Share:


Impacts of liner shipping connectivity and global competitiveness on logistics performance: the mediating role of the quality of port and infrastructure

Abstract

Logistics Performance (LP) is one of the fundamental catalysts that serve as a podium for the integration of the world economy. This study is conducted to observe the combined effects of Liner Shipping Connectivity (LSC) and Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) on LP in mediating the Quality of Port and Infrastructure (PORT). We selected 28 Asian economies and 1 special administrative region (Hong Kong) counting the year of 2007–2018. Partial Least Square – Structural Equation Model (PLS–SEM) with an extension of the Importance–Performance Map Analysis (IPMA) was applied. Empirical evidence derived from the path diagram has revealed that LSC and global competitiveness in mediating the PORT have significant effects of accelerating LP, leading to higher competitiveness in terms of strategic development and yielding better connectivity. Due to limited resources, Asian decision-makers need a guidance to focus on how to improve LP. This work also helps to highlight the dimensions of LSC and global competitiveness factors to be concentrated on and the policies to be implemented in this regard.

Keyword : logistics performance, liner shipping connectivity, global competitiveness, least square, structural equation model, importance–performance map analysis

How to Cite
Chen, Y.-C., & Hasan, M. K. (2023). Impacts of liner shipping connectivity and global competitiveness on logistics performance: the mediating role of the quality of port and infrastructure. Transport, 38(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2023.19372
Published in Issue
Oct 5, 2023
Abstract Views
400
PDF Downloads
371
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Acar, A. Z.; Bentyn, Z.; Kocaoğlu, B. 2015. Logistic performance development of the countries on the path along the new silk road, European Transport \ Trasporti Europei 59: 1. Available from Internet: http://www.istiee.unict.it/europeantransport/papers/N59/P01_59_12_2015.pdf

Ahmed, Md. T.; Khan, F. 2020. Trade logistics: a South Asian perspective, The Financial Express, 4 May 2020. Available from Internet: https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/views/reviews/trade-logistics-a-south-asian-perspective-1583335280

Ainur, A. K.; Sayang, M. D.; Jannoo, Z.; Yap, B. W. 2017. Sample size and non-normality effects on goodness of fit measures in structural equation models, Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology 25(2): 575–586.

Anderson, J. C.; Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Arvis, J.-F.; Ojala, L.; Wiederer, C.; Shepherd, B.; Raj, A.; Dairabayeva, K.; Kiiski, T. 2018. Connecting to Compete 2018: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/29971

Awang, Z. 2012. A Handbook on SEM: Structural Equation Modelling Using AMOS Graphics. 4th edition. Kelantan: University Technology MARA Press.

Bentler, P. M.; Bonett, D. G. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin 88(3): 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Beysenbaev, R.; Dus, Y. 2020. Proposals for improving the logistics performance index, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 36(1): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.10.001

Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley-Interscience. 514 p.

Bollen, K. A.; Long, J. S. 1993. Testing Structural Equation Models. SAGE Publications. 308 p.

Bookbinder, J. H.; Tan, C. S. 2003. Comparison of Asian and European logistics systems, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 33(1): 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030310460990

Chen, Y.-C.; Hasan, M. K. 2020. Model to improve the dimensions of logistics performance in Asian countries, North American Academic Research 3(7): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3930252

Chin, W. W. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling, in G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.). Modern Methods for Business Research, 295–336.

Clark, X.; Dollar, D.; Micco, A. 2004. Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade, Journal of Development Economics 75(2): 417–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.005

Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika 16(3): 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Çemberci, M.; Civelek, M. E.; Canbolat, N. 2015. The moderator effect of global competitiveness index on dimensions of logistics performance index, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 195: 1514–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.453

Dare, T. O.; Aubyn, L. N. A.; Boumgard, T. 2019. Analyzing, Evaluating and Improving the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) of a Country’s Economy: Case Study: Nigeria, Ghana and Morocco. MSc Dissertation No 1181. World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden. 127 p. Available from Internet: https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/1181

Demo, G.; Neiva, E. R.; Nunes, I.; Rozzett, K. 2012. Human resources management policies and practices scale (HRMPPS): exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, BAR – Brazilian Administration Review 9(4): 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922012005000006

El-Sheikh, A.; Abonazel, M. R.; Gamil, N. 2017. A review of software packages for structural equation modeling: a comparative study, Applied Mathematics and Physics 5(3): 85–94. Available from Internet: http://pubs.sciepub.com/amp/5/3/2/

Erkan, B. 2014. The importance and determinants of logistics performance of selected countries, Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking 3(6): 1237–1254.

Fan, Y.; Chen, J.; Shirkey, G.; John, R.; Wu, S. R.; Park, H.; Shao, C. 2016. Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review, Ecological Processes 5: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3

Fornell, C.; Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Fugazza, M.; Hoffmann, J. 2017. Liner shipping connectivity as determinant of trade, Journal of Shipping and Trade 2: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-017-0019-5

García, C. B.; García, J.; López Martín, M. M.; Salmerón, R. 2015. Collinearity: revisiting the variance inflation factor in ridge regression, Journal of Applied Statistics 42(3): 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2014.980789

Gonzalez-Aregall, M.; Bergqvist, R.; Monios, J. 2018. A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 59: 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.013

Gordon, J. R. M.; Lee, P.-M.; Lucas, H. C. 2005. A resource-based view of competitive advantage at the Port of Singapore, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14(1): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2004.10.001

Green, K. W.; Whitten, D.; Inman, R. A. 2008. The impact of logistics performance on organizational performance in a supply chain context, Supply Chain Management 13(4): 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810882206

Hair, J. F.; Ringle, C. M.; Sarstedt, M. 2011. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19(2): 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

Hamid, M. R. A.; Sami, W.; Sidek, M. H. M. 2017. Discriminant validity assessment: use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 890: 012163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163

Hasan, M. K.; Chen, Y.-C. 2020. Empirical study on the comparison of regional competitiveness of Asian countries in perspective of global competitiveness index, North American Academic Research 3(7): 33–56. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3930242

Henseler, J.; Dijkstra, T. K.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C. M.; Diamantopoulos, A.; Straub, D. W.; Ketchen, D. J.; Hair, J. F.; Hult, G. T. M.; Calantone, R. J. 2014. Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013), Organizational Research Methods 17(2): 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928

Henseler, J.; Ringle, C. M.; Sarstedt, M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43(1): 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hoffmann, J.; Saeed, N.; Sødal, S. 2020. Liner shipping bilateral connectivity and its impact on South Africa’s bilateral trade flows, Maritime Economics & Logistics 22(3): 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-019-00124-8

Hox, J. J.; Bechger, T. M. 1998. An introduction to structural equation modelling, Family Science Review 11: 354–373.

Hua, C.; Chen, J.; Wan, Z.; Xu, L.; Bai, Y.; Zheng, T.; Fei, Y. 2020. Evaluation and governance of green development practice of port: a sea port case of China, Journal of Cleaner Production 249: 119434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119434

Jiang, J.; Lee, L. H.; Chew, E. P.; Gan, C. C. 2015. Port connectivity study: An analysis framework from a global container liner shipping network perspective, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 73: 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.012

Jouili, T. A. 2019. Determinants of liner shipping connectivity, International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences 6(11): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2019.11.002

Kabak, Ö.; Önsel Ekici, Ş.; Ülengin, F. 2020. Analyzing two-way interaction between the competitiveness and logistics performance of countries, Transport Policy 98: 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.007

Kabak, Ö.; Ülengin, F.; Önsel Ekici, Ş. 2018. Connecting logistics performance to export: a scenario-based approach, Research in Transportation Economics 70: 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.007

Karaman, A. S.; Kilic, M.; Uyar, A. 2020. Green logistics performance and sustainability reporting practices of the logistics sector: the moderating effect of corporate governance, Journal of Cleaner Production 258: 120718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120718

Khan, S. A. R.; Jian, C.; Zhang, Y.; Golpîra, H.; Kumar, A.; Sharif, A. 2019. Environmental, social and economic growth indicators spur logistics performance: from the perspective of South Asian association for regional cooperation countries, Journal of Cleaner Production 214: 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.322

Kline, R. B. 2023. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 5th edition. Guilford Press. 494 p.

Koufteros, X. A. 1999. Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling, Journal of Operations Management 17(4): 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00002-9

Lam, J. S. L.; Yap, W. Y. 2011. Dynamics of liner shipping network and port connectivity in supply chain systems: analysis on East Asia, Journal of Transport Geography 19(6): 1272–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.06.007

Liang, R.; Liu, Z. 2020. Port infrastructure connectivity, logistics performance and seaborne trade on economic growth: an empirical analysis on “21st-century maritime silk road”, Journal of Coastal Research 106(sp1): 319–324. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI106-074.1

Lin, P.-C.; Kuo, S.-Y.; Chang, J.-H. 2020. The direct and spillover effects of liner shipping connectivity on merchandise trade, Maritime Business Review 5(2): 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-12-2019-0055

Liu, H.; Jin, I. H.; Zhang, Z. 2018a. Structural equation modeling of social networks: specification, estimation, and application, Multivariate Behavioral Research 53(5): 714–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1479629

Liu, J.; Yuan, C.; Hafeez, M.; Yuan, Q. 2018b. The relationship between environment and logistics performance: evidence from Asian countries, Journal of Cleaner Production 204: 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.310

Lu, C.-S.; Lai, K.-H.; Cheng, T. C. E. 2007. Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use Internet services in liner shipping, European Journal of Operational Research 180(2): 845–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.001

Lun, Y. H. V.; Hoffmann, J. 2016. Connectivity and trade relativity: the case of ASEAN, Journal of Shipping and Trade 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-016-0015-1

Miles, J. 2005. Tolerance and variance inflation factor, in B. S. Everitt, D. C. Howell (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science 4: 2055–2056. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa683

Munim, Z. H.; Schramm, H.-J. 2018. The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade, Journal of Shipping and Trade 3: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-018-0027-0

Notteboom, T. E.; Rodrigue, J.-P. 2005. Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development, Maritime Policy & Management: the Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 32(3): 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830500139885

O’Brien, R. M. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors, Quality & Quantity 41(5): 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

Önsel Ekici, Ş.; Kabak, Ö.; Ülengin, F. 2019. Improving logistics performance by reforming the pillars of global competitiveness index, Transport Policy 81: 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.014

Önsel Ekici, Ş.; Kabak, Ö.; Ülengin, F. 2016. Linking to compete: Logistics and global competitiveness interaction, Transport Policy 48: 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.015

Pavlic, B.; Cepak, F.; Sucic, B.; Peckaj, M.; Kandus, B. 2014. Sustainable port infrastructure, practical implementation of the green port concept, Thermal Science 18(3): 935–948. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI1403935P

Pettit, S. J.; Beresford, A. K. C. 2009. Port development: from gateways to logistics hubs, Maritime Policy & Management: the Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 36(3): 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830902861144

Qi, G.; Shi, W.; Lin, K.-C.; Yuen, K. F.; Xiao, Y. 2020. Spatial spillover effects of logistics infrastructure on regional development: Evidence from China, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 135: 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.022

Rashidi, K.; Cullinane, K. 2019. Evaluating the sustainability of national logistics performance using data envelopment analysis, Transport Policy 74: 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.014

Ravand, H.; Baghaei, P. 2016. Partial least squares structural equation modeling with R, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 21: 11. https://doi.org/10.7275/D2FA-QV48

Rumaji, R.; Adiliya, A. 2019. Port maritime connectivity in South-East Indonesia: a new strategic positioning for transhipment Port of Tenau Kupang, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 35(4): 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.12.004

Sargsyan, A. 2017. Variety of approaches in assessment of global competitiveness, International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences 6(6): 479. https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000479

Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C. M.; Hair, J. F. 2017. Partial least squares structural equation modeling, in C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, A. Vomberg (Eds.). Handbook of Market Research, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1

Schermelleh-Engel, K.; Moosbrugger, H.; Müller, H. 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures, Methods of Psychological Research Online 8(2): 23–74.

Schøyen, H.; Bjorbæk, C. T.; Steger-Jensen, K.; Bouhmala, N.; Burki, U.; Jensen, T. E.; Berg, Ø. 2018. Measuring the contribution of logistics service delivery performance outcomes and deep-sea container liner connectivity on port efficiency, Research in Transportation Business & Management 28: 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.03.002

Sharapiyeva, M.; Antoni, A.; Yessenzhigitova, R. 2019. The impact of port transport-logistics infrastructure and LPI for economic growth: on the example of landlocked countries, Pomorstvo 33(1): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.33.1.7

Song, L.; Van Geenhuizen, M. 2014. Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: panel evidence in port regions and provinces, Transport Policy 36: 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.003

Su, S.-I. I.; Ke, J.-Y. F.; Lim, P. 2011. The development of transportation and logistics in Asia: an overview, Transportation Journal 50(1): 124–136. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.50.1.0124

Sy, B.; Villejo, S. J.; Lacaza, R. 2020. An analysis of the impact of ASEAN’s logistics performance on trade flows using linear and non-linear methods in an augmented gravity model, Logistics Research 13(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.23773/2020_5

Tang, C. F.; Abosedra, S. 2019. Logistics performance, exports, and growth: evidence from Asian economies, Research in Transportation Economics 78: 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2019.100743

UNCTAD. 2017. Review of Maritime Transport 2017. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 130 p. Available from Internet: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2017_en.pdf

UNCTAD. 2020. Statistical Data. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Available from Internet: https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx

Wan, C.; Zhang, D.; Yan, X.; Yang, Z. 2018. A novel model for the quantitative evaluation of green port development – a case study of major ports in China, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 61: 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.021

Wilmsmeier, G.; Hoffmann, J. 2008. Liner shipping connectivity and port infrastructure as determinants of freight rates in the Caribbean, Maritime Economics & Logistics 10(1–2): 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100195

Wilmsmeier, G.; Hoffmann, J.; Sanchez, R. J. 2006. The impact of port characteristics on international maritime transport costs, Research in Transportation Economics 16(1): 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(06)16006-0

Wong, W. P.; Tang, C. F. 2018. The major determinants of logistic performance in a global perspective: evidence from panel data analysis, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: a Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management 21(4): 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2018.1438377

WSC. 2020. Benefits of Liner Shipping. World Shipping Council (WSC). Available from Internet: https://www.worldshipping.org

Wu, W.-W.; Lan, L. W.; Lee, Y.-T. 2012. Exploring the critical pillars and causal relations within the NRI: An innovative approach, European Journal of Operational Research 218(1): 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.013

Yap, W. Y.; Zahraei, S. M. 2018. Liner shipping alliances and their impact on shipping connectivity in Southeast Asia, Maritime Business Review 3(3): 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-05-2018-0018

Yeo, G.-T.; Roe, M.; Dinwoodie, J. 2008. Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42(6): 910–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.014

Zaman, M. B.; Vanany, I.; Awaluddin, K. D. 2015. Connectivity Analysis of Port in Eastern Indonesia, Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 14: 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2015.07.092