Audit committee independence and a contracting perspective on goodwill impairment: Singaporean evidence

    Jamaliah Abdul-Majid Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.013

Abstract

This study examines factors influencing and constraining the decision to recognize zero goodwill impairment in a sample of 52 Singaporean listed firms from 2010–2012. Using binary logistic regressions, the results reveal that firms that are approaching violation of their debt covenants have a higher likelihood of exercising the recognition choice, while a higher proportion of audit committee independence constrains this choice. The policy implication of this study is that to improve the quality of the financial statements, the relevant authorities need to monitor firms’ reporting incentives closely. This study contributes to the literature on IFRS by providing evidence that supports the applicability of the debt hypothesis in explaining the decision of Singaporean listed firms to recognize zero goodwill impairment.

Keywords:

IFRS, recognition choice, contracting perspective, audit committee independence, managerial discretion, goodwill impairment

How to Cite

Abdul-Majid, J. (2017). Audit committee independence and a contracting perspective on goodwill impairment: Singaporean evidence. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 128-135. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.013

Share

Published in Issue
August 8, 2017
Abstract Views
859

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2017-08-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Abdul-Majid, J. (2017). Audit committee independence and a contracting perspective on goodwill impairment: Singaporean evidence. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 128-135. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.013

Share