A new hybrid fuzzy PSI-PIPRECIA-CoCoSo MCDM based approach to solving the transportation company selection problem

    Alptekin Ulutaş Affiliation
    ; Gabrijela Popovic Affiliation
    ; Pavle Radanov Affiliation
    ; Dragisa Stanujkic Affiliation
    ; Darjan Karabasevic Affiliation


Nowadays, customers are not only interested in the quality of products, but they also want to have these products in a timely manner. The managers of an organization are faced with two problems when the distribution of products is in question, namely: (1) customers are usually geographically dispersed and (2) transportation should be performed in a cost-effective way. Although managers may have a significant experience and formal knowledge, decisions connected with the selection of an appropriate transportation company may very often be biased. For the purpose of avoiding making the inadequate decisions that might harm the operation of the organization, the application of a hybrid MCDM model is proposed in this paper. The proposed model consists of three fuzzy MCDM methods, including: the PIPRECIA, the PSI, and the CoCoSo methods. The fuzzy-PIPRECIA method is used to achieve the subjective weights of criteria, whereas the fuzzy-PSI method is used to obtain the objective weights of criteria. Fuzzy-CoCoSo is utilized to rank alternative transportation companies according to their performances. The possibilities of the proposed hybrid model are tested on a real case study pointed at the selection of an appropriate company for the transportation of ready-garments to retailers in Turkey.

First published online 07 July 2021

Keyword : MCDM, fuzzy PIPRECIA method, fuzzy PSI method, fuzzy CoCoSo method, hybrid model, transportation company selection

How to Cite
Ulutaş, A., Popovic, G., Radanov, P., Stanujkic, D., & Karabasevic, D. (2021). A new hybrid fuzzy PSI-PIPRECIA-CoCoSo MCDM based approach to solving the transportation company selection problem. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(5), 1227-1249.
Published in Issue
Aug 31, 2021
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Afful-Dadzie, E., Oplatkova, Z. K., & Prieto, L. A. B. (2017). Comparative state-of-the-art survey of classical fuzzy set and intuitionistic fuzzy sets in multi-criteria decision making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(3), 726–738.

Attri, R., & Grover, S. (2015). Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle. Journal of King Saud University –Engineering Sciences, 27(2), 207–216.

Bagočius, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2014). Multi-person selection of the best wind turbine based on the multi-criteria integrated additive-multiplicative utility function. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(4), 590–599.

Ballou, R. H. (1997). Business logistics: Importance and some research opportunities. Gestão & Produção, 4(2), 117–129.

Biswas, T. K., Stević, Ž., Chatterjee, P., & Yazdani, M. (2019). An integrated methodology for evaluation of electric vehicles under sustainable automotive environment. In P. Chatterjee, M. Yazdani, S. Chakraborty, D. Panchal, & S. Bhattacharyya (Eds.), Advanced multi-criteria decision making for addressing complex sustainability issues (pp. 41–62). IGI Global.

Borujeni, M. P., & Gitinavard, H. (2017). Evaluating the sustainable mining contractor selection problems: An imprecise last aggregation preference selection index method. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 16(4), 207–218.

Brans, J. P., & Vincke, P. (1985). Note – A preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Management Science, 31(6), 647–656.

Chauhan, R., Singh, T., Thakur, N. S., & Patnaik, A. (2016). Optimization of parameters in solar thermal collector provided with impinging air jets based upon preference selection index method. Renewable Energy, 99, 118–126.

Christopher, M. (2012). Logistics and supply chain management. Pearson.

Churchman, C. W., & Ackoff, R. L. (1954). An approximate measure of value. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(2), 172–187.

Đalić, I., Stević, Ž., Karamasa, C., & Puška, A. (2020). A novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA – interval rough SAW model: Green supplier selection. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 126–145.

Erceg, Ž., Starčević, V., Pamučar, D., Mitrović, G., Stević, Ž., & Žikić, S. (2019). A new model for stock management in order to rationalize costs: ABC-FUCOM-interval rough CoCoSo model. Symmetry, 11(12), 1527.

Erdogan, S. A., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision making in construction management: AHP and expert choice approach. Procedia Engineering, 172, 270–276.

He, T., Ho, W., Lee Ka Man, C., & Xu, X. (2012). A fuzzy AHP based integer linear programming model for the multi-criteria transshipment problem. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(1), 159–179.

Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., & Luque, M. (2004). Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1), 98–109.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems: Vol. 186. Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58–191). Springer.

Ilgin, M. A., Gupta, S. M., & Battaïa, O. (2015). Use of MCDM techniques in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: State of the art. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 746–758.

Jaukovic Jocic, K., Jocic, G., Karabasevic, D., Popovic, G., Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., & Thanh Nguyen, P. (2020). A novel integrated PIPRECIA-interval-valued triangular fuzzy ARAS model: E-Learning course selection. Symmetry, 12(6), 928.

Kabir, G. (2015). Selection of hazardous industrial waste transportation company using extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, 7(1), 40–58.

Karabašević, D., Stanujkic, D., Maksimovic, M., Popovic, G., & Momcilovic, O. (2019). An approach to evaluating the quality of websites based on the weighted sum preferred levels of performances method. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 16(5), 195–215.

Karaşan, A., & Bolturk, E. (2019, August). Solid waste disposal site selection by using neutrosophic combined compromise solution method. In 2019 Conference of the International Fuzzy Systems Association and the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT 2019). Atlantis Press.

Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258.

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2018). An extended step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis with symmetric interval type-2 fuzzy sets for determining the subjective weights of criteria in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Symmetry, 10(4), 91.

Kulak, O., & Kahraman, C. (2005). Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 170(2–4), 191–210.

Kundu, P., Kar, S., & Maiti, M. (2014). A fuzzy MCDM method and an application to solid transportation problem with mode preference. Soft Computing, 18(9), 1853–1864.

Liao, H., Xu, Z., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2018). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in decision making: A state-of-the-art survey. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(7), 2084–2110.

Maniya, K. D., & Bhatt, M. G. (2011). The selection of flexible manufacturing system using preference selection index method. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 9(3), 330–349.

Maniya, K., & Bhatt, M. G. (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Materials & Design, 31(4), 1785–1789.

Mohagheghi, V., Mousavi, S. M., & Siadat, A. (2016, December). Assessing E-waste recycling programs by developing preference selection index under interval type-2 fuzzy uncertainty. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 1259–1263). IEEE.

Mota, B., Gomes, M. I., Carvalho, A., & Barbosa-Povoa, A. P. (2015). Towards supply chain sustainability: Economic, environmental and social design and planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 14–27.

Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering.

Paul, M., Sridharan, R., & Ramanan, T. R. (2016). A multi-objective decision-making framework using preference selection index for assembly job shop scheduling problem. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 9(4), 362–387.

Peng, X., Zhang, X., & Luo, Z. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53, 3813–3847.

Popović, G., Milovanovic, G., & Stanujkic, D. (2018). Prioritization of strategies for tourism development by applying a SWOT-SWARA analysis: The case of Sokobanja Spa. Teme – Časopis za Društvene Nauke, 42(3), 999–1016.

Popović, G., Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., Maksimovic, M., & Sava, C. (2019). Multiple criteria approach in the ranking of the sustainable indicators for cultural heritage sites. Quaestus, 14, 165–175.

Razavi Hajiagha, S. H., Mahdiraji, H. A., Hashemi, S. S., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Determining weights of fuzzy attributes for multi-attribute decision-making problems based on consensus of expert opinions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(5), 738–755.

Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundation of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision, 31(1), 49–73.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGrawHill.

Samanta, S., & Jana, D. K. (2019). A multi-item transportation problem with mode of transportation preference by MCDM method in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(2), 605–617.

Sandberg, E. (2013). Understanding logistics-based competition in retail – a business model approach. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(3), 176–188.

Sawant, V. B., Mohite, S. S., & Patil, R. (2011). A decision-making methodology for automated guided vehicle selection problem using a preference selection index method. In K. Shah, V. R. Lakshmi Gorty, & A. Phirke (Eds.), Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 145. Technology systems and management (pp. 176–181). Springer.

Stanujkic, D. (2015). Extension of the ARAS method for decision-making problems with intervalvalued triangular fuzzy numbers. Informatica, 26(2), 335–355.

Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., & Cipriana, S. A. V. A. (2018). An application of the PIPRECIA and WS PLP methods for evaluating website quality in hotel industry. Quaestus, 12, 190–198.

Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F., & Cavallaro, F. (2019). An approach to determining customer satisfaction in traditional Serbian restaurants. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1127–1138.

Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Karabasevic, D., Smarandache, F., & Turskis, Z. (2017a). The use of the pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment method for determining the weights of criteria. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 20(4), 116–133.

Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Karabasevic, D., Turskis, Z., & Keršulienė, V. (2017b). New group decision-making ARCAS approach based on the integration of the SWARA and the ARAS methods adapted for negotiations. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(4), 599–618.

Stević, Ž., Stjepanović, Ž., Božičković, Z., Das, D., & Stanujkić, D. (2018). Assessment of conditions for implementing information technology in a warehouse system: A novel fuzzy PIPRECIA method. Symmetry, 10(11), 586.

Tokar, T. (2010). Behavioural research in logistics and supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(1), 89–103.

Torkayesh, A. E., Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., & Chatterjee, P. (2021). An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1–12.

Turskis, Z., Dzitac, S., Stankiuviene, A., & Šukys, R. (2019a). A fuzzy group decision-making model for determining the most influential persons in the sustainable prevention of accidents in the construction SMEs. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 14(1), 90–106.

Turskis, Z., Goranin, N., Nurusheva, A., & Boranbayev, S. (2019b). Information security risk assessment in critical infrastructure: A hybrid MCDM approach. Informatica, 30(1), 187–211.

Turskis, Z., Lazauskas, M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Fuzzy multiple criteria assessment of construction site alternatives for non-hazardous waste incineration plant in Vilnius city, applying ARAS-F and AHP methods. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 20(2), 110–120.

Ulutaş, A., Topal, A., & Bakhat, R. (2019). An application of fuzzy integrated model in green supplier selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 4256359.

Vahdani, B., Mousavi, S. M., & Ebrahimnejad, S. (2014). Soft computing-based preference selection index method for human resource management. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26(1), 393– 403.

Wang, T. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2008). Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP. Information Sciences, 178(19), 3755–3765.

Wang, T. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2011). Fuzzy multi-criteria selection among transportation companies with fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11884–11890.

Wen, Z., Liao, H., Mardani, A., & Al-Barakati, A. (2019a, August). A hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method for multiple criteria decision making. In J. Xu, S. Ahmed, F. Cooke, & G. Duca (Eds.), Advances in intelligent systems and computing: Vol. 1001. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (pp. 813–821). Springer.

Wen, Z., Liao, H., Ren, R., Bai, C., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., & Al-Barakati, A. (2019b). Cold chain logistics management of medicine with an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4843.

Wen, Z., Liao, H., Zavadskas, E. K., & Al-Barakati, A. (2019c). Selection third-party logistics service providers in supply chain finance by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method. Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 4033–4058.

Yazdani, M., Wen, Z., Liao, H., Banaitis, A., & Turskis, Z. (2019). A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(8), 858–874.

Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2018). A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519.

Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Adeli, H., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision making methods: A review of applications in engineering. Scientia Iranica, 23(1), 1–20.

Zavadskas, E. K., & Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(02), 267–283.

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 165–179.

Zemlickienė, V., & Turskis, Z. (2020). Evaluation of the expediency of technology commercialization: A case of information technology and biotechnology. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(1), 271–289.

Zheng, J. H. (2015). A fuzzy TOPSIS approach based to evaluate the transportation mode selection: An experience in a suburban university. Advances in Transportation Studies, 1, 23–34.

Zolfani, S. H., Chatterjee, P., & Yazdani, M. (2019, May). A structured framework for sustainable supplier selection using a combined BWM-CoCoSo model. In International Scientific Conference in Business, Management and Economics Engineering (pp. 797–804).