The motivation for engineering change in the industrial company

    Augustinas Maceika   Affiliation
    ; Eligijus Toločka   Affiliation


The authors of this article established the goal to investigate parameters related to the staff motivation for engineering change in the industrial company as case study and to predict the ways of improving the performance of the company. Employees of the company can be more motivated to generate innovative ideas and to implement them. That can be related to the better engineering change situation. For this reason, in this work, we have explored the environment and opportunities to improve the engineering performance of the company in the context of engineering change. The authors of the paper have conducted several studies, collected and analysed important information. Methods used – review of scientific literature and other sources of information, case study, structural systematic analysis, and sociological survey of industrial company personnel based on hypothesis. The object of the research was motives for engineering change in the industrial company. Motivated organizational behaviour actions, that focus on creation and realization of innovative ideas for engineering change, can be based on creation of an innovation-friendly environment. As our research has shown, it is important to consider parameters related to the staff motivation, such as, satisfaction with the company’s declared policy, satisfaction with the management’s behaviour in encouraging employees, freedom of employees to communicate and take creative initiative.

Keyword : motivation, engineering change, industrial company, organizational behaviour, innovation

How to Cite
Maceika, A., & Toločka, E. (2021). The motivation for engineering change in the industrial company. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 98-108.
Published in Issue
Mar 23, 2021
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Alexe, C.-G., & Alexe, C.-M. (2018). Similarities and differentiations at the level of the industries in acquiring an organizational culture in innovation. In the 11th International Conference Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, INTER-ENG 2017, Tirgu-Mures, Romania, Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 317–324.

Chen, J., Zhang, S., Wang, M., & Xu, C. (2017). A novel change feature-based approach to predict the impact of current proposed engineering change. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 33, 132–143.

Do, N. (2018). Identifying experts for engineering changes using product data analytics. Computers in Industry, 95, 81–92.

Eide, A. E., Saether, E. A., & Aspelund, A. (2020). An investigation of leaders’ motivation, intellectual leadership, and sustainability strategy in relation to Norwegian manufacturers’ performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120053.

González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, O. (2005). A study of the motivations for the environmental transformation of companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 462–475.

Grieco, A., Massimo Pacella, M., & Blaco, M. (2017). On the application of text clustering in engineering change process. In the 10th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering – CIRP ICME‘1, Procedia CIRP, 62, 187–192.

Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: a self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95–96, 74–89.

Huang, G. Q., Yee, W. Y., & Mak, K. L. (2003). Current practice of engineering change management in Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 139(1–3), 481–487.

Iakymenko, N., Romsdal, A., Semini, M., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2018). Managing engineering changes in the engineer-toorder environment: challenges and research needs. IFAC PapersOnLine, 51(11), 144–151.

Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. L. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258.

Lau, C. M., Scully, G., & Lee, A. (2018). The effects of organizational politics on employee motivations to participate in target setting and employee budgetary participation. Journalof Business Research, 90, 247–259.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

Mitchell, R., Schuster, L., & Jin, H. S. (2020). Gamification and the impact of extrinsic motivation on needs satisfaction: making work fun? Journal of Business Research, 106, 323–330.

Ozkeser, B. (2019). Impact of training on employee motivation in human resources management. In the 3rd World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (WOCTINE). Procedia Computer Science, 158, 802–810.

Pikosz, P., & Malmqvist, J. (1998). A comparative study of engineering change management in three Swedish engineering companies. In Proceedings of the DETC98 ASME design engineering technical conference, 78–85.

Rusu, G., & Avasilcai, S. (2014). Linking human resources motivation to organizational climate. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 51–58.

Schuh, G., Gartzen, T., Soucy-Bouchard, S., & Basse, F. (2017). Enabling agility in product development through an adaptive engineering change management. In the 50th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems. Procedia CIRP, 63, 342–347.

Schuh, G., Prote, J.-P., Luckert, M., Basse, F., Thomson, V., & Mazurek, W. (2018). Adaptive design of engineering change management in highly iterative product development. In the 28th CIRP Design Conference, Nantes, France, Procedia CIRP, 70, 72–77.

Shaikh, I. A., & O’Connor. G. O. (2020). Understanding the motivations of technology managers in radical innovation decisions in the mature R&D firm context: an agency theory perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 55, 101553.

Shakirov, E., Brandl, F. J., Bauer, H., Kattner, N., Becerril, L., Fortin, C., Lindermann, U., Reinhart, G., & Uzhinsky, I. (2019). Integration of engineering and manufacturing change management: infrastructure and scenarios for teaching and demonstration. In the CIRP Manufacturing Systems Conference, Procedia CIRP, 81, 535–540.

Siddharth, L., & Sarkar, P. (2017). A methodology for predicting the effect of engineering design changes. In the 27th CIRP Design, Procedia CIRP, 60, 452–457.

Singh, N., Jain, S., & Sharma, P. (2015). Motivations for implementing environmental management practices in Indian industries. Ecological Economics, 109, 1–8.

Ullah, I., Tang, D., & Yin, L. (2016). Engineering product and process design changes: a literature overview. In the 9th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology – DET 2016 – “Intelligent Manufacturing in the Knowledge Economy Era”, Procedia CIRP, 56, 25–33.

VDA. (2010). VDA ECM Recommendation – Part 0 (ECM). SASIG, PRO-STEP IVIP, VDA.

Yu, J., Liu, R., & Chen, F. (2020). Linking institutional environment with technological change: the rise of China’s flat panel display industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 151, 119852.

Zheng, P., Chen, C-H., & Shang, S. (2019). Towards an automatic engineering change management in smart product service systems – a DSM-based learning approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 39, 203–213.