneroni, M. (2015). The brescia smart campus demonstrator. Renovation toward a zero energy classroom building. Procedia Engineering, 118, 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.508

Flauzac, O., González, C., Hachani, A., & Nolot, F. (2015, March). SDN based architecture for IoT and improvement of the security. In 2015 IEEE 29th international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops (pp. 688–693). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2015.110

Galego, D., Giovannella, C., & Mealha, O. (2016). Determination of the smartness of a university campus: The case study of Aveiro. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.336

Gudkova, S. A., Treshina, I. V., Malashchenko, M. V., Yakusheva, T. S., & Dayneko, M. V. (2023). The concept of new-generation lecturers for smart universities: Case study and trends. In V. L. Uskov, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (eds), Smart Education and e-Learning – Smart University. KES-SEEL 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (Vol. 355). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2993-1_13

Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, Á., Villarán-Molina, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Augmented reality-based simulators as discovery learning tools: An empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(3), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2379712

Kwok, L.-F. (2015). A vision for the development of i-campus. Smart Learning Environments, 2, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-015-0009-8

Přibyl, O., Opasanon, S., & Horak, T. (2018). Student perception of smart campus: A case study of Czech Republic and Thailand. In 2018 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP) (pp. 1–7), Czech Republic. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCSP.2018.8402669

Sánchez-Torres, B., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. A., Rico-Bautista, D. W., & Guerrero, C. D. (2018). Smart campus: Trends in cybersecurity and future development. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 27(47), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v27.n47.2018.7807

Sanik, M. E., Zulkifli, N. M., Hussin, F. N. I., & Haekal, N. S. M. (2021). Feasibility Study of smart campus as downscaled smart city. Multidisciplinary Applied Research and Innovation, 2(2), 79–86.

Silva-da-Nóbrega, P. I., Chim-Miki, A. F., & Castillo-Palacio, M. (2022). A smart campus framework: Challenges and opportunities for education based on the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14(15), Article 9640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159640

Zhang, A., & Feng, X. (2022). The concept analysis of smart teaching. Nurse Education Today, 112, Article 105329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105329

Zhang, Y., Dong, Z. Y., Yip, C., & Swift, S. (2020). Smart campus: A user case study in Hong Kong. IET Smart Cities, 2(3), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smc.2020.0047

Zhou, Y., Sun, L., Hu, X., & Ma, L. (2021). Clustering and statistical analyses of electricity consumption for university dormitories: A case study from China. Energy and Buildings, 245, Article 110862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110862

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2026-09-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kont, K.-R. (2026). Creative technological, educational, effective, and secure smartness of higher education institutions: the pilot study of the perspective of Estonian students. Creativity Studies, 19(2), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.24226

Share