How does environmental tax reform drive corporate innovation to green technologies? Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2025.24354Abstract
How to motivate enterprises to formulate green technology (GT) innovation is crucial for promoting green development and minimizing pollution control costs. This research employs a quasi-experimental approach to analyze the impact of environmental tax reform (ETR) on corporate innovation decisions. First, we construct a two-sector model within a single enterprise, where the enterprise produces goods using GT and non-green technology (NGT) respectively. ETR influences a company’s innovation choices by the relative market value, R&D intensity, and productivity of products manufactured using GT and NGT under profit maximization. Second, we test our model using 20122023 manufacturing firms’ data, and the empirical results confirm our theoretical predictions. Third, we perform robustness tests to exclude the impact of subsidies, command and control environmental supervision and the COVID-19 epidemic. Fourth, we conduct heterogeneity analysis in polluting level and market competition. Finally, this study uses two instrumental variables (IVs) to validate our main regression results: the interaction between regional water area and industrial chemical oxygen demand, and the proportion of days affected by temperature inversion. This study contributes to the literature related to innovation choices under environmental policy and has implications for directing firms’ innovation to GT.
Keywords:
corporate innovation choices, green technological innovation, non-green technological innovation, environmental tax reform, manufacturing firms, quasi-natural experimentHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
Barbieri, N., Marzucchi, A., & Rizzo, U. (2023). Green technologies, interdependencies, and policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118, Article 102791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102791
Blind, K., Petersen, S. S., & Riillo, C. A. F. (2017). The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets. Research Policy, 46(1), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.003
Chen, C., Pinar, M., & Roman-Collado, R. (2024). Green innovation and energy efficiency: Moderating effect of institutional quality based on the threshold model. Environmental & Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00902-w
Chen, Y., Xie, Y., You, H., & Zhang, Y. (2018a). Does crackdown on corruption reduce stock price crash risk? Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 51, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.05.005
Chen, Z., Kahn, M.E., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018b). The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 88, 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.010
Cojoianu, T. F., Clark, G. L., & Hoepner, A. G. F. (2020). Entrepreneurs for a low carbon world: How environmental knowledge and policy shaped the creation and financing of green start- ups. Research Policy, 49(6), Article 103988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103988
Costantini, V., Crespia, F., & Palmad, A. (2017). Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies. Research Policy, 46(4), 799–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004
Cuerva, M. C., Triguero-Cano, Á., & Córcoles, D. (2014). Drivers of green and non-green in- novation: Empirical evidence in low-tech SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.049
Gillingham, K., Newell, R. G., & Palmer, K. (2009). Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 597–620. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.102308.124234
Gu, W., & Yuan, W. (2024). Research on the influence of chain shareholder network on enterprise green innovation. Journal of Business Research, 172, Article 114416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114416
Gugler, K., Szücs, F., & Wiedenhofer, T. (2024). Environmental policies and directed technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 124, Article 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102916
Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45, 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002
Hedegaard, T. F., & Kongshoj, K. (2024). How redistribution can make carbon taxes more acceptable to the public. Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2024.2416774
Huang, X. Q., Liu, W., Zhang, Z., & Zhao Z. H. (2022). Intensive judicial oversight and corporate green innovations: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. China Economic Review, 74, Article 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101799
Hu, H., Qi, S., & Chen, Y. (2023a). Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies. China Economic Review, 78, Article 101933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101933
Hu, J., Fang, Q., & Wu, H. (2023b). Environmental tax and highly polluting firms green transformation: Evidence from green mergers and acquisitions. Energy Economics, 127, Article 107046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107046
Hu, S., Wang, A., & Du, K. (2023c). Environmental tax reform and greenwashing: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Energy Economics, 124, Article 106873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106873
Hu, Y., Jin, S., Ni, J., Peng, K., & Zhang, L. (2023d). Strategic or substantive green innovation: How do non-green firms respond to green credit policy? Economic Modelling, 126, Article 106451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106451
Karmaker, S. C., Hosan, S., Chapman, A. J., & Saha, B. B. (2021). The role of environmental taxes on technological innovation. Energy, 232, Article 121052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121052
Karydas, C., & Zhang, L. (2019). Green tax reform, endogenous innovation and the growth dividend. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 97, 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.09.005
Kemp, R., & Pontoglio, S. (2011). The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments – A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological Economics, 72, Article 2836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014
Lasrado, F., & Zakaria, N. (2020). Go green! Exploring the organizational factors that influence self-initiated green behavior in the United Arab Emirates. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 823–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09665-1
Liu, G., Lu, D., & Yang, J. (2023a). Innovation for promotion: The effect of executive involvement on inventors’ innovation choice. Journal of Corporate Finance, 80, Article 102394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102394
Liu, G., Yang, Z., Zhang, F., & Zhang, N. (2022). Environmental tax reform and environmental investment: A quasi-natural experiment based on Chinas environmental protection tax law. Energy Economics, 109, Article 106000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106000
Liu, M., Tan, R., & Zhang, B. (2021). The costs of blue sky: Environmental regulation, technology upgrading, and labor demand in China. Journal of Development Economics, 150, Article 102610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102610
Liu, S. S., Hua, G., Ma, B. J., & Cheng, T. (2023b). Competition between green and non-green products in the blockchain era. International Journal of Production Economics, 264, Article 108970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108970
Liu, Y., Liu, Z., & Xu, K. (2023c). Imitative innovation or independent innovation strategic choice of emerging economies in non-cooperative innovation competition. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 19, 1893–1910. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2022023
Nesta, L., Vona, F., & Nicolli, F. (2014). Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 67, 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.01.001
Ribau, C. P., Moreira, A. C., & Raposo, M. (2017). SMEs innovation capabilities and export performance: And experimental orientation view. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(5), 920–934. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1352534
Rizzi, F., Gigliotti, M., Runfola, A., & Ferrucci, L. (2022). Don’t miss the boat when consumers are in-store! Exploring the use of point-of-purchase displays to promote green and non-green products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, Article 103034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103034
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Shahzad, U., Liu, J., & Luo, F. K. (2022). Stock liquidity and corporate trade credit strategies: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.15655
Shao, Y., & Xu, K. (2024). Be cautious or win in danger? Firms’ economic policy uncertainty perception and green technology innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09944-y
Tsiotas, D., & Tselios, V. (2022). Understanding the uneven spread of COVID-19 in the context of the global interconnected economy. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 666. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04717-3
Wang, C., Li, W., Li, J., & Wan, L. (2024). The effects of extreme climate events on green technology innovation in manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 25(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2024.21170
Wu, J., & Tal, A. (2018). From pollution charge to environmental protection tax: A comparative analysis of the potential and limitations of Chinas new environmental policy initiative. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 20(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1361597
Xie, B. C., Jiang, J., & Chen, X. P. (2022). Policy, technical change, and environmental efficiency: Evidence of Chinas power system from dynamic and spatial perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 323, Article 116232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116232
Yao, Q., Zeng, S., Sheng, S., & Gong, S. (2021). Green innovation and brand equity: Moderating effects of industrial institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 573–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09664-2
Zhang, Z. (2024). Green credit policy, corporate social responsibility and green innovation. Journal of Business Economics & Management, 25(3), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2024.21563
Zhao, S., Teng, L., Arkorful, V. E., & Hu, H. (2023). Impacts of digital government on regional eco-innovation: Moderating role of dual environmental regulations. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 196, Article 122842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122842
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.