Techno-creativity and authentic leadership: creativity, technology, and artistic practice intertwined

    Marija Griniuk Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.20122

Abstract

Through my work as an artist, educator, and activist, I aim to promote the interconnectedness of arts, management, creativity, curating, research, and technology by developing courses for art academies, art students, and interdisciplinary students at universities. I believe that future university and art academy education will increasingly integrate interdisciplinarity, combining fields such as management, creativity, technology (including artificial intelligence), curating, and other disciplines. This approach aligns with the interdisciplinary nature of professional life after graduation, whether one pursues a career as an artist or as a director of an institution. I reference both the art academy and university environments due to my experience as a lecturer in both settings. The article explores the relationship between authentic leadership and creativity within the context of university pedagogy, utilizing a reflexive research method based on a case study of creativity education. This case study focuses solely on the university environment, specifically on teaching creativity to interdisciplinary groups of students. My experience as a lecturer contains teaching artists, performers, and interdisciplinary students at both the Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts levels. Data includes my notes as a facilitator-lecturer, as well as the creative output and feedback from the interdisciplinary student groups. This data is analyzed using qualitative methods. The case study, derived from a Digital Creativity course, is examined speculatively to assess how the skills acquired may impact students post-graduation. As I was not in contact with students after the course ended, observations are limited to the processes observed during the course itself. The research question addressed is: how can digital learning of authentic leadership and creativity be facilitated within university pedagogy to create a safe and empathetic learning environment for students? Leadership is discussed from the perspective of authentic leadership and its relationship to creativity. Digital literacy is framed as critical thinking and responsibility in the context of collaboration with non-human entities, such as artificial intelligence. This study is relevant for university and art academy professionals working in cross-disciplinary contexts related to authentic leadership and creativity.

Keywords:

art, creativity, education, leadership, technology, university pedagogy

How to Cite

Griniuk, M. (2026). Techno-creativity and authentic leadership: creativity, technology, and artistic practice intertwined. Creativity Studies, 19(1), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.20122

Share

Published in Issue
March 25, 2026
Abstract Views
12

References

Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791

Bonetto, E., Arciszewski, Th., Pichot, N., Pavani, J.-B., Guiller, Th., Girandola, F., & Bonnardel, N. (2024). Boosting scientific creativity among researchers: How efficient are creativity trainings? Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 11(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2024-0007

Bono, de E. (1999). Six thinking hats. Little, Brown and Company.

Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Richard, P., Burkhardt, J.-M., Frantz, B., & Lubart, T. (2020). The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: An exploratory study. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712162

Burgsteiner, H., Kandlhofer, M., & Steinbauer, G. (2016). iRobot: Teaching the basics of artificial intelligence in high schools. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 30(1), 4126–4127. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9864

Byrge, Ch., & Hansen, S. (2009). The creative platform: A new paradigm for teaching creativity. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 18, 33–50.

Cory Robinson, S. (2020). Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI). Technology in Society, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101421

Design Council. (2026). Framework for innovation. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/framework-for-innovation/

Duarte, A. P., Ribeiro, N., Semedo, A. S., & Roque Gomes, D. (2021). Authentic leadership and improved individual performance: Affective commitment and individual creativity’s sequential mediation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675749

Ermine, J.-L. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurship, management series. Innovation and technology set. Knowledge management: The creative loop (Vol. 5). ISTE Ltd./John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using our selves in research. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2006). Truth and method. Continuum.

Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020961763

Griniuk, M., & Brisson Mosich, T. (2022). Transcorporeal writing: The interconnectedness between random stimuli in enhancing creativity training and the involvement of AI in the practice of writing. In P. Parviainen (Ed.), Nivel 17 Publication Series of the Theatre Academy, University of the Arts Helsinki. The 7th Colloquium on Artistic Research in Performing Arts. Proceedings of Carpa7: Elastic Writing in Artistic Research, Helsinki, Finland. https://nivel.teak.fi/carpa7/transcorporeal-writing/

Johnson, S. L. (2019). Authentic leadership theory and practical applications in nuclear medicine. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 47(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.118.222851

Kandlhofer, M., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., & Huber, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, Pennsylvania, United States. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757570

Kivunja, Ch. (2015). Using de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats model to teach critical thinking and problem solving skills essential for success in the 21st Century economy. Creative Education, 6(3), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.63037

Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.004

Łapińska, J. (2020). Creativity of human and non-human matter interwoven: Autonomous sensory meridian response videos in a posthuman perspective. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11703

Mosely, G., Wright, N., & Wrigley, C. (2018). Facilitating design thinking: A comparison of design expertise. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.004

Pires, L., & Varajão, J. (2024). Creativity as a topic in project management – a scoping review and directions for research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101477

Speranza, C. R., & Pierce, A. (2019). Development of a personal leadership philosophy: An experiential and reflective opportunity in the graduate classroom. Journal of Leadership Education, 18(3), 167–175.

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

Thompson, L., & Mimno, D. (2017). Computational cut-ups: The influence of Dada. The Journal of Modern Periodical Studies, 8(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.5325/jmodeperistud.8.2.0179

Thompson, R. L. (2004). The automatic hand: Spiritualism, psychoanalysis, surrealism. Invisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Culture, 7. https://doi.org/10.47761/494a02f6.bbff141a

Timbadia, V. A., & Khavekar, R. S. (2016). Review on creativity techniques for product development. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 8(4), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.18311/gjeis/2016/15778

Tsz Kit Ng, D., Ka Lok Leung, J., Chu, K. W. S., & Shen Qiao, M. (2021a). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487

Tsz Kit Ng, D., Ka Lok Leung, J., Kai Wah Chu, S., & Shen Qiao, M. (2021b). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2026-03-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Griniuk, M. (2026). Techno-creativity and authentic leadership: creativity, technology, and artistic practice intertwined. Creativity Studies, 19(1), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2026.20122

Share