Research of evaluation significance criteria for BIM structural model variants
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2022.15805Abstract
The article analyzes of evaluation criteria for the construction variants of the Building Information Model (BIM). The article analyzes the evaluation criteria of the construction variants of the Building Information Modeling (BIM). Based on the different construction variants of the multistorey building information model, the most important criteria have been identified for the evaluation of BIM technologies in the construction project. A survey questionnaire was created and after interviewing 22 respondents the evaluations of BIM experts were collected. The obtained research data were analyzed with the help of the analytical pairwise comparison method in the hierarchy process. The significance of the criteria and the benefits of the application of BIM technologies were determined with the help of using iterations by the expert pairwise comparison method.
Article in Lithuanian.
Konstrukcinių BIM modelio variantų vertinimo rodiklių reikšmingumų tyrimas
Santrauka
Straipsnyje analizuojami statinio informacinio modelio (angl. Building Information Modeling – BIM) konstrukcinių variantų vertinimo rodikliai. Tyrimui atlikti sumodeliuoti skirtingi daugiabučio pastato informacinio modelio konstrukciniai variantai, remiantis jais vertinimui išskirti svarbiausi rodikliai, lemiantys BIM technologijų taikymą statybos projekte. Tyrimui buvo sudaryta apklausos anketa ir apklausus 22 respondentus surinkti BIM ekspertų vertinimai. Gauti tyrimo duomenys išanalizuoti analitiniu hierarchijos procese esančiu porinio palyginimo metodu. Pasitelkus ekspertinio porinio palyginimo metodo iteracijas nustatyti tiriamų rodiklių reikšmingumai BIM technologijų taikymo srityje bei BIM technologijų taikymo nauda.
Reikšminiai žodžiai: AHP, BIM, MCDM, daugiakriterių sprendimų priėmimo metodika, porinio palyginimo metodas, konstrukcinio modelio vertinimo rodikliai.
Keywords:
AHP, BIM, MCDM, multi-criteria decision-making, pairwise comparison method, evaluation criteria for structural modelHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Chan, D. W. M., Olawumi, T. O., & Ho, A. M. L. (2019). Perceived benefits of and barriers to Building Information Modelling (BIM) implementation in construction: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Building Engineering, 25, 100764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100764> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100764
Goepel, K. D. (2018). Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(3), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590> https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590
Pavlovskis, M., Antucheviciene, J., Migilinskas, D. (2017). Assessment of buildings redevelopment possibilities using MCDM and BIM techniques. Procedia Engineering, 172, 846–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.083> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.083
Pavlovskis, M., Migilinskas, D., Antucheviciene, J., & Kutut, V. (2019). Ranking of heritage building conversion alternatives by applying BIM and MCDM: A case of Sapieha Palace in Vilnius. Symmetry, 11(8), 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11080973> https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11080973
Poškas, G., Poškas, P., Sirvydas, A. ir Šimonis, A. (2012). Daugiakriterinės analizės metodo taikymas parenkant Ignalinos AE V1 pastato įrengimų išmontavimo būdą. 2. Daugiakriterinės analizės metodika ir jos taikymo rezultatai. Energetika, 58(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.6001/energetika.v58i2.2341> https://doi.org/10.6001/energetika.v58i2.2341
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8> https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
Tafraout, S., Bourahla, N., Bourahla, Y., & Mebarki, A. (2019). Automatic structural design of RC wall-slab buildings using a genetic algorithm with application in BIM environment. Automation in Construction, 106, 102901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102901> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102901
Tan, T., Mills, G. R., Papadonikolaki, E., & Liu, Z. (2021). Combining multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with building information modelling (BIM): A review. Automation in Construction, 121, 103451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103451> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103451
Wang, T., Zhang, Q., Chong, H., & Wang, X. (2017). Integrated supplier selection framework in a resilient construction supply chain: An approach via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA). Sustainability, 9(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020289> https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020289
Zhao, L., Liu, Z., & Mbachu, J. (2019). Optimization of the supplier selection process in prefabrication using BIM. Buildings, 9(10), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9100222> https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9100222
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.