Criteria selection for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings
Abstract
Cultural heritage buildings are an important origin of a country‘s cultural memory, originality, and attractiveness, which motivated cultural growth, economic development, and social employment. However, cultural heritage buildings threaten to decay regarding the contributing poor funding for cultural heritage buildings preservation and maintenance, increasing urbanization changes. The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings is one of the reasons, helping to preserve heritage buildings. This paper submits qualitative and quantitative criteria and subcriteria for the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings. The set of criteria consists of economic, social, environmental, cultural heritage and legal criterion.
Article in Lithuanian.
Kriterijų parinkimas kultūros paveldo pastatų pakartotiniam naudojimui
Santrauka
Kultūros paveldo pastatai – svarbus šalies kultūrinės atminties, savitumo ir patrauklumo šaltinis, skatinantis šalies kultūrinį augimą, ekonominį vystymąsi ir socialinį užimtumą. Tačiau, skiriant nepakankamą finansavimą paveldo pastatų priežiūrai ir išsaugojimui, didėjant urbanizacijos pokyčiams gresia šių pastatų sunykimas. Todėl paveldo pastatų pakartotinis naudojimas – viena iš išeičių, padėsiančių išsaugoti paveldo pastatus. Straipsnyje siūlomas paveldo pastatų pakartotinio naudojimo kriterijų rinkinys. Pasiūlyti kriterijai suskirstyti į kiekybinius ir kokybinius kriterijus bei subkriterijus. Kriterijų rinkinį sudaro ekonominiai, socialiniai, aplinkos, kultūros paveldo ir teisiniai kriterijai. Kriterijai skirti paveldo pastatų pakartotinio naudojimo alternatyvoms vertinti.
Reikšminiai žodžiai: paveldo pastatai, kultūros pastatai, pakartotinis naudojimas, kriterijai, vertinimas.
Keyword : heritage buildings, cultural buildings, adaptive reuse, criteria, evaluation
How to Cite
Morkūnaitė, Žydrūnė. (2020). Criteria selection for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 11. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2019.11347
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ai-Lin Teo, E., & Lin, G. (2010). Developing a model for computing the building adaptation potential index for public housing in Singapore. Architectural Science Review, 53, 429–440. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2009.0081
Ai-Lin Teo, E., & Lin, G. (2012). Factors affecting adaptation potential for public housing in Singapore: Decision makers’ perspective. International Journal of Constructin Management, 12(3), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2012.10773195
Aigwi, I. E., Egbelakin, T., & Ingham, J. (2018). Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilized historical buildings: Towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centers. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0007
Blagojevič, M. R., & Tufegdzin, A. (2016). The new technology era requirements and sustainable approach to industrial heritage renewal. Energy and Buildings, 115, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.062
Castaldo, V. L., Pisello, A. L. Boarin, P., Petrozzi, A., & Cotana, F. (2017). The experience of international sustainability protocols for retrofitting historical buildings in Italy. Buildings 7(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7020052
Cellura, M., Ciulla, G., Guarino, F., & Longo, S. (2017). Redesign of a rural building in a heritage site in Italy: Towards the Net Zero energy target. Buildings, 7(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7030068
Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4-5), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-11-2015-0052
Choi, E. (2010). Ustification of public subsidy: Externality effects of a historic church reuse project on neighborhood housing sale prices in Cleveland, Ohio. International Review of Public Administration, 15(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805166
Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E., & Chew, M. (2016). Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Building Reasearch and Information, 44(5), 507–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1156951
Conejos S., Chew M. Y. L., Yung E. H. K. (2017). The future adaptivity of nineteenth century heritage buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 35(4), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-03-2017-0012
Dyson, K., Matthews, J., & Love, P. E. D. (2016). Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2015-0002
Eshrati, P., Bahramjerdi, S. F. N., Mahabadi, S. E., & Azad, M. (2017). Evaluation of authenticity on the basis of the Nara Grid in Adaptive Reuse of Manochehri historical house Kashan, Iran. Archnet- Ijar International Journal of Architectural Research, 11(3), 214. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1276
Ferretti, V., Bottero, M., & Mondini, G. (2014). Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15, 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007
Fuentes, J. M. (2010). Methodological bases for documenting and reusing vernacular farm architecture. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.03.004
Giove, S., Rosato, P., & Breil, M. (2011). An application of multicriteria decision making to build heritage. The redevelopment of Venice Arsenale. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 17, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.455
Giuliani, F., De Falco, A., Landi, S., Bevilacqua, M. G., Santini, L., & Pecori, S. (2018). Reusing grain silos from the 1930s in Italy. A multi-criteris decision analysis for the case of Arezzo. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 29, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.07.009
Hsu, Y., & Juan, Y. (2016). ANN – based decision model for the reuse of vacant buildings in urban areas. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2015.1101626
Irons, J., & Armitage, L. (2011). The value of built heritage: community, economy, and environment. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 14(4), 614–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2011.11104345
Langston, C., & Shen, L. (2007). Application of the adaptive reuse potential model in Hong Kong: a case study of Lui Seng Chun. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11, 193–207. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2007.9637569
Lynch, N. (2014). Divine living: marketing and selling churches as lofts in Toronto, Canada. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2013.837840
Lynch, N. (2016). Domesticating the church: the reuse of urban churches as loft living in the post – secular city. Social and Cultural Geography, 17(7), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1139167
Martins, A. M. T., & Carlos, J. S. (2014). The retrofitting of the Bernardas’ Convent in Lisbon. Energy and Buildings, 68, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.087
Mehr, S. Y., & Wilkinson, S. (2018). Technical issues and energy efficient adaptive reuse of heritage listed city halls in Queensland Australia. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(5), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0020
Milisirlisoy, D., & Gunçe, K. (2016). A critical look to the adaptive reuse of traditional urban houses in the Walled city of Nicosia. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 22(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2016.1248095
Oevermann, H., Degenkolb, J., Diessler, A., Karge, S., & Peltz, U. (2015). Participation in the reuse of industrial heritage sites: the case of Oberschoneweide, Berlin. International Journal of Heritage, 22(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1083460
Paolillo, P. L., Benedetti, A., Baresi, U., Terlizzi, L., & Graj, G. (2011). An assessment – based process for modifying the built fabric of historic centres: the case of Como in Lombrady. CCSA 2011: Computational Science and Its Applications – IC-CSA 2011, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21928-3_12
Plevoets, B., & Sowinska-Heim, J. (2018). Community initiatives as a catalyst for regeneration of heritage sites: Vernacular transformation and its influence on the formal adaptive re-use practice. Cities, 78, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.007
Pszczolkowski, M. (2016). Adaptation problems of the postindustrial heritage on the example of selected objects of Bydgoszcz. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports, 22(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1515/ceer-2016-0043
Radziszewska- Zielina, E., & Sladowski, G. (2015). Fuzzy inference system assisting the choice of a variant of adaptation of a historical building. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 14(4), 131–148.
Radziszewska- Zielina, E., & Sladowski, G. (2017). Supporting the selection of a variant of the adaptation of a historical building with the use of fuzzy modelling and structural analysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 26, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.008
Remoy, H., & van der Voordt, T. (2014). Adaptive reuse of office buildings into housing: opportunities and risks. Building Research and Information, 42(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.864718
Sallem Beg, M. (2016). Issues of conservation and adaptation in protecting Kashmir’s vernacular heritage. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 73(4), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2016.1178986
Tan, Y., Shen, L., & Langston, C. (2014). A fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.864718
Tokede, O., Udawatta, N., & Luther, M. (2018). Retrofitting heritage office buildings in the UK: a case study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2016-0068
Ustinovičius, L. ir Jakučionis, S. (2000). Application of multicreteria decision methods in restoration of building in the old town. Statyba – Civil Engineering, 6(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13921525.2000.10531594
Wang, H., & Zeng, Z. (2010). A multi-objective decision – making process for reuse selection of historic buildings. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.034
Wilkinson, S. (2014). The preliminary assessment of adaptation potential in existing office buildings. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.853705
Wilkinson, S., James, K., & Reed, R. (2009). Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Structural Survey, 27(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910941683
Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2007). Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building’s regeneration alternatives. Building and Environment, 42, 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.001
Zilinskas, R. (2016). Tyrimų teisinis reguliavimas. Kultūros paveldo tyrimai. Metodinis leidinys, 14–19.
Ai-Lin Teo, E., & Lin, G. (2012). Factors affecting adaptation potential for public housing in Singapore: Decision makers’ perspective. International Journal of Constructin Management, 12(3), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2012.10773195
Aigwi, I. E., Egbelakin, T., & Ingham, J. (2018). Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilized historical buildings: Towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centers. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0007
Blagojevič, M. R., & Tufegdzin, A. (2016). The new technology era requirements and sustainable approach to industrial heritage renewal. Energy and Buildings, 115, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.062
Castaldo, V. L., Pisello, A. L. Boarin, P., Petrozzi, A., & Cotana, F. (2017). The experience of international sustainability protocols for retrofitting historical buildings in Italy. Buildings 7(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7020052
Cellura, M., Ciulla, G., Guarino, F., & Longo, S. (2017). Redesign of a rural building in a heritage site in Italy: Towards the Net Zero energy target. Buildings, 7(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7030068
Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4-5), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-11-2015-0052
Choi, E. (2010). Ustification of public subsidy: Externality effects of a historic church reuse project on neighborhood housing sale prices in Cleveland, Ohio. International Review of Public Administration, 15(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805166
Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E., & Chew, M. (2016). Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Building Reasearch and Information, 44(5), 507–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1156951
Conejos S., Chew M. Y. L., Yung E. H. K. (2017). The future adaptivity of nineteenth century heritage buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 35(4), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-03-2017-0012
Dyson, K., Matthews, J., & Love, P. E. D. (2016). Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2015-0002
Eshrati, P., Bahramjerdi, S. F. N., Mahabadi, S. E., & Azad, M. (2017). Evaluation of authenticity on the basis of the Nara Grid in Adaptive Reuse of Manochehri historical house Kashan, Iran. Archnet- Ijar International Journal of Architectural Research, 11(3), 214. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1276
Ferretti, V., Bottero, M., & Mondini, G. (2014). Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15, 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007
Fuentes, J. M. (2010). Methodological bases for documenting and reusing vernacular farm architecture. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.03.004
Giove, S., Rosato, P., & Breil, M. (2011). An application of multicriteria decision making to build heritage. The redevelopment of Venice Arsenale. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 17, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.455
Giuliani, F., De Falco, A., Landi, S., Bevilacqua, M. G., Santini, L., & Pecori, S. (2018). Reusing grain silos from the 1930s in Italy. A multi-criteris decision analysis for the case of Arezzo. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 29, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.07.009
Hsu, Y., & Juan, Y. (2016). ANN – based decision model for the reuse of vacant buildings in urban areas. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2015.1101626
Irons, J., & Armitage, L. (2011). The value of built heritage: community, economy, and environment. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 14(4), 614–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2011.11104345
Langston, C., & Shen, L. (2007). Application of the adaptive reuse potential model in Hong Kong: a case study of Lui Seng Chun. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11, 193–207. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2007.9637569
Lynch, N. (2014). Divine living: marketing and selling churches as lofts in Toronto, Canada. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2013.837840
Lynch, N. (2016). Domesticating the church: the reuse of urban churches as loft living in the post – secular city. Social and Cultural Geography, 17(7), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1139167
Martins, A. M. T., & Carlos, J. S. (2014). The retrofitting of the Bernardas’ Convent in Lisbon. Energy and Buildings, 68, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.087
Mehr, S. Y., & Wilkinson, S. (2018). Technical issues and energy efficient adaptive reuse of heritage listed city halls in Queensland Australia. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(5), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0020
Milisirlisoy, D., & Gunçe, K. (2016). A critical look to the adaptive reuse of traditional urban houses in the Walled city of Nicosia. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 22(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2016.1248095
Oevermann, H., Degenkolb, J., Diessler, A., Karge, S., & Peltz, U. (2015). Participation in the reuse of industrial heritage sites: the case of Oberschoneweide, Berlin. International Journal of Heritage, 22(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1083460
Paolillo, P. L., Benedetti, A., Baresi, U., Terlizzi, L., & Graj, G. (2011). An assessment – based process for modifying the built fabric of historic centres: the case of Como in Lombrady. CCSA 2011: Computational Science and Its Applications – IC-CSA 2011, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21928-3_12
Plevoets, B., & Sowinska-Heim, J. (2018). Community initiatives as a catalyst for regeneration of heritage sites: Vernacular transformation and its influence on the formal adaptive re-use practice. Cities, 78, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.007
Pszczolkowski, M. (2016). Adaptation problems of the postindustrial heritage on the example of selected objects of Bydgoszcz. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports, 22(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1515/ceer-2016-0043
Radziszewska- Zielina, E., & Sladowski, G. (2015). Fuzzy inference system assisting the choice of a variant of adaptation of a historical building. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 14(4), 131–148.
Radziszewska- Zielina, E., & Sladowski, G. (2017). Supporting the selection of a variant of the adaptation of a historical building with the use of fuzzy modelling and structural analysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 26, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.008
Remoy, H., & van der Voordt, T. (2014). Adaptive reuse of office buildings into housing: opportunities and risks. Building Research and Information, 42(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.864718
Sallem Beg, M. (2016). Issues of conservation and adaptation in protecting Kashmir’s vernacular heritage. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 73(4), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2016.1178986
Tan, Y., Shen, L., & Langston, C. (2014). A fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.864718
Tokede, O., Udawatta, N., & Luther, M. (2018). Retrofitting heritage office buildings in the UK: a case study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2016-0068
Ustinovičius, L. ir Jakučionis, S. (2000). Application of multicreteria decision methods in restoration of building in the old town. Statyba – Civil Engineering, 6(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13921525.2000.10531594
Wang, H., & Zeng, Z. (2010). A multi-objective decision – making process for reuse selection of historic buildings. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.034
Wilkinson, S. (2014). The preliminary assessment of adaptation potential in existing office buildings. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.853705
Wilkinson, S., James, K., & Reed, R. (2009). Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Structural Survey, 27(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910941683
Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2007). Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building’s regeneration alternatives. Building and Environment, 42, 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.001
Zilinskas, R. (2016). Tyrimų teisinis reguliavimas. Kultūros paveldo tyrimai. Metodinis leidinys, 14–19.