A PSO-optimized fuzzy neural model for evaluating the coordinated development of agricultural economy and ecological protection

    Han Zhang Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2026.25792

Abstract

The coordinated development of agricultural economy and ecological protection is essential for achieving sustainable agriculture, as the resulting ecological benefits have significant implications for both environmental security and economic stability. However, existing ecological benefit evaluation models often suffer from limited indicator coverage and insufficient intelligence in weight assignment, making it difficult to capture the coupled relationship between ecological and economic dimensions. To address these issues, this study proposes a comprehensive evaluation model based on fuzzy logic and a particle swarm optimized backpropagation neural network (PSO-FBP). A multi-level indicator system integrating ecological and economic value is constructed, and fuzzy logic is introduced to manage uncertainty, while PSO enables adaptive weight optimization. The proposed model demonstrates strong learning capability and robustness, enabling a comprehensive quantification of agricultural ecosystem services. A case study of a province shows that waste treatment, agricultural production, and soil conservation are the main contributors to ecological value, confirming the model’s effectiveness in real-world agricultural contexts. This research provides a scientific and practical tool for ecological benefit assessment, offering valuable support for decision-making in sustainable agricultural policy.

Keywords:

fuzzy logic, PSO-FBP, ecological benefit assessment, agricultural economy, ecological protection, coordinated development

How to Cite

Zhang, H. (2026). A PSO-optimized fuzzy neural model for evaluating the coordinated development of agricultural economy and ecological protection. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 34(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2026.25792

Share

Published in Issue
March 10, 2026
Abstract Views
7

References

Afrasiabi, A., Tavana, M., & DiCaprio, D. (2022). An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(25), 37291–37314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17851-2

Akbar, U., Li, Q. L., Akmal, M. A., Shakib, M., & Iqbal, W. (2021). Nexus between agro-ecological efficiency and carbon emission transfer: Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 18995–19007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09614-2

Akter, M. S. (2024). Harnessing technology for environmental sustainability: Utilizing AI to tackle global ecological challenges. Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS), 2(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.v2i1.97

Ayyildiz, E., & Taskin Gumus, A. (2021). Pythagorean fuzzy AHP based risk assessment methodology for hazardous material transportation: An application in Istanbul. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(27), 35798–35810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13223-y

Azareh, A., Rafiei Sardooi, E., Choubin, B., Barkhori, S., Shahdadi, A., Adamowski, J., & Shamshirband, S. (2021). Incorporating multi-criteria decision-making and fuzzy-value functions for flood susceptibility assessment. Geocarto International, 36(20), 2345–2365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1695958

Caymaz, T., Çalışkan, S., & Botsalı, A. R. (2022). Evaluation of ergonomic conditions using fuzzy logic in a metal processing plant. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 8(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.932994

Czyżewski, B., Matuszczak, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2021). Environmental sustainable value in agriculture revisited: How does Common Agricultural Policy contribute to eco-efficiency? Sustainability Science, 16(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00834-6

Duleba, S., Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., & Moslem, S. (2021). Interval-valued spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to evaluate public transportation development. Informatica, 32(4), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.15388/21-INFOR451

Gashaw, T., Dile, Y. T., Worqlul, A. W., Bantider, A., Zeleke, G., Bewket, W., & Alamirew, T. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of best management practices on soil erosion reduction using the SWAT Model: For the case of Gumara watershed, Abbay (Upper Blue Nile) Basin. Environmental Management, 68(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01492-9

Ge, Y., Hu, S., Song, Y, Zheng, H., Liu, Y., Ye, X. (2023). Sustainable poverty reduction models for the coordinated development of the social economy and environment in China. Science Bulletin, 68(19), 2236–2246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.08.015

Groumpos, P. P. (2023). A critical historic overview of artificial intelligence: Issues, challenges, opportunities, and threats. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 1(4), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA3202689

Hasheminezhad, A., Hadadi, F., & Shirmohammadi, H. (2021). Investigation and prioritization of risk factors in the collision of two passenger trains based on fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy DEMATEL methods. Soft Computing, 25(6), 4677–4697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05478-3

Jafarzadeh, G., Shaffiee, H., Memarpour, G., Guido, G., & Vitale, A. (2023). Road safety assessment and risks prioritization using an integrated SWARA and MARCOS approach under spherical fuzzy environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(6), 4549–4567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07929-4

Katumo, D. M., Liang, H., Ochola, A. C., Lv, M., Wang, Q., & Yang, C. (2022). Pollinator diversity benefits natural and agricultural ecosystems, environmental health, and human welfare. Plant Diversity, 44(5), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2022.01.005

Kayacık, M., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Using quantum spherical fuzzy decision support system as a novel sustainability index approach for analyzing industries listed in the stock exchange. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(6), 1145–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.10.001

Kılıc, O. M., Ersayın, K., Gunal, H., Khalofah, A., & Khalofah, M. (2022). Combination of fuzzy-AHP and GIS techniques in land suitability assessment for wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 29(4), 2634–2644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.12.050

Li, L. (2023). Research on ecological environmental protection and high-quality coordinated economic development in the Yellow River Basin. Open Access Library Journal, 10(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110102

Liu, K., Sun, Y., & Yang, D. (2023). The administrative center or economic center: Which dominates the regional green development pattern? A case study of Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration, China. Green and Low-Carbon Economy, 1(3), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewGLCE3202955

Mishra, A. R., Chandel, A., & Saeidi, P. (2022). Low-carbon tourism strategy evaluation and selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy additive ratio assessment approach based on similarity measures. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 7236–7282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01746-w

Naseem, S., & Tong, G. (2021). A system-GMM approach to examine the renewable energy consumption, agriculture and economic growth’s impact on CO2 emission in the SAARC region. GeoJournal, 86(5), 2021–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10136-9

Omair, M., Noor, S., Tayyab, M., Maqsood, M., Ahmed, W., Sarkar, B., & Habib, M. (2021). The selection of the sustainable suppliers by the development of a decision support framework based on analytical hierarchical process and fuzzy inference system. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 23(7), 1986–2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01073-2

Soner, O., Celik, E., & Akyuz, E. (2022). A fuzzy best–worst method (BWM) to assess the potential environmental impacts of the process of ship recycling. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(3), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1889066

Turunen, J., Elbrecht, V., Steinke, D., & Aroviita, J. (2021). Riparian forests can mitigate warming and ecological degradation of agricultural headwater streams. Freshwater Biology, 66(4), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13678

Wuest, S. E., Peter, R., & Niklaus, P. A. (2021). Ecological and evolutionary approaches to improving crop variety mixtures. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(8), 1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01497-x

Zhou, B., Chen, J., Wu, Q., Pamučar, D., Wang, W., & Zhou, L. (2022). Risk priority evaluation of power transformer parts based on hybrid FMEA framework under hesitant fuzzy environment. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 20(2), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME220223013Z

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2026-03-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, H. (2026). A PSO-optimized fuzzy neural model for evaluating the coordinated development of agricultural economy and ecological protection. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 34(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2026.25792

Share