The meaning of being a creative teacher through discovering
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.23072Abstract
The research problem relates to the lack of research in terms of perceiving the meaning of being a creative teacher. The study aimed to highlight the phenomenological structure meaning of being a creative teacher. The methodology was based on the approach of integral phenomenology. A total of 26 interviews were obtained. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed by integrating approaches of practical and epistemological phenomenologies. Findings showed that for teachers the core component in the phenomenological meaning of being a creative teacher was discovering. The conclusions summarized that discovering within the phenomenological structure of being a creative teacher involves pursuing, updating, engaging, being spontaneous, and experimenting.
Keywords:
creative teacher, discovering, integrative phenomenology, interview, school, studentHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alexander, R. (2008). Essays on pedagogy. Routledge.
Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x
Armfield, Sh. W. J. (2007). A descriptive case study of teaching and learning in an innovative middle school program [PhD/Doctoral Thesis, Northern Arizona University]. United States. https://legacy.nau.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/07/Armfield_Dissertation_PDF.pdf
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.027
Beghetto, R. A. (2020). On creative thinking in education: Eight questions, eight answers. Future EDge: NSW Department of Education, 1, 48–71.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
Boyle, G. J. (1983). Critical review of state-trait curiosity test development. Motivation and Emotion, 7, 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991647
Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Creativity beliefs, creative personality and creativity-fostering practices of gifted education teachers and regular class teachers in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.10.003
Chen, H.-H., & Yuan, Y.-H. (2021). The study of the relationships of teacher’s creative teaching, imagination, and principal’s visionary leadership. Sage Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211029932
Chen, X., & Padilla, A. M. (2022). Emotions and Creativity as predictors of resilience among L3 learners in the Chinese educational context. Current Psychology, 41, 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00581-7
Daugela, M., & Zydziunaite, V. (2024). Academic self-realization of researchers in higher education: Phenomenological research-based evidence. Education Sciences, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080823
Delmar, Ch. (2006). The phenomenology of life phenomena – in a nursing context. Nursing Philosophy, 7(4), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00282.x
Deverell, A., & Moore, S. (2014). Releasing creativity in teaching and learning: The potential role of organisational legitimacy and increased dialogue. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.771968
Hariri, A., Muslim, S., Ekohariadi, E., & Yundra, E. (2021). The effect of creative thinking in improving decision making. Management Science Letters, 11, 1765–1770. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2021.2.006
Jaušovec, N., & Jaušovec, K. (2011). Brain, creativity, and education. The Open Education Journal, 4, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874920801104010050
Jeffrey, B. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: Towards a common discourse and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640600866015
Joubert, M. M. (2007). The art of creative teaching: NACCCE and beyond. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 17–34). Continuum.
Küpers, W. (2005). Phenomenology of embodied implicit and narrative knowing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(6), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510630006
Küpers, W. M. (2009). The status and relevance of phenomenology for integral research: Or why phenomenology is more and different than an “Upper Left” or “Zone #1” affair. Integral Review, 5(1), 51–95.
Manen, van M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology and Practice, 1(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19803
Manen, van M. (2014). Developing qualitative inquiry. Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. J. Morse (Series Ed.). Routledge.
Manen, van M., & Manen, van M. (2021). Doing phenomenological research and writing. Qualitative Health Research, 31(6), 1069–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211003058
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Nkalo Ruth, U., Dick, M. A., & Chioma, D. A. (2021). Influence of teachers creativity on the academic performance of senior secondary school students in port Harcourt Metropolis: Implication for counselling. International Journal of Innovative Education Research, 9(3), 84–99.
Pishghadam, R., Ghorbani Nejad, T., & Shayesteh, Sh. (2012). Creativity and its relationship with teacher success. BELT Journal, 3(2), 204–216.
Stoppel, H., & Czarnocha, B. (2017). Creativity, Aha! moments and teaching-research. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), ICME-13 monographs. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 689–690). G. Kaiser (Series Ed.), Hamburg, Germany. Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_108
Stringaris, A. K., Medford, N., Giora, R., Giampietro, V. C., Brammer, M. J., & David, A. S. (2006). How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: The role of the right frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 33(2), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.057
Težak, K. (2015). Creative thinking and decision-making processes in EFL creative writing. English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 12(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.12.2.161-174
Treffinger, D. J. (2009). Myth 5: Creativity is too difficult to measure. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 245–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346829
Vasudevan, H. (2013). The influence of teachers’ creativity, attitude and commitment on students’ proficiency of the English language. IOSR Journal of Research and Method in Education, 1(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0121219
Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2016). Assessing progression in creative and critical thinking skills [PowerPoint slides]. Slideshare.net. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/assessing-progression-in-creativity-and-critical-thinking-skills-by-stphan-vincentlancrin-oecd/72337679#2
Woods, P. (2004). Teaching and learning in the new millenium. In C. Sugrue & Ch. Day (Eds.), Developing teachers and teaching practice: International research perspectives (pp. 73–91). Routledge/Falmer.
Žydžiūnaitė, V., & Arce, A. (2021). Being an innovative and creative teacher: Passion-driven professional duty. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.14087
Žydžiūnaitė, V., Butanavičius, V., Jurgilė, V., & Kaminskienė, L. (2022). Leadership within the phenomenological structure of teacher creativity. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.819848
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.