Evaluating economic freedom via a multi-criteria MEREC-DNMA model-based composite system: case of OPEC countries

    Fatih Ecer Affiliation
    ; Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani Affiliation


Economic freedom indicators create a beneficial and suitable guide and a crucial reference for investors, policymakers, lenders, and market researchers worldwide. In light of these indicators, the economic freedom performances of countries can be determined. The Heritage Foundation annually releases a ranked list of the country based on their performance in terms of fourteen economic freedom criteria with equal weights through a simple aggregation approach. According to an average-based aggregator, equal weight of economic freedom criteria and calculating rank of countries cannot be a completely reliable approach. Thus, this work establishes a composite index system in the form of a decision support system that employs the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) and the double normalization-based multi-aggregation (DNMA) to specify the economic freedom levels of the OPEC countries. MEREC obtains the importance weights of indicators without the interference of any stakeholder or decision-makers. Afterward, DNMA, as a novel ranking multi-criteria method, is applied to sort countries based on their performance against all economic freedom criteria. This is the first attempt in the literature to calculate the index of economic freedom utilizing an integrated multi-criteria decision support model. Whereas “investment freedom” is the most significant indicator of economic freedom, the UAE is in the best position in terms of economic freedom among OPEC countries. A fourphased sensitivity control is also performed so as to verify the robustness and usefulness of the developed decision tool.

Keyword : economic freedom, OPEC, economic freedom index, sustainable development, MCDM, composite index system

How to Cite
Ecer, F., & Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. (2022). Evaluating economic freedom via a multi-criteria MEREC-DNMA model-based composite system: case of OPEC countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(4), 1158–1181.
Published in Issue
Jul 15, 2022
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Amado, C. A., São José, J. M., & Santos, S. P. (2016). Measuring active ageing: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(1), 207–223.

Antanasijević, D., Pocajt, V., Ristić, M., & Perić-Grujić, A. (2017). A differential multi-criteria analysis for the assessment of sustainability performance of European countries: Beyond country ranking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 213–220.

Arbolino, R., De Simone, L., Carlucci, F., Yigitcanlar, T., & Ioppolo, G. (2018). Towards a sustainable industrial ecology: Implementation of a novel approach in the performance evaluation of Italian regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 220–236.

Asadzadeh, A., Kötter, T., Salehi, P., & Birkmann, J. (2017). Operationalizing a concept: The systematic review of composite indicator building for measuring community disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 25, 147–162.

Assi, A. F., Isiksal, A. Z., & Tursoy, T. (2020). Highlighting the connection between financial development and consumption of energy in countries with the highest economic freedom. Energy Policy, 147, 111897.

Attardi, R., Cerreta, M., Sannicandro, V., & Torre, C. M. (2018). Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: The Land-Use Policy Efficiency Index (LUPEI). European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 491–507.

Boggia, A., Massei, G., Pace, E., Rocchi, L., Paolotti, L., & Attard, M. (2018). Spatial multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment: A new model for decision making. Land Use Policy, 71, 281–292.

Böyükaslan, A., & Ecer, F. (2021). Determination of drivers for investing in cryptocurrencies through a fuzzy full consistency method-Bonferroni (FUCOM-F’B) framework. Technology in Society, 67, 101745.

Cabello, J. M., Ruiz, F., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2021). An alternative aggregation process for composite indexes: An application to the Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index. Social Indicators Research, 153(2), 443–467.

Clivillé, V., Berrah, L., & Mauris, G. (2007). Quantitative expression and aggregation of performance measurements based on the MACBETH multi-criteria method. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(1), 171–189.

Dobos, I., & Vörösmarty, G. (2014). Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicators. International Journal of Production Economics, 157, 273–278.

Ecer, F. (2014). A hybrid banking websites quality evaluation model using AHP and COPRAS-G: A Turkey case. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 758–782.

Ecer, F. (2018). Third-party logistics (3PLs) provider selection via Fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 615–634.

Ecer, F. (2021a). Sustainability assessment of existing onshore wind plants in the context of triple bottom line: A best-worst method (BWM) based MCDM framework. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 19677–19693.

Ecer, F. (2021b). A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110916.

Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121981.

Ecer, F., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2022). A stratified fuzzy decision-making approach for sustainable circular supplier selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–15.

Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., Zolfani, S. H., & Eshkalag, M. K. (2019). Sustainability assessment of OPEC countries: Application of a multiple attribute decision making tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118324.

El Gibari, S., Gómez, T., & Ruiz, F. (2019). Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: A review. Journal of Business Economics, 89(1), 1–24.

Emas, R. (2015). The concept of sustainable development: Definition and defining principles. Brief for GSDR 2015.

Erilli, N. A. (2018). Economic freedom index calculation using FCM. Alphanumeric Journal, 6(1), 93–116.

Galik, A., Bąk, M., Bałandynowicz-Panfil, K., & Cirella, G. T. (2022). Evaluating labour market flexibility using the TOPSIS method: Sustainable industrial relations. Sustainability, 14(1), 526.

Graafland, J. (2019). Economic freedom and corporate environmental responsibility: The role of small government and freedom from government regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 250–258.

Gropper, D. M., Jahera Jr, J. S., & Park, J. C. (2015). Political power, economic freedom and Congress: Effects on bank performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 60, 76–92.

Gušavac, B. A., & Savić, G. (2021). Operations research problems and data envelopment analysis in agricultural land processing – A review. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business & Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 26(1), 1–13.

Gwartney, J. (2017). Economic freedom of the world. The Fraser Institute.

Haider, H., Hewage, K., Umer, A., Ruparathna, R., Chhipi-Shrestha, G., Culver, K., Holland, M., Kay, J., & Sadiq, R. (2018). Sustainability assessment framework for small-sized urban neighbourhoods: An application of fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 36, 21–32.

Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Ecer, F., Pamučar, D., & Raslanas, S. (2020). Neighborhood selection for a newcomer via a novel BWM-based revised MAIRCA integrated model: A case from the Coquimbo-La Serena conurbation, Chile. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 24(2), 102–118.

Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Torkayesh, A. E., Ecer, F., Turskis, Z., & Šaparauskas, J. (2021). International market selection: A MABA based EDAS analysis framework. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 99–124.

Hernandez-Perdomo, E. A., & Mun, J. (2017). Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable. Applied Energy, 195, 487–502.

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. (2021). Assessment of distribution center locations using a multi-expert subjective–objective decision-making approach. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–19.

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13(4), 525.

Krajnc, D., & Glavič, P. (2005). How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological economics, 55(4), 551–563.

Kropp, W. W., & Lein, J. K. (2012). Assessing the geographic expression of urban sustainability: A scenario based approach incorporating spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Sustainability, 4(9), 2348–2365.

Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596–609.

Lai, H., & Liao, H. (2021). A multi-criteria decision making method based on DNMA and CRITIC with linguistic D numbers for blockchain platform evaluation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 101, 104200.

Lai, H., Liao, H., Šaparauskas, J., Banaitis, A., Ferreira, F. A., & Al-Barakati, A. (2020). Sustainable cloud service provider development by a Z-number-based DNMA method with Gini-coefficient-based weight determination. Sustainability, 12(8), 3410.

Li, W., Yu, S., Pei, H., Zhao, C., & Tian, B. (2017). A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 60, 49–64.

Liao, H., & Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega, 94, 102058.

Liao, H., Long, Y., Tang, M., Streimikiene, D., & Lev, B. (2019). Early lung cancer screening using double normalization-based multi-aggregation (DNMA) and Delphi methods with hesitant fuzzy information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 453–463.

Liao, H., Xue, J., Nilashi, M., Wu, X., & Antucheviciene, J. (2020). Partner selection for automobile manufacturing enterprises with a q-rung orthopair fuzzy double normalizaion-based multi-aggregation method. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19.

Martí, L., Martín, J. C., & Puertas, R. (2017). A DEA – logistics performance index. Journal of Applied Economics, 20(1), 169–192.

Miller, T., Kim, A. B., & Roberts, J. M. (2021). Index of economic freedom. The Heritage Foundation.

Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Giovannini, E., & Hofman, A. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Technical report. OECD, Paris.

Nie, S., Liao, H., Wu, X., Tang, M., & Al-Barakati, A. (2019). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic DNMA method with cardinal consensus reaching process for shopping mall location selection. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 23(6), 420–434.

Ott, J. (2018). Measuring economic freedom: Better without size of government. Social Indicators Research, 135(2), 479–498.

Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Cirovic, G., & Arlasheedi, M. A. (2020). Application of improved best worst method (BWM) in real-world problems. Mathematics, 8(8), 1342.

Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., & Deveci, M. (2021). Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. Science of the Total Environment, 788, 147763.

Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., & Saltelli, A. (2013). Ratings and rankings: Voodoo or science? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 176(3), 609–634.

Petrović, M., Bojković, N., Anić, I., Stamenković, M., & Tarle, S. P. (2014). An ELECTRE-based decision aid tool for stepwise benchmarking: An application over EU Digital Agenda targets. Decision Support Systems, 59, 230–241.

Radovanović, S., Petrović, A., Delibašić, B., & Suknović, M. (2021). Eliminating Disparate Impact in MCDM: The case of TOPSIS. In Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems (pp. 275–282). Faculty of Organization and Informatics. Varazdin.

Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Saha, A., Hezam, I. M., & Pamucar, D. (2022). Fermatean fuzzy Heronian mean operators and MEREC‐based additive ratio assessment method: An application to food waste treatment technology selection. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(3), 2612–2647.

Rodrigues, T. C., Montibeller, G., Oliveira, M. D., & e Costa, C. A. B. (2017). Modelling multicriteria value interactions with reasoning maps. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(3), 1054–1071.

Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2002). State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. European Commission.

Shahnazi, R., & Shabani, Z. D. (2021). The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU. Renewable Energy, 169, 293–307.

Sibille, A. D. C. T., Cloquell-Ballester, V. A., Cloquell-Ballester, V. A., & Darton, R. (2009). Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(1), 40–66.

Simic, V., Gokasar, I., Deveci, M., & Karakurt, A. (2021). An integrated CRITIC and MABAC based Type-2 neutrosophic model for public transportation pricing system selection. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 101157.

Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212.

Sousa, M., Almeida, M. F., & Calili, R. (2021). Multiple criteria decision making for the achievement of the UN sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Sustainability, 13(8), 4129.

Strezov, V., Evans, A., & Evans, T. J. (2017). Assessment of the economic, social and environmental dimensions of the indicators for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 242–253.

Torkayesh, A. E., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2021b). Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102975.

Torkayesh, A. E., Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., & Chatterjee, P. (2021). An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 78, 101052.

Trung, D. D., & Thinh, H. X. (2021). A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 16(4), 443–456.

Tutak, M., & Brodny, J. (2022). Analysis of the level of energy security in the three seas initiative countries. Applied Energy, 311, 118649.

Wang, J., Wang, Z., Yang, C., Wang, N., & Yu, X. (2012). Optimization of the number of components in the mixed model using multi-criteria decision-making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(9), 4227–4240.

Wang, L., & Rani, P. (2021). Sustainable supply chains under risk in the manufacturing firms: An extended double normalization-based multiple aggregation approach under an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.

Wang, Q., Dai, H. N., & Wang, H. (2017). A smart MCDM framework to evaluate the impact of air pollution on city sustainability: A case study from China. Sustainability, 9(6), 911.

Wu, X. L., & Liao, H. C. (2019). Comparison analysis between DNMA method and other MCDM methods. ICSES Transaction on Neural and Fuzzy Computing, 2(1), 4–10.

Wu, X., Nie, S., Liao, H., & Gupta, P. (2020). A large‐scale group decision making method with a consensus reaching process under cognitive linguistic environment. International Transactions in Operational Research, 1–26.

Yalcin, N., & Ünlü, U. (2018). A multi-criteria performance analysis of Initial Public Offering (IPO) firms using CRITIC and VIKOR methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 534–560.

Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2019), A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519.

Zakeri, S., Ecer, F., Konstantas, D., & Cheikhrouhou, N. (2021). The vital-immaterial-mediocre multi-criteria decision-making method. Kybernetes.

Zhang, H., Liao, H., Wu, X., Zavadskas, E. K., & Al-Barakati, A. (2020). Internet financial investment product selection with Pythagorean fuzzy DNMA method. Engineering Economics-Inzinerine ekonomika, 31(1), 61–71.

Zhang, H., Peng, Y., Tian, G., Wang, D., & Xie, P. (2017). Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach. PloS ONE, 12(5), e0177578.

Zu, J., Peng, Z., & Chen, F. (2022). Overseeing road safety progress using CV-PROMETHEE II-JSS: A case study in the EU context. Expert Systems with Applications, 195, 116623.