Impact of spatial configuration to spatial quality: Venice and Istanbul

    İmran Gümüş   Affiliation
    ; Ebru Erdönmez   Affiliation


The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between spatial configuration and spatial quality, and how they affect each other. Spatial quality is a sophisticated concept and encompasses physical, social, economic, cultural and environmental components. Urban squares reflect these parameters and also play a decisive role in urban identity as areas of apparent urban culture and collective memory. Spatial configuration also determines the character of the squares as a result of morphological feature of cities. In the study, qualitative and quantitative methods are used together. Initially, the case study was conducted on two pier squares, San Marco Square (Venice) and Beşiktaş Square (Istanbul) according to fifty public space quality parameters. Secondly, morphological analysis was performed through space syntax method. It has been investigated whether there is a connection between spatial configuration and the factors determining the quality of space or not. As a result, it has been revealed that the spatial configuration is one of the determining factors being assessed the quality of the space, however, it does not provide sufficient data alone. The importance of this article is that it proposes an analytical approach that includes both quantitative and qualitative components of spatial quality.

Keyword : spatial quality, urban square, space syntax, urban morphology, Venice, Istanbul

How to Cite
Gümüş, İmran, & Erdönmez, E. (2021). Impact of spatial configuration to spatial quality: Venice and Istanbul. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 45(2), 205-216.
Published in Issue
Dec 13, 2021
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Abshirini, E., & Koch, D. (2017). Resilience, space syntax and spatial interfaces: The case of river cities. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 14(1), 25–41.

Agboola, O. P., Rasidi, M. H., Said, I. B., Zakka, S. D., & Shuaibu, A.-W. (2018). Residents’ social interactions in market square and its impact on community well-being. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 2(2), 24–32.

Agirbas, A., & Ardaman, E. (2015). A morphological comparison of urban tissues of Trani and Galata. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 39(4), 232–247.

Albrechts, L., Schreurs, J., & Van den Broeck, J. (2003). In search indicators and processes for strengthening spatial quality: The case of Belgium. Built Environment, 29(4), 288–295.

Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Shlomo, A. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.

Appleyard, D., & Lintell, M. (1972). The environmental quality of city streets: The residents’ viewpoint. Journal of the American Planning Association, 38(2), 84–101.

Appleyard, D. (1981). Livable streets. University of California Press.

Arruda Campos, M. B. M. D. (1997). Strategic space: Patterns of use in public squares of the city of London. In M. D. Major, L. Amorim, & F. Dufaux (Eds.), Space Syntax – First International Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 26.01–26.11), Space Syntax Laboratory, University College London.

Arruda Campos, M. B. M. D. (2000). Urban public spaces: a study of the relation between spatial configuration and use patterns [PhD thesis]. University College London, United Kingdom.

Ashihara, Y. (1981). Exterior design in architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Avila, M. I. M. (2001). Factors that influence the social life and vitality of public spaces in Maracaibo – Venezuela. Case study: Plaza de la Madre and Plaza de la Republica. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Bacon, E. (1974). Design of cities. Viking.

Banerjee, T., & Southworth, M. (Eds.). (1991). City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch. The MIT Press.

Banerjee, T. (2001). The future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 9–24.

Baytin, Ç. P. (2006). Public areas: The arenas of expression of identity. Mimarist Dosya: Kamusal Alan, 4, 78–81.

Bendjedidi, S., Bada, Y., & Meziani, R. (2018). Open spaces: Spatial configuration, visibility analysis and use: Case study of mass housing in Biskra, Algeria. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 6(4), 93–109.

Bendjedidi, S., Bada, Y., & Meziani, R. (2019). Urban plaza design process using space syntax analysis: El-Houria plaza, Biskra, Algeria. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 7, 125–142.

Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S., & Smith, G. (1985). Responsive environment: A manual for designers (pp. 85–95). Architectural Press.

Brand, N., Kersten, I., Pot, R., & Warmerdam, M. (2014). Research by design on the Dutch coastline: Bridging flood control and spatial quality. Built Environment, 40(2), 265–280.

CABE and DETR. (2001). The value of urban design. Thomas Telford.

Carmona, M. (2014). The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 2–36.

Carmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 24, 47–59.

Carmona, M., & Matos Wunderlich, F. (2012). Capital spaces: The multiple complex public spaces of a global city. Routledge.

Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Urban spaces-public places: The dimensions of urban design. Architectural Press.

Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.

Çil, E. (2006). Theoretical and methodological discussion of the space syntax analysis as a tool for reading the city. Megaron, 1(4), 218–233.

Collins, G. R., Collins, C. C., Collins, G. R., & Sitte, C. (1986). Camillo Sitte: The birth of modern city planning. Rizzoli.

Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. (2001). The value of urban design: A research project commissioned by CABE and DETR to examine the value added by good urban design. Thomas Telford.

Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. (2006). The principles of inclusive design (They include you).

Cullen, G. (1961). The concise townscape. Routledge/Architectural Press.

Danisworo, M. (1989). Konsep peremajaan kota. Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88, 297–310.

Department of the Environment. (1994). Vitaland viable town centres: Meeting the challenge. HMSO.

Desyllas, J., & Duxbury, E. (2001). Axial maps and visibility graph analysis: A comparison of their methodology and use in models of urban pedestrian movement. In Proceedings 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 27.1–27.13), Atlanta.

Doi, K., Kii, M., & Nakanishi, H. (2008). An integrated evaluation method of accessibility, quality of life, and social interaction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(6), 1098–1116.

Dutta, S., Bardhan, S., & Bhaduri, S. (2013). Patterns of urbanization and environmental quality in the context of Indian cities. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 4(2), 287–299.

Erdönmez, M. E., & Akı, A. (2005). Açık kamusal kent mekânlarının toplum ilişkilerindeki etkileri. YTU Arch. Fac. e-Journal, 1(1), 67–87.

Erem, Ö., & Şener, E. G. (2008). Complexity versus sustainability in urban space: The case of Taksim Square, Istanbul. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 5(1), 54–73.

Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84.

Fraser, A. (2020, June 04). Venice prepares to welcome back tourists. CGTN.

Gehl architects. (2002). Public spaces and public life: City of Adelaide 2002. Adelaide City Council.

Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: Using public space (J. Koch, Trans.). Van Nostrand Reinhold. (Original work published 1971)

Gehl, J. (2002). Public space and public life. City of Adelaide: 2002.

Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.

Gehl, J., Kaefer, L. J., & Reigstad, S. (2006). Close encounters with buildings. Urban Design International, 11, 29–47.

Gökgür, P. (2006). Basic qualities of public area. Mimarist Dosya: Kamusal Alan, 4, 62–66.

Hajmirsadeghi, R. S., Shamsuddin, S., & Foroughi, A. (2012). The impact of physical design factors on the effective use of public squares. International Journal of Fundamental Psychology and Social Sciences, 2(3), 49–56.

Hillier, B. (1996). Cities as movement economies. Urban Design International, 1, 41–60.

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.

Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66.

Hu, H., Luo, Z., Chen, Y., Bian, Q., & Tong, Z. (2017). Integration of space syntax into agent-based pedestrian simulation in urban open space. In CAADRIA 2017 – 22nd International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia: Protocols (pp. 325–334), Flows and Glitches.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Penguin.

Javadi, H. (2016). Sustainable urban public squares. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(3), 361–370.

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Katz, P., Scully, V., & Bressi, T. W. (1994). The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. McGraw-Hill.

Khan, A. Z., Moulaert, F., Schreurs, J., & Miciukiewicz, K. (2014). Integrative spatial quality: A relational epistemology of space and transdisciplinarity in urban design and planning. Journal of Urban Design, 19(4), 393–411.

Krier, R. (1979). Urban space. Rizzoli.

Lennard, S. H. C. (1987). Livable cities: People and places: Social and design principles for the future of the city. Gondolier Press.

Lu, Y., Gou, Z., Ye, Y., & Sheng, Q. (2019). Three-dimensional visibility graph analysis and its application. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(5), 948–962.

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.

Lynch, K. (1971). Site planning (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Lynch, K. (1981). Good city form. MIT Press.

Madanipour, A. (1999). Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(6), 879–891.

Madanipour, A. (2006). Roles and challenges of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), 173–193.

Mahmoud, A. H., & Omar, R. H. (2015). Planting design for urban parks: Space syntax as a landscape design assessment tool. Collection of Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4, 35–45.

Major, M. D., Penn, A., Spiliopoulou, G., & Spende, N. (1999, January). In with the Right Crowd: Crowd movement and space use in Trafalgar Square during the New Year’s Eve celebrations. In Space Syntax 2nd International Symposium (pp. 1–17), Brazil.

Major, M., Penn, A., Spiliopoulou, G., Spende, N., Doxa, M., & Fong, P. (2000). Following the crowd: Spatial layout and crowd behaviour. Architectural Research Quarterly, 4(3), 257–264.

Mazumdar, S. (2007). Kentsel yaşam kalitesi ve yer duygusu. Mimarlık Dergisi, 335, 32–36.

Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating public space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88.

Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116.

Moulaert, F., Van Dyck, B., Khan, A. Z., & Schreurs, J. (2013). Building a meta-framework to ‘address’ spatial quality. International Planning Studies, 18(3–4), 389–409.

Nasution, A. D., & Zahrah, W. (2012). Public open space privatization and quality of life, case study Merdeka Square Medan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 466–475.

Okan University. (2015, May 02). Evaluation of the future of sea transportation in Istanbul. ISTKA.

Oktay, D., Rustemli, A., & Marans, R. W. (2009). Neighborhood satisfaction, sense of community, and attachment: Initial findings from Famagusta quality of urban life study. ITU A/Z Journal, 6(1), 6–20.

Panagopoulos, T., González Duque, J. A., & Bostenaru Dan, M. (2016). Urban planning with respect to environmental quality and human well-being. Environmental Pollution, 208, 137–144.

Parvin, A., Ye, A., & Jia, B. (2007). Multilevel Pedestrian movement: does visibility make any difference? In 6th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 1–16), İstanbul.

Praliya, S., & Garg, P. (2019). Public space quality evaluation: prerequisite for public space management. The Journal of Public Space, 4(1), 93–126.

Project for Public Spaces. (Ed.). (2000). How to turn a place around: A handbook for creating successful public spaces. Project for Public Spaces Incorporated.

Rapoport, A. (1970). The study of spatial quality. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 4(4), 81–95.

Read, S. (1999). Space syntax and the Dutch city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(2), 251–264.

Roger Tym & Partners. (2006). Physical regeneration investment framework (Newcastle, One NorthEast).

Rowley, A. (1998). Private‐property decision makers and the quality of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(2), 151–173.

Safari, H., & Moridani, F. F. (2017). Syntactical analysis of the accessibility and sociability of a square in the Kuala Lumpur City Center. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(4), 456–468.

Schulz, N. C. (1971). Existence space & architecture. Studio Vista, Praeger Publishers Inc.

Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Sitte, C. (1889). City planning according to artistic principles (G. R. Collins, & C. C. Collins, Trans.). Phaidon Press. (Original work published 1965)

Smith, T., Nelischer, M., & Perkins, N. (1997). Quality of an urban community: a framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 39(2), 229–241.

Southworth, M. (1989). Theory and practice of contemporary urban design: A review of urban design plans in the United States. Town Planning Review, 60(4), 369–402.

Sternberg, E. (2000). An integrative theory of urban design. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), 265–278.

Terzi, F., Akay, M., Erdem Okumuş, D., & Gökçe, P. (2019). Re-coding the characteristics of public spaces: The case of İstanbul. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 7(2), 487–512.

Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 103–121.

Vadiati, N., & Kashkooli, A. M. S. (2011). Environmental sustainability of newly developed city squares in historic cities: Case study of Isfahan-Iran. Procedia Engineering, 21, 829–837.

Valipour, E., Mobaraki, A., Nikoofam, M., & Tayyebisoudkolaei, S. (2019). Establishment of Space syntax to read and analyze urban network; the case of study, Famagusta city of Cyprus. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 3(1), 154–160.

Van der Geer, J., Hanraads, J. A. J., & Lupton R. A. (2000). The art of writing a scientific article. Journal of Scientific Communications, 163, 51–59.

Van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2018). Space Syntax: a method to measure urban space related to social, economic and cognitive factors. In C. Yamu, A. Poplin, O. Devisch, & G. De Roo (Eds.), The virtual and the real in planning and urban design: Perspectives, practices and applications (pp. 136–150). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Vandell, K. D., & Lane, J. S. (1989). The economics of architecture and urban design: Some preliminary findings. Real Estate Economics, 17, 235–260.

Walzer, M. (1986). Pleasures and costs of urbanity. Dissent, 33, 470–475.

White, E. T. (1999). Path portal place: Appreciating public space in urban environments. Architectural Media.

Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. The Conservation Foundation.

Whyte, W. H. (1985). The social life of small urban spaces. The Conservation Foundation.

Whyte, W. H. (1988). City: Rediscovering the centre. Doubleday.

Yeganeh, M., & Kamalizadeh, M. (2018). Territorial behaviors and integration between buildings and city in urban public spaces of Iran’s metropolises. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(4), 588–599.

Zakariya, K., Harun, N. Z., & Mansor, M. (2014). Spatial characteristics of urban square and sociability: A review of the city square, Melbourne. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 678–688.

Zengel, R. (2007). Dönüştürülmüş Bir Meydan: Konak Meydanına Analitik Bir Yaklaşım. Mimarlık, 334, 40–43.

Zerouati, W., & Bellal, T. (2019). Evaluating the impact of mass housings’ in-between spaces’ spatial configuration on users’ social interaction. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(1), 34–53.

Zucker, P. (1970). Town and square: From the agora to the village green. MIT Press.