Real-time information-based combined control method for bus delay
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2025.22886Abstract
As environmental pollution and energy consumption become increasingly serious concerns, more cities are opting for electric buses over traditional fuel buses. However, the stability and reliability of electric buses during operation are challenged by the unpredictability of traffic flow and passenger demand. Factors such as traffic congestion, weather conditions, and fluctuations in passenger numbers can compromise the punctuality of electric bus services, often resulting in delays. To address these challenges, a real-time dual-objective bus control model for mixed traffic scenarios has been proposed. This model aims to minimize both passenger time costs and company operational costs. Factors such as intersections and traffic flow are also considered. A combined control strategy, including speed control and a backup bus replacement strategy, has been proposed. Speed control is specifically aimed at managing intersection delays, allowing buses to adjust their speeds to pass through intersections optimally between queue dissipation and the end of the green-light period. The backup bus replacement strategy, on the other hand, is implemented at bus terminals, where a backup bus replaces a delayed one to maintain the schedule. A heuristic algorithm based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is incorporated into the model, enhancing its effectiveness by iteratively updating the positions and velocities of particles in the search space. Harbin City Road 96 was selected as a case study for model validation. In the off-peak case scenario, schedule deviation was reduced by 89% through the implementation of the proposed speed control strategy. Additionally, passenger waiting time was reduced by 8%, and passenger travel time was reduced by 14%. In the peak case scenario, the proposed control strategy effectively eliminated bus departure delays originating within the bus system. These results demonstrate the potential of the proposed model to significantly enhance the reliability and stability of public transportation systems, thereby improving the overall quality of public transport services.
Keywords:
electric bus, speed control, backup bus replacement strategy, dual-objective model, heuristic algorithmHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alamatsaz, K.; Hussain, S.; Lai, C.; Eicker, U. 2022. Electric bus scheduling and timetabling, fast charging infrastructure planning, and their impact on the grid: a review, Energies 15(21): 7919. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15217919
Ampountolas, K.; Kring, M. 2021. Mitigating bunching with bus-following models and bus-to-bus cooperation, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22(5): 2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2973585
Anderson, P.; Daganzo, C. F. 2019. Effect of transit signal priority on bus service reliability, Transportation Research Procedia 38: 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.05.002
Berrebi, S. J.; Watkins, K. E.; Laval, J. A. 2015. A real-time bus dispatching policy to minimize passenger wait on a high frequency route, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 81: 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.05.012
Bie, Y.; Xiong, X.; Yan, Y.; Qu, X. 2020. Dynamic headway control for high-frequency bus line based on speed guidance and intersection signal adjustment, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 35(1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12446
Cao, Z.; Ceder, A.; Zhang, S. 2019. Real-time schedule adjustments for autonomous public transport vehicles, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 109: 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.10.004
Cats, O.; Larijani, A. N.; Koutsopoulos, H. N.; Burghout, W. 2011. Impacts of holding control strategies on transit performance: bus simulation model analysis, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2216: 51–58. https://doi.org/10.3141/2216-06
Chen, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, S.; Wang, W. 2015a. Design of limited-stop bus service with capacity constraint and stochastic travel time, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 83: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.08.007
Chen, X.; Hellinga, B.; Chang, C.; Fu, L. 2015b. Optimization of headways with stop-skipping control: a case study of bus rapid transit system, Journal of Advanced Transportation 49(3): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1278
Chow, A. H. F.; Li, S.; Zhong, R. 2017. Multi-objective optimal control formulations for bus service reliability with traffic signals, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 103: 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.02.006
Daganzo, C. F. 2009. A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: systematic analysis and comparisons, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43(10): 913–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.04.002
Daganzo, C. F.; Pilachowski, J. 2011. Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45(1): 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.06.005
Deng, Y.-J.; Liu, X.-H.; Hu, X.; Zhang, M. 2020. Reduce bus bunching with a real-time speed control algorithm considering heterogeneous roadway conditions and intersection delays, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems 146(7): 04020048. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000358
Estrada, M.; Mensión, J.; Aymamí, J. M.; Torres, L. 2016. Bus control strategies in corridors with signalized intersections, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 71: 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.08.013
Fu, L.; Liu, Q.; Calamai, P. 2003. Real-time optimization model for dynamic scheduling of transit operations, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1857: 48–55. https://doi.org/10.3141/1857-06
Gkiotsalitis, K. 2021. Bus holding of electric buses with scheduled charging times, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22(11): 6760–6771. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2994538
Han, F.; Xie, R.; Lai, M. 2018. Traffic density, congestion externalities, and urbanization in China, Spatial Economic Analysis 13(4): 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2018.1459045
He, H.; Guler, S. I.; Menendez, M. 2016. Adaptive control algorithm to provide bus priority with a pre-signal, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 64: 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.009
Huo, Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, S. 2018. Modelling bus delay at bus stop, Transport 33(1): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2014.1003324
Janos, M.; Furth, P. G. 2002. Bus priority with highly interruptible traffic signal control: simulation of San Juan’s Avenida Ponce de Leon, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1811: 157–165. https://doi.org/10.3141/1811-19
Koehler, L. A.; Kraus, W. 2010. Simultaneous control of traffic lights and bus departure for priority operation, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18(3): 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.01.007
Koehler, L. A.; Seman, L. O.; Kraus, W.; Camponogara, E. 2019. Real-time integrated holding and priority control strategy for transit systems, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20(9): 3459–3469. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2876868
Liang, S.; Zhao, S.; Lu, C.; Ma, M. 2016. A self-adaptive method to equalize headways: numerical analysis and comparison, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 87: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.02.008
Liu, Z.; Yan, Y.; Qu, X.; Zhang, Y. 2013. Bus stop-skipping scheme with random travel time, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 35: 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.06.004
Ma, W.; Xie, H.; Han, B. 2012. Development and evaluation of an economic-driving assistance program for transit vehicles, Energies 5(2): 371–385. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5020371
Ma, W.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y. 2010. Development and evaluation of a coordinated and conditional bus priority approach, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2145: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.3141/2145-06
Muñoz, J. C.; Cortés, C. E.; Giesen, R.; Sáez, D.; Delgado, F.; Valencia, F.; Cipriano, A. 2013. Comparison of dynamic control strategies for transit operations, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 28: 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.12.010
Nesheli, M. M.; Ceder, A.; Gonzalez, V. A. 2016. Real-time public-transport operational tactics using synchronized transfers to eliminate vehicle bunching, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17(11): 3220–3229. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2542268
Petit, A.; Lei, C.; Ouyang, Y. 2019. Multiline bus bunching control via vehicle substitution, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 126: 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.05.009
Petit, A.; Ouyang, Y.; Lei, C. 2018. Dynamic bus substitution strategy for bunching intervention, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 115: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.06.001
Seman, L. O.; Koehler, L. A.; Camponogara, E.; Kraus, W. 2020. Integrated headway and bus priority control in transit corridors with bidirectional lane segments, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 111: 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.001
Sun, A.; Hickman, M. 2005. The real-time stop-skipping problem, Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations 9(2): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450590934642
Van Oort, N.; Boterman, J. W.; Van Nes, R. 2012. The impact of scheduling on service reliability: trip-time determination and holding points in long-headway services, Public Transport 4(1): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-012-0054-4
Wang, W.; Zong, F.; Yao, B. 2021. A proactive real-time control strategy based on data-driven transit demand prediction, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22(4): 2404–2416. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3028415
Yang, X.; Chen, A.; Ning, B.; Tang, T. 2016. A stochastic model for the integrated optimization on metro timetable and speed profile with uncertain train mass, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 91: 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.06.006
Zhang, H.; Liang, S.; Zhao, S.; Shang, Q. 2021. Advantages of bus stop skipping and holding control in reducing schedule deviation, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Municipal Engineer 174(1): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmuen.18.00036
Zhao, J.; Dessouky, M.; Bukkapatnam, S. 2006. Optimal slack time for schedule-based transit operations, Transportation Science 40(4): 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1060.0170
View article in other formats
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.