Scientific capacity and industrial development as locomotors of international competitiveness in Latin America

    Jesús Peña-Vinces   Affiliation
    ; Diego Sanchez-Ancochea   Affiliation
    ; Jorge Guillen   Affiliation
    ; Luis F. Aguado   Affiliation


Different bodies of literature emphasise the separate impact of the manufacturing sector and scientific capacity for competitiveness in developing countries. Scientific knowledge can increase productivity and promote innovation, while the manufacturing sector creates spillovers and generates processes of learning-by-doing. Yet, do these two processes complement each other? Do they, together, contribute to even higher international competitiveness? This paper explores these questions, drawing on an eleven-years panel data set for ten South American economies. We develop a moderation hypothesis model based on the congruence between science, industry, and international competitiveness. Our results support our hypothesis that scientific capacity and manufacturing development have a joint impact on international competitiveness that goes beyond their marginal effects and thus calls for future efforts to implement industrial policy.

Keyword : scientific capacity, manufacturing sector, international competitiveness, industrial policy, Latin America

How to Cite
Peña-Vinces, J., Sanchez-Ancochea, D., Guillen, J., & Aguado, L. F. (2019). Scientific capacity and industrial development as locomotors of international competitiveness in Latin America. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(2), 300-321.
Published in Issue
Feb 25, 2019
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant. South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Amsden, A. H. (2004). The rise of “the rest”: Challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

An, G., & Iyigun, M. F. (2004). The export skill content, learning by exporting and economic growth. Economics Letters, 84(1), 29-34.

Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2011). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587-601.

Barba-Sánchez, V., & Calderón-Milán, M. J. (2018). A study of the value of ICT in improving corporate performance: a corporate competitiveness view. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(4), 1388-1407.

Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego, A. (2009). The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 61-83.

Belderbos, R., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2005). Competitive drivers and international plant configuration strategies: A product-level test. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 557-593.

Bodas Freitas, I. M., Marques, R. A., & Silva, E. M. de P. e. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443-453.

Burger, M. J., Karreman, B., & van Eenennaam, F. (2015). The competitive advantage of clusters: Cluster organisations and greenfield FDI in the European life sciences industry. Geoforum, 65, 179-191.

Caldentey, E. P. (2012). Income convergence, capability divergence, and the middle income trap: an analysis of the case of Chile. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47(2), 185-207.

Castro-Gonzáles, S., Peña-Vinces, J., Sosa-Varela, J., & Ruiz-Torres, A. (2014). A. Intra-country study of global competitiveness from the Double Diamond Approach for Puerto Rico, Costa Rica and Singapore. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 20(3), 122-130.

Castro-Gonzáles, S., Peña-Vinces, J. C., & Guillen, J. (2016). The competitiveness of Latin-American economies: consolidation of the double-diamond theory. Economic System, 4(10), 73-386.

Cheung, A. C. K., Yuen, T. W. W., Yuen, C. Y. M., & Cheng, Y. C. (2011). Strategies and policies for Hong Kong’s higher education in Asian markets: Lessons from the United Kingdom, Australia, and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(2), 144-163.

Cho, Y. J., Leem, C. S., & Shin, K. T. (2008). The relationships among manufacturing innovation, competitiveness, and business performance in the manufacturing industries of Korea. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 38(7-8), 840-850.

Choo, D., & Moon, H.-C. (2000). From Adam Smith to Michael Porter (Vol. 2). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

Choo, D., Moon, H.-C., & Kim, M.-Y. (2008). Characterizing international competitiveness in international business research: A MASI approach to national competitiveness. Research in International Business and Finance, 22(2), 175-192.

Ciencia sem Fronteiras. (2015, September 6). Ciencia sem Fronteiras(Science without Borders): Ministérios da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI) e do Ministério da Educação (MEC), Brazil. Retrieved from

Cienciactiva. (2014). Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica- Perú. Retrieved from

Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365-382.

Czinkota, M., & Pinkwart, A. (2012). International business research and the new role of universities (there is sunshine above the clouds). Thunderbird International Business, 19(4), 337-343.

Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, 43(10), 1785-1799.

Dufour, P., & Gingras, Y. (1988). Development of Canadian science and technology policy. Science and Public Policy, 15(1), 13-18.

Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (1998). The geographical sources of competitiveness of multinational enterprises: an econometric analysis. International Business Review, 7(2), 115-133.

ECLAC. (2016). Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC): Latin America and the Caribbean in the world economy, 2016. Santiago: United Nations.

Explora. (2015, September 15). Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica de Chile. Retrieved from

Felipe, J., Kumar, U., & Abdon, A. (2014). As you sow so shall you reap: From capabilities to opportunities. Oxford Development Studies, 42(4), 488-515.

Fosu, A. (2013). Development success. Historical accounts from more advanced countries. Policy Brief, 1, 1-8.

Furukawa, T., Shirakawa, N., & Okuwada, K. (2012). An empirical study of graduate student mobility underpinning research universities. Higher Education, 66(1), 17-37.

Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748-764.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). England: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hall, E. H., & Lee, J. (2008). Assessing the impact of export performance: Acritical analysis of its effect on diversification. Journal of Global Business Management, 4(1), 1-10.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis : A regression-based approach. New York, USA: The Guilford Press.

Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39-57.

Héraud, J. A., & Lévy, R. (2005). University-industry relationships and regional innovation systems: Analysis of the French procedure cifre. In S. B. Heidelberg (Ed.), Innovation policy in a knowledgebased economy: theory and practice (pp. 193-219). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Jong, S., & Slavova, K. (2014). When publications lead to products: The open science conundrum in new product development. Research Policy, 43(4), 645-654.

Kafouros, M., Wang, C., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhang, M. (2015). Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions. Research Policy, 44(3), 803-817.

Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 1-18.

Kull, T. J., Yan, T., Liu, Z., & Wacker, J. G. (2014). The moderation of lean manufacturing effectiveness by dimensions of national culture: Testing practice-culture congruence hypotheses. International Journal of Production Economics, 153, 1-12.

Leten, B., Landoni, P., & Van Looy, B. (2014). Science or graduates: How do firms benefit from the proximity of universities? Research Policy, 43(8), 1398-1412.

Lin, J., & Chang, H.-J. (2009). Should industrial policy in developing countries conform to comparative advantage or defy it? A debate between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang. Development Policy Review, 27(5), 483-502.

Liyanage, S., & Mitchell, H. (1994). Strategic management of interactions at the academic-industry interface. Technovation, 14(10), 641-655.

Martínez Franzoni, J., & Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2014). The double challenge of market and social incorporation: Progress and bottlenecks in Latin America. Development Policy Review, 32(3), 275-298.

McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., & Verduzco-Gallo, Í. (2014). Globalization, structural change, and productivity growth, with an update on Africa. World Development, 63, 11-32.

Moaniba, I. M., Su, H.-N., & Lee, P.-C. (2018). Does reverse causality explains the relationship between economic performance and technological diversity? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(3), 859-892.

Mok, K. H., & Kan, Y. (2013). Promoting entrepreneurship and innovation in China: Enhancing research and transforming university curriculum. Frontiers of Education in China, 8(2), 173-197.

National Science Foundation. (2016). Science and Engineering Labor Force (Chapter 3). In Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. Retrieved from

Nilsson, J. E. (Ed.), Arbo, P., Dahl, M. S., Dahlum, B., Edvardsson, I. R., & Eskelinen, H. (2006). The role of universities in regional innovation systems: A Nordic perspective. Copenhagen.: CBS Press.

Ocampo, J. A. (2006). Latin America and the world economy in the long twentieth century. In K. S. Jomo (Ed.), The great divergence: Hegemony, uneven development and global inequality (pp. 1-229). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Ocampo, J. A., Rada, C., & Taylor, L. (2009). Growth and policy in developing countries. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.

Parteka, A., & Tamberi, M. (2013). Product diversification, relative specialisation and economic development: Import–export analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics, 38, 121-135.

Paus, E. (2012). Confronting the middle income trap: insights from small latecomers. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47(2), 115-138.

Paus, E. (2014). Latin America and the middle-income trap. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago de Chile. Retrieved from

Peña-Vinces, J., Casanova, L., Guillen, J., & Urbano, D. (2017). International competitiveness of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Peru, a Latin-American emerging market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(1), 1-19.

Peña-Vinces, J., Cepeda-Carrión, G., & Wynee, C. (2012). Effect of ITC on the international competitiveness of firms. Management Decision, 50(6), 1045-1061.

Peña-Vinces, J. C. (2009). Comparative analysis of competitiveness on the Peruvian and Chilean economies from a global view. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 14(12), 87-106.

Peña-Vinces, J. C., & Urbano, D. (2014). The influence of domestic economic agents on the international competitiveness of Latin American firms: Evidence from Peruvian small and medium multinational enterprises. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(6), 43-63.

Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition (1 ed.). Boston, USA: Harvard Business School.

Prometeo. (2015, April 18). Programa de becas para investigadores/ Prometeo: Secretaria de Educación Superior, Ciencia tecnología e Innovación de Ecuador. Retrieved from

Quintas, P., Wield, D., & Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), 161-175.

Rehner, J., Baeza, S. A., & Barton, J. R. (2014). Chile’s resource-based export boom and its outcomes: Regional specialization, export stability and economic growth. Geoforum, 56, 35-45.

Sanchez-Ancochea, D. (2006). Development trajectories and new comparative advantages: Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic under Globalization. World Development, 34(6), 996-1015.

Santhapparaj, A. S., Sreenivasan, J., & Jude Chong Kuan, L. (2006). Competitive Factors of Semiconductor Industry in Malaysia: the Managers’ Perspectives. Competitiveness Review, 16(3/4), 197-211.

Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America: business, labor, and the challenges of equitable development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Siddiqui, A., & Rehman, A. (2017). The human capital and economic growth nexus: in East and South Asia. Applied Economics, 49(28), 2697-2710.

Teixeira, A. A. C., & Queirós, A. S. S. (2016). Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis. Research Policy, 48(8), 1636-1648.

The World Bank. (2018, January 24). The World Bank, Indicators: Data Bank Microdata Data Catalog. Retrieved from

Tzeng, C.-H. (2011). An evolutionary-institutional framework for the growth of an indigenous technology firm: The case of Lenovo computer. Technology in Society, 33(3), 212-222.

UNCTAD. (2017, January 27). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: UncatStad. Retrieved from

Wade, R. (2004). Governing the market : economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553-1560.

Yaşar, M., & Paul, C. J. M. (2011). Firm performance and knowledge spillovers from academic, industrial and foreign linkages: the case of China. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(3), 237-253.