Integrated management systems in aviation: insights from case study research
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2026.27569Abstract
Integrated Management Systems (IMS) have gained increasing attention within the aviation industry as organisations seek to manage multiple, often fragmented, management systems more effectively. Despite this interest, empirical research and regulatory guidance on IMS implementation in aviation remain limited, with much of the existing literature focusing on conceptual models rather than practical application. Recent studies emphasize the importance of incorporating risk as a unifying element within IMS, given its central role across all management systems. This paper presents a case study evaluating the practical applicability of an IMS model developed by Meeûs, which aims to bridge the gap between theoretical integration frameworks and operational implementation. The model is derived from an analysis of the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Safety Management System components and their alignment with various management systems, resulting in a standardized integration “language.” This language consists of a shared risk component and two classification mechanisms designed to identify events and underlying causes across multiple systems. The model further introduces the IMS Cube concept, enabling reported events to be reviewed holistically rather than in isolation within individual management systems. Using empirical data, this study analyses the feasibility of implementing the proposed IMS language and integrated process in an operational aviation context. The findings provide insights into the model’s behaviour in practice and contribute empirical evidence to support the advancement of risk-based integrated management systems in aviation.
Keywords:
management systems, integrated management systems, interoperability, integrated risk, IMS cube, safety management system, aviation, airlineHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Algheriani, N. M. S., Majstorovic, V. D., Kirin, S., & Spasojevic Brkic, V. (2019). Risk model for integrated management system. Tehnicki Vjesnik, 26(6), 1833–1840. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20190123142317
Carvalho, K. M. P., Picchi, F., Camarini, G., & Chamon, E. M. Q. O. (2015). Benefits in the implementation of safety, health, environmental and quality integrated system. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2015.V7.814
Chountalas, P. T., & Lagodimos, A. G. (2024). Integrated management systems: A content and bibliometric analysis. TQM Journal, 37(7), 1827–1873. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2024-0164
European Parliament. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0376
Ispas, L., & Mironeasa, C. (2022). The identification of common models applied for the integration of management systems: A review. Sustainability, 14(6), Article 3559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063559
Ispas, L., Mironeasa, C., & Silvestri, A. (2023). Risk-based approach in the implementation of integrated management systems: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310251
López-Fresno, P. (2010). Implementation of an integrated management system in an airline: A case study. TQM Journal, 22(6), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731011085311
Maier, D., Vadastreanu, A. M., Keppler, T., Eidenmuller, T., & Maier, A. (2015). Innovation as a part of an existing integrated management system. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 1060–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00930-2
Malakis, S., Kontogiannis, T., & Smoker, A. (2023). A pragmatic approach to the limitations of safety management systems in aviation. Safety Science, 166(May), Article 106215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106215
Meeûs, J., Dewulf, W., & Macário, R. (2023). Management systems in aviation: Challenges and opportunities to upgrade to an integrated management system. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310424
Meeûs, J., Dewulf, W., & Macário, R. (2024). IMS cube, a new risk model for integrated management systems in aviation. Aviation, 28(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2024.21703
Meeûs, J. (2026). Breaking silos in aviation: The IMS cube approach to integrated management systems [Thesis, University of Antwerp]. University of Antwerp. https://doi.org/10.63028/10067/2207460151162165141
Muzaimi, H., Chew, B. C., & Hamid, S. R. (2017). Integrated management system: The integration of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 and ISO 31000. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1818, Article 020034. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976898
Nunhes, T. V., Bernardo, M., & Oliveira, O. J. (2019). Guiding principles of integrated management systems: Towards unifying a starting point for researchers and practitioners. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 977–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.066
The International Civil Aviation Organization. (2018). Safety management manual (Doc 9859 AN/474) (4th ed.). ICAO.
View article in other formats
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.