Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.5209Abstract
Although the Pritzker Architecture Prize is prestigious and highly influential, it has not been the subject of any coherent studies to date. This research investigates the network of sponsors, the jury members influential on the nomination process, as well as the discourses dominant during each year of the prize. In the first section, we examine the network of sponsors using the bibliography method. In the second section, we study the contents of the annual jury citations using the content analysis method. The second section shows that each announcement contains four parts and various sub-parts. we compare the results of both sections to draw a content map of the various years of the prize. Finally, we attempted to evaluate the relationship between the jury members and their cooperation network with the discourses formed over time.
Keywords:
Pritzker, data mining, content analysis, bibliography, bibliometric maps, architectureHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Carolina, A. M. (2013). Pritzker Architecture Prize Committee Denies Honors for Denise Scott Brown. Retrieved from architectmagazine.com
Ghaedi, M. R., & Golshani, A. (2016). Content analysis method, from quantitative to qualitative. Journal of Psychological Methods and Models, Year 7, 23, 57-6852.
Heynen, H. (2012). Genius, gender and architecture: the star system as exemplified in the Pritzker Prize. Architectural Theory Review, 17, 2-3, 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2012.727443
Luce, K. M. (2009). Revolutions in parallel: the rise and fall of drawing in architectural design. Michigan.
Marik, L. (2016). How to win a Pritzker prize. Retrieved from www.architectsjournal.co.uk
Pogrebin, R. (2013). Partner without the Prize. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/18/arts/design/bid-for-pritzker-prize-to-acknowledge-denise-scott-brown.html
Sorkin, M. (2005). What can you say about the Pritzker? Perspecta, 37, Famous (2005), 106-111.
Tabrizi, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of deductive and inductive approaches. Social Sciences Quarterly, 64, Spring 1393, 106-115.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice (pp. 285-320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
Wikipedia. (2019). List of architecture awards. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_architecture_prizes
Willard, E. (2018). Research methods – content analysis. Retrieved from https://www.tutor2u.net/psychology/reference/research-methods-content-analysis
Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2013). A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. European Physical Journal B, 86, 471. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0
Zarghami, R., Bagheri, N. M., Haghdoost, O., S. F., Nasim N. M. (2008). Content analysis, from quantitative to qualitative. Iranian Journal of Nursing, Spring 87, 21(53), 41-52.
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.