Metaphor as a marker of creativity in digital visual art: aspect of socio-cultural communication
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.22931Abstract
This article investigates metaphor as a key element of creative digital visual art within the context of Kazakhstan’s contemporary art scene. The authors analyse the role of metaphor in shaping the aesthetic and communicative potential of works by Kazakhstani digital artists, focusing on materials shared on social media platforms. Special attention is given to metaphors rooted in national cultural codes, such as the yurt, camel, traditional Kazakh attire, and other symbols, and their diverse interpretations. The author highlight that creative metaphorical thinking becomes particularly active during periods of civic engagement. The yurt, for instance, serves as a metaphorical image that unveils meanings related to national identity, historical heritage, and the future development of Kazakh society. Metaphor functions as an indicator of effective large-scale communication, involving audiences in co-creation and interpretation of significant phenomena, including natural disasters and social tragedies. In this context, metaphor contributes to the interactivity of digital art. The article also emphasizes the importance of social media as a platform for sharing works with vivid metaphorical imagery and discusses the interdependence of financial support, technological innovation, and the qualitative growth of creative digital visual art.
Keywords:
creativity, digital visual art, interactivity, Kazakhstani art, national identity, metaphor, visual culture, social mediaHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adorno, Th. W. (2015). Theory and history of literature: Vol. 88. Aesthetic theory. G. Adorno, R. Tiedemann, & R. Hullot-Kentor (Eds.). University of Minnesota Press.
Arutyunova, N. (1990). Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary]. In V. N. IArtseva (Ed.-in-Chief), Sovetskaya entsiklopediya (p. 296). Sovetskaya entsiklopediya.
Bekbass, A. [@bekbass_art]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/bekbass_art/?hl=en
Comic Con Astana. (2024). Comic Con Astana 2024. https://comicconastana.kz/en
Daly-Lipe, P. (2011). Myth, magic, and metaphor: A journey into the heart of creativity. Artists Rights Society/ADAGP.
Danabol [@bdanabol]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/bdanabol/?hl=en
Dean Paint [@deanpaint]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Received January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/deanpaint/
Dostoevsky, F. (2003). The brothers Karamazov. Penguin Classics.
Dilman, M. [@marat_dilman]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/marat_dilman/?hl=en
Efes Art Space [@efesartspace]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/efesartspace/
Fedoseeva, D. A. (2017). Kognitivnaya teoriya metafory i obzor imbodiment-podkhoda k poznaniyu [Cognitive theory of metaphor and an overview of the imbodiment approach to cognition]. METOD: Moskovskiy ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin, 7, 306–314.
Go Viral Central Asia [@goviral.ca]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/goviral.ca/
Grigor’ev, S. L. (2022). Metafora digital’noy peshhery v kontseptual’nykh interpretatsiyakh ekrannoy kul’tury [The digital cave metaphor in conceptual interpretations of screen culture]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura, 3(95), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.24158/fik.2022.3.28
Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (Eds.). (2012). Digital anthropology. BERG.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1984). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Nauryz Fest [@nauryz.fest]. (2024). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved December 29, 2025, from https://www.instagram.com/nauryz.fest/
Ospan, A. [@ospanali]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/p/DS8ZwpxjlNU/
Plato. (2003). Cambridge texts in the history of political thought. The Republic. G. R. F. Ferrari (Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ryzhenkova, V. V. (2020). Svidetel’stvo budushchego: tsifrovoi povorot v filosofii media i gibridnom iskusstve [Witnessing the future: the digital turn in media philosophy and hybrid art]. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i istorii iskusstva, 10, 641–648.
Tabiyev, T. [@chequeredman]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/chequeredman/?hl=en
Tereze [@tereze_ala]. (2026). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved January 2, 2026, from https://www.instagram.com/tereze_ala/
View article in other formats
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.