An evaluation study on immigrants′ transport system adaptation behaviour: Turkey example
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2025.24066Abstract
Global migration patterns have led to significant population shifts, particularly in regions such as Turkey, which has experienced a substantial influx of immigrants due to political crises, economic instability, and armed conflicts. This study examines the adaptation behaviour of immigrants to Turkey′s transport system, identifying key challenges, expectations, and integration patterns. Using survey data from immigrants in Turkey, the study explores the role of demographic factors, prior transport experiences, and socio-economic conditions in shaping mobility choices. The findings indicate that while many aspects of Turkey′s transport system are familiar to immigrants, significant barriers such as high travel costs, unclear traffic signage, and language-related difficulties hinder complete adaptation. Younger, higher-educated immigrants and those from culturally similar backgrounds demonstrate a faster integration process, whereas older immigrants and those with limited educational backgrounds face more significant obstacles. Statistical analyses, including multiple linear regression and decision tree classifier, reveal that age is the most significant predictor of long-term transport adaptation. Additionally, the study highlights that as the duration of stay increases, immigrants exhibit a higher reliance on public transportation, with ownership of private vehicles gradually rising among long-term residents. The research underscores the need for policy interventions, such as reducing transport costs, improving multilingual signage, and offering integration programs to enhance immigrant mobility. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers, urban planners, and transport authorities striving to develop more inclusive and efficient transport systems.
Keywords:
immigrants, transportation, adaptation, decision tree classifier, surveyHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adıgüzel, Y. 2016. Göçmenlerin kültürel entegrasyonu, in A. Esen, M. Duman (Eds.). Türkiye’de Geçici Koruma Altındaki Suriyeliler: Tespitler ve Öneriler, 171–194. (in Turkish).
Aydin, M. M.; Topal, A. 2016. Effect of road surface deformations on lateral lane utilization and longitudinal driving behaviours, Transport 31(2): 192–201. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2016.1193049
Aydin, M. M.; Topal, A. 2019. Effects of pavement surface deformations on traffic flow, Transport 34(2): 204–214. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.8631
Babaoğlu, C.; Kocaoğlu, M. 2017. ‘Kentli’ sığınmacılar meselesi ve belediyeler, Türk İdare Dergisi 485: 497–518. (in Turkish).
Blumenberg, E.; Evans, A. E. 2010. Planning for demographic diversity: the case of immigrants and public transit, Journal of Public Transportation 13(2): 23–45. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.13.2.2
Blumenberg, E.; Smart, M. J. 2011. Migrating to driving: exploring the multiple dimensions of immigrants’ automobile use, in K. Lucas, E. Blumenberg, R. Weinberger (Eds.). Auto Motives, 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780857242341-012
Buran, A. 2024. Türkiye’de belediye ve büyükşehir belediyelerinin göçmenlerin sosyal uyumundaki rollerinin yeniden değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye. (in Turkish).
Çelik, M. E. 2020. Göçmenlere dil öğretimine ilişkin temel kavramlar, in U. Başar, B. Tüfekçioğlu (Eds.). Göçmenlere Türkçe Öğretimi, 1–29. (in Turkish).
Chakrabarti, S.; Painter, G. 2019. Geographic mobility of recent immigrants and urban transit demand in the U.S.: new evidence and planning implications, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 120: 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.019
Chapman, J.; Bernstein, J. 2003. Immigration and poverty: how are they linked?, Monthly Labor Review 126(4): 10–15. Available from Internet: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41861706
Ereş, F. 2015. Türkiye’de göçmen eğitimi sorunsalı ve göçmen eğitiminde farklılığın yönetimi, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 6(2): 17–30. (in Turkish).
Favell, A. 2022. Immigration, integration and citizenship: elements of a new political demography, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48(1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2020955
Gibson, M. A.; Carrasco, S. 2009. The education of immigrant youth: some lessons from the U.S. and Spain, Theory into Practice 48(4): 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840903188118
Gonzalez-Feliu, J.; Pronello, C.; Salanova Grau, J. M.; Skačkauskas, P. 2018. Collaboration and urban transport, Transport 33(4): 861–866. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6156
Hanna, M. 2021. Movement after Migration: Immigrants’ Disproportionate Reliance on Public Transportation. Migration Policy Institute, Washington, DC, US. Available from Internet: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/movement-migration-immigrants-public-transportation
Hemminki, K. 2014. Immigrant health, our health, European Journal of Public Health 24(1): 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku108
Kenworthy, J.; Laube, F. 2002. Urban transport patterns in a global sample of cities & their linkages to transport infrastructure, land use, economics & environment, World Transport Policy & Practice 8(3): 5–19.
Khyatti, M.; Trimbitas, R.-D.; Zouheir, Y.; Benani, A.; El Messaoudi, M.-D.; Hemminki, K. 2014. Infectious diseases in North Africa and North African immigrants to Europe, European Journal of Public Health 24(1): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku109
Nygh, P. 2000. The future of the United Nations’ 1951 Refugees Convention, Australian International Law Journal 2000: 1–24.
Polzin, S. E.; Chu, X.; Rey, J. R. 2000. Density and captivity in public transit success: observations from the 1995 nationwide personal transportation study, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1735: 10–18. https://doi.org/10.3141/1735-02
Rosenbloom, S.; Fielding, G. F. 1998. Transit Markets of the Future: the Challenge of Change. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report No 28. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, US. 67 p. Available from Internet: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_28-a.pdf
Sezgin, A. A.; Yolcu, T. 2016. Göç ile gelen uluslararasi öğrencilerin sosyal uyum ve toplumsal kabul süreci, Humanitas – Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 4(7): 417–436. (in Turkish).
Shelest‐Szumilas, O.; Wozniak, M. 2024. Stay away or stay in? Exploring settlement decisions of economic migrants and war refugees from Ukraine in the structural approach framework, International Migration 62(5): 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13297
Smart, M. 2010. US immigrants and bicycling: two-wheeled in Autopia, Transport Policy 17(3): 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.002
T. C. İçişleri Bakanlığı – Göç İdaresi Başkanlığı. 2024. Güncel veriler. Available from Internet: https://www.goc.gov.tr (in Turkish).
Waslin, M. L. 2013. Driving while immigrant: driver’s license policy and immigration enforcement, in D. Brotherton, D. Stageman, S. Leyro (Eds.). Outside Justice: Immigration and the Criminalizing Impact of Changing Policy and Practice, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6648-2_1
View article in other formats
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.