Inclusive space for children in vertical housing


This paper aims to explore forms and types of space in vertical housing in order to support the creation of inclusive living environments for children, through observing children’s activities and the available spaces and facilities. The field observation was carried out in vertical housing and their surrounding environments in Indonesia and Japan. Housing is currently in high demand in Indonesia, but land availability in cities is limited whereas children population in Indonesia has reached about one third of total population. Vertical buildings, thus, become one of feasible solution. Meanwhile Japan, as a developed country, has implemented vertical housing for a long time to meet society’s needs in various places and forms. Housing as a living environment which is suitable for children sometimes receives little attention, especially when there are challenges of limited resources. Therefore there are not many spaces that designated to accommodate various children activities. On the other hand, spaces in vertical housing have their potential to support a child-inclusive living environments. In this study, the qualitative method was employed to explore vertical housing living environments and spaces for children. The results indicated there are three scales of spaces that need to receive attention to the creation of inclusive living environment for children in vertical housing, namely micro, meso, and macro spaces.

Keyword : inclusive space, child-inclusive, child-inclusive space, vertical housing, inclusive design, spaces for children

How to Cite
Pandelaki, E. E., & Firmandhani, S. W. (2022). Inclusive space for children in vertical housing. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 46(2), 100–106.
Published in Issue
Oct 19, 2022
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2014). Persentase Penduduk Daerah Perkotaan menurut Provinsi, 2010-2035.

BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2018). Proyeksi Penduduk Indonesia 2015-2045. Hasil SUPAS 2015-2045. BPS-Statistics Indonesia.

Baskara, M. (2011). Prinsip pengendalian perancangan taman bermain anak di ruang publik. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 3(1), 27–34.

Blau, D. M., Haskell, N. L., & Haurin, D. R. (2019). Are housing characteristics experienced by children associated with their outcomes as young adults? Journal of Housing Economics, 46, 101631.

Clarkson, P. J., & Coleman, R. (2015). History of inclusive design in the UK. Applied Ergonomics, 46, 235–247.

Fletcher, H. (2006). The principles of inclusive design. (They include you.). The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.

Goodman-Deane, J., Ward, J., Hosking, I., & Clarkson, P. J. (2014). A comparison of methods currently used in inclusive design. Applied Ergonomics, 45(4), 886–894.

Hanapi, N. L., & Ahmad, S. Sh. (2016). A review on environmental characteristic that influence children physical activities in low cost housing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 19–27.

Heenan, R. (2017). Healthy higher density living for kids. NSW Government, Western Sydney Local Health District, City of Parramatta.

Mizrachi, D., & Whitzman, C. (2009). Vertical living kids: Creating supportive environments for children in Melbourne Central City High Rises [Conference presentation]. Proceedings of the State of Australian Cities National Conference “City Growth, Sustainability, Vitality and Vulnerability”, Australian Sustainable Cities Research Network.

Olsen, H., Kennedy, E., & Vanos, J. (2019). Shade provision in public playgrounds for thermal safety and sun protection: A case study across 100 play spaces in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 200–211.

Paris, J., Ricardo, A., & Rymond, D. (2019). Child growth and development (version 1.2). College of the Canyons.

Persson, H., Ahman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2014). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(4).

Rinaldi, R. A., Mauliani, L., & Lissimia, F. (2017). Penerapan konsep ramah anak pada Rumah Susun Sederhana. Jurnal Purwarupa, 1(1), 17–21.

Rollings, K. A., Wells, N. M., Evans, G. W., Bednarz, A., & Yang, Y. (2017). Housing and neighborhood physical quality: Children’s mental health and motivation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 50, 17–23.

Shi, Y. (2017). Explore children’s outdoor play spaces of community areas in high-density cities in China: Wuhan as an example. Procedia of Engineering, 198, 654–682.

The Building Centre of Japan. (2017, June). A quick look at housing in Japan.

Vandivere, S., Hair, E. C., Theokas, C., Cleveland, K., McNamara, M., & Atienza, A. (2006). How housing affects child well-being. Funders’ Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities.

Whitzman, C. (2010). Can tall building be child-friendly? The vertical living kids research project. Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Journal, (4), 18–23.

Whitzman, C. (2015). Creating child-friendly living environments in central cities: Vertical living kids. In C. Freeman, P. Tranter, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Geographies of children and young people: Vol. 12. Risk, protection, provision and policy (pp. 1–16). Springer.