Search for sustainable pension system and state support for funded pensions in CEE countries


Pension systems around Europe are being reformed for several decades already. Main objectives of the reforms are to enable people to have adequate income at retirement and to ensure the system’s financial sustainability. Many European countries implemented policies aiming at diversification of financing sources of income at older age: risk-sharing between pay-as-you-go and funded pensions is expected to help in achieving social policy objectives towards pension systems. Central and Eastern European countries (CEE) face even more challenges in ensuring adequate income at retirement. First, CEE countries were required to transform radically their economies in 1990s towards market economy, including old age pension systems. Second, in order to ensure diversified future old age pension income and attract more financial means to the system, introduction of funded pensions from scratch and ensuring as wide as possible coverage with funded pension schemes was of primary importance also. The paper discusses latest developments of retirement pension systems in Europe and state involvement in private pension schemes. In doing so, the focus is on the introduction of funded private pension schemes in selected CEE countries. In spite of initially chosen different paths for the reforms, inconsistent state policies towards funded pensions in the CEE countries resulted in similar outcomes of the reforms. The paper starts with discussion on main objectives of pension systems – enabling people to have adequate income at retirement and ensuring financial sustainability of the systems. Further, possibilities to achieve the objectives of pension reforms are analysed – diversification of income at retirement. Third part of the paper discusses prevailing debates on future of welfare state as such and individualisation trends within different European welfare state models. These debates and perceptions of population about responsibilities of a state for individual welfare affect direction of reforms and future shape of old age pension systems. Fourth part of the paper deals with state policies and tools that are used for encouragement of participation in supplementary pensions. Final part of the paper presents more detailed outline of the pension reforms in selected CEE countries and summarises particular challenges of their pension systems. The paper ends with a discussion on policy implications in relation to latest developments of pension systems in CEE countries.

Keyword : retirement income, funded pensions, state support, reforms, CEE countries

How to Cite
Poškutė, V., Gudaitis, T., Medaiskis, T., & Mečkovski, J. (2022). Search for sustainable pension system and state support for funded pensions in CEE countries. Business: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 313–322.
Published in Issue
Sep 7, 2022
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Altiparmakov, N. (2018). Another look at causes and consequences of pension privatization reform reversals in Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(3), 224–241.

Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica, 44(4), 283–299.

Barr, N. (2012). Economics of the welfare state (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Barr, N. (2013). The pension system in Sweden. Report to the expert group on public economics.

Bielawska, K., Chłoń-Domińczak, A., & Stańko, D. (2017). Retreat from mandatory pension funds in countries of the Eastern and Central Europe in result of financial and fiscal crisis: Causes, effects and recommendations for fiscal rules (MPRA Paper No. 83345).

Crespy, A. (2016). Welfare markets in Europe. The democratic challenge of European integration. Palgrave Macmillan.

Drahokoupil, J., & Domonkos, S. (2012). Averting the funding-gap crisis: East European pension reforms since 2008. Global Social Policy, 12(3), 283–299.

Ebbinghaus, B. (Ed.) (2011). The varieties of pension governance. In Pension privatization in Europe. Oxford University Press.

Economic Policy Committee and Social Protection Committee. (2019). Joint paper on pensions 2019. Brussels.

Eurofound. (2017). European quality of life survey 2016: Quality of life, quality of public services, and quality of society. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg.

European Commission. (2018a). The 2018 pension adequacy report: Current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU. Vol. I. Joint Report prepared by the Social Protection Committee (SPC) and the European Commission (DG EMPL). Brussels.

European Commission. (2018b). The 2018 ageing report: Economic & budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2016–2070) (Institutional Paper 079 | May 2018). Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2019). Final report of the high-level group of experts on pensions. Brussels.

European Social Survey. (2008).

European Social Survey. (2016).

Eurostat. (2022a). Aggregate replacement ratio for pensions (excluding other social benefits) by sex.

Eurostat. (2022b). People at risk of poverty or social exclusion by age.

Galbraith, J. K. (2017). The culture of contentment. Princeton University Press.

Gelissen, J. (2000). Popular support for institutionalised solidarity: A comparison between European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9(4), 285–300.

Gelissen, J. (2002). Worlds of welfare, worlds of consent? Public opinion on the welfare state. Brill.

Greve, B. (2019). Welfare, populism and welfare chauvinism. Policy Press.

Guardiancich, I. (2013). Pension reforms in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe. From post-socialist transition to the global financial crisis. Routledge.

Hayes, R., Kyer, B., & Weber, E. (2015). The case study cookbook. Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Hechter, M. (1988). Principles of group solidarity. University of California Press.

Hinz, R., Holzmann, R., Tuesta, D., & Takayama, N. (Eds.). (2013). Matching contributions for pensions: A review of international experience. World Bank.

Holzmann, R., & Guven, U. (2009). Adequacy of retirement income after pension reforms in Central, Eastern, and Southern Europe: Eight country Studies. World Bank.

Holzmann, R., Orenstein, M. A., & Rutkowski, M. (Eds.). (2003). Pension reform in Europe: Process and progress. World Bank Publications.

Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western Publics. Princeton University Press.

Jæger, M. M. (2006). What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: Self-interest or political ideology? A longitudinal approach. Acta Sociologica, 49(3), 321–338.

Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265–275.

Mau, S. (2003). The moral economy of welfare states: Britain and Germany compared. Routledge.

Medaiskis, T., & Gudaitis, T. (2013). Assessing the impact of second pillar component on old age pension in Lithuania. Ekonomika, 92(4), 54–72.

Müller, K., Ryll, A., & Wagener, H.-J. (1999). Transformation of social security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Physica-Verlag.

Naczyk, M., & Domonkos, S. (2016). The financial crisis and varieties of pension privatization reversals in Eastern Europe. Governance, 29(2), 167–184.

OECD. (2004). Reforming public pensions. Sharing the experience of transition and OECD countries. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2012). OECD pensions outlook 2012. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2016). The changing pensions landscape: The growing importance of pension arrangements in which assets back pension benefits. In OECD pensions outlook 2016. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2018). Financial incentives and retirement savings. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019). Financial incentives for funded private pension plans. OECD country profiles. OECD Publishing.

Orenstein, M. A. (2008). Privatizing pensions. The transnational compaign for social security reform. Princeton University Press.

Roosma, F., van Oorschot, W., & Gellisen, J. (2016). The Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy: Perceptions of overuse and underuse of social benefits in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(2), 177–196.

Rose, R., & Peters, G. (1978). Can government go bankrupt? Basic Books.

Schwarz, A. M., Arias, O. S., Zviniene, A., Rudolph, H. P., Eckardt, S., Koettl, J., Immervoll, H., & Abels, M. (2014). The Inverting Pyramid: Pension systems facing demographic challenges in Europe and Central Asia. World Bank.

Taylor-Gooby, P. (1999). Markets and motives trust and egoism in welfare markets. Journal of Social Policy, 28(1), 97–114.

Taylor-Gooby, P. (2001). Sustaining state welfare in hard times: Who will foot the bill? Journal of European Social Policy, 11(2), 133–147.

Taylor-Gooby, P., & Leruth, B. (Eds.). (2018). Attitudes, aspirations and welfare. Social policy directions in uncertain times. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wiß, T. (2015). From welfare states to welfare sectors: Explaining sectoral differences in occupational pensions with economic and political power of employees. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(5), 489–504.

Wilensky, H. L. (1975). The welfare state and equality. University of California Press.

World Bank. (1994). Averting the old age crisis. Stand Alone Books.