Integrated management systems in aviation: insights from case study research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2026.27569

Abstract

Integrated Management Systems (IMS) have gained increasing attention within the aviation industry as organisations seek to manage multiple, often fragmented, management systems more effectively. Despite this interest, empirical research and regulatory guidance on IMS implementation in aviation remain limited, with much of the existing literature focusing on conceptual models rather than practical application. Recent studies emphasize the importance of incorporating risk as a unifying element within IMS, given its central role across all management systems. This paper presents a case study evaluating the practical applicability of an IMS model developed by Meeûs, which aims to bridge the gap between theoretical integration frameworks and operational implementation. The model is derived from an analysis of the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Safety Management System components and their alignment with various management systems, resulting in a standardized integration “language.” This language consists of a shared risk component and two classification mechanisms designed to identify events and underlying causes across multiple systems. The model further introduces the IMS Cube concept, enabling reported events to be reviewed holistically rather than in isolation within individual management systems. Using empirical data, this study analyses the feasibility of implementing the proposed IMS language and integrated process in an operational aviation context. The findings provide insights into the model’s behaviour in practice and contribute empirical evidence to support the advancement of risk-based integrated management systems in aviation.

Keywords:

management systems, integrated management systems, interoperability, integrated risk, IMS cube, safety management system, aviation, airline

How to Cite

Meeûs, J., Dewulf, W., & Macário, R. (2026). Integrated management systems in aviation: insights from case study research. Aviation, 30(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2026.27569

Share

Published in Issue
August 31, 2026
Abstract Views
70

References

Algheriani, N. M. S., Majstorovic, V. D., Kirin, S., & Spasojevic Brkic, V. (2019). Risk model for integrated management system. Tehnicki Vjesnik, 26(6), 1833–1840. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20190123142317

Carvalho, K. M. P., Picchi, F., Camarini, G., & Chamon, E. M. Q. O. (2015). Benefits in the implementation of safety, health, environmental and quality integrated system. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2015.V7.814

Chountalas, P. T., & Lagodimos, A. G. (2024). Integrated management systems: A content and bibliometric analysis. TQM Journal, 37(7), 1827–1873. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2024-0164

European Parliament. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0376

Ispas, L., & Mironeasa, C. (2022). The identification of common models applied for the integration of management systems: A review. Sustainability, 14(6), Article 3559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063559

Ispas, L., Mironeasa, C., & Silvestri, A. (2023). Risk-based approach in the implementation of integrated management systems: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310251

López-Fresno, P. (2010). Implementation of an integrated management system in an airline: A case study. TQM Journal, 22(6), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731011085311

Maier, D., Vadastreanu, A. M., Keppler, T., Eidenmuller, T., & Maier, A. (2015). Innovation as a part of an existing integrated management system. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 1060–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00930-2

Malakis, S., Kontogiannis, T., & Smoker, A. (2023). A pragmatic approach to the limitations of safety management systems in aviation. Safety Science, 166(May), Article 106215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106215

Meeûs, J., Dewulf, W., & Macário, R. (2023). Management systems in aviation: Challenges and opportunities to upgrade to an integrated management system. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310424

Meeûs, J., Dewulf, W., & Macário, R. (2024). IMS cube, a new risk model for integrated management systems in aviation. Aviation, 28(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2024.21703

Meeûs, J. (2026). Breaking silos in aviation: The IMS cube approach to integrated management systems [Thesis, University of Antwerp]. University of Antwerp. https://doi.org/10.63028/10067/2207460151162165141

Muzaimi, H., Chew, B. C., & Hamid, S. R. (2017). Integrated management system: The integration of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 and ISO 31000. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1818, Article 020034. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976898

Nunhes, T. V., Bernardo, M., & Oliveira, O. J. (2019). Guiding principles of integrated management systems: Towards unifying a starting point for researchers and practitioners. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 977–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.066

The International Civil Aviation Organization. (2018). Safety management manual (Doc 9859 AN/474) (4th ed.). ICAO.

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Meeûs, J., Dewulf, W., & Macário, R. (2026). Integrated management systems in aviation: insights from case study research. Aviation, 30(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2026.27569

Share