The convergence of environmental innovation, stakeholder pressure, open innovation in logistics firms: pathway to renewable energy in the presence of managerial cognition & competitive advantage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.23858Abstract
The logistics industry has recently been pressured to adopt sustainable practices due to increasing environmental concerns and regulatory mandates. This study investigates the nexus between ecological innovation, stakeholder pressure, open innovation, and renewable energy adoption in logistics firms, emphasizing the moderating role of managers’ cognition of sustainable opportunities and competitive advantage. In this regard, stakeholder pressure compels organizations to adopt renewable solutions. On the other hand, open innovation and eco-innovation are pivotal in taming firms’ internal limitations and advancing the adoption of renewable technologies. Thereby, analyzing empirical data from China’s logistics firm, the present study demonstrates how open innovation, eco-innovation, and stakeholder pressure affect renewable energy adoption and the firm’s competitive advantage. In addition, the study explicitly outlines the critical role of managers’ cognition of sustainable opportunities and competitive advantage as a moderator. Through SEM, the study reveals a positive and significant relationship between open-innovation, eco-innovation, and stakeholders’ pressures regarding renewable energy adoption. The moderation of managers’ cognition in the case of eco-innovation and open innovation proved significant, whereas, in the case of stakeholder pressure, it is insignificant. Competitive advantage, another moderator, failed to moderate the proposed relationship. Findings explain that managers can realize strategic significance in terms of sustainability. They may shift toward green strategies aligned with market apprehensions and environmental regulations. This cognitive factor enhances the usefulness of open and eco-innovation during renewable adoption. Overall, the study’s findings underscore the significance of managerial insights in leveraging these factors to accelerate the industry toward a sustainable future.
Keywords:
eco-innovation, stakeholder pressure, open innovation, manager’s cognition, competitive advantageHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adomako, S., & Tran, M. D. (2022). Environmental collaboration, responsible innovation, and firm performance: The moderating role of stakeholder pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2977
Afum, E., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Baah, C., Asamoah, G., & Kusi, L. Y. (2022). Eco-market orientation in the logistics industry: A conveyor belt for achieving organizational outcomes via green logistics practices. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(2), 712–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-07-2021-0383
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Al-Belushi, K. I. A., Stead, S. M., Gray, T., & Burgess, J. G. (2018). Measurement of open innovation in the marine biotechnology sector in Oman. Marine Policy, 98, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.004
Ali, Z., Gongbing, B., & Mehreen, A. (2019). Predicting supply chain effectiveness through supply chain finance: Evidence from small and medium enterprises. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 488–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-05-2018-0118
Amling, A., & Daugherty, P. J. (2020). Logistics and distribution innovation in China. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2018-0273
Anshari, M., & Almunawar, M. N. (2022). Adopting open innovation for SMEs and industrial revolution 4.0. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(2), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2020-0061
Banelienė, R., & Strazdas, R. (2023). Green innovation for competitiveness: Impact on GDP growth in the European Union. Contemporary Economics, 17(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.501
Barham, H., Dabic, M., Daim, T., & Shifrer, D. (2020). The role of management support for the implementation of open innovation practices in firms. Technology in Society, 63, Article 101282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101282
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086
Cai, W., & Li, G. (2018). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
Cao, H., & Chen, Z. (2019). The driving effect of internal and external environment on green innovation strategy – The moderating role of top management’s environmental awareness. Nankai Business Review International, 10(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-05-2018-0028
Cao, X., Ouyang, T., Balozian, P., & Zhang, S. (2020). The role of managerial cognitive capability in developing a sustainable innovation ecosystem: A case study of Xiaomi. Sustainability, 12(17), Article 7176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177176
Chang, C.-H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0914-x
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
Chen, X., Chen, X., Fang, M., Xia, W., & Hu, Y. (2023). The impact of the top management team faultlines on environment, social and governance performance of listed companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(6), 1776–1806. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.19547
Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414
Coyne, K. P. (1986). Sustainable competitive advantage – What it is, what it isn’t. Business Horizons, 29(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(86)90087-X
Gouldson, A., & Sullivan, R. (2013). Long-term corporate climate change targets: What could they deliver? Environmental Science & Policy, 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.013
Guo, Y., & Wang, L. (2022). Environmental entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of environmental innovation and stakeholder pressure. Sage Open, 12(1), Article 21582440211061354. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061354
Gupta, S., & Agrawal, R. (2018). Environmentally responsible consumption: Construct definition, scale development, and validation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1476
He, F., Miao, X., Wong, C. W. Y., & Lee, S. (2018). Contemporary corporate eco-innovation research: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 502–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.314
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247
Helmig, B., Spraul, K., & Ingenhoff, D. (2016). Under positive pressure: How stakeholder pressure affects corporate social responsibility implementation. Business & Society, 55(2), 151–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313477841
Hsu, C.-C. (2024). The impact of innovation adoption on sustainable business development in China: The role of environmental, social, and corporate governance performance. Engineering Economics, 35(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.35.2.33190
Irfan, M., Zhao, Z.-Y., Rehman, A., Ozturk, I., & Li, H. (2021). Consumers’ intention-based influence factors of renewable energy adoption in Pakistan: A structural equation modeling approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10504-w
Khan, S. A. R., Godil, D. I., Yu, Z., Abbas, F., & Shamim, M. A. (2022). Adoption of renewable energy sources, low‐carbon initiatives, and advanced logistical infrastructure – an step toward integrated global progress. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2243
Khavul, S., & Bruton, G. D. (2013). Harnessing innovation for change: Sustainability and poverty in developing countries. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01067.x
Konadu, R., Ahinful, G. S., Boakye, D. J., & Elbardan, H. (2022). Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, Article 121279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279
Li, J., Zhang, X., Ali, S., & Khan, Z. (2020). Eco-innovation and energy productivity: New determinants of renewable energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, Article 111028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111028
Li, M., & Wang, J. (2022). Spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factors of total factor productivity in China’s logistics industry under low-carbon constraints. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15614-7
Liao, Y. C., & Tsai, K. H. (2019). Bridging market demand, proactivity, and technology competence with eco‐innovations: The moderating role of innovation openness. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1710
Liu, J., Chen, L., & Kittilaksanawong, W. (2013a). External knowledge search strategies in China’s technology ventures: The role of managerial interpretations and ties. Management and Organization Review, 9(3), 437–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12037
Liu, W., Wang, C., & Mol, A. P. J. (2013b). Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: The case of Shandong in China. Applied Energy, 102, 1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.057
Moshood, T. D., Nawanir, G., Mahmud, F., Mohamad, F., Ahmad, M. H., & AbdulGhani, A. (2022). Sustainability of biodegradable plastics: New problem or solution to solve the global plastic pollution? Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 5, Article 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100273
Nguyen, N. P., & Adomako, S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure for eco‐friendly practices, international orientation, and eco‐innovation: A study of small and medium‐sized enterprises in Vietnam. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2185
Pata, U. K. (2018). The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy, 160, 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.095
Pereira, R. M., MacLennan, M. L. F., & Tiago, E. F. (2020). Interorganizational cooperation and eco-innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(5), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-01-2020-0008
Persson, Å., & Rockström, J. (2011). Business leaders. Nature Climate Change, 1, 426–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1290
Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. In Wubben, E. (Ed.), The Dynamics of the eco-efficient economy: Environmental regulation and competitive advantage (pp. 33–56). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782543978.00010
Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M., & Riahi, K. (2013). Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature, 493, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11787
Schaltenbrand, B., Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A., & Lindeman, K. (2018). See what we want to see? The effects of managerial experience on corporate green investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1129–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3191-x
Shubham, Charan, P., & Murty, L. (2018). Organizational adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in India: Integrating institutional theory and corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1258373
Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2906
Solarin, S. A., Bello, M. O., & Tiwari, A. K. (2022). The impact of technological innovation on renewable energy production: Accounting for the roles of economic and environmental factors using a method of moments quantile regression. Heliyon, 8(7), Article e09913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09913
Statista. (2023a). Logistics industry in China – Statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/10092/logistics-industry-in-china/#topicOverview
Statista. (2023b). Share of social logistics costs in China’s gross domestic product (GDP) from 2014 to 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/949249/china-national-logistics-costs-as-a-percentage-of-gdp/#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20social%20logistics%20costs,to%2012%20percent%20by%202025.
Tran-Thi-Thanh, T., & Nguyen-Thi-Phuong, A. (2023). Exploring the mechanisms underlying firms’ intent to adopt circular business models. Contemporary Economics, 17(4), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.518
Tsinopoulos, C., Sousa, C. M., & Yan, J. (2018). Process innovation: Open innovation and the moderating role of the motivation to achieve legitimacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12374
Vu, T. L., Paramaiah, C., Tufail, B., Nawaz, M. A., Xuyen, N. T. M., & Huy, P. Q. (2023). Effect of financial inclusion, eco-innovation, globalization, and sustainable economic growth on ecological footprint. Engineering Economics, 34(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.34.1.32402
Wall, W. P., Khalid, B., Urbański, M., & Kot, M. (2021). Factors influencing consumer’s adoption of renewable energy. Energies, 14(17), Article 5420. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175420
Wang, D. D., & Sueyoshi, T. (2018). Climate change mitigation targets set by global firms: Overview and implications for renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.024
Wang, J., Zhang, J., Cifuentes-Faura, J., Ileana, S. C., & Zhao, X. (2024). Exploring factors influencing the digital economy: Uncovering the relationship structure to improve sustainability in China. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(2), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.20600
Wang, S., & Li, W. (2024). Effects of ICT and energy transition on sustainable fiscal growth: Empirical evidence from China. Engineering Economics, 35(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.35.2.33431
Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
White, J. C., Varadarajan, P. R., & Dacin, P. A. (2003). Market situation interpretation and response: The role of cognitive style, organizational culture, and information use. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.3.63.18654
Xinhua. (2018). Economic watch: China seeks to green logistics services to beat plastic pollution. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-06/05/c_137232196.htm
Xu, G., Hou, G., & Zhang, J. (2022). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A digital capability perspective through digital innovation orientation for social and environmental value creation. Sustainability, 14(18), Article 11222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811222
Xu, M., Xu, Q., Wei, S., & Cong, L. (2024). The role of organizational resilience in social, economic, environmental and human sustainability: Evidence form Chinese FMCG sector. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(3), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.20476
Yang, D., Wang, A. X., Zhou, K. Z., & Jiang, W. (2019). Environmental strategy, institutional force, and innovation capability: A managerial cognition perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3830-5
Yu, X., Xu, H., Lou, W., Xu, X., & Shi, V. (2023). Examining energy eco-efficiency in China’s logistics industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 258, Article 108797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108797
Zhang, R., Chen, X., Li, Z., & Qiu, P. (2023). Innovation under an umbrella: how can blockchain contribute to corporate innovation in the age of globalization. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(3), 1005–1040. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.18967
Zhao, X.-X., Ma, J., Wen, J., & Chang, C.-P. (2024). The impact of epidemics on green innovation: Global analysis. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.18677
Zhu, L., & Wang, X. (2023). Green innovation in educational institutes of China: Mediating role of green value co-creation. Engineering Economics, 34(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.34.1.32836
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.