Roy Bahl's implementation rules for fiscal decentralization: theoretical insights and empirical evidence from OECD countries
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2026.25840Abstract
The paper refers to the twelve principles of fiscal decentralization, proposed by Roy Bahl (Bahl’s Rules for Fiscal Decentralization – BRfd), with special emphasis on the first Bahl’s rule (regarding the comprehensiveness of the fiscal decentralization, CSfd). The purpose of the research was to estimate the level of CSfd in OECD countries. Thus, the objective was to construct a synthetic measure of the first Bahl’s rule (CSfd) which constitutes the value added of this research. The goal was also to rank countries as the main idea was to advance empirical assessment in the field of fiscal federalism and to provide practical guidance for shaping public finance policy including policies on the collection of public revenues and the allocation of public expenditure. This directly corresponds to the research problem of the very limited number of tools available for measuring fiscal decentralization. Based on Hellwig’s method of linear ordering two rankings were developed using the Euclidean metric and the Mahalanobis metric. The results indicate that the most comprehensive fiscal decentralisation systems in 2022 were found in the Slovak Republic, Switzerland and Canada (ranking based on the Mahalanobis metric). When the Euclidean metric is used, Switzerland emerges as the leader, followed by Spain and Austria.
First published online 4 June 2026
Keywords:
fiscal decentralization, Bahl’s rules for fiscal decentralization, OECD countriesHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adamowicz, M., & Janulewicz, P. (2012). Wykorzystanie metod wielowymiarowych w określeniu pozycji konkurencyjnej gminy na przykładzie województwa lubelskiego [The use of multidimensional methods in determining the competitive position of a commune on the example of the Lublin Voivodeship]. Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych – Quantitative Methods in Economic Research, 13(1), 17–28.
Bahasoan, A. N., Rahmatia, Tajibu, M. J., & Yunus, A. K. F. A. (2025). The impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth: A theoretical and empirical review. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(3), 1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.64252/7jtxts62
Bahl, R. (1999). Implementation rules for fiscal decentralization (Working Paper No. 99-1). Georgia State University.
Bahl, R. W., & Linn, J. F. (1992). Urban public finance in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
Bąk, A. (2016). Porządkowanie liniowe obiektów metodą Hellwiga i TOPSIS – analiza porównawcza [Linear ordering of subjects using Hellwig and TOPSIS methods – a comparative analysis. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu = Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics, (426), 22–31. http://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2016.426.02
Bird, R. M., & Vaillancourt, F. (1999). Fiscal decentralization in developing countries. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559815
Boadway, R., & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal federalism: Principles and practice of multiorder governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626883
Diamond, L. (2020). Breaking out of the democratic slump. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 36–50.
Darby, J., Muscatelli, A., & Roy, G. (2002). Fiscal federalism and fiscal autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other industrialised countries. Scottish Affairs, 41(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.3366/scot.2002.0052
Ebel, R. D., & Yilmaz, S. (2002). On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2809). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2809
Felis, P., Patrzałek, L., Bem, A., Bernardelli, M., Malinowska-Misiąg, E., Olejniczak, J., & Kowalska, M. (2025). Local tax policy in Central and Eastern Europe: Property taxation and municipal finance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003530503
Gu, G. C. (2012). Developing composite indicators for fiscal decentralization: Which is the best measure for whom? (Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 43032). University Library of Munich.
Guziejewska, B. (2018). Normatywne versus pozytywne ujęcie decentralizacji fiskalnej a mierniki jej oceny [Normative versus positive aproach to fiscal decentralisation and the measures of decentralisation. An analysis based on the example of selected countries of Central and Eastern Europe]. Comparative Economic Research, 21(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0006
Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. R. Hamowy (Ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału kraju ze względu na poziom rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr [Application of the taxonomic method to the typological division of countries according to the level of development and the resources and structure of qualified personnel]. Przegląd Statystyczny – Statistical Review, 15(4), 307–326.
Hu, J. (2025). Fiscal decentralization and COVID 19 response: An evaluation of OECD countries. International Tax and Public Finance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-025-09939-z
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems: Vol. 186. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state-ofthe-art survey. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2014). How close is your government to its people? Worldwide indicators on localization and decentralization. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 8. http://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-3
Iwacewicz-Orłowska, A., & Sokołowska, D. (2016). Ocena realizacji koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju w podregionach województw Polski Wschodniej z wykorzystaniem metody wzorca rozwoju Hellwiga [Assesment of the implementation of the concept of sustainable development in the subregions of the Eastern Polish Voivodeships using the Hellwig development pattern method]. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne – Optimum. Economic Studies, 1(79), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.15290/ose.2016.01.79.12
Kimchoeun, P. (2011). Fiscal decentralisation in Cambodia: A review of progress and challenges. (CDRI Working Paper Series No. 50).
Konopka, P. (2021). Metody wielokryterialnego podejmowania decyzji w badaniu ryzyka finansowania przedsiębiorstw [Multi-criteria decision-making methods in the study or corporate financing risk]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
Kopiński, A. (2014). Taksonomia i zastosowanie metody Hellwiga w ocenie efektywności funduszu inwestycyjnych [Taxonomy and aplication of Hellwig’s method for assessing the effectiveness of investment funds]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu = Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics, 330, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2014.330.20
Krakowiak-Bal, A. (2005). Wykorzystanie wybranych miar syntetycznych do budowy miary rozwoju infrastruktury technicznej [The implementation of chosen synthetic measures for construction of development’s measure of technical infrastructure]. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, 3, 71–82.
Kurkiewicz, J., Pociecha, J., & Zając, K. (1991). Metody wielowymiarowej analizy porównawczej w badaniach rozwoju demograficznego: Vol. 336. Monografie i Opracowania. Szkoła Główna Handlowa [Methods of multivariate comparative analysis in demographic development research: Vol. 336. Monographs and Studies]. Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of Statistics and Demography.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Crown.
Li, W., & Li, D. (2024). How does technological innovation affect the fiscal decentralization of local governments? Evidence from China. Heliyon, 10(9), Article e30132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30132
Liu, L. C.-h. (2011). The typology of fiscal decentralization system: A cluster analysis approach. Public Administration and Development, 31(5), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.605
Marcinčin, A. (2024). Divergence of Slovak regions: Bumpy road to decentralization. In M. Augustín, P. Jančovič, & B. S. Sergi (Eds.). Modeling economic growth in contemporary Slovakia. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-454-720241011
Meloche, J.-P., Vaillancourt, F., & Yilmaz, S. (2004). Decentralization or fiscal autonomy? What does really matter? Effects on growth and public sector size in European transition countries (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3254). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3254
Młodak, A. (2006). Analiza taksonomiczna w statystyce regionalnej [Taxonomic analysis in regional statistics]. Difin.
Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic (n.d.). The process of fiscal decentralization. Retrieved 8 August, 2025, from https://www.mfsr.sk/en/finance/public-finance/fiscal-decentralization/the-process-fiscal-decentralization/
Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. McGraw-Hill.
Nickson, A. (2023). Decentralization in Latin America after 40 years: Work in progress; A commentary essay. Public Organization Review, 23, 1017–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00739-9
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Olaide, K., Uwilingiye, J., & Simo-Kengne, B. D. (2025). The relationship between fiscal federalism and fiscal discipline: Panel quantile regression approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 161. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04489-5
Onofrei, M., Oprea, F., Iaţu, C., Cojocariu, L., & Anton, S. G. (2022). Fiscal decentralization, good governance and regional development – Empirical evidence in the European context. Sustainability, 14(12), Article 7093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127093
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). Measuring fiscal decentralisation: Concepts and policies. OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies. OECD Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174849-en
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020). The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of government. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d3e314e1-en
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2024). Subnational governments structure and finance. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/topics/policy-issues/subnational-finance-and-investment/subnational-governments-infrastructure-finance-2024.pdf
OECD Data Explorer (n.d.). https://data-explorer.oecd.org
Pinilla-Rodríguez, D. E., & Hernández-Medina, P. (2024). Governance and fiscal decentralisation in Latin America: An empirical approach. Economies, 12(8), Article 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12080207
Poniatowicz, M. (2018). Koncepcja federalizmu fiskalnego w systemie finansów samorządu terytorialnego [The concept of fiscal federalism in the local government financial system]. CeDeWu.
Poniatowicz, M. (2022). Fiscal federalism and the COVID-19 Crisis: Theoretical aspects and Poland’s experience. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 67(1), 517–546. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2022-0026
Poniatowicz, M. (2023). Decentralizacja oraz autonomia finansowa i podatkowa samorządu terytorialnego jako fundamenty federalizmu fiskalnego [Decentralization and financial and fiscal autonomy of local government as foundations of fiscal federalism]. In J. Szołno-Koguc (Ed.), Finanse samorządowe (pp. 27–52). Polska Akademia Nauk. https://doi.org/10.24425/146953
Poniatowicz, M., Konopka, P., & Piekutowska, A. (2024). Towards a comprehensive evaluation of decentralization: A multidimensional insight of OECD countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(6), 1652–1681. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.21518
Rao, M. G. (2003). Fiscal decentralization in China and India: A comparative perspective. Asia Pacific Development Journal, 10(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.18356/0d190afc-en
Reingewertz, Y. (2014). Fiscal decentralization – a survey of the empirical literature. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2523335
Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150172
Roszkowska, E., & Filipowicz-Chomko, M. (2021). Measuring sustainable development using an extended Hellwig method: A case study of education. Social Indicators Research, 153, 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02491-9
Roszkowska, E., Filipowicz-Chomko, M., Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak, A., & Majewska, E. (2024). Extended Hellwig’s method utilizing entropy-based weights and Mahalanobis distance: Applications in evaluating sustainable development in the education area. Entropy, 26(3), Article 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26030197
Stegarescu, D. (2005). Public sector decentralization: Measurement concepts and recent international trends. Fiscal Studies, 26(3), 301–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00014.x
Schaltegger, C. A., & Schmid, L. A. (2023). Switzerland. In J. F. Tremblay (Ed.). The forum of federations handbook of fiscal federalism (pp. 383–419). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97258-5_10
Schneider, A. (2003). Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38, 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686198
Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An empirical typology of local government systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.807807
Treisman, D. (2002). Defining and measuring decentralization: A global perspective (Unpublished manuscript).
Trusova, N. V., Kohut, I. A., Osypenko, S. A., Radchenko, N. G., & Rubtsova, N. N. (2019). Implementation of the results of fiscal decentralization of Ukraine and the countries of the European Union. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(6), 1649–1663.
Tunio, F. H., & Nabi, A. A. (2021). Political decentralization, fiscal centralization, and its consequences in case of Pakistan. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), Article 1924949. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1924949
Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2016). Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision making: Analytical hierarchy process case study. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos, A. J. Falcão, N. Vafaei, & S. Najdi (Eds.), IFIP advances in information and communication technology: Vol. 470. Technological innovation for cyber-physical systems. DoCEIS 2016. (pp. 261–269). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31165-4_26
Wang, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, T., Jiang, B., & Wang, X. (2024). Impact of fiscal decentralization and local government competition on the supply of basic public services: Based on the empirical evidence of prefecture-level cities in China. Heliyon, 10(4), Article e26511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26511
Wichowska, A. (2021). The degree of fiscal decentralization in European Union countries in different stages of the economic cycle. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 198–208. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(13)
Wright, G. (2017). New rules for implementation of fiscal decentralization. Developments in Administration, 2(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.46996/dina.v2i1.5113
Wysocki, F. (2010). Metody taksonomiczne w rozpoznawaniu typów ekonomicznych rolnictwa i obszarów wiejskich [Taxonomic methods in recognizing types of agriculture and rural areas]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego.
Yimenu, B. (2024). The political economy of fiscal transfers: The case of Ethiopia. Public Administration and Development, 44(3), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2053
Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016). Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems – an overview on developments from 2000 to 2015. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(3), 645–682. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016300019
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.