Share:


Creativity and visuality of closed spaces: the case of Ettore Scola

    Dario Martinelli   Affiliation

Abstract

The article seeks to discuss a particular stylistic tendency, within audiovisuality, to contextualize narration and themes within closed (and often small) places – a tendency which has been given the name of claustrophilia. While particularly suitable to genres like horrors and thrillers, where the closed space often takes sinister and threatening connotations, claustrophilia may also appear in a more positive light, as a metaphor of shelter and safety, and has been in fact represented in all kind of ways. Within this picture, and throughout all its history, Italian cinema has often shown a remarkable attention for claustrophiliac representations. As a consequence, the focus of the article will be the director Ettore Scola, a figure specialized in this approach, and particularly the case study of his 1977 release A Special Day (in Italian: Una giornata particolare), one of his most celebrated works, and a well-known one at international level, due also to its Academy Awards candidature and Golden Globe Awards win.

Keyword : A Special Day, audiovisuality, claustrophilia, Ettore Scola, fascism, homophobia, Italian cinema, M.A.P. model, sexism, visuality

How to Cite
Martinelli, D. (2022). Creativity and visuality of closed spaces: the case of Ettore Scola. Creativity Studies, 15(2), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.15539
Published in Issue
Apr 22, 2022
Abstract Views
135
PDF Downloads
119
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Boccaccio, G. (2003). Penguin classics. The Decameron. Penguin Books.

Brunet, C. (2012). Champs visuels. Le monde d’Ettore Scola: La famille, la politique, l’histoire. P.-J. Benghozi, R. Moine, B. Péquignot, & G. Soulez (Series Eds.). L’Harmattan.

Bruni, S., & D’Angelo, M. C. (2008). Una giornata particolare: Ettore Scola. Guerra Edizioni.

Chaucer, G. (2003). Penguin classics. The Canterbury tales. Penguin Books.

Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350251977

Greimas, A. J. (1989). Figurative semiotics and the semiotics of the plastic arts: Preface to a postface. New Literary History, 20(3), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.2307/469358

Kezich, T., & Levantesi, A. (Eds.). (2003). Una giornata particolare di Ettore Scola: Incontrarsi e dirsi addio nella Roma del ‘38. Edizioni Lindau.

Lanzoni, R., & Bowen, E. (Eds.). (2020). Contemporary approches to film and media series. The cinema of Ettore Scola. B. K. Grant (General Ed.). Wayne State University Press.

Marcus, M. (2020). Persistence of vision: Realism and the popular in Italian cinema of the New Millennium. In J. Luzzi (Ed.), Italian Cinema: From the silent screen to the digital image (pp. 104–120). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501302640.0012

Martinelli, D. (2020). What you see is what you hear: Creativity and communication in audiovisual texts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32594-7

Merriam-Webster. (2022). Claustrophilia. https://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/claustrophilia

Moscati, I. (2017). Ettore Scola e la commedia degli italiani. C’eravamo tanto amati? Ediesse.

Saussure, de F. (2016). Petite Biblio Payot Classique. Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.

Santi, de P. M., & Vittori, R. (1987). I film di Ettore Scola. Gremese Editore.

Sesti, M. (1994). Nuovo cinema italiano. Gli autori, i film, le idee. Theoria.

Zagarrio, V. (1998). Cinema italiano anni novanta. Marsilio Editori.