Energy efficient rehabilitation of a historic building in Tucson, Arizona: investigating the potential for energy conservation while preserving the building’s historical integrity
The focus of this study was to investigate the feasibility of transforming historically significant buildings with high energy requirements into high-performance constructions. The researcher suggested adaptive reuse for the case study, recommending that the building be converted from a warehouse into a café and art studio, which would be in line with the surrounding art district in Tucson, Arizona. As a result of the change in design, everything from the floor plans to the building facades and the mechanical systems were modified. During the visit to the location, the researcher was able to identify the primary factors that led to the low energy efficiency. The study was conducted using the real-life energy simulation that the DOE-2 simulation engine provides. During the process of redesigning the building, the researcher utilized both passive and active design strategies to evaluate how these techniques impacted the amount of energy consumed by the structure. The total amount of energy that was saved from all of the implemented solutions was compared to the total amount of energy that was consumed by the base case (the existing condition). The findings indicated that the chosen case study had a significant potential for reducing energy consumption, with savings amounting to more than 50 percent of the total energy usages.
Keyword : energy efficiency, historic buildings, rehabilitation, restoration, energy simulation, remodelling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alam, M. M., Murad, M. W., Noman, A. H. M., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecological Indicators, 70, 466–479.
Azari, R., & Abbasabadi, N. (2018). Embodied energy of buildings: A review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends. Energy and Buildings, 168, 225–235.
Becherini, F., Lucchi, E., Gandini, A., Barrasa, M. C., Troi, A., Roberti, F., Sachini, M., Di Tuccio, M. C., Arrieta, L. G., Pockelé, L., & Bernardi, A. (2018). Characterization and thermal performance evaluation of infrared reflective coatings compatible with historic buildings. Building and Environment, 134, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.034
Chastas, P., Theodosiou, T., & Bikas, D. (2016). Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review. Building and Environment, 105, 267–282.
CORDIS, & European Commission. (n.d.). Final Report Summary – EFFESUS (Energy Efficiency for EU Historic Districts Sustainability). Retrieved December 23, 2021, from https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/314678/reporting
Crowther, P. (1999). Design for disassembly to recover embodied energy. In Sustaining the future: Energy ecology architecture PLEA ‘99 (pp. 95–100). PLEA International.
Di Ruocco, G., Sicignano, C., & Sessa, A. (2017). Integrated methodologies energy efficiency of historic buildings. Procedia Engineering, 180, 1653–1663.
Dixit, M. K., Fernández-Solís, J. L., Lavy, S., & Culp, C. H. (2010). Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 42(8), 1238–1247.
Griffin, J. M., Fantini, A.-M., Tallett, M., Aguilera, R. F., Arellano, J. L., & Ban, J. (2015). World oil Outlook 2015. Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.
Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. (n.d.). 2011 buildings energy data book (U.S. Department of Energy). Retrieved December 23, 2021, from https://ieer.org/resource/energy-issues/2011-buildings-energy-data-book/
Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the new production philosophy to construction (Vol. 72). Citeseer.
Lucchi, E., Roberti, F., & Alexandra, T. (2018). Definition of an experimental procedure with the hot box method for the thermal performance evaluation of inhomogeneous walls. Energy and Buildings, 179, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.049
Nequette, A. M., & Jeffery, R. B. (2021). A guide to Tucson architecture. University of Arizona Press.
Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007). Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article. Energy and Buildings, 39(3), 249–257.
Serraino, M., & Lucchi, E. (2017). Energy efficiency, heritage conservation, and landscape integration: The case study of the San Martino Castle in Parella (Turin, Italy). Energy Procedia, 133, 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.387
Smith, H. V. (1945). The climate of Arizona. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ).
Treloar, G. J., Love, P. E., & Holt, G. D. (2001). Using national input/output data for embodied energy analysis of individual residential buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), 49–61.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (n.d.). Annual energy Outlook 2021. Retrieved December 23, 2021, from https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/
Weather Spark. (n.d.). Tucson climate, weather by month, average temperature (Arizona, United States). Retrieved December 22, 2021, from https://weatherspark.com/y/2857/Average-Weather-in-Tucson-Arizona-United-States-Year-Round