Performance evaluation model of Romanian manufacturing listed companies by fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS

    Adrian Ioan Ban   Affiliation
    ; Olimpia Iuliana Ban   Affiliation
    ; Victoria Bogdan   Affiliation
    ; Diana Claudia Sabau Popa   Affiliation
    ; Delia Tuse   Affiliation


We are interested in the hierarchy of the main Romanian companies in the manufacturing industry by considering eight financial and seven non-financial indicators. Thirty three listed companies, that are non-financial institutions, were selected for the study and in order to control the reliability of the data we used the Bucharest Stock Exchange database, official data published by the Romanian Ministry of Public Finance, and the annual reports released by the companies on their websites, collecting information for the years 2011–2015. Because the human thinking is subjective and ambiguous we prefer linguistic variables, converted afterwards in triangular fuzzy numbers, to represent the importance of indicators. Our method involves the calculation of the weights of individual or categories of indicators based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Then, the level of performance for each company, separately for financial, non-financial and all indicators is obtained by TOPSIS method. We deduce an objective hierarchy of the companies on a rigorous basis, which is however dependent from the choice of indicators and the conversion scale of linguistic variables into triangular fuzzy numbers. Also, following the obtained results we concluded that the overall performance of companies for the analyzed period is significantly influenced by non-financial indicators.

First published online 16 April 2020

Keyword : manufacturing company, indicator, performance, evaluation, fuzzy sets, FAHP, TOPSIS, hierarchy

How to Cite
Ban, A. I. ., Ban, O. I. ., Bogdan, V. ., Sabau Popa, D. C. ., & Tuse, D. . (2020). Performance evaluation model of Romanian manufacturing listed companies by fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(4), 808-836.
Published in Issue
Jun 12, 2020
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Ahmed, F., & Kilic, K. (2015). Modifications to fuzzy extent analysis method and its performance analysis. In J. M. Framonan, P. P. Gonzalez, & A. Artiba (Eds.), 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (pp. 435–438).

Ahmed, F., & Kilic, K. (2019). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 362, 110–128.

Aydogan, E. K. (2011). Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the roughAHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3992–3998.

Amile, M., Sedaghat, M., & Poorhossein, M. (2013). Performance evaluation of banks using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS, case study: State-owned banks, partially private and private banks in Iran. Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2(3), 128–138.

Ban, A. I., & Ban, O. (2012). Optimization and extensions of a fuzzy multicriteria decision making method and applications to selection of touristic destinations. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 7216–7225.

Ban, A. I., & Coroianu, L. (2015). Simplifying the search for effective ranking of fuzzy numbers. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23, 327–339.

Ban, O. (2011). Fuzzy multicriteria decision making method applied to selection of the best touristic destinations. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Science, 5, 264–271.

Bassemir, M., & Novotny-Farkas, Z. (2018). IFRS adoption, reporting incentives and financial reporting quality in private firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 45(7–8), 759–796.

Bernasconi, M., Choirat, C., & Seri, R. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and the theory of measurement. Management Science, 56(4), 699–711.

Binder, C. (2016). Integrating organizational cultural values with performance management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 36(2–3), 185–201.

Bogdan, V., & Pop, C. M. (2008). Romanian companies’ web-based disclosure choices and capital markets. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 1–13.

Bogdan, V., Platon, J., & Popa, D. N. (2011). Intellectual capital reporting and disclosure in the annual reports of Romanian manufacturing listed companies – methodology and discussion of results. The Annals of University of Oradea, Economic Sciences, Tom XX(2), 466–476.

Botezat, E. A., Dodescu, A. O., Vaduva, S., & Fotea, S. L. (2018). An exploration of circular economy practices and performance among Romanian producers. Sustainability, 10(9), 3191.

Buckley, J. J., Feuring, T., & Hayashi, Y. (2001). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 129(1), 48–64.

Buyukozkan., G., & Cifci., G. (2012). A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2341–2354.

Cabinova, V., Onuferova, E., Gallo, P. Jr., Gallo, P., & Gallo, J. (2018). Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(4), 85–96.

Calabrese, A., Costa, R., & Menichini, T. (2013). Using fuzzy AHP to manage intellectual capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 3747–3755.

Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2009). Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: An update and reinvestigation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 61–78.

Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417–431.

Chan, Y. H., & Yeh, C. H. (2001). Evaluating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making. Omega, 29(5), 405–415.

Chang., D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.

Chiu, C. R., Fang, C. L., Thang, S. S., & Chen, Y. F. (2018). Performance evaluation of the semiconductor industry based on a metafrontier approach. Techonological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(3), 825–843.

Choudhary, D., & Shankar, R. (2012). An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India. Energy, 42(1), 510–521.

Ciora, C. (2013). Performance analysis by value creation. The Economic Publishing House.

Dahooie, J. H., Zavadskas, E. K., Vanaki, A. S., Firoozfar, H. R., Lari, M., & Turskis, Z. (2019). A new evaluation model for corporate financial performance using integrated CCSD and FCM-ARAS approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1088–1113.

Deng, H. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21(3), 215–231.

Dima B., & Dima, S. M. (2017). Mutual information and persistence in the stochastic volatility of market returns: An emergent market example. International Review of Economics and Finance, 51, 36–59.

Ecer, F. (2018). Third-Party Logistic (3PLs) provider selection via fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 615–634.

Erdogan, S. A., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision making in construction management: AHP and expert choice approach. Procedia Engineering, 172, 270–276.

Erhemjamts, O., Li, Q., & Venkateswaran, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and its impact on firm’s investment policy, organizational structure and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 395–412.

Ertugrul, I., & Karakasoglu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702–715.

Fenyves, V., Bacs, Z., Karnai, L., Nagy, A., & Tarnoczi, T. (2018). Financial performance measurement of Hungarian retail food companies. Contemporary Economics, 12(4), 459–472.

Garcia-Castro, R., Arino, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 107–126.

Gumus, A. T. (2009). Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzyAHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 4067–4074.

Hategan, C. D., & Curea-Pitorac, R. I. (2017). Testing the correlations between corporate giving, performance and company value. Sustainability, 9(7), 1210, 1–20.

Heilpern, S. (1992). The expected value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 47(1), 81–86.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer.

Ignatius, J., Rahman, A., Yazdani, M., Šaparauskas, J., & Haron, S. H. (2016). An integrated fuzzy ANPQPD approach for green building assessment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(4), 551–563.

Institute of Management and Administration. (2001). Which non-financial performance measures are companies using (IOMA’s report).

Institute of Management and Administration. (2002). Time for non-financial performance measures (IOMA’s report).

International Accounting Standards Board. (2011). The conceptual framework for financial reporting.

Ittner, C., Lacker, D., & Rajan, M. (1997). The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 231–255.

Jordan, C. E., Clark, S. J., & Smith, W. R. (2007). Should earnings per share (EPS) be taught as a means of comparing of comparing intercompany performance? Journal of Education for Business, 82(6), 343–348.

Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., & Dogan, Y. (2003). Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences, 157, 135–153.

Kiselakova, D., Sofrankova, B., Cabinova, V., & Soltesova, J. (2018). Analysis of enterprise performance and competitiveness to streamline managerial decisions, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(2), 101–111.

Kluczek, A., & Gladysz, B. (2015). Analytical hierarchical process/technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution-based approach to the generation of environmental improvement options for painting process e Results from an industrial case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 360–367.

Kou, G., Ergu, D., Lin, C., & Chen, Y. (2016). Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(5), 738–765.

Lee, A. H. I., Chen, W. C., & Chang, C. J. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 96–107.

Leung, L. C., & Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1), 102–113.

Li, W., Yu, S., Pei, H., Zhao, C., & Tian, B. (2017). A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 60, 49–64.

Lima, Junior, F. R., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194–209.

Madded, B. J. (1999). CFROI valuation. A total system approach to valuing the firm. Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford.

Mahdavi, I., Mahdavi-Amiri, N., Heidarzade, A., & Nourifar, R. (2008). Designing a model of fuzzy TOPSIS in multiple criteria decision making. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 206(2), 607– 617.

Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31(3), 233–253.

Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 409–422.

Mandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., & Benkovic, S. (2014). Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Economic Modelling, 43, 30–37.

Manes-Rossi, F., Tiron-Tudor, A., Nicolo, G., & Zanellato, G. (2018). Ensuring more sustainable reporting in Europe using non-financial disclosure – De Facto and De Jure evidence. Sustainability, 10(4), 1162.

Martin, J. D., & Petty, J. W. (2000). Value based management: The corporate response to the shareholder revolution. Harvard Business School Press.

Moghimi, R., Anvari, A., Amoozesh, N., & Ghesary, T. (2013). An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach, and analysis, to the evaluation of the financial performance of Iranian cement companies. Life Science Journal, 10(5s), 570–586.

Moyer, R. C., McGuigan, J. R., & Kretlow, W. J. (1992). Contemporary Financial Management. USA, West Publishing Company.

Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32, 197–209.

Palepu, K. G., Healy, P. M., & Bernarnd, V. L. (2000). Business Analysis and valuation, using financial statements. Southwestern Publishing Company, Cincinnati OH.

Pirtea, M., Botoc, C., & Jurcut, C. (2014). Risk and return analysis: Evidence from emerging markets. Transformations in Business and Economics, 13(2B), 637–647.

Ramik, J., & Korviny, P. (2010). Inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements based on geometrical mean. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161(11), 1604–1613.

Rezaie, K., Ramiyani, S. S., Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., & Badizadeh, A. (2014). Evaluating performance of Iranian cement firms using an integrated fuzzy AHP-VIKOR method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(21–22), 5033–5046.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.

Saaty, T. L. (1991). Multicriteria decision making – The analytical hierarchy process. RWS Publications.

Saaty, T. L. (1992). Decision making for leaders. RWS Publications.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.

Sahu, A., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. (2017). Evaluation of performance index in resilient supply chain: A fuzzy-based approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(1), 118–142.

Samanlioglu, F., Taskaya, Y. E, Gulen, U. C, & Cokcan, O. (2018). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS-based group decision-making approach to IT personnel selection. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20, 576–1591.

Secme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699–11709.

Sekreter, M. S., Akyuz, G., & Cetin, E. I. (2004). A model for the rating of companies: An application for food sector. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Journal, 8, 139–155.

Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., & Ramezani, I. (2014). Application of fuzzy AHP approach for financial performance evaluation of Iranian petrochemical sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 995–1004.

Shaverdi, M., Ramezani, I., Tahmasebi, R., & Anvary Rostamy, A. A. (2016). Combining fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS with financial ratios to design a novel performance evaluation model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 18, 248–262.

Singh, A., & Vinodh, S. (2017), Modeling and performance evaluation of agility coupled with sustainability for business planning. Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 109–128.

Stewart, G. B. (1991). The quest for value. A guide for senior managers. Harper Business.

Sun, C. C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7745–7754.

Thevaranjan, A., Joseph, K., & Srinivasan, D. (1999). Managerial myopia and non-financial measures: The case of customer satisfaction mitigating hard-selling, 1–45.

Tripathi, K. K., Hasan, A., & Jha, K. N. (2019). Evaluating performance of construction organizations using fuzzy preference relation technique. International Journal of Construction Management.

Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1–3), 229–241.

Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 735–747.

Xia, W., & Wu, Z. (2007). Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega, 35(5), 494–504.

Yaghoobi, T., & Haddadi, F. (2016), Organizational performance measurement by a framework integrating BSC and AHP. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(7), 959–976.

Yalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 350–365.

Yuksel, I., & Dagdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1270–1278.

Yurdakul, M. (2004). AHP as strategic decision making tool to justify machine tool selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 146(3), 365–376.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

Zavadskas, E. K., & Turkis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: An overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 397–427.

Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill.

Zhu, K. J., Jing, Y., & Chang, D. Y. (1999). A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 450–456.

Zolfani, S. H., & Šaparauskas, J. (2013). New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability indicators of energy system. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 24(5), 408–414.