AI framework for automated terminal aerodrome forecasting

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2025.25334

Abstract

Accurate Terminal Aerodrome Forecasts (TAFs) are essential for aviation safety and operational efficiency worldwide. This study develops an AI framework for automated TAF generation, including data preprocessing, model development, and evaluation. Using GFS and ECMWF datasets from 2020–2023 and real TAF forecasts from Brno International Airport the study explores the effectiveness of ML approaches for wind speed and visibility prediction. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) efficiently reduced dimensionality for wind speed predictors but proved less effective for visibility, highlighting its complex nature. Feature importance analysis identified initial observations and seasonal patterns as dominant predictors, underscoring the influence of data quality. Regression models for wind speed met ICAO standards. While Gradient Boosting (GB) classification outperformed human forecasts in raw accuracy, it suffered from poor probability calibration due to dataset imbalance. A critical evaluation of accuracy metrics – such as log-loss and F1-score – revealed their advantages and limitations, particularly in handling imbalanced datasets and probabilistic forecasting. Beyond its empirical findings, the study provides a theoretical foundation for integrating machine learning (ML) into TAF generation, discussing methodological considerations and the interaction between model performance and forecast interpretability. Future research is recommended to focus on the local models, explore advanced models, and expand the framework to diverse climatic conditions.

Keywords:

accuracy metrics, aviation forecasts, machine learning forecasting, terminal forecast, TAF, weather forecasting

How to Cite

Sládek, D. (2025). AI framework for automated terminal aerodrome forecasting. Aviation, 29(4), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2025.25334

Share

Published in Issue
November 26, 2025
Abstract Views
13

References

Altinok, A., Kiran, R., Bue, B., & Bilimoria, K. (2018). Modeling key predictors of airport runway configurations using learning algorithms. In 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Aerospace Research Central. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3673

Anggoro, M., Siregar, D. C., Ninggar, R., & Widomurti, L. (2019). Aerodrome warning verification using quality measurement of contingency table (Case study in Jakarta and Tanjungpinang). In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Statistics and Analytics (ICSA 2019), Bogor, Indonesia. EUDL. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.2-8-2019.2290486

Ayhan, S., Comitz, P., Gerberick, G., & Wilson, I. (2013). ADTOS: Arrival departure tradeoff optimization system. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on GeoStreaming (pp. 50–57). ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/2534303.2534314

Boyd, D., & Guinn, T. (2021). A comparison of the Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) and Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) accuracy for general aviation. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2159-6670.1230

Buxi, G., & Hansen, M. (2013). Generating day-of-operation probabilistic capacity scenarios from weather forecasts. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 33, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.12.006

Chase, R. J., Harrison, D. R., Burke, A., Lackmann, G. M., & McGovern, A. (2022). A machine learning tutorial for operational meteorology. Part I: Traditional machine learning. Weather and Forecasting, 37(8), 1509–1529. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-22-0070.1

Dhal, R., Roy, S., Taylor, C., & Wan, Y. (2013). Forecasting weather-impacted airport capacities for flow contingency management: Advanced methods and integration. In AIAA Aviation Forum 2013. Aerospace Research Central. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-4356

Everitt, B. J., Landau, S., & Leese, M. (1974). Cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL21531058M/Cluster_analysis

Famiglini, L., Campagner, A., & Cabitza, F. (2023). Towards a rigorous calibration assessment framework: Advancements in metrics, methods, and use. In Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications. ECAI (Vol. 372, pp. 645–652). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA230327

Ferri, C., Hernández‐Orallo, J., & Modroiu, R. (2008). An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 30(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2008.08.010

Hubbard, K. G., Goddard, S., Sorensen, W., Wells, N. P., & Osugi, T. T. (2005). Performance of quality assurance procedures for an applied climate information system. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 22(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-1657.1

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2016). International Standards and Recommended Practices: Annex 3 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation – Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation (19th ed.). ICAO.

Jacobs, A., & Maat, N. (2005). Numerical guidance methods for decision support in aviation meteorological forecasting. Weather and Forecasting, 20(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-827.1

Jolliffe, I. T. (2005). Principal component analysis. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa501

Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. Wiley. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA00969679

Kicinger, R., Chen, J., Steiner, M., & Pinto, J. (2016). Airport capacity prediction with explicit consideration of weather forecast uncertainty. Journal of Air Transportation, 24(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.D0017

Lanyon, A., Standen, J., & Buchanan, P. (2020). A new process for producing first-guess TAFs. In EGU General Assembly 2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5154

Mason, S. J. (2004). On using “climatology” as a reference strategy in the Brier and ranked probability skill scores. Monthly Weather Review, 132(7), 1891–1895. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1891:OUCAAR>2.0.CO;2

Natekin, A., & Knoll, A. (2013). Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021

National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce. (2015). NCEP GFS 0.25-degree global forecast grids historical archive. Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.5065/D65D8PWK

Nielsen‐Gammon, J. W., Hu, X. M., Zhang, F., & Pleim, J. E. (2010). Evaluation of planetary boundary layer scheme sensitivities for the purpose of parameter estimation. Monthly Weather Review, 138(9), 3400–3417. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3292.1

Novotný, J., Dejmal, K., Repal, V., Gera, M., & Sladek, D. (2021). Assessment of TAF, METAR, and SPECI reports based on ICAO ANNEX 3 regulation. Atmosphere, 12(2), Article 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020138

Patriarca, R., Simone, F., Di Gravio, G., Bonafé, G. P., Gobbi, G. P., & Angelini, F. (2023). Supporting weather forecasting performance management at aerodromes through anomaly detection and hierarchical clustering. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, Article 119210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119210

Simone, F., Di Gravio, G., & Patriarca, R. (2022). Performance-based analysis of aerodrome weather forecasts. In 2022 New Trends in Civil Aviation (NTCA) (pp. 27–33). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/NTCA55899.2022.9934004

Sládek, D., Chalupníková, B., Schneidrová, A., & Roučková, L. (2024). Analyses of European terminal aerodrome weather forecasts in 2022 and 2023. Aviation, 28(2), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2024.21690

Wong, W.-K., Lau, C.-S., & Chan, P.-W. (2013). Aviation model: A fine-scale Numerical Weather Prediction system for aviation applications at the Hong Kong International Airport. Advances in Meteorology, 2013, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/532475

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2025-11-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sládek, D. (2025). AI framework for automated terminal aerodrome forecasting. Aviation, 29(4), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2025.25334

Share