The creativity of trauma representation through monuments

    Viktorija Rimaitė-Beržiūnienė Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.22450

Abstract

Based on a multimodal discourse analysis, the article explains how non-martyrological monuments dedicated to the anti-Soviet resistance reflect emerging tensions regarding the role of certain partisan movement figures during the Holocaust. The search for an answer to this question is encouraged by public debates sparking off every now and then on the role of some participants in the partisan movement during the Nazi occupation and, more specifically, during the Holocaust. The article links monuments as creative collective memory practices to the theoretical perspective of ontological security with the view that monuments are one of the practices creating a narrative that supports ontological security and connects the past (collective memory) with the present and the future.

Keywords:

ontological security, monuments, memorials, collective memory, state identity
Published in Issue
November 13, 2026
Abstract Views
25

How to Cite

Rimaitė-Beržiūnienė, V. (2026). The creativity of trauma representation through monuments. Creativity Studies, 19(2), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.22450

Share

References

Abousnnouga, G., & Machin, D. (2010). Analysing the language of war monuments. Visual Communication, 9(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357210369884

Akmenytė-Ruzgienė, V. (2018). “Lietuvos valstybės simboliai.” In Dvigubas kryžius. Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. https://www.lrs.lt/sip/portal.show?p_r=38115&p_k=1

Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 65, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/488538

Bachleitner, K. (2021). Collective memory in international relations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895363.001.0001

Belavusau, U. (2018). The rise of memory laws in Poland: An adequate tool to counter historical disinformation? Security and Human Rights, 29, 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02901011

Budrytė, D. (2021). Memory politics and the study of crises in international relations: Insights from Ukraine and Lithuania. Journal of International Relations and Development, 24, 980–1000. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111000596-002

Budrytė, D. (2022). Mnemonic conflicts and cooperation in memory politics: Development of narratives about historical traumas in Lithuania after 1991. Parlamento studijos, 1(32), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.51740/PS.32.2

Croft, S., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2017). Fit for purpose? Fitting ontological security studies ‘into’ the discipline of international relations: Towards a vernacular turn. Cooperation and Conflict, 52(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653159

David, L. (2019). Policing memory in Bosnia: Ontological security and international administration of memorialization policies. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 32(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-018-9305-y

Davoliūtė, V. (2017). Heroes, villains and matters of state: The partisan and popular memory in Lithuania. Cultures of History Forum. http://www.cultures-of-history.uni-jena.de/debates/lithuania/heroes-villains-and-matters-of-state-thepartisan-and-popular-memory-in-lithuania/

Gailius, B. (2009). 1944–1953 m. partizanų karas šiuolaikinėje Lietuvos istorinėje, politinėje ir teisinėje kultūroje [Doctoral dissertation, Vilnius University]. Vilnius University Library.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.

Giddens, A. (2000). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age [Modernybė ir asmens tapatumas: Asmuo ir visuomenė vėlyvojoje modernybėje]. Pradai.

Gustafsson, K. (2014). Memory politics and ontological security in Sino-Japanese relations. Asian Studies Review, 38(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2013.852156

Jakulytė-Vasil, M. (2013). Lietuvos Holokausto paminklų istorija ir jų įtaka istorinei atminčiai. Kultūros paminklai, 17, 133–143.

Jurkutė, M. (2016). Lietuvos partizanų karas: sovietinis, vietinis ir išeivijos pasakojimai [Doctoral dissertation, Vilnius University]. Lituanistika Database.

Kramer, M. (2017). Public memory and the difficulty of overcoming the communist legacy: Poland and Russia in comparative perspective. In T. Piffer & V. Zubok (Eds.), Totalitarian societies and democratic transition: Essays in memory of Victor Zaslavsky (pp. 385–421). CEU Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789633861325-017

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

Laing, R. D. (1960). The divided self: An existential study in sanity and madness. Penguin Books.

Mälksoo, M. (2015). Memory must be defended: Beyond the politics of mnemonical security. Security Dialogue, 46(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614552549

Mälksoo, M. (2021). Militant memory in international relations: Mnemonical status anxiety and memory laws in Eastern Europe. Review of International Studies, 47(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000140

Merewether, C. (1999). The rise and fall of monuments. Grand Street, 68, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/25008505

Noreika, D. (2018). Lietuvos partizanai epochų kontekstuose: Vanagas, Holokaustas ir faktai. In A. Astramskas & D. Juzėnas (Eds.), Iš Panevėžio praeities: Miško broliai (pp. 8–28). Panevėžio kraštotyros muziejus.

Petrauskienė, A. (2017). Partizaninio karo vietos: įamžinimas ir įpaveldinimas nepriklausomoje Lietuvoje [Doctoral dissertation, Vilnius University]. Lituanistika Database.

Pocius, M. (2022). Juozas Krikštaponis (Krištaponis) – dalyvavimo Holokauste ir istorinio atminimo problema. Genocidas ir rezistencija, 1(51), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.61903/GR.2022.101

Rimaitė-Beržiūnienė, V. (2022). Paminklai Lietuvoje: valstybės tapatybės konstravimas [Monuments in Lithuania: Shaping state identity] [PhD dissertation, Vilnius University].

Subotić, J. (2018). Political memory, ontological security and Holocaust remembrance in post-communist Europe. European Security, 27(3), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497980

Trimonienė, R. (2006). Monuments commemorating the victims of Soviet genocide and participants in the resistance in Lithuania [Master’s thesis, Vilnius University].

Wozniak, K. H. (2016). Ontological insecurity, racial tension, and confidence in the police in the shadow of urban unrest. Sociological Forum, 31(4), 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12296

Young, J. E. (1993). The texture of memory: Holocaust memorials and meanings. Yale University Press.

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2026-11-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rimaitė-Beržiūnienė, V. (2026). The creativity of trauma representation through monuments. Creativity Studies, 19(2), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.22450

Share