Share:


Assessing the commercial potential of high-tech production business targets in risk-generated innovation economies using fuzzy set methods

    Olha Ilyash   Affiliation
    ; Vitaliy Zakharchenko Affiliation
    ; Svitlana Yermak Affiliation
    ; Larysa Frolova Affiliation
    ; Glib Mazhara Affiliation
    ; Liubov Smoliar Affiliation

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to develop a methodology that will make it possible to use attitudes and expressions of professional language to the maximum extent when selecting business goals of high-tech entrepreneurship during the development, production and sale of the latest products and to reduce the sensitivity of the assessment to small deviations of the factors and increase its reliability. It is proven that the proposed method allows to use the attitude and expression of professional language to the maximum when choosing a business goal. At the same time, the sensitivity of the assessment to small deviations of the factors decreases, and the reliability increases. It has been investigated and established that when using fuzzy methods in the decision-making process in high-tech production, unlike the existing ones, there is an opportunity to actively use fuzzy estimates and different points of view of people who carry out planning or decision-making, as well as fuzzy information expressed in words.

Keyword : commercial potential, business goal, high technologies, fuzzy sets, rapid assessment, risk, innovative economy

How to Cite
Ilyash, O., Zakharchenko, V., Yermak, S., Frolova, L., Mazhara, G., & Smoliar, L. (2025). Assessing the commercial potential of high-tech production business targets in risk-generated innovation economies using fuzzy set methods. Business: Theory and Practice, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2025.20922
Published in Issue
Jan 9, 2025
Abstract Views
53
PDF Downloads
22
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Afrasiabi, A., Tavana, M., & Di Caprio, D. (2022). An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 37291–37314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17851-2

Aleixo, G. G., & Tenera, A. B. (2009). New product development process on high-tech innovation life cycle. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(10).

Bandarian, R. (2008). Measuring commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2(4), 73–85.

Bilenko, D., Kozlovskyi, S., Ivanyuta, N., Baidala, V., Lavrov, R., & Kozlovskyi, V. (2022). Efficiency assessment of tax measures in the European countries against the effects of COVID-19. Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.02

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis, Technovation, 80–81, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005

Eseoglu, G., Yapsakli, K., Tozan, H., & Vayvay, O. (2022). A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas. Scientific Report, 12, Article 8800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12643-1

Evers, N., Cunningham, J. A., & Hoholm, T. (2016). International entrepreneurship in universities: Context, emergence and actors. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 14(3), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-016-0188-6

Filyppova, S., Okulich-Kazarin, V., Kibik, O., Shamborovskyi, G., & Cherkasova, S. (2019). Influence of the market of business intellectual services on the innovation safety of EU countries. Journal of Security and Sustainability, 9(1), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.9.1(26)

Filyppova, S., Bovnegra, L., Chukurna, O., Vudvud, O., & Dobrovolskyi, V. (2021). Assessment of the impact of automatic parking on emissions of harmful substances in the Green Logistic System. In New technologies, development and applications (pp. 815–822). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75275-0_89

Fishburn, P. (1999). Preference structures and their numerical representations. Theoretical Computer Science, 217(2), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(98)00277-1

Fishburn, P. (1978). Utility theory for decision making. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0708563.pdf

Frolova, L., Zhadko, K., Ilyash, O., Yermak, S., & Nosova, T. (2021). Model for opportunities assessment to increase the enterprise innovation activity. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2021.13273

Gbadegeshin, S. A. (2017). Commercialization process of high technology: A study of Finnish university spin-off. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 23(2), 1–22.

Government Portal. (2022). National economic strategy of Ukraine for the period up to 2030. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatverdzhennya-nacionalnoyi-eko-a179

Hindle, K., & Yencken, J. (2004). Public research commercialisation, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: An integrated model. Technovation, 24(10), 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00023-3

Hung, R. Y. Y., Chung, T. T., & Lien, B. Y. H. (2007). Organizational process alignment and dynamic capabilities in high-tech industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(9), 1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360701594154

Ilyash, О. (2015). Strategic priorities of Ukraine’s social security concept development and implementation. Economic Annals XXI, 152(7–8((1)), 20–23.

Ilyash, O., Lupak R., Vasyltsiv,T., Trofymenko, O., & Dzhadan, I. (2021). Modelling of the dependencies of industrial develop­ment on marketing efficiency, innovation and technological activity indicators. Ekonomika, 100(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2021.1.6

Kiseliova, E. M., Pritomanova, O. M., & Zhuravel, S. V. (2016). Assessment of the investment attractiveness of startups based on neuro-fuzzy technologies. Problems of Management and Informatics, 5, 123–143.

Kofman, A. (1983). Introduction to the theory of fuzzy sets. Radio and communication.

Kovtunenko, K., Kovtunenko, Y., Shatskova, L., & Yatsenko, M. (2019). Management mechanism as an independent element of the food industry enterprise innovative activity expenditures management system. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 28, 73–80.

Kozlovskyi, S., Mazur, H., Vdovenko, N., Shepel, T., & Kozlovskyi, V. (2018). Modeling and forecasting the level of state stimulation of agricultural production in Ukraine based on the theory of fuzzy logic. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(3), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-3.3

Kozlovskyi, S., Nikolenko, L., Peresada, O., Pokhyliuk, O., Yat­chuk, O., Bolgarova, N., & Kulhanik, O. (2020). Estimation level of public welfare on the basis of methods of intellectual analysis. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(3), 355–372.

Liao, M.-S., Liang, G.-S., & Chen, C.-Y. (2013). Fuzzy grey relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems. Quality & Quantity, 47(6), 3065–3077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9704-5

Lytvynenko, S., Tregubov, O., Prykhno, Y., Yakymova, N., Panchenko, I., & Popova, Y. (2022). Transformation of the paradigm of entrepreneurial activity innovative development in the pandemic conditions. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 10(Special issue 1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.33687/ijae.010.00.3853

Makedon, V., Myachin, V., Plakhotnik, O., Fisunenko, N., & Mykhailenko, O. (2024). Construction of a model for evaluating the efficiency of technology transfer process based on a fuzzy logic approach. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13(128), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.300796

Mokiy, A., Ilyash, O., Pynda, Y., Pikh, M., & Tyurin, V. (2020). Dynamic characteristics of the interconnections urging the construction enterprises development and regions economic growth. TEM Journal, 9(4),1550–1561. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM94-30

Nedosekin, A. (2003). Fuzzy financial management. Audit and financial analysis. http://www.mirkin.ru/_docs/book0308_033.pdf

Olawore, A. S., Wong, K. Y., Ma’aram, A., & Sutopo, W. (2023). Prioritization of technology commercialization success factors using fuzzy best worst method. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), Article 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100096

Ozdemir, Y. S. (2022). A spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for Industry 4.0 performance measurement. Axioms, 11(7), Article 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11070325

Ryzhov, A. P. (1998). Elements of the theory of fuzzy sets and measurement of fuzziness. Dialogue-MGU.

Sarfaraz, A. H., Yazdi, A. K., Hanne, T., & Hosseini, R. S. (2023). Decision support for technology transfer using fuzzy quality function deployment and a fuzzy inference system. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 44(5), 7995–8014. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-222232

Sotnyk, V., Kupchyn, A., Trynchuk, V., Glonti, V., & Belinskaja, L. (2022). Fuzzy logic decision-making model for technology foresight. Economic Studies (Ikonomicheski Izsledvania), 31(1), 139–159.

Tsihanok, V., & Roik, P. (2018). A method of determining and increasing the consistency of expert assessments for supporting group decision-making. System Research and Information Technologies, 3, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2018.3.10

Yager, R. R. (2009). On generalized Bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteria aggregation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50(8), 1279–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.004

Yager, R. R. (2013). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989

Yager, R. R. (2017). Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005

Yermak, S., & Bugaenko, O. (2016). Implementation of innovative development strategy of a dairy enterprise based on a smart farm concept. Actual Problems of Economics, 12(186), 138–146.

Yermak, S. (2017). Problems of innovative activity development at food industry enterprises of Ukraine. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 21, 96–102.

Xiao, L., Huang, G., Pedrycz, W., Pamucar, D., Martínez L., & Zhang, G. (2022). A q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision-making model with new score function and best-worst method for manufacturer selection. Information Sciences, 608, 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.06.061

Zakharchenko, V. (2013). Dynamics of investment and innovation processes in an unstable environment. Oldi-plus.

Zakharchenko, V., & Yermak, S. (2021). Methodological bases of creation of organizational and technological systems in high-tech production. Economics: The realities of time. Scientific Journal, 3(55), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.15276/ETR.03.2021.6

Zhang, Z. (2024). Application of fuzzy decision support systems in risk assessment of Southeast Asian labor market. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 17, Article 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00556-y

Zemlickienė, V., Bublienė, R., & Jakubavičius, A. (2018). A model for assessing the commercial potential of high technologies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.002