Striving for carbon neutrality in EU region: examining the role of environmental policy stringency in geopolitical risk and energy transition
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2026.24489Abstract
Global economic policymakers are facing increasing demands from diverse environmental constituents to prioritize sustainable development through the implementation of strict environmental policies, energy transition strategies, and the reduction of fossil fuel consumption by fostering technological advancement. This study aims to assess the moderating role of environmental Policy Stringency (EPS), among Geopolitical Risks (GPR), Energy Transition (ET), Technological Innovation (INV), and environmental degradation (CO2 emission). This study relies on empirical datasets spanning the years 1990 to 2022 in 13 EU countries and employed an extensive range of econometric techniques., Dynamic Ordinary Least Square (DOLS), Fully modified Ordinary Least Square (FMOLS), Canonical Cointegration Regression (CCR), and Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) to examine the data. The empirical findings demonstrate that interaction of GPR*EPS, INV*EPS, and ET*EPS plays a crucial role in promoting environmental sustainability and lowering CO2 emissions. Whereas, environmental degradation is attributed to higher geopolitical instability and increased economic activities. Further, Quantile Regression (QR) and Feasible Generalized least square (FGLS) methods are employed to check the robustness empirical findings of the primary techniques. Based on our comprehensive empirical research findings, we can put forth constructive policy recommendations aimed at addressing environmental concerns and achievement of SDGs 7 & 13 in EU region.
Keywords:
geopolitical risks, energy transition, environmental policy stringency, technological innovation, CO2 emission, MMQR, EU countriesHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adelekan, O. A., Ilugbusi, B. S., Adisa, O., Obi, O. C., Awonuga, K. F., Asuzu, O. F., & Ndubuisi, N. L. (2024). Energy transition policies: A global review of shifts towards renewable sources. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(2), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i2.752
Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Riaz, M., & Yang, X. (2024). Modeling the linkage between climate-tech, energy transition, and CO2 emissions: Do environmental regulations matter?. Gondwana Research, 127, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.003
Ahmed, K. (2020). Environmental policy stringency, related technological change and emissions inventory in 20 OECD countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 274, Article 111209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111209
Aytun, C., Erdogan, S., Pata, U. K., & Cengiz, O. (2024). Associating environmental quality, human capital, financial development and technological innovation in 19 middle-income countries: A disaggregated ecological footprint approach. Technology in Society, 76, Article 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102445
Bakhsh, S., Zhang, W., Ali, K., & Anas, M. (2024). Energy transition and environmental stability prospects for OECD economies: The prominence role of environmental governance, and economic complexity: Does the geopolitical risk matter?. Journal of Environmental Management, 354, Article 120358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120358
Baltagi, B. H., Bratberg, E., & Holmås, T. H. (2005). A panel data study of physicians’ labor supply: The case of Norway. Health Economics, 14(10), 1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.991
Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2013). A generalized spatial panel data model with random effects. Econometric Reviews, 32(5–6), 650–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2012.742342
Bashir, M. F., Shahbaz, M., Ma, B., & Alam, K. (2024). Evaluating the roles of energy innovation, fossil fuel costs and environmental compliance towards energy transition in advanced industrial economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, Article 119709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119709
Beaurain, C., Chembessi, C., & Rajaonson, J. (2023). Investigating the cultural dimension of circular economy: A pragmatist perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, Article 138012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138012
Bergougui, B. (2024). Moving toward environmental mitigation in Algeria: Asymmetric impact of fossil fuel energy, renewable energy and technological innovation on CO2 emissions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 51, Article 101281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101281
Bildirici, M. E., Salman, M., & Ersin, Ö. Ö. (2022). Nonlinear contagion and causality nexus between oil, gold, VIX investor sentiment, exchange rate and stock market returns: The MS-GARCH copula causality method. Mathematics, 10(21), Article 4035. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214035
Bilgin, M. H., Gozgor, G., & Karabulut, G. (2020). How do geopolitical risks affect government investment? An empirical investigation. Defence and Peace Economics, 31(5), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2018.1513620
Blomquist, J., & Westerlund, J. (2013). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation. Economics Letters, 121(3), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.09.012
Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R., Hammoudeh, S., & Wohar, M. E. (2019). What are the categories of geopolitical risks that could drive oil prices higher? Acts or threats?. Energy Economics, 84, Article 104523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104523
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Brożyna, J., Strielkowski, W., & Zpěvák, A. (2023). Evaluating the chances of implementing the “Fit for 55” green transition package in the V4 countries. Energies, 16(6), Article 2764. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062764
Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2018). Measuring geopolitical risk (International Finance Discussion Paper No. 1222). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.). https://doi.org/10.17016/ifdp.2018.1222r1
Cevik, S., & Ninomiya, K. (2023). Chasing the sun and catching the wind: Energy transition and electricity prices in Europe. Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 912–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-023-09626-x
Chatti, W., & Khan, Z. (2024). Towards smart sustainable cities: Does technological innovation mitigate G7 CO2 emissions? Fresh evidence from CS-ARDL. Science of the Total Environment, 913, Article 169723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169723
Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P. S. (2022). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20(4), 2277–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8
Chen, H., Wu, H., Kan, T., Zhang, J., & Li, H. (2023). Low-carbon economic dispatch of integrated energy system containing electric hydrogen production based on VMD-GRU short-term wind power prediction. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 154, Article 109420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109420
Chen, L., Gozgor, G., Lau, C. K. M., Mahalik, M. K., Rather, K. N., & Soliman, A. M. (2024). The impact of geopolitical risk on CO2 emissions inequality: Evidence from 38 developed and developing economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 349, Article 119345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119345
Cheng, C., Ren, X., Dong, K., Dong, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, Article 111818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111818
Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
Chu, L. K., Doğan, B., Abakah, E. J. A., Ghosh, S., & Albeni, M. (2023). Impact of economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and economic complexity on carbon emissions and ecological footprint: An investigation of the E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 34406–34427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24682-2
Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Smyth, R., & Zhang, X. (2019). R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Economics, 80, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.020
Cui, X., Wang, W., Işık, C., Uddin, I., Yan, J., Gu, X., & Ahmad, M. (2024). Do geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty cause CO2 emissions in BRICS? The role of institutional quality and energy productivity. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 38, 1685–1699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02646-3
Dam, M. M., Işık, C., & Ongan, S. (2023). The impacts of renewable energy and institutional quality in environmental sustainability in the context of the sustainable development goals: A novel approach with the inverted load capacity factor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 95394–95409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29020-8
Bako, E. D., Rus., A. V., Rovinaru, M. D., Varvasi, S. A. D., Rovinaru, F. I., & Negrut, L. (2022). Climate change approach in EU countries vs economic development. Transformations in Business & Economics, 21(2(56A)), 707–726.
Dogah, K. E., Lan, H., & Zhao, S. (2024). Energy transition dynamics amid policy uncertainty, environmental regulations, and geopolitics: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 467, Article 142992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142992
Drosos, D., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., Arabatzis, G., & Tsotsolas, N. (2020). Evaluating customer satisfaction in energy markets using a multicriteria method: The case of electricity market in Greece. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3862. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093862
Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non‐causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Ebadi, A. G., Toughani, M., Najafi, A., & Babaee, M. (2020). A brief overview on current environmental issues in Iran. Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation, 1(1), 1–11.
Gollakota, A. R., & Shu, C.-M. (2023). COVID-19 and energy sector: Unique opportunity for switching to clean energy. Gondwana Research, 114, 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.01.014
Hassan, M., Oueslati, W., & Rousselière, D. (2020). Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: An empirical analysis of panel data. Economic Systems, 44(3), Article 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100806
Hassan, N. A., Zailani, S., & Rahman, M. K. (2021). Impact of integrated audit management effectiveness on business sustainability in manufacturing firms. Management Research Review, 44(12), 1599–1622. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2020-0658
Hassan, S. T., Danish, D., Baloch, M. A., Bui, Q., & Khan, N. H. (2024). The heterogeneous impact of geopolitical risk and environment-related innovations on greenhouse gas emissions: The role of nuclear and renewable energy in the circular economy. Gondwana Research, 127, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.08.016
Herman, K. S. (2023). Green growth and innovation in the Global South: A systematic literature review. Innovation and Development, 13(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2021.1909821
Hunjra, A. I., Azam, M., Verhoeven, P., Taskin, D., & Dai, J. (2024). The impact of geopolitical risk, institutional governance and technological innovation on attaining net-zero carbon emission. Journal of Environmental Management, 359, Article 120927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120927
Husnain, M. I. U., Syed, Q. R., Bashir, A., & Khan, M. A. (2022). Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 41640–41652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17606-z
Im, K. S., & Pesaran, M. H. (2003). On the panel unit root tests using nonlinear instrumental variables. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.482463
Jiatong, W., Xu, Q., Sibt-e-Ali, M., Shahzad, F., & Ayub, B. (2023). How economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk affect environmental pollution: Does renewable energy consumption matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 101858–101872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29553-y
Jin, Z., & Gambatese, J. (2020). Exploring the potential of technological innovations for temporary structures: A survey study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), Article 04020049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001828
Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
Kennedy, S. J. (1993). Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: A framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491272
Khan, K., Khurshid, A., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023a). Investigating the relationship between geopolitical risks and economic security: Empirical evidence from central and Eastern European countries. Resources Policy, 85, Article 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103872
Khan, K., Khurshid, A., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023b). Is geopolitics a new risk to environmental policy in the European Union?. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, Article 118868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118868
Kruse, T., Dechezleprêtre, A., Saffar, R., & Robert, L. (2022). Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD countries: An update of the OECD composite EPS indicator (OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1703). OECD Publishing.
Kyriakopoulos, G. L., Sebos, I., Triantafyllou, E., Stamopoulos, D., & Dimas, P. (2023). Benefits and synergies in addressing climate change via the implementation of the common agricultural policy in Greece. Applied Sciences, 13(4), Article 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042216
Li, L. S.-Z., Liu, Y., & Yuan, J. (2023a). De-globalization and innovation: Evidence from the US-China Trade War. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4540205
Li, S., Samour, A., Irfan, M., & Ali, M. (2023b). Role of renewable energy and fiscal policy on trade adjusted carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of environmental policy stringency. Renewable Energy, 205, 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.047
Liang, Y. (2023). Mitigation strategy for lessening the negative impacts of climate change. Transformations in Business & Economics, 22(1), 87–97.
Lin, Y., Wang, Q. J., & Zheng, M. Q. (2024). Nexus among digital economy, green innovation, and green development: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 60(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2258260
Liu, L., Niu, J., & Wu, J. Y. (2023). Improving energy efficiency of photovoltaic/thermal systems by cooling with PCM nano-emulsions: An indoor experimental study. Renewable Energy, 203, 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.090
Luo, H., & Sun, Y. (2024). Effects of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and the moderating role of environmental policy stringency. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 10747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60773-5
Machado, J. A. F., & Santos Silva, J. M. C. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
Maghyereh, A., Boulanouar, Z., & Essid, L. (2025). The dynamics of green innovation and environmental policy stringency in energy transition investments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 487, Article 144649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144649
Nicoli, M., Colucci, G., Di Cosmo, V., Lerede, D., & Savoldi, L. (2025). Evaluating the impact of hurdle rates on the Italian energy transition through TEMOA. Applied Energy, 377, Article 124633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124633
Park, J. Y. (1992). Canonical cointegrating regressions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 60(1), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951679
Panarello, D., & Gatto, A. (2023). Decarbonising Europe – EU citizens’ perception of renewable energy transition amidst the European Green Deal. Energy Policy, 172, Article 113272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113272
Pedroni, P. (2001). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (pp. 93–130). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2
Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
Pengfei, C., Xingang, H., & Baekryul, C. (2023). The effect of geopolitical risk on carbon emissions: Influence mechanisms and heterogeneity analyzed using evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 105220–105230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29829-3
Pesaran, M. H. (1981). Pitfalls of testing non-nested hypotheses by the Lagrange multiplier method. Journal of Econometrics, 17(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90005-1
Pesaran, M. H., Schuermann, T., & Weiner, S. M. (2004). Modeling regional interdependencies using a global error-correcting macroeconometric model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22(2), 129–162. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500104000000019
Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Plümper, T., Troeger, V. E., & Manow, P. (2005). Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research, 44(2), 327–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00230.x
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Rasoulinezhad, E., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Sung, J., & Panthamit, N. (2020). Geopolitical risk and energy transition in Russia: Evidence from ARDL bounds testing method. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 2689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072689
Ritchie, H. (2021). Many countries have decoupled economic growth from CO2 emissions, even if we take offshored production into account. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-gdp-decoupling
Rumokoy, L. J., Omura, A., & Roca, E. (2023). Geopolitical risk and corporate investment in the metals and mining industry: Evidence from Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, Article 101991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101991
Saadaoui, J., Smyth, R., & Vespignani, J. (2025). Ensuring the security of the clean energy transition: Examining the impact of geopolitical risk on the price of critical minerals. Energy Economics, 142, Article 108195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108195
Saliba, C. (2024). Do the energy-related uncertainties stimulate renewable energy demand in developed economies? Fresh evidence from the role of environmental policy stringency and global economic policy uncertainty. Energies, 17(18), Article 4746. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184746
Sharif, A., Saqib, N., Dong, K., & Khan, S. A. R. (2022). Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: The moderating role of social globalisation. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1934–1946. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2360
Sharif, A., Kocak, S., Khan, H. H. A., Uzuner, G., & Tiwari, S. (2023). Demystifying the links between green technology innovation, economic growth, and environmental tax in ASEAN-6 countries: The dynamic role of green energy and green investment. Gondwana Research, 115, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.11.010
Streimikiene, D., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., Lekavicius, V., & Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I. (2021). Energy poverty and low carbon just energy transition: Comparative study in Lithuania and Greece. Social Indicators Research, 158(1), 319–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02685-9
Streimikiene, D., & Kyriakopoulos, G. (2024). Climate change mitigation performance in the EU tourism destination sector. Journal of Tourism and Services, 15(28), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v15i28.758
Tiwari, S., Mohammed, K. S., Mentel, G., Majewski, S., & Shahzadi, I. (2024). Role of circular economy, energy transition, environmental policy stringency, and supply chain pressure on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(3), Article 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101682
Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023). Achieving decarbonization goals in BRICS economies: Revisiting the joint role of composite risk index, green innovation, and environmental policy stringency. Cogent Social Sciences, 9, Article 2234230. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2234230
Umar, Z., Bossman, A., Choi, S. Y., & Teplova, T. (2022). Does geopolitical risk matter for global asset returns? Evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression. Finance Research Letters, 48, Article 102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102991
Vaghela, P., Pandey, V., Sircar, A., Yadav, K., Bist, N., & Kumari, R. (2023). Energy storage techniques, applications, and recent trends: A sustainable solution for power storage. MRS Energy & Sustainability, 10, 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43581-023-00069-9
Wang, Z., Yen-Ku, K., Li, Z., An, N. B., & Abdul-Samad, Z. (2022). The transition of renewable energy and ecological sustainability through environmental policy stringency: Estimations from advance panel estimators. Renewable Energy, 188, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.075
Wang, X., Sun, X., Ahmad, M., & Chen, J. (2024). Energy transition, ecological governance, globalization, and environmental sustainability: Insights from the top ten emitting countries. Energy, 292, Article 130551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130551
Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2007). New improved tests for cointegration with structural breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 28(2), 188–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00504.x
Xie, P., Xu, Y., Tan, X., & Tan, Q. (2023). How does environmental policy stringency influence green innovation for environmental managements?. Journal of Environmental Management, 338, Article 117766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117766
Yirong, Q. (2022). Does environmental policy stringency reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from high-polluted economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, Article 130648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130648
Zhang, N., & Ding, W. (2022). Influencing paths of China‘s financial investment in science and technology on lowcarbon economic transformation. Transformations in Business & Economics, 21(2A), 630–657. https://www.transformations.knf.vu.lt/56a/article/infl
Zhang, Y., Chao, Q., Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., & Yu, X. (2021). China’s carbon neutrality: Leading global climate governance and green transformation. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 9(3), Article 2150019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748121500196
Zhu, Q., Xie, X., Li, Y., & Shao, X. (2024). Orchestrating network resources: How European Union green cooperation affects member states’ sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 459, Article 142499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142499
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.