Share:


Arts and culture as creative learning of students through cultural product design

    Jong Boonpracha   Affiliation

Abstract

The study explores whether a design activity could promote creative learning expression and development among students regarding arts and culture issues through cultural product design. Therefore, students engage in designing a cultural product model. The study aims to analyze their ability to develop arts and culture through sketches and an appearance model. The research project was conducted to observe students (aged 18–20 years) as they negotiated and shared creative ideas during the process of cultural product design, interaction with fellow students, and the design presentation. The results indicate that design activities significantly contributed to students’arts and culture learning by developing creative ideas through cultural product design. Moreover, students developed reasoning, communication, and collaboration skills during the development of their work.

Keyword : arts and culture, creative learning, creativity, cultural product design, cultural product model, design activity

How to Cite
Boonpracha, J. (2022). Arts and culture as creative learning of students through cultural product design. Creativity Studies, 15(2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.14307
Published in Issue
Apr 19, 2022
Abstract Views
56
PDF Downloads
57
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Albrecht, D., Lupton, E., & Skov Holt, S. (2000). Design culture now: National design triennial. Princeton Architectural Press.

Asino, T. I., Giacumo, L. A., & Chen, V. (2017). Culture as a design “Next”: Theoretical frameworks to guide new design, development, and research of learning environments. The Design Journal: An International Journal for All Aspects of Design, 20, 875–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353033

Barlex, D. (2006). Pedagogy to promote reflection and understanding in school technology-courses. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining Technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework (pp. 179–196). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053_13

Birkeland, J. (2002). Design for sustainability: A sourcebook of integrated eco-logical solutions. Earthscan Publications Limited.

Boess, S., & Kanis, H. (2008). Meaning in product use: A design perspective. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 305–332). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50015-0

Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Collins Publishers.

Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Bumroongrak, V. (2012). Wattanatham Thang kang Suksa Lae Kan Pattana. Fine Arts Department.

Busch, A. (Ed.). (2002). Design is… words, things, people, buildings, and places. Princeton Architectural Press.

Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Elsevier.

Campos, C. (Ed.). (2006). Product design now: Designs and sketches. Harper Collins Publishers.

Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Chen, Ch.-W. (2018). New product styles and concepts in the bicultural context. The Design Journal: An International Journal for All Aspects of Design, 21(6), 771–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1516496

Chong, M. (2004). Designing the user experience for international web users. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research. Cultural ergonomics (Vol. 4, 281–316). E. Salas (Series Ed.). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3601(03)04010-4

Cila, N., Hekkert, P., & Visch, V. (2014). Source selection in product metaphor generation: The effects of salience and relatedness. International Journal of Design, 8(1). http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1382/613

Cross, N. (1999). Natural intelligence in design. Design Studies, 20(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00026-X

Frambach, J. M., Driessen, E. W., Chan, L.-Ch., & Vleuten, van der C. P. M. (2012). Rethinking the globalisation of problem‐based learning: How culture challenges self‐directed learning. Medical Education, 46, 738–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04290.x

Gaver, W. (B.), Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235

Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802

Ingerman, Å., & Collier-Reed, B. (2011). Technological literacy reconsidered: A model for enactment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9108-6

Inkong, P. (2017). Kan Ookbaap Palitapan Wattanatham: Neawkid Rupbabb Rae Khanvikraew. Unlimited Printing.

Intrachuto, S. (2013). Upcycling: Pattana Seth Wassadu Yang Saengsan. National Science and Technology Development Agency.

Julier, G. (2014). The culture of design. SAGE.

Khalid, M. (2017). Fostering problem solving and performance assessment among Malaysian mathematics teachers. Sains Humanika, 9(1–2), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-2.1098

Kujasene, J. (2001). Manut Lae Sing Wadlom. Chulalongkorn Book Center.

Lin, R.-T. (2007). Transforming Taiwan aboriginal cultural features into modern product design: A case study of a cross-cultural product design model. International Journal of Design, 1(2). http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/46/26

Lind, J., Pelger, S., & Jakobsson, A. (2020). Students’ knowledge of emerging technology and sustainability through a design activity in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09604-y

Lucas, L. M. (2006). The role of culture on knowledge transfer: The case of the multinational corporation. The Learning Organization, 13(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470610661117

Martin, A. (2017). Visual knowledge for multimodal learning. Studentlitteratur.

Middleton, H. (2005). Creative thinking, values and design and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-6199-y

Morris, R. (2016). The fundamentals of product design. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Potter, N. (2002). What is a designer: Things, places, messages. Hyphen Press.

Prasertsilp, P. (2015). Wattanatham Lae Kan Pattana. O.S. Printing House Press.

Rodgers, P., & Milton, A. (2011). Product design. Laurence King Publishing Ltd.

Salehi, M. (2012). Reflections on culture, language and translation. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 2(5), 76–85.

Schütze, M., Sachse, P., & Römer, A. (2003). Support value of sketching in the design process. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-002-0028-7

Svensson, M., & Johansen, G. (2019). Teacher’s didactical moves in the technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9432-1

Tinakul, N. (2009). Kan Bleng-Plang Thang Wattanatham Lae Sungkom. Chulalongkorn University.

Tucker, T. (2012). Upcycling: a new corporate trend. Trafford Publishing.

Vries, de M. J. (2016). Contemporary issues in technology education. Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. P. J. Williams, A. Jones, & C. Buntting (Series Eds.). Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32945-1

Wakefield, J. (2017). TEDGlobal: Africa needs more engineers and makers. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41080479

Whiteley, N. (1998). Design for society. Reaktion Books.

Zhang, X., Ordóñez de Pablos, P., & Xu, Q. (2014). Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multinational virtual classes: A mixed method. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.021