Efficiency assessment of measures to increase sustainability of the transport system

    Irina Makarova Affiliation
    ; Ksenia Shubenkova Affiliation
    ; Anton Pashkevich Affiliation


This paper considers managerial approaches to increase efficiency of the urban transport system such as promotion and integration of sustainable modes of transport, development of public transport route network, renewing the existing vehicle fleet and shift to environmental friendly fuel types in the public transport system. To assess such kind of efficiency, it is proposed to take into account the economic viability of suggested solutions as well as their influence on social sphere, environmental friendliness and sustainability of the urban transport system. The city of Naberezhnye Chelny (Russia) was chosen for the case study, where the following measures were modelled: changes of bus route network and choice of an optimal fleet on routes depending on passenger flow by hours of day. In addition, the efficiency of these measures were assessed. To evaluate the sustainability of the proposed route network, the method of “radar map” was used, which shows both strengths and weaknesses of selected indicators. Together with this evaluation, analysis of risks in managing the urban bus transportation was carried out.

Keyword : sustainable transport, transport system efficiency, “radar map”, route network, “spider chart”, mass passenger public transport

How to Cite
Makarova, I., Shubenkova, K., & Pashkevich, A. (2021). Efficiency assessment of measures to increase sustainability of the transport system. Transport, 36(2), 123-133.
Published in Issue
Jun 1, 2021
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


ADS. 2017. City Analytics. Amsterdam Data Science (ADS), The Netherlands. Available from Internet:

Brand, C.; Goodman, A.; Ogilvie, D. 2014. Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: a controlled longitudinal study, Applied Energy 128: 284–295.

Chitnis, M.; Sorrell, S.; Druckman, A.; Firth, S. K.; Jackson, T. 2014. Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups, Ecological Economics 106: 12–32.

Duran-Fernandez, R.; Santos, G. 2014. A regional model of road accessibility in Mexico: Accessibility surfaces and robustness analysis, Research in Transportation Economics 46: 55–69.

EEA. 2015. European Briefings – Transport. European Environment Agency (EEA). Available from Internet:

EEA. 2016. Transitions Towards a More Sustainable Mobility System. TERM 2016: Transport Indicators Tracking Progress Towards Environmental Targets in Europe. EEA Report No 34/2016. European Environment Agency (EEA). 88 p.

Ferbrache, F.; Knowles, R. D. 2016. Generating opportunities for city sustainability through investments in light rail systems: introduction to the special section on light rail and urban sustainability, Journal of Transport Geography 54: 369–372.

Goodman, A.; Sahlqvis, S.; Ogilvie, D. 2014. New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: one- and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect study, American Journal of Public Health 104(9): e38–e46.

Holden, E.; Linnerud, K.; Banister, D. 2014. Sustainable development: our common future revisited, Global Environmental Change 26: 130–139.

IBM. 2009. A Vision of Smarter Cities: How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future. Executive Report. IBM Global Services, Somers, NY, US. 20 p. Available from Internet:

Lecca, P.; McGregor, P. G.; Swales, J. K.; Turner, K. 2014. The added value from a general equilibrium analysis of increased efficiency in household energy use, Ecological Economics 100: 51–62.

Mäe, R.; Antov, D.; Antso, I. 2013. Jobs created out of Tallinn have not reduced commuting, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 8(1): 58−65.

Nordbakke, S.; Schwanen, T. 2015. Transport, unmet activity needs and wellbeing in later life: exploring the links, Transportation 42(6): 1129–1151.

OECD. 2012. Addressing Environmental Challenges: the Role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and the Internet. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2 p. Available from Internet:

RariTEK. 2021. RariTEK Company Group. Available from Internet:

Schippl, J.; Gudmundsson, H.; Sørensen, C. H.; Anderton, K.; Brand, R.; Leiren, M. D.; Reichenbach, M. 2016. Different pathways for achieving cleaner urban areas: a roadmap towards the white paper goal for urban transport, Transportation Research Procedia 14: 2604–2613.

Smart Cities Council. 2015. Smart Cities Readiness Guide: the Planning Manual for Building Tomorrow’s Cities Today. 364 p. Available from Internet:

Sorrell, S. 2007. The Rebound Effect: an Assessment of the Evidence for Economy-wide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre, London, UK. 123 p. Available from Internet:

Stapleton, L.; Sorrell, S.; Schwanen, T. 2016. Estimating direct rebound effects for personal automotive travel in Great Britain, Energy Economics 54: 313–325.

Steurer, N.; Bonilla, D. 2016. Building sustainable transport futures for the Mexico City metropolitan area, Transport Policy 52: 121–133.

UITP. 2020. UITP Declaration on Climate Leadership: an Update on Implementation 2020. Report. International Association of Public Transport – Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP). 28 p. Available from Internet:

WBCSD. 2016. Integrated Sustainable Mobility in Cities – a Practical Guide. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). 92 p. Available from Internet:

WHO. 2015. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015. World Health Organization (WHO). 340 p. Available from Internet:

Xerox. 2017. City Analytics. Xerox Corporation. 20 p. Available from Internet: