Community action: value or instrument? An ethics and planning critical review

    Luca Tricarico Info

Abstract

The community concept has maintained a constant and growing interest in urban studies and many related fields. The origin of this continuing interest seems to derive from the importance of the concept of community within diverse forms of political language and interpretations within different planning practices. In this contribution, through the analysis of different ethical and planning theories, we want to provide an update framework on community action. According to this objective, the argumentation will proceed through a literature review on four ethics theories and three key aspects related to spatial planning, as well as matching this theoretical analysis with exemplifying practices. The final objective is to provide an original analysis on drivers and outcomes of different forms of community, raising general issues that refer to spatial planning, social organization and regulation.

Keywords:

community, politics, city society, interpretation, local communities

How to Cite

Tricarico, L. (2017). Community action: value or instrument? An ethics and planning critical review. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2017.1355278

Share

Published in Issue
September 19, 2017
Abstract Views
1470

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2017-09-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tricarico, L. (2017). Community action: value or instrument? An ethics and planning critical review. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2017.1355278

Share