Should Bitcoin be held under the U.S. partisan conflict?

    Chi-Wei Su Affiliation
    ; Meng Qin Affiliation
    ; Xiao-Lei Zhang Affiliation
    ; Ran Tao Affiliation
    ; Muhammad Umar Affiliation


This paper probes the interrelationship between Bitcoin price (BP) and the U.S. partisan conflict (PC) by performing the bootstrap full- and sub-sample Granger causality tests. The positive influence from PC to BP reveals that Bitcoin can be considered as a tool to avoid the uncertainty caused by the rise in PC. However, this view cannot be supported by the negative impact, the major reason is that the burst of bubble undermines the hedging ability of Bitcoin. The above results are inconsistent with the intertemporal capital asset pricing model (ICAPM), underlining that high PC may drive BP to rise, in order to compensate for the losses and costs from factionalism. Conversely, BP has a negative impact on PC, suggesting that the U.S. political situation can be reflected by the Bitcoin market. Under the circumstance of the fiercer factionalism in the U.S., this investigation can benefit investors and related authorities.

First published online 04 February 2021

Keyword : Bitcoin price, U.S. partisan conflict, rolling- window, dynamic nexus

How to Cite
Su, C.-W., Qin, M., Zhang, X.-L., Tao, R., & Umar, M. (2021). Should Bitcoin be held under the U.S. partisan conflict?. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(3), 511-529.
Published in Issue
May 25, 2021
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Akhtaruzzaman, M., Sensoy, A., & Corbet, S. (2019). The influence of Bitcoin on portfolio diversification and design. Finance Research Letters, 37, 101344.

Andrews, D. W. K. (1993). Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica, 61(4), 821–856.

Andrews, D. W. K., & Ploberger, W. (1994). Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica, 62(6), 1383–1414.

Azzimonti, M. (2014). Partisan conflict (Working Paper No. 14-19). FRB of Philadelphia.

Azzimonti, M. (2019). Does partisan conflict deter FDI inflows to the US? Journal of International Economics, 120, 162–178.

Balcilar, M., & Ozdemir, Z. A. (2013). The export-output growth nexus in Japan: A bootstrap rolling window approach. Empirical Economics, 44, 639–660.

Balcilar, M., Ozdemir, Z. A., & Arslanturk, Y. (2010). Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1398–1410.

Bartsch, Z. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty and dollar-pound exchange rate return volatility. Journal of International Money and Finance, 98, 102067.

Baur, D. G., Dimpfl, T., & Kuck, K. (2018). Bitcoin, gold and the US dollar – A replication and extension. Finance Research Letters, 25, 103–110.

Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R., & Wohar, M. E. (2019). Safe havens in the face of presidential election uncertainty: A comparison between Bitcoin, oil and precious metals. Applied Economics, 51(57), 6076– 6088.

Bouri, E., & Gupta, R. (2019). Predicting Bitcoin returns: Comparing the roles of newspaper- and internet search-based measures of uncertainty. Finance Research Letters, 101398.

Bouri, E., Gupta, R., Lau, C. K. M., Roubaud, D., & Wang, S. X. (2018). Bitcoin and global financial stress: A copula-based approach to dependence and causality in the quantiles. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 69, 297–307.

Bouri, E., Gupta, R., Tiwar, A. K., & Roubaud, D. (2017). Does Bitcoin hedge global uncertainty? Evidence from wavelet-based quantile-in-quantile regressions. Finance Research Letters, 23, 87–95.

Cai, Y. F., & Wu, Y. R. (2019). Time-varied causality between US partisan conflict shock and crude oil return. Energy Economics, 84, 104512.

Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2017). Measuring geopolitical risk (International Finance Discussion Papers No. 1222). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Chan, W. G., Le, M., & Wu, Y. W. (2019). Holding Bitcoin longer: The dynamic hedging abilities of Bitcoin. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 71, 107–113.

Cheng, C. G. J., Chiu, C. W., Hankins, W. B., & Stone, A. (2018). Partisan conflict, policy uncertainty and aggregate corporate cash holdings. Journal of Macroeconomics, 58, 78–90.

Cheng, C. H. J., Hankins, W. B., & Chiu, C. W. (2016). Does US partisan conflict matter for the Euro area? Economics Letters, 138, 64–67.

Cifarelli, G., & Paladino, G. (2010). Oil price dynamics and speculation: A multivariate financial approach. Energy Economics, 32(2), 363–372.

Clance, M. W., Gupta, R., & Wohar, M. E. (2018). Geopolitical risks and recessions in a panel of advanced economies: Evidence from over a century of data. University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.

Colon, F., Kim, C., Kim, H., & Kim, W. (2020). The effect of political and economic uncertainty on the cryptocurrency market. Finance Research Letters, 101621 (in Press).

Conlon, T., & McGee, R. (2020). Safe haven or risky hazard? Bitcoin during the Covid-19 bear market. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101607.

Demir, E., Gozgor, G., Lau, C. K. M., & Vigne, S. A. (2018). Does economic policy uncertainty predict the Bitcoin returns? An empirical investigation. Finance Research Letters, 26, 145–149.

Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016). Bitcoin, gold and the dollar – A GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Research Letters, 16, 85–92.

Elwell, C. K., Murphy, M. M., & Seitzinger, M. V. (2013). Bitcoin: Questions, answers, and analysis of legal issues (Congressional Research Service Report).

Fang, L., Bouri, E., Gupta, R., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Does global economic uncertainty matter for the volatility and hedging effectiveness of Bitcoin? International Review of Financial Analysis, 61, 29–36.

Gleeson, D., Lexchin, J., Lopert, R., & Kilic, B. (2018). The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement, intellectual property and medicines: Differential Outcomes for developed and developing countries. Global Social Policy, 18(1), 7–27.

Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2019). Personality moderates the relationship between uncertainty and political violence: Evidence from two large U.S. samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 102–109.

Gozgor, G., Tiwari, A. K., Demir, E., & Akron, S. (2019). The relationship between Bitcoin returns and trade policy uncertainty. Finance Research Letters, 29, 75–82.

Gupta, R., Lau, C. K. M., Miller, S. M., & Wohar, M. (2017). U.S. fiscal policy and asset prices: The role of partisan conflict. International Review of Finance, 19(4), 851–862.

Gupta, R., Mwamba, J. W. M., & Wohar, M. E. (2018b). The role of partisan conflict in forecasting the U.S. equity premium: A nonparametric approach. Finance Research Letters, 25, 131–136.

Gupta, R., Pierdzioch, C., Selmi, R., & Wohar, M. E. (2018a). Does partisan conflict predict a reduction in US stock market (realized) volatility? Evidence from a quantile-on-quantile regression model. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 43, 87–96.

Hanson, B. E. (1992). Tests for parameter instability in regressions with I(1) processes. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(1), 45–59.

Jiang, X. D., & Shi, Y. L. (2018). Does US partisan conflict affect US–China bilateral trade? International Review of Economics & Finance.

Jiang, Y., Ren, Y. S., Ma, C. Q., Liu, J. L., & Sharp, B. (2020). Does the price of strategic commodities respond to U.S. partisan conflict? Resources Policy, 66, 101617.

Kalyvas, A., Papakyriakou, P., Sakkas, A., & Urquhart, A. (2019). What drives Bitcoin’s price crash risk? Economics Letters, 191, 108777.

Klein, T., Thu, H. P., & Walther, T. (2018). Bitcoin is not the New Gold – A comparison of volatility, correlation, and portfolio performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 59, 105–116.

Kliber, A., Marszałek, P., Musiałkowska, I., & Świerczyńska, K. (2019). Bitcoin: Safe haven, hedge or diversifier? Perception of bitcoin in the context of a country’s economic situation – A stochastic volatility approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 524, 246–257.

Li, Z. Z., Tao, R., Su, C. W., & Lobont, O. R. (2018). Does Bitcoin bubble burst? Quality & Quantity, 53(2), 1–15.

Luther, W. J., & Salter, A. W. (2017). Bitcoin and the bailout. Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance, 66, 50–56.

Mamun, M. A., Uddin, G. S., Suleman, M. T., & Kang, S. H. (2020). Geopolitical risk, uncertainty and Bitcoin investment. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 54, 123107.

Matkovskyy, R., & Jalan, A. (2019). From financial markets to Bitcoin markets: A fresh look at the contagion effect. Finance Research Letters, 31, 93–97.

Neves, R. H. D. (2020). Bitcoin pricing: impact of attractiveness variable. Financial Innovation, 6(1), 1–18.

Nyblom, J. (1989). Testing for the constancy of parameters over time. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(405), 223–230.

Pesaran, M. H., & Timmermann, A. (2005). Small sample properties of forecasts from autoregressive models under structural breaks. Journal of Econometrics, 129(1–2), 183–217.

Pham, H. N. A., Ramiah, V., Moosa, N., Huynh, T., & Pham, N. (2018). The financial effects of Trumpism. Economic Modelling, 74, 264–274.

Pyo, S., & Lee, J. (2019). Do FOMC and macroeconomic announcements affect Bitcoin prices? Finance Research Letters, 37, 101386.

Qin, M., Su, C. W., & Tao, R. (2020). BitCoin: A new basket for eggs? Economic Modelling (in Press).

Regilme, S. S. F. (2019). The decline of American power and Donald Trump: Reflections on human rights, neoliberalism, and the world order. Geoforum, 102, 157–166.

Ron, J., David, M., Charles, P., & Jones, K. (2018). Geographies of Brexit and its aftermath: Voting in England at the 2016 referendum and the 2017 general election. Space & Polity, 22(2), 162–187.

Shahzad, S. J. H., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., & Kristoufek, L. (2020). Safe haven, hedge and diversification for G7 stock markets: Gold versus bitcoin. Economic Modelling, 87, 212–224.

Shahzad, S. J. H., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., Kristoufek, L., & Lucey, B. (2019). Is Bitcoin a better safe-haven investment than gold and commodities? International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 322–330.

Shaikh, I. (2020). Policy uncertainty and Bitcoin returns. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(3), 257–268.

Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.

Shukur, G., & Mantalos, P. (1997). Size and power of the RESET test as applied to systems of equations: A bootstrap approach (Working Paper). Department of Statistics, University of Lund.

Shukur, G., & Mantalos, P. (2000). A simple investigation of the Granger-causality test in integratedcointegrated VAR systems. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(8), 1021–1031.

Su, C. W., Qin, M., Tao, R., & Umar, M. (2020a). Does oil price really matter for the wage arrears in Russia? Energy, 208, 118350.

Su, C. W., Qin, M., Tao, R., & Umar, M. (2020b). Financial implications of fourth industrial revolution: Can bitcoin improve prospects of energy investment? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 158, 120178.

Su, C. W., Qin, M., Tao, R., Nicoleta-Claudia, M., & Oana-Ramona, L. (2020c). Factors driving oil price – From the perspective of united states. Energy, 197, 117219.

Su, C. W., Qin, M., Tao, R., Shao, X. F., Albu, L. L., & Umar, M. (2020d). Can Bitcoin hedge the risks of geopolitical events? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120182.

Su, C. W., Wang, X. Q., Tao, R., & Oana-Ramona, L. (2019). Do oil prices drive agricultural commodity prices? Further evidence in a global bio-energy context. Energy, 172, 691–701.

Xiong, J. W., Liu, Q., & Zhao, L. (2019). A new method to verify Bitcoin bubbles: Based on the production cost. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 51, 101095.

Yen, K. C., & Cheng, H. P. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty and cryptocurrency volatility. Finance Research Letters, 101428 (in Press).