Multidimensional cost analysis of Europe–Asia container transport routes

    Tomi Solakivi Info
    Tuomas Kiiski Info
    Aleksi Paimander Info
    Jarmo Malmsten Info
    Vesa Kilpi Info
    Lauri Ojala Info
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2025.22874

Abstract

In this article, we propose a 3-dimensional framework for evaluating the costs of transporting goods between Europe and Asia, including direct transport, time, and Environmental Costs (ECs). We estimate the costs of alternative container transport routes, including direct sea transport via the Suez Canal Route (SCR) and the Northern Sea Route (NSR); direct rail connections via the Trans-Siberian Rail (TSR) and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and intermodal transport options consisting of rail and sea transport legs. When considering environmental and Inventory Carrying Costs (ICs), the NSR is viable at least seasonally, whereas rail and intermodal alternatives remain more expensive. The results provide a robust estimate of the potential of alternative transport routes and modes. The inclusion of ECs in our analysis provides valuable new information to stakeholders on how to achieve the ambitious environmental goals while also considering the economic viability of different route options in Europe–Asia container trade.

Keywords:

Europe–Asia container trade, transport corridors, cost of transport, environmental impact, route selection, transport policy

How to Cite

Solakivi, T., Kiiski, T., Paimander, A., Malmsten, J., Kilpi, V., & Ojala, L. (2025). Multidimensional cost analysis of Europe–Asia container transport routes. Transport, 40(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2025.22874

Share

Published in Issue
November 4, 2025
Abstract Views
0

References

Aksenov, Y.; Popova, E. E.; Yool, A.; Nurser, A. J. G.; Williams, T. D.; Bertino, L.; Bergh, J. 2017. On the future navigability of Arctic Sea routes: high-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice, Marine Policy 75: 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.027

Alstom. 2020. Alstom′s First Prima Electric Locomotive Delivered to Indian Railways Begins Operation. Press Realise. Alstom SA. Available from Internet: https://www.alstom.com/press-releases-news/2020/5/alstoms-first-prima-electric-locomotive-delivered-indian-railways-begins-operation

Benedyk, I. V.; Peeta, S. 2018. A binary probit model to analyze freight transportation decision-maker perspectives for container shipping on the Northern Sea route, Maritime Economics & Logistics 20(3): 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-016-0046-4

Bezrukov, L. A. 2018. The Trans-Siberian and the Silk Road, Problems of Economic Transition 60(1–3): 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611991.2018.1456199

Bucsky, P. 2020. The iron Silk Road: how important is it?, Area Development and Policy 5(2): 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2019.1672571

Cariou, P.; Cheaitou, A.; Faury, O.; Hamdan, S. 2021. The feasibility of Arctic container shipping: the economic and environmental impacts of ice thickness, Maritime Economics & Logistics 23(4): 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-019-00145-3

Chan, M. H. T. 2018. The Belt and Road initiative – the New Silk Road: a research agenda, Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 7(2): 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2019.1580407

Clarksons Research. 2025. World Fleet Register. Clarkson Research Services Limited, London, UK. Available from Internet: https://www.clarksons.net/wfr

Cullinane, K.; Khanna, M. 1999. Economies of scale in large container ships, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 33(2): 185–207. Available from Internet: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20053805

Ding, W.; Wang, Y.; Dai, L.; Hu, H., 2020. Does a carbon tax affect the feasibility of Arctic shipping?, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 80: 102257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102257

EC. 2021a. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC Establishing a System for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Union, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Concerning the Establishment and Operation of a Market Stability Reserve for the Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme and Regulation (EU) 2015/757. COM/2021/551 Final. European Commission (EC). Available from Internet: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021PC0551

EC. 2021b. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Seventh Monitoring Report on the Development of the Rail Market under Article 15(4) of Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. COM/2021/5 Final. European Commission (EC). Available from Internet: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0005

EC. 2021c. The European Green Deal: Striving to be the First Climate-Neutral Continent. European Commission (EC). Available from Internet: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en

EEA. 2025. Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Electricity Generation in Europe. European Environmental Agency (EEA). Available from Internet: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-intensity-of-1

EMBER. 2025. European Electricity Prices and Costs. Available from Internet: https://ember-energy.org/data/european-electricity-prices-and-costs

Eurostat. 2025. Eurostat: the Home of High-Quality Statistics and Data on Europe. Available from Internet: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

Fries, N.; De Jong, G. C.; Patterson, Z.; Weidmann, U. 2010. Shipper willingness to pay to increase environmental performance in freight transportation, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2168: 33–42. https://doi.org/10.3141/2168-05

Frischknecht, R.; Messmer, A.; Stolz, P.; Tuchschmid, M. 2016. Mobitool – Grundlagenbericht: Hintergrund, Methodik & Emissionsfaktoren. Mobitool, Zürich, Schweiz. 70 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24306.09921 (in German).

Furuichi, M.; Otsuka, N. 2018. Examining quick delivery at an affordable cost by the NSR/SCR-combined shipping in the age of mega-ships, Maritime Policy & Management: the Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 45(8): 1057–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1473656

Gattuso, D.; Restuccia, A., 2014. A tool for railway transport cost evaluation, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 111: 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.088

Gilbert, P.; Walsh, C.; Traut, M.; Kesieme, U.; Pazouki, K.; Murphy, A., 2018. Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels, Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.165

Gunnarsson, B.; Moe, A. 2021. Ten years of international shipping on the Northern Sea route: trends and challenges, Arctic Review on Law and Politics 12: 4–30. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v12.2614

Hao, C.; Yue, Y. 2016. Optimization on combination of transport routes and modes on dynamic programming for a container multimodal transport system, Procedia Engineering 137: 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.272

Hummels, D. 2007. Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization, Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3): 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.3.131

Hummels, D.; Schaur, G. 2013. Time as a trade barrier, American Economic Review 103(7): 2935–2959. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.7.2935

ICAP. 2025a. ETS Map. International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). Available from Internet: https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets

ICAP. 2025b. Kazakhstan Emissions Trading System. International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). Available from Internet: https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets/kazakhstan-emissions-trading-system

IEA. 2025. Energy Statistics Data Browser. International Energy Agency (IEA). Available from Internet: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-statistics-data-browser?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20supply&indi­cator=TESbySource

IEA. 2023. Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2023. International Energy Agency (IEA). Available from Internet: https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-progress-2023

IMO. 2021a. Fourth Greenhouse Gas Study 2020. International Maritime Organization (IMO). Available from Internet: https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/fourth-imo-greenhouse-gas-study-2020.aspx

IMO. 2021b. Further Shipping GHG Emission Reduction Measures Adopted. International Maritime Organization (IMO). Available from Internet: https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/pressbriefings/pages/mepc76.aspx

IMO. 1973 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). International Maritime Organization (IMO). Available from Internet: https://www.imo.org/en/knowledgecentre/conferencesmeetings/pages/marpol.aspx

Investing.com. 2025. USD/KZT – US Dollar Kazakh Tenge. Available from Internet: https://www.investing.com/currencies/usd-kzt-historical-data

Kang, K.; Strauss-Wieder, A.; Eom, J. K. 2010. New approach to appraisal of rail freight projects in South Korea: using the value of freight transit time savings, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2159: 52–58. https://doi.org/10.3141/2159-07

Kiiski, T. 2017. Feasibility of Commercial Cargo Shipping Along the Northern Sea Route. Dissertation. University of Turku, Finland. 208 p. Available from Internet: https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/130546

Klein, A.; Hilster, D.; Scholten, P.; Van Wijngaarden, L.; Tol, E.; Otten, M. 2021. STREAM Freight Transport 2020: Emissions of Freight Transport Modes. CE Delft, The Netherlands. 146 p. Available from Internet: https://cedelft.eu/publications/stream-freight-transport-2020

Kurri, J.; Sirkiä, A.; Mikola, J. 2000. Value of time in freight transport in Finland, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1725: 26–30. https://doi.org/10.3141/1725-04

Lasserre, F. 2014. Case studies of shipping along Arctic routes. Analysis and profitability perspectives for the container sector, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 66: 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.05.005

Ligterink, N. E.; Smit, T.; Spreen, J. S. 2017. Insight into the Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and NOx Emissions of Rail Freight Transport. Report No. TNO 2017 R11679 V2. 20 p. Available from Internet: https://repository.tno.nl/SingleDoc?find=UID%2086cc82c5-44dc-42ef-b829-5720c4fad678

Lin, Y. 2021. China′s national carbon market exceeds expectations. LSEG: Data & Analytics (Refinitiv). Available from Internet: https://www.lseg.com

Liu, M.; Kronbak, J. 2010. The potential economic viability of using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe, Journal of Transport Geography 18(3): 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.08.004

Lu, M.; Chen, Y.; Morphet, R.; Lu, Y.; Li, E., 2019. The spatial competition between containerised rail and sea transport in Eurasia, Palgrave Communications 5: 122. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0334-6

Macrotrends. 2025a. Euro Dollar Exchange Rate – EUR USD (1999–2025). Macrotrends LLC. Available from Internet: https://www.macrotrends.net/2548/euro-dollar-exchange-rate-historical-chart

Macrotrends. 2025b. Dollar Yuan Exchange Rate (1981–2025). Macrotrends LLC. Available from Internet: https://www.macrotrends.net/2575/us-dollar-yuan-exchange-rate-historical-chart

Maloni, M.; Paul, J. A.; Gligor, D. M. 2013. Slow steaming impacts on ocean carriers and shippers, Maritime Economics & Logistics 15(2): 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.2

Marcu, A.; Vangenechten, D.; Alberola, E.; Olsen, J.; Schleicher, S.; Caneill, J.-Y.; Cabras, S. 2021. 2021 State of the EU ETS Report. European Roundtable on Climate Change and Sustainable Transition (ERCST). 37 p. Available from Internet: https://ercst.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/20210414-2021-State-of-the-EU-ETS-Report-vfinal-1.pdf

MSC. 2025. Asia – North Europe. Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC). 20 p. Available from Internet: https://www.msc.com/-/media/files/msc-cargo/msc-solutions/trades/east-west-network/via-cape-asia-north-europe-network-2025.pdf

Nordeng, A.; Rihel A.; Kolos, M.; Lin, Y.; Liao, C.; Zelljadt, L. 2021. Refinitiv Carbon Market Survey 2021. LSEG: Data & Analytics (Refinitiv). Available from Internet: https://www.lseg.com

Nordhaus, W. D. 2017. Revisiting the social cost of carbon, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(7): 1518–1523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609244114

Parry, I.; Black, S.; Roaf, J. 2021. Proposal for an International Carbon Price Floor among Large Emitters. International Monetary Fund (IMF) Staff Climate Notes No 2021/001. 21 p. Available from Internet: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/staff-climate-notes/Issues/2021/06/15/Proposal-for-an-International-Carbon-Price-Floor-Among-Large-Emitters-460468

Pepe, J. M. 2020. The “Eastern polygon” of the Trans-Siberian rail line: a critical factor for assessing Russia′s strategy toward Eurasia and the Asia-Pacific, Asia Europe Journal 18(3): 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00543-5

Pomfret, R. 2021. The Eurasian landbridge: implications of linking East Asia and Europe by rail, Research in Globalization 3: 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100046

Psaraftis, H. N.; Kontovas, C. A. 2010. Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15(8): 458–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.05.001

Psaraftis, H. N.; Kontovas, C. A. 2013. Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: a taxonomy and survey, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 26: 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.012

Rail Baltica. 2018. Rail Baltica: Preparation of the Operational Plan of the Railway. Final Study Report. 439 p. RB Rail AS Headquarters, Riga, Latvia. Available from Internet: https://railbaltica.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/RB_Operational_Plan_Final_Study_Report_final.pdf

Rodrique, J.-P. 2020. The Geography of Transport Systems. 5th Edition. Routledge. 480 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346323

Salary Explorer. 2025. Salary and Cost of Living Comparison. Available from Internet: https://www.salaryexplorer.com/#browsesalaries

Saldanha, J. P.; Tyworth, J. E.; Swan, P. F.; Russell, D. M. 2009. Cutting logistics costs with ocean carrier selection, Journal of Business Logistics 30(2): 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00118.x

Schramm, H.-J.; Zhang, X. 2018. Eurasian rail freight in the one belt one road era, in J. Stentoft (Ed.). Proceedings of the 30th Annual NOFOMA Conference: Relevant Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research, 13–15 June 2018, Kolding, Denmark, 769–798.

Shahid, S. M.; Ko, S.; Kwon, S. 2019. Real-time classification of diesel marine engine loads using machine learning, Sensors 19(14): 3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143172

Ship & Bunker. 2021. Rotterdam Bunker Prices. Ship & Bunker. Squamish, British Columbia, Canada. Available from Internet: https://shipandbunker.com/prices/emea/nwe/nl-rtm-rotterdam

Sibul, G.; Jin, J. 2021. Evaluating the feasibility of combined use of the Northern Sea route and the Suez Canal route considering ice parameters, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 147: 350–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.024

Solakivi, T.; Kiiski, T.; Ojala, L. 2018. The impact of ice class on the economics of wet and dry bulk shipping in the Arctic waters, Maritime Policy & Management: the Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 45(4): 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1443226

Solvang, H. B.; Karamperidis, S.; Valantasis-Kanellos, N.; Song, D.-W. 2018. An exploratory study on the Northern Sea Route as an alternative shipping passage, Maritime Policy & Management: the Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 45(4): 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1446104

Suez Canal Authority. 2025. Vessels Tolls Calculator. Suez Canal Authority, Ismailia, Egypt. Available from Internet: https://www.suezcanal.gov.eg/English/Navigation/Tolls/Pages/TollsCalculator.aspx

Tavasszy, L.; Minderhoud, M.; Perrin, J.-F.; Notteboom, T. 2011. A strategic network choice model for global container flows: specification, estimation and application, Journal of Transport Geography 19(6): 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.05.005

UNCTAD. 2020. Review of Maritime Transport 2020. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 159 p. Available from Internet: https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2020

UNECE. 2019. Euro-Asian Transport Linkages: Operationalisation of Inland Transport between Europe and Asia. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 301 p. https://doi.org/10.18356/040ffa02-en

UNECE. 2006. Recommendations: Organizing Demonstration Runs of Container Block Trains on Euro-Asian Transport Links. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 12 p. Available from Internet: https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/brochures/SC2_Container_Block_Trains_e.pdf

UTLC. 2020. Annual Report 2020. UTLC Eurasian Rail Alliance (ERA), Joint-Stock Company “UTLC ERA”, Moscow, Russia. Available from Internet: https://www.utlc.com/en

Vlček, T.; Bodišová, L′.; Vencourová, Ž. 2019. The Northern Sea route: oil transportation alternative for current sea lanes of communication?, Czech Journal of Political Science / Politologický časopis 26(1): 50–73. https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2019-1-50

Wang, S.; Meng, Q.; Liu, Z., 2013. Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: a critical review and extensions, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 53: 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.02.003

Wijnolst, N.; Wergeland, T. 2009. Shipping Innovation. IOS Press. 832 p. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-943-1

World Bank Group. 2019. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019. World Bank Group, Washington, DC, US. 97 p. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1435-8

Xing, H.; Stuart, C.; Spence, S.; Chen, H., 2021. Alternative fuel options for low carbon maritime transportation: pathways to 2050, Journal of Cleaner Production 297: 126651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126651

Yang, D.; Jiang, L.; Ng, A. K. Y. 2018. One belt one road, but several routes: a case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 117: 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001

Yangjun, W.; Ren, Z.; Shanshan, G.; Longxia, Q. 2018. Investigating the effect of Arctic sea routes on the global maritime container transport system via a generalized Nash equilibrium model, Polar Research 37: 1547042. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1547042

Zeng, Q.; Lu, T.; Lin, K.-C.; Yuen, K. F.; Li, K. X. 2020. The competitiveness of Arctic shipping over Suez Canal and China-Europe railway, Transport Policy 86: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.11.005

Zhang, X.; Schramm, H.-J. 2020. Assessing the market niche of Eurasian rail freight in the belt and road era, The International Journal of Logistics Management 31(4): 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2019-0351

Zhang, Y. 2021. Alternative Transport Mode: China-EU Trade on Rail. S&P Global. Available from Internet: https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/alternative-transport-mode-china-eu-trade-on-rail

Zhao, H.; Hu, H.; Lin, Y. 2016. Study on China-EU container shipping network in the context of Northern Sea route, Journal of Transport Geography 53: 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.01.013

Zhu, S.; Fu, X.; Ng, A. K. Y.; Luo, M.; Ge, Y.-E. 2018. The environmental costs and economic implications of container shipping on the Northern Sea Route, Maritime Policy & Management: the Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 45(4): 456–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1443228

View article in other formats

CrossMark check

CrossMark logo

Published

2025-11-04

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Solakivi, T., Kiiski, T., Paimander, A., Malmsten, J., Kilpi, V., & Ojala, L. (2025). Multidimensional cost analysis of Europe–Asia container transport routes. Transport, 40(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2025.22874

Share