Share:


Designcommunication – a facilitator of creativity for all

    Daniella Dominika Galla   Affiliation
    ; Dóra Horváth   Affiliation
    ; Attila Róbert Cosovan   Affiliation

Abstract

Our goal is to introduce the term designcommunication written in one word, a creative, academically based design approach combining theory and practical experience as good as possible in various application settings, be it education, scientific research, concept, product or system development. Designcommunication provides a highly flexible framework and a sound methodological base beyond the familiar. Designcommunication, in other words, creating a connection as designing, is an approach that uses a holistic triple relation framework of opposing dimensions: material–immaterial, permanent–variable and survival–subsistence–development relations. This framework of relations is available and possibly applicable to anyone regardless of level and area of education. Introducing such a design approach to education opens new horizons of creative cooperation, as designcommunication facilitates the development of creativity, collaboration and communication as increasingly valued soft skills.

Keyword : cooperation, creativity, design approach, designcommunication, education for creativity, infographics, soft skills, visual expression

How to Cite
Galla, D. D., Horváth, D., & Cosovan, A. R. (2024). Designcommunication – a facilitator of creativity for all. Creativity Studies, 17(1), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2024.15363
Published in Issue
May 30, 2024
Abstract Views
302
PDF Downloads
277
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Aakhus, M. (2007). Communication as design. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196383

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations (Harvard Business School Background Note no. 9-396-239). https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4927750/mod_resource/content/0/Creativity%20and%20Innovation%20in%20Organizations.pdf

Angyal, Á. (2007). A felismerés és annak 23-féle támogatása. Vezetéstudomány, 38(12), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2007.12.01

Benkler, Y. (2007). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.

Bergström, B. (2008). Essentials of visual communication. Laurence King Publishing.

Boland, R. J., & Collopy, F. (Eds.). (2004). Managing as designing. Stanford University Press.

Boonpracha, J. (2022). Arts and culture as creative learning of students through cultural product design. Creativity Studies, 15(2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.14307

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review. https://readings.design/PDF/Tim%20Brown,%20Design%20Thinking.pdf

Bury, J., & Masuzawa, Y. (2018). Non‐hierarchical learning: Sharing knowledge, power and outcomes. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 7(1), 32–51.

Cosovan, A. (2009). DISCO: Co&Co Communication. CO&CO Communication.

Cosovan, A. (2015, 9 May–24 November). The sustainable identity of clichés. In K. German (Ed.), Sustainable Identities. International Art Exhibition La Biennale di Venezia 56 (pp. 94–99). Hungarian Pavilion, Venice, Italy. Ludwig Museum Budapest/Office of the National Commissioner of Hungary.

Cosovan, A., Horváth, D., & Mitev, A. (2018). A designkommunikáció antropológiai megközelítése: a kreatív alkotói kapcsolatteremtés rítusa. Replika, 106–107(1–2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.32564/106-107.14

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8

Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Digby, R., Howe, A., Collier, Ch., & Hay, P. (2014). The roles and development needs of teachers to promote creativity: A systematic review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.003

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of “Design Thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006

Green, M., & Somerville, M. (2015). Sustainability education: Researching practice in primary schools. Environmental Education Research, 21(6), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.923382

Gregory, R. L. (1978). World university library. Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Henriksen, D., Heywood, W., & Gruber, N. (2022). Meditate to create: Mindfulness and creativity in an arts and design learning context. Creativity Studies, 15(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.13206

Horváth, D., Cosovan, A., Csordás, T., Horváth, D., & Mitev, A. (2018a, 1–2 August). Beyond the scope of design thinking: DesignCommunication. In Next Wave: The 21st DMI: Academic Design Management Conference Proceedings (pp. 653–662). Ravensbourne University London. Design Management Institute.

Horváth, D., Cosovan, A., Horváth, D., & Lachin, N. (2018b). Tanulás-munka interface. A valós idejű találkozások jelentősége a digitális oktatási környezetben. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, 49(12), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2018.12.08

Huggins, V., & Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2015). Education for sustainable development through international partnerships. Early Education Journal, 76, 14–15.

Hungarian Intellectual Property Office. (2008). International trademark publications I. Hungarian Gazette for Patents and Trade Marks, 113(12/I). https://www.sztnh.gov.hu/kiadv/szkv/200812a-pdf/10_Nki_vedjegy_I_0812.pdf

Kepes, G. (1995). Language of vision. Dover Publications, Inc.

Lee, H.-K., & Park, J. E. (2022). Digital responsibility insights from a cross-cultural design thinking workshop for creativity. Creativity Studies, 15(2), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.14063

Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (2009). Collaborative teaching for teacher educators – what does the research say? Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(4), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.009

Papanek, V. (1973). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Bantam Books.

Park, W., & Lee, H.-K. (2021). Creative integration of design thinking and strategic thinking in a design education framework. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.13700

Pye, D. (2007). The nature and aesthetics of design. A&C Black Visual Arts.

Raelin, J. A. (2016). Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership, 12(2), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715014558076

Rinaldi, A. (2009). Science Wikinomics: Mass networking through the web creates new forms of scientific collaboration. EMBO Reports, 10(5), 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.79

Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929

Sahlberg, P., & Oldroyd, D. (2010). Pedagogy for economic competitiveness and sustainable development. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01429.x

Suryanto, H., Degeng, I. N. S., Djatmika, E. T., & Kuswandi, D. (2021). The effect of creative problem solving with the intervention social skills on the performance of creative tasks. Creativity Studies, 14(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.12364

szelidhaz.blogspot.com. (2024). Szelíd ember, szelíd ház. http://szelidhaz.blogspot.com/p/prezentacio.html

Zurcher, B. (1988). Georges Braque: Life and work. Rizzoli.

Žydžiūnaitė, V., & Arce, A. (2021). Being an innovative and creative teacher: Passion-driven professional duty. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.14087