A grey-based hybrid decision support framework for assessing the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) sustainable performance: a case study of BIST-listed banks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.24359Abstract
The present research has been designed to address two significant gaps in the existing literature pertaining to the banking industry. Firstly, it presents a set of criteria derived from the Refinitiv database for the evaluation of ESG sustainability performance. Secondly, it puts forward a novel methodological framework that is both novel and noteworthy in the MCGDM field. This framework employs a grey-based multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) technique with Bonferroni aggregation to comparatively analyze banks’ ESG sustainable performance. The developed methodology uses extended versions of three very recent methods, like the Modified Standard Deviation (MSD), Symmetry Point of Criterion (SPC), and Simple Ranking Process (SRP), based on the utilization of interval grey numbers. The Bonferroni aggregation operator is utilized for the aggregation of the experts’ evaluations concerning the alternatives based on the selected criteria. A real-life case study on seven publicly traded banks in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index is conducted with the aid of five experts. The research results imply that among the three main ESG dimensions, environmental management practices emerged as the most important factor influencing banks’ sustainable performance. This finding also signals that banks that adopt sound environmental management practices into their business models may gain a competitive edge over their competitors in terms of environmental regulations, resilience to environmental risks, and achieving high performance and stability. Finally, the model’s validity is checked via comparison and sensitivity assessments. The outcomes of the two-stage validation analysis corroborate the robustness and dependability of the suggested grey MCGDM model.
Keywords:
sustainability measurement, banking sector, grey theory, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), Modified Standard Deviation (MSD), Symmetry Point of Criterion (SPC), Simple Ranking Process (SRP)How to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Elhoseny, M., Abouhawash, M., Nam, Y., & Abdelaziz, N. M. (2021). Effcient MCDM model for evaluating the performance of commercial banks: A case study. Computers, Materials & Continua, 67(3), 2729–2746. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.015316
Al Shammari, M., & Milli, M. (2021). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model for customers’ bank selection decision in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Operational Research, 21, 1429–1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00496-y
Ali, J. (2024). Spherical fuzzy symmetric point criterion-based approach using Aczel–Alsina prioritization: Application to sustainable supplier selection. Granular Computing, 9, Article 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-024-00449-7
Aras, G., Tezcan, N., Kutlu Furtuna, O., & Hacioglu Kazak, E. (2017). Corporate sustainability measurement based on entropy weight and TOPSIS: A Turkish banking case study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2016-0100
Aras, G., Tezcan, N., & Kutlu Furtuna, O. (2018). The value relevance of banking sector multidimensional corporate sustainability performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1062–1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1520
Aslani, B., Rabiee, M., & Tavana, M. (2021). An integrated information fusion and grey multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 8(4), 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2020.1776414
Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.023
Baydaş, M., & Elma, O. E. (2021). An objective criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402257b
Baydaş, M., & Pamucar, D. (2022). Determining objective characteristics of MCDM methods under uncertainty: An exploration study with financial data. Mathematics, 10(7), Article 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071115
Baydaş, M., Elma, O. E., & Stević, Ž. (2024). Proposal of an innovative MCDA evaluation methodology: Knowledge discovery through rank reversal, standard deviation, and relationship with stock return. Financial Innovation, 10, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00526-x
Bayrakdaroğlu, A., & Yalçın, N. (2013). A fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of the operational risk factors for the state-owned and privately-owned commercial banks in Turkey. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 19(2), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2013.755098
Belton, V., & Gear, T. (1985). The legitimacy of rank reversal – A comment. Omega, 13(3), 143–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(85)90052-0
Bilyay-Erdogan, S. (2022). Corporate ESG engagement and information asymmetry: The moderating role of country-level institutional differences. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2128710
Bilyay-Erdogan, S., Danisman, G. O., & Demir, E. (2023). ESG performance and dividend payout: A channel analysis. Finance Research Letters, 55, Article 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103827
Bilyay-Erdogan, S., & Öztürkkal, B. (2023). The role of environmental, social, governance (ESG) practices and ownership on firm performance in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(12), 3776–3797. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2223930
Biswas, S., Božanić, D., Pamucar, D., & Marinković, D. (2023). A spherical fuzzy based decision making framework with Einstein aggregation for comparing preparedness of SMES in quality 4.0. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 21(3), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME230831037B
Bonferroni, C. (1950). Sulle medie multiple di potenze [On multiple averages of powers]. Bollettino Dell’Unione Matematica Italiana, 5(3–4), 267–270.
Cao, Q., Zhu, T., & Yu, W. (2024). ESG investment and bank efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 133, Article 107516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107516
Deepa, N., Ganesan, K., Srinivasan, K., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Realizing sustainable development via modified integrated weighting MCDM model for ranking agrarian dataset. Sustainability, 11(21), Article 6060. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216060
Deng, J. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters, 1(5), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X
Deng, J. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal of Grey System, 1(1), 1–24.
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
Dincer, H. (2019). HHI-based evaluation of the European banking sector using an integrated fuzzy approach. Kybernetes, 48(6), 1195–1215. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2018-0055
Dincer, H., & Hacioglu, U. (2013). Performance evaluation with fuzzy VIKOR and AHP method based on customer satisfaction in Turkish banking sector. Kybernetes, 42(7), 1072–1085. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2013-0021
Dincer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2018). Comparative evaluation of BSC-based new service development competencies in Turkish banking sector with the integrated fuzzy hybrid MCDM using content analysis. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(8), 2497–2516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0519-y
Do, D. T. (2024). Assessing the impact of criterion weights on the ranking of the Top Ten Universities in Vietnam. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(4), 14899–14903. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7607
Ecer, F. (2018). An integrated fuzzy AHP and ARAS model to evaluate mobile banking services. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 670–695. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1255275
Ecer, F., Gunes, E., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2024). Focusing on identifying the digital transformation performance of banks in the technology age through a multi-criteria methodology. Transformations in Business and Economics, 23(1), 127–153.
Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW-DOBI multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega, 112, Article 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102690
Esangbedo, M. O., & Tang, M. (2023). Evaluation of enterprise decarbonization scheme based on Grey-MEREC-MAIRCA hybrid MCDM method. Systems, 11(8), Article 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080397
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Fazeli, Z., Abbasi, F. B., & Sardar, S. (2023). Identifying and ranking indicators affecting the evaluation of financial performance in private banks using the fuzzy AHP method. Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling Journal, 4(3), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.30495/FOMJ.2023.1995996.1114
Fu, H., Zhang, Y., Subbareddy, R., & Vadivel, T. (2021). Mathematical modeling on workplace violence hazard assessment and security analysis using Optimized Grey Dynamic System Theory. Work, 68(3), 835–843. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203417
Gligorić, Z., Gligorić, M., Miljanović, I., Lutovac, S., & Milutinovic, A. (2023). Assessing criteria weights by the symmetry point of criterion (Novel SPC method) – application in the efficiency evaluation of the mineral deposit multi-criteria partitioning algorithm. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 136(1), 955–979. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.025021
Gupta, S., Mathew, M., Gupta, S., & Dawar, V. (2021). Benchmarking the private sector banks in India using MCDM approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(2), Article e2409. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2409
Hezam, I. M., Mishra, A. K., Pamucar, D., Rani, P., & Mishra, A. R. (2023a). Standard deviation and rank sum-based MARCOS model under intuitionistic fuzzy information for hospital site selection. Kybernetes, 53(10), 3727–3753. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2023-0136
Hezam, I. M., Rama, N., Vedala, D., Kumar, B. R., Mishra, A. R., & Cavallaro, F. (2023b). Assessment of biofuel industry sustainability factors based on the intuitionistic fuzzy symmetry point of criterion and rank-sum-based MAIRCA method. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6749. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086749
Horváthová, E. (2010). Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 70(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.004
Iç, Y. T., Yurdakul, M., & Pehlivan, E. (2022). Development of a hybrid financial performance measurement model using AHP and DOE methods for Turkish commercial banks. Soft Computing, 26, 2959–2979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06589-1
Işık, Ö. (2023). ESG activities and financial performance in banking industry. International Journal of Insurance and Finance, 3(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.52898/ijif.2023.10
Işık, Ö., & Koşaroğlu, Ş. M. (2020). Pay senetleri Borsa Istanbul’da işlem gören Türk petrol şirketlerinin finansal performanslarinin SD ve MAUT yöntemleri kullanilarak analizi [Analysis of the financial performance of Turkish listed oil companies through the application of SD and MAUT methods]. Third Sector Social Economy Review, 55(3), 1395–1411. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.20.06.1378
Karadağ Albayrak, Ö. (2021). Gri Sistem Teorisi Tabanlı Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri ve Uygulama Örnekleri Teori ve Uygulama [Grey System Theory based multi-criteria decision making techniques and application examples: Theory and application]. Gazi Kitabevi.
Kiani-Ghalehno, R., & Mahmoodirad, A. (2024). Providing bank branch ranking algorithm with fuzzy data, using a combination of two methods DEA and MCDM. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 15, 3563–3574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-024-04833-8
Korzeb, Z., & Samaniego-Medina, R. (2019). Sustainability performance: A comparative analysis in the Polish banking sector. Sustainability, 11(3), Article 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030653
Liang, D., Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., & Jamaldeen, A. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR approaches based on TODIM for evaluating internet banking website quality of Ghanaian banking industry. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 78, 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.006
Liu, J., & Qiao, J.-Z. (2014). A grey rough set model for evaluation and selection of software cost estimation methods. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 4(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-08-2013-0016
Liu, S., Jin, J., & Nainar, K. (2023). Does ESG performance reduce banks’ nonperforming loans? Finance Research Letters, 55, Article 103859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103859
Lin, Y.-H., Lee, P.-C., & Ting, H.-I. (2008). Dynamic multi-attribute decision making model with grey number evaluations. Expert Systems With Applications, 35(4), 1638–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.064
Mahmoudi, A., Mi, X., Liao, H., Feylizadeh, M. R., & Turskis, Z. (2020). Grey best-worst method for multiple experts multiple criteria decision making under uncertainty. Informatica, 31(2), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.15388/20-INFOR409
Mandas, M., Lahmar, O., Piras, L., & De Lisa, R. (2023). ESG in the financial industry: What matters for rating analysts? Research in International Business and Finance, 66, Article 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102045
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K. M. D., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 28(1), 516–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Halicka, K., Ejdys, J., Magruk, A., & Ahmad, U. N. U. (2018). Determining the utility in management by using multi-criteria decision support tools: A review. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 31(1), 1666–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1488600
Marković, V., Stajić, L., Stević, Ž., Mitrović, G., Novarlić, B., & Radojičić, Z. (2020). A novel integrated subjective-objective MCDM model for alternative ranking in order to achieve business excellence and sustainability. Symmetry, 12, Article 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12010164
Mian, S. H., Nasr, A. E., Moiduddin, K., Saleh, M., Abidi, H. M., & Alkhalefah, H. (2024). Assessment of consolidative multi-criteria decision making (C-MCDM) algorithms for optimal mapping of polymer materials in additive manufacturing: A case study of orthotic application. Heliyon, 10(10), Article e30867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30867
Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Pamucar, D., & Simic, V. (2024). Evaluation and prioritization of sustainable enterprise resource planning in SMEs using q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough set-based decision support model. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 32(5), 3260–3273. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2024.3374799
Narayanamoorthy, S., Brainy, J. V, Shalwala, R. A., Alsenani, T. R., Ahmadian, A., & Kang, D. (2023). An enhanced fuzzy decision making approach for the assessment of sustainable energy storage systems. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 33, Article 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2022.100962
Nguyen, P.-H., Tsai, J.-F., Nguyen, V.-T., Vu, D.-D., & Dao, T.-K. (2020). A decision support model for financial performance evaluation of listed companies in the Vietnamese retailing industry. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.1005
Olteanu, A. L., Ionaşcu, A. E., Cosma, S., Barbu, C. A., Popa, A., Cioroiu, C. G., & Goswami, S. S. (2024). Prioritizing the European investment sectors based on different economic, social, and governance factors using a fuzzy-MEREC-AROMAN decision-making model. Sustainability, 16(17), Article 7790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177790
Palmieri, E., Ferilli, G. B., Altunbas, Y., Stefanelli, V., & Geretto, E. F. (2024). Business model and ESG pillars: The impacts on banking default risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, Article 102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102978
Pamucar, D., Yazdani, M., Montero-Simo, M. J., Araque-Padilla, R. A., & Mohammed, A. (2021). Multi-criteria decision analysis towards robust service quality measurement. Expert Systems with Applications, 170, Article 114508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114508
Polychroniou, P. V., & Giannikos, I. (2009). A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making methodology for selection of human resources in a Greek private bank. Career Development International, 14(4), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910979853
Puška, A., Nedeljković, M., Šarkoćević, Ž., Golubović, Z., Ristić, V., & Stojanović, I. (2022). Evaluation of agricultural machinery using multi-criteria analysis methods. Sustainability, 14, Article 8675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148675
Rani, P., Chen, S., & Raj, A. (2023a). Retraction: Multiple attribute decision making based on MAIRCA, standard deviation-based method, and Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 644, Article 119274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119274
Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Pamucar, D., Ali, J., & Hezam, I. M. (2023b). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy symmetric point criterion-based MULTIMOORA method for sustainable recycling partner selection in SMEs. Soft Computing, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08189-7
Rao, P. K., & Shukla, A. (2023). Strategic sustainability in Indian banking industry: A performance analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(6), 2016–2034. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2023-0199
Rao, S. H., Kalvakolanu, S., & Chakraborty, C. (2021). Integration of ARAS and MOORA MCDM techniques for measuring the performance of private sector banks in India. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 29(Suppl 2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488521400158
Reyes-Norambuena, P., Martinez-Torres, J., Nemati, A., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2024). Towards sustainable urban futures: Integrating a novel Grey multi-criteria decision making model for optimal pedestrian walkway site selection. Sustainability, 16(11), Article 4437. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114437
Roy, P., & Shaw, K. (2023). A fuzzy MCDM decision-making model for m-banking evaluations: Comparing several m-banking applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14, 11873–11895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-03743-x
Şahin, M. (2021). Location selection by multi-criteria decision-making methods based on objective and subjective weightings. Knowledge and Information Systems, 63, 1991–2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-021-01588-y
Sariyer, G., Kumar, S., Chowdhury, S., & Erkan, M. (2024). Predictive and prescriptive analytics for ESG performance evaluation: A case of Fortune 500 companies. Journal of Business Research, 181, Article 114742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114742
Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699–11709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.013
Shabir, M., Ping, J., Işık, Ö., & Razzaq, K. (2024). Impact of corporate social responsibility on bank performance in emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-02-2023-0208
Shaju, K., Babu, S., & Thomas, B. (2023). Analysing effectiveness of grey theory-based feature selection for meteorological estimation models. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123, Article 106243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106243
Shi, X., Wang, L., & Emrouznejad, A. (2023). Performance evaluation of Chinese commercial banks by an improved slacks-based DEA model. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 90, Article 101702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101702
Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., & Turskis, Z. (2017). An extension of the EDAS method based on the use of interval grey numbers. Studies in Informatics and Control, 26(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.24846/v26i1y201701
Stathas, O., Kosmidou, K., Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2002). A multicriteria approach to assess banking performance : The case of Greece. In C. Zopounidis (Ed.), New trends in banking management. Contributions to management science (pp. 53–68). Physica. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57478-8_4
Tirkolaee, E. B., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2022). Retraction: A cluster-based stratified hybrid decision support model under uncertainty: Sustainable healthcare landfill location selection. Applied Intelligence, 52, 13614–13633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03335-4
Torkayesh, A. E., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Kahvand, M., & Khazaelpour, P. (2021). Landfill location selection for healthcare waste of urban areas using hybrid BWM-grey MARCOS model based on GIS. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, Article 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102712
Trung, D. D., Dudić, B., Dung, H. T., & Truong, N. X. (2024). Innovation in financial health assessment: Applying MCDM techniques to banks in Vietnam. Economics, 12(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2024-0011
Tüysüz, F., & Yıldız, N. (2020). A novel multi-criteria analysis model for the performance evaluation of bank regions: An application to Turkish agricultural banking. Soft Computing, 24, 5289–5311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04279-7
Ulutaş, A., Balo, F., Sua, L., Demir, E., Topal, A., & Jakovljević, V. (2021). A new integrated grey MCDM model: Case of warehouse location selection. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME210424060U
Vavrek, R., & Bečica, J. (2020). Efficiency evaluation of cultural services in the Czech republic via multi-criteria decision analysis. Sustainability, 12(8), Article 3409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083409
Więckowski, J., & Sałabun, W. (2024). A new sensitivity analysis method for decision-making with multiple parameters modification. Information Sciences, 678, Article 120902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.120902
Wu, H.-Y., Tzeng, G.-H., & Chen, Y.-H. (2009). A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on balanced scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 10135–10147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.005
Wu, C.-R., Lin, C.-T., & Tsai, P.-H. (2010). Evaluating business performance of wealth management banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.04.034
Xia, X., Govindan, K., & Zhu, Q. (2015). Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 811–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.044
Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), Article 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635
Zolfani, S. H., Sedaghat, M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Performance evaluating of rural ICT centers (telecenters), applying fuzzy AHP, SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey, a case study in Iran. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(2), 364–387. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.685110
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.