Advantages and disadvantages of the remote teamwork


Remote teamwork has become common during the pandemic and continues even after it is over. In Lithuania alone, during the pandemic, around 40% of employees worked or still work remotely, while in the US this number reaches 50%. The purpose of this article is to compare the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of remote teamwork presented by scientists with the opinion of experts. Several main factors were selected after literature analysis and were given to the experts to evaluate them in a survey which was created using Likert scale. Experts were selected from one financial company and they lead teams of 7–10 people and have been working remotely for the past two years. The obtained results were evaluated using Kendall’s concordance coefficient and factor analysis methods. These methods helped evaluate the compatibility of the experts’ opinions and factors were divided into advantages and disadvantages based on the experts’ evaluations. The theoretical and practical assessment of the advantages of remote teamwork showed that the opinions of scientists and experts differ. This research can help remote teams and their managers to find what they can improve.

Article in Lithuanian.

Nuotolinio komandinio darbo privalumai ir trūkumai


Nuotolinis komandinis darbas pandemijos metu tapo įprastu reiškiniu, kuris tęsiasi ir pandemijai pasibaigus. Vien Lietuvoje pandemijos metu apie 40 % darbuotojų dirbo arba vis dar dirba nuotoliniu būdu, o JAV šis rodiklis siekia mažiausiai 50 %. Šio straipsnio tikslas yra palyginti teorijoje mokslininkų pateikiamus nuotolinio komandinio darbo privalumus ir trūkumus su ekspertų nuomone. Atlikus literatūros analizę buvo pasirinkti keli pagrindiniai veiksniai ir duoti ekspertams įvertinti Likerto skalėje apklausos metu. Buvo pasirinkti ekspertai iš vienos finansinės įmonės, jie vadovauja 7–10 žmonių komandoms ir pastaruosius dvejus metus dirbo tik nuotoliniu būdu. Gauti rezultatai buvo vertinami Kendall konkordancijos koeficientu ir faktorinės analizės metodais. Šie metodai padėjo įvertinti ekspertų nuomonės suderinamumą ir remiantis jų vertinimais suskirstyti veiksnius į privalumus ir trūkumus. Teorinis ir praktinis nuotolinio komandinio darbo privalumų ir trūkumų vertinimas parodė, jog mokslininkų ir ekspertų nuomonės išsiskiria – pateiktus teiginius mokslininkai ir ekspertai skirtingai priskiria nuotolinio komandinio darbo privalumams ir trūkumams. Šis tyrimas naudingas nuotoliniu būdu dirbančioms komandoms ir jų vadovams, siekiant sužinoti, ką būtų galima pagerinti.

Reikšminiai žodžiai: nuotolinis darbas, komandinis darbas, nuotolinis komandinis darbas, darbo ir gyvenimo balansas, darbo efektyvumas, pasitenkinimas darbu, bendravimas komandoje.

Keyword : remote work, teamwork, remote teamwork, life-work balance, job effectiveness, job satisfaction, team communication

How to Cite
Krukauskaitė, E., & Jesevičiūtė-Ufartienė, L. (2024). Advantages and disadvantages of the remote teamwork. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 16.
Published in Issue
Jan 5, 2024
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Adekoya, O. D., Adisa, T. A., & Aiyenitaju, O. (2022). Going forward: Remote working in the post-COVID-19 era. Employee Relations, 44(6), 1410–1427.

Adu, E. T., & Opawole, A. (2020). Assessment of performance of teamwork in construction projects delivery in South-Southern Nigeria. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(1), 230–250.

Ahudey, E., Prince Clement, A., Ernest Kwame, A., & Zhiguang, Q. (2020). Kendall’s coefficient of concordance ranking of the effectiveness of single machine learning models in predicting stock price movement. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 9(9), 1098–1107.

Beigi, M., Shirmohammadi, M., & Stewart, J. (2018). Flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies among academics. Human Resource Development Review, 17(3), 314–336.

Boell, S., Cheng, J., Campbell, J., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2013). Advantages, challenges and contradictions of the transformative nature of telework: A review of the literature [Conference presentation]. Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago.

de Prada, E., Mareque, M., & Pino-Juste, M. (2022). Teamwork skills in higher education: Is university training contributing to their mastery? In Psicologia: Reflexao e critica (Vol. 35, Issue 1). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH.

Dubosaitienė, I. (2022). Nuotolinio darbo įtaka darbo-gyvenimo balansui viešajame sektoriuje [Baigiamasis magistro darbas, Kauno technologijos universitetas]. Kaunas.

Driskell, J. E., Salas, E., & Driskell, T. (2018). Foundations of teamwork and collaboration. American Psychologist, 73(4), 334–348.

Fathi, M., Ghobakhloo, M., & Syberfeldt, A. (2019). An interpretive structural modeling of teamwork training in higher education. Education Sciences, 9(1), 16.

Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2021). Aggregating multiple ordinal rankings in engineering design: The best model according to the Kendall’s coefficient of concordance. Research in Engineering Design, 32(1), 91–103.

George, T. J., Atwater, L. E., Maneethai, D., & Madera, J. M. (2022). Supporting the productivity and wellbeing of remote workers: Lessons from COVID-19. Organizational Dynamics, 51(2), 100869.

Gohoungodji, P., N’Dri, A. B., & Matos, A. L. B. (2023). What makes telework work? Evidence of success factors across two decades of empirical research: A systematic and critical review. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(3), 605–649.

He, S., Lai, D., Mott, S., Little, A., Grock, A., Haas, M. R. C., & Chan, T. M. (2020). Remote e-work and distance learning for academic medicine: Best practices and opportunities for the future. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 12(3), 256–263.

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54.

Kotlyar, I., & Krasman, J. (2022). Virtual simulation: New method for assessing teamwork skills. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(3), 344–360.

Leung, L., & Zhang, R. (2017). Mapping ICT use at home and telecommuting practices: A perspective from work/family border theory. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 385–396.

Martono, S., Khoiruddin, M., Wijayanto, A., Ridloah, S., Wulansari, N. A., & Udin, U. (2020). Increasing teamwork, organizational commitment and effectiveness through the implementation of collaborative resolution. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 427–437.

Mendonça, I., Coelho, F., Ferrajão, P., & Abreu, A. M. (2022). Telework and mental health during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2602.

Pimentel, J. L. (2019). Some biases in Likert scaling usage and its correction. International Journal of Sciences Basic and Applied, 45(1), 183–191.

Raišienė, A. G., Rapuano, V., Varkulevičiūtė, K., & Stachová, K. (2020). Working from home–who is happy? A survey of Lithuania’s employees during the COVID-19 quarantine period. Sustainability, 12(13), 5332.

Rydenfält, C., Borell, J., & Erlingsdottir, G. (2019). What do doctors mean when they talk about teamwork? Possible implications for interprofessional care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(6), 714–723.

Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11.

Staniulienė, S., & Zaveckis, A. (2022). Employee empowerment in remote work in case of Lithuanian companies. Sustainability, 14(14), 8463.

Tzeng, G.-H., & Huang, J.-J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. CRC Press.

Watson, H. R., Dolley, M. K., Perwaiz, M., Saxelby, J., Bertone, G., Burr, S., Collett, T., Jeffery, R., & Zahra, D. (2022). ‘Everyone is trying to outcompete each other’: A qualitative study of medical student attitudes to a novel peer-assessed undergraduate teamwork module. FEBS Open Bio, 12(5), 900–912.